Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why does organizational structure matter
The impact of organizational structure on
Effect of organizational structures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why does organizational structure matter
An Assessment of Elizabeth Winters as a Manager of DMPS
Relationship building
Ms. Winters’ predecessors had learned the hard way the importance of an integrated peer network. When Maddox reorganised the divisions in 1999 in order to encourage collaboration and enhance the combination of expertise across units, he unintentionally separated the marketing and product development teams. Similarly, as some DMPS employees had noted, CW tended to isolate their new ventures “while they were ‘incubating’ ” – possibly stemming from the existing culture that valued individual contributions over combined efforts – and that there was indeed a need to have a more integrated network of groups.
An important first step that Ms. Winters took was the way that she moved rapidly to take advantage of top level management support given to her by Nick Kennedy and Anita Fields to meet with mid level management. This helped to achieve two objectives. Firstly she managed to spread the news of her arrival and of the new direction and plans for DMPS thus building momentum. Secondly she was able to quickly introduce herself and network among multiple players in the company – a method that proves invaluable in determining allies and gaining support by personally bringing a top level initiative to the mid level at a time when many felt that they were facing a crisis. Involving managers both internal and external to the project would have helped with the reorganisation of DMPS.
Organisation
The existing individualistic culture was one that had developed around a product development need. Whilst smaller “silos” were indeed conducive to supporting the flexibility and innovation inherent in this culture, and suitable for the creation of a wider array of product designs within the existing firm, they proved to foster a degree of duplication of efforts as well as the limiting knowledge sharing throughout the organisation. New ventures require the support of the parent company and its resources and this needed to be changed for the success of DMPS.
With this in mind, Winters’ efforts to change the structure of DMPS was, in my view, a necessary one. The creation of a system whereby individuals reported to multiple managers accomplished several goals. Firstly, it facilitated a wider awareness of ongoing activities across the organisation. Secondly, it allowed for more solid strategy formation by having advice and guidance come from multiple inputs with a wider range of experience. Lastly, this structure paralleled that of the parent company, allowing for easier understanding of what these activities represented.
“It’s not surprising that there’s distrust and a lack of communication among managers.” Outside DAC meetings, we rarely work together,” said one DAC member. “There’s been no attempt at team building, and with eight managers with widely varying management styles, we’re bound to step on each other’s toes” (Chell, 1996, pg. 12).
Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Create colleagues, not competitors . Harvard Business Review, 83(9), 24-28.
I found working within a team enabled us to spread responsibility and we determined ...
High cohesiveness is an effective tool in the success and effectiveness of an organization. However, in order for ...
This case study demonstrates a young woman leader, Toby Johnson, who used to serve in the military as a pilot and attended Harvard Business School, joined PepsiCo’s Leadership Development Program (LDP), and was working in the management team at the Williamsport plant. She determined to forge ahead, and led the plant to achieve the Level 3 CI and also won the Doolin Award, which the Williamsport plant had never achieved before. The problem that Johnson encounters currently is that if the plant should continue to forge ahead and achieve the ultimate Level 4 CI, which will cost huge amount of money and efforts with the risk of her sudden leave of plant.
On the surface, the seven-member MGI team which comprised of Henry Tam and Dana Soiman – both current HBS MBA Students, Alex Sartakov – a Berklee College of Music student, Dav Clar – a MIT graduate student, and Alexander (Sasha) Gimpelson, Igor Tkachenko, and Roman Yakub – the MGI founders, seems like an ideal team, with each member bringing different experiences and technical skills to help with the business plan contest at HBS. However, as we will see in this paper, interpersonal dynamics, a lack of clear leadership, resulting in unclear team goals and individual roles, and a lack of healthy group norms, contribute to an ineffective team process at MGI. With the deadline less than three weeks away and the team without even a first draft of the business plan, Henry is certain that the team would not meet the deadline if it continued to function as it had so far.
2. J&J wished to increase both the number and quality of strategic choices for creating its future. Groups are often more successful than individuals in developing creative solutions due to the increased diversity of ideas available to the members. J&J managers attempted to benchmark high performance activities by investigating processes at its three internal and three external organizations. With a focus of identifying and implementing the new processes into J&J, the program "What's New" was the focus of the collection of J&J’s executive and senior management team. By mixing managers from different organizations within J&J, the executive board hoped to manage knowledge in a manner that supports new ideas. A manager from one area may be able to shed considerable insight into the problems of a manager from another section of the company and as a result, organizational learning is increased through a free exchange of ideas.
According to former American Businessman, Henry Ford, he describes working as a team as, “Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success.” When working with a group there will always be struggles and roadblocks that could lead your group to any form of success. However, it takes a successful group leader who is able to keep the group working together to reach the common goal as working as one. This paper will demonstrate the integration and understanding of group dynamics and structure. I have selected the Delta Alpha Pi Honor Society to discuss the following five main principles in each group: the purpose of the group, the individuals and their roles of the group, the structure and the norms that
...world has become extremely fast and full of change. If the leader can’t adapt to changing conditions, it is very possible for his firm to be kicked out of the game. How can the firm change, though? The most effective way is to go through new ideas. Here, it reminders me Welch’s famous saying: "Change before you have to."
Before a group can achieve the synergistic performance Jimenez is looking for it must meet three preconditions. First, team members have to approach the task at hand with the motivation to work cross-functionally and the confidence that they can produce effective solutions. In Wichita, much of the motivation came from the evident crisis in performance. Everyone in the plant knew that it was underperforming and there is no stronger motivation for action than a survival crisis.
Designs by Kate is a company that sells women’s jewelry using the direct sales method. DBK has seen sales success and growth despite unfavorable economic conditions and slow growth in the retail industry. With all of this being said Kate Creevey founder and CEO of DBK is concerned with her company’s top-line growth trajectory which has slowed down as of late. This issue has been attributed to a couple factors. The first factor is a “slowdown in the rate at which new sales representatives were transitioning to “leader” status and beginning to build their own teams.” This is a major issue because team building is central to DBK’s business model and success. The sales growth at DBK has been driven by the growth in the number
However, this vision generates an overlapping problem between the marketing department and the product development department. The marketing department, among other duties, is responsible for the identification of new opportunities and also to assure the development of new products. Unless these activities are extremely well coordinated with the product development department, there will be misalignment in the strategy of the EPD. Ultimately, this misalignment will affect a third department, i.e. the manufacturing department, since it is directly involved in the product development process.
In addition to urgency, Gustavsson could not create a powerful guiding coalition. He established a cross-functional team to develop a new moisture-resistant product. But the team did not include a sales manager who knows customers' needs and eventually sells the product. Although the team developed a commercially-viable product, their efforts, at least in the short term, were unsatisfactory, because with sales people's own doubts about the new product, they were afraid of jeopardizing the reputation of current product. Moreover, these cross functional teams operated within the established organization maintained the company's dominate culture and past norms. We know that structurally independent teams that are tightly integrated into the existing hierarchy with different cultures and processes are often more successful.
Change was and continues to be an important component of these processes that I am responsible for because it allows me to develop efficiencies and economies of scale. As an example, I managed a team that implemented the installation of the Graduate Admission’s Customer Relationship Management system. The implementation enabled the Graduate Admissions office to more effectively track and plan the movement of interested candidates from inquiry to application in one system. This implementation and deployment ultimately altered the way two separate offices conduct business. The implementation required changes in practice and was ultimately needed for the continued growth of the Graduate Admissions office.
The innovations story of 3M, be it the post-it notes or the other adhesives that they have innovated for the special need of the customers, the impact of the top management’s thinking and strategic decision making is highlighted in these stories. The culture at 3M was to let the market decide the value of the project or the innovation made rather than some analysis of their internal manager or the innovator himself! The authors also acknowledge the collaboration of various functions and the various departments that is needed in building this process ideology. The 3M example stands testimony to the fact that If one of the department fails or does a terrible business mistake, the other departments must pitch in and help even before help is asked. That is a culture where an organization thrives in a paradoxical paradigm which enables it to be small in spite of being big, decentralized, in spite of being centralized and local in spite of being