Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lessons learned from the Holocaust
Essays of resilience
Resilience theory strengths and limitations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lessons learned from the Holocaust
Among the multitude of unsettling statements Wiesel made in his speech, the one to disturb the most unrest within me was when he explained that for his people amidst the injustice against them, their fear of God abandoning them, expressing indifference towards them, was far greater than the reality of the same being done by their human brethren. Running with his thesis of the destruction of indifference, Wiesel also noted that the wrathful punishment of God would have been preferable than to experience the extreme disconnect from God born out of apathy. The conclusion that even during their suffering, God was still (silently) by their side tells me that hope is not lost. This is what hammered his point of the entire speech to me. In the paragraph
following that, he talks about negative emotions being more desirable than lack of life, the inhuman behaviour. It’s heartbreaking to realise that those inflicted with cruel inequality would rather cry out for anger, hatred, response, emotion, than the embodiment of nothing. In ending his speech with the announcement that this time, ignoring the problem is not an option, Wiesel reinstates the hope that must remain between stagnancy and change. This further edifies the danger of indifference and the responsibility of action we have as a human race.
This poem is related to night and the idea of not giving up when all seems lost. The people of Sighet never lost hope until the end, sometimes they are ever too optimistic, “Every encounter filled us with joy-yes joy: Thank God! You are still alive!” (pg. 35). When Elie thought about giving up, dying, whether it be in the last few months of Buna, on the death march to Gleiwitz, or the trains to Buchenwald, he did not give up because of his father, which motivated him to keep on surviving and not give up. And what if he were dead, as well? I called out to him. No response. I would have screamed if I could have. He was not moving. Suddenly, the evidence overwhelmed me: there was no longer any reason to live, any reason to fight.” Elie without
In his address to Ronald Reagan, Elie Wiesel attempts to convince the president not to visit the Bitburg cemetery. Weisel is well aware of President Reagan’s situation, and thus, he crafts his speech around rhetorical techniques, namely concession refutation, repetition, and the appeals.
Having an opinion and or a belief is better than not having one at all. A great man such as Elie Wiesel would agree to that statement. He believes standing up for what is right by showing compassion for a fellow human being than for letting good men do nothing while evil triumphs. The message he passes was how indifference is showing the other man he is nothing. He attempts to grasp the audience by personal experiences and historic failures, we need to learn from and also to grow to be the compassionate human being we all are.
So as the morning Sun rose. The light beamed on Christopher's face. The warmth of the sun welcomed him to a new day and woke up in a small house in Los Angeles. Christopher is a tall, male, that loves technology and video games. He stretched and went to the restroom it was 9 o'clock and he was thankful it was spring break and didn’t have to go to school. Christopher made his way to the kitchen trying not wake up his parents and made himself breakfast. He served himself cereal Honey Bunches of Oats to be exact with almond milk. Then he took a shower and watched some YouTube videos before doing his homework.
Most people have never experienced anything near as awful as what Wiesel experienced. He was one of the only people who found a way to hold onto their faith. Many made excuses not to perform rituals and eventually lost all faith. Wiesel was weakened, but remained faithful. Akiba Drumer, a friend of Wiesel, tried to convince himself that it was a test by God. However, Akiba also lost faith. “Never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to ashes.” (Wiesel 34) This quote was from a small portion of Wiesel’s “Never Shall I Forget Poem.” It showed how Elie lost faith in God when he saw what the Nazis were doing to families and children. This quote shows how the religious part of Elie was “murdered.” Elie seemed to become foreign and isolated from his people. He seemed to be just going through the motions during his time in the camps. “In the midst of these men assembled for prayer, I felt like an observer, a stranger.” (Mauriac XXI) This quote shows how Wiesel felt like he was a stranger to the religion, community, and faith. Elie Wiesel couldn’t understand why God would hurt people, and most of all why he was spared. “And question of questions: Where was God in all this? It seemed as impossible to conceive of Auschwitz with God as to conceive of Auschwitz without God.” (Hope, Despair and Memory) This shows how Wiesel couldn’t grasp the reasoning behind God. He wanted
He rebelled against Him and “no longer accepted God’s silence” (Wiesel
It was the end of the war and he no longer has a family after he was relocated and wiesel is basically a walking corpse. “And in spite of myself, a prayer formed inside me, a prayer to this God in whom I no longer believed.” was written in page 91 which clearly states that he no longer believed in God. Now the last piece of evidence to prove that he doesn't care for others anymore would by when his father left the land of the living. On page 112 Wiesel writes how he felt about his passing ‘And deep inside me, if I could have searched the recesses of my feeble conscience, I might have something like: Free at
Wiesel’s loss of religion becomes the loss of identity, humanity, selfishness, and decency.... ... middle of paper ... ... This man is obviously beside himself and does not trust anyone except Hitler, his archenemy.
Elie Weisel once said this: “I know and I speak from experience, that even in the midst of darkness, it is possible to create light and share warmth with one another; that even on the edge of the abyss, it is possible to dream exalted dreams of compassion; that it is possible to be free and strengthen the ideals of freedom, even within prison walls; that even in exile, friendship becomes an anchor.” Compassion is not something that is easy to understand, or even easy to show sometimes. The Holocaust was a difficult time to comprehend: how could one man have so much power and hate towards a society of people that he started a genocide? There may never be the right emotional explanation to describe the disturbing events that happened during the Holocaust, but Elie Weisel was able to share his. His message was that compassion and friendship can refrain someone from sinking so deep into a dark sea like the Holocaust.
Throughout the speech, Wiesel utilizes a wide range of tones and uses strategic pauses so the audience experiences no difficulties in understanding the struggle he went through. In one of his more intense moments of the speech, he begins talking about how much worse being ignored was, versus being unjustly judged. Religion may be unjust, but it is not indifferent. People cannot live “Outside God” (Wiesel), they need Him even if He is far away.
In the book Night, Elie Wiesel uses specific devices to create a rhetorical effect. Thought how do these devices enhance the theme of this text? Surely he could have conveyed his story without them. Even though it would have lacked character. Though in the book Night Elie Wiesel used devices like imagery, foreshadowing, etc to give his story more depth and to have the reader emotionally engaged in the story.
Oppression is the systematic method of prolonged cruelty and unjust treatment, often intended for those who are deemed “different” by a hierarchical society. It’s a basis that can be found in the plot of a fictional movie or novel, but most importantly, it’s an aspect of both past and modern life that has affected multiple nations. Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, is a humanitarian who embodies the personal experiences of what being oppressed feels like – how it itches at one’s skin like the hatred and stares directed at them. The reason he is so important is because of his stories; what he has seen. The insight and intelligence he has brought forth further educates those who had previously accepted the world with their eyes closed.
One trait that the writer is lacking in his quote is clarity. He says that because civilization can never be sustainable, we should halt it. The word "halt" needs to be clarified. Does he mean that we should stop trying to advance our world and stay where we are? Does he mean that we should stop trying to be civilized and let everyone do whatever they want? It is tough to determine what meaning he was thinking of when he used the word "halt". Another trait the writer was lacking in his quote was relevance. I don't think the connection between civilization and how sustainable it is can be relevant to putting all of civilization to a halt. People are advancing further in to technology everyday and it keeps getting updated. This technology is
Decisions are everywhere. So very frequently influences come from everywhere. Advertisements, News, Media, Politics. We should choose whether or not we should be vulnerable or whether we should maintain equanimity. The decision determines whether you would be forged into an impeccable target for the abuse. This quote pertains to the Holocaust as told in Frankl’s speech as well as Elie Wiesel’s quote does too. The mental responses of the Jews; presumably, in an inhumane imprisonment must appear a lot more intense than the negligible statements that we may experience about specific physical and sociological states. Even though the prisoners in the concentration camp were undergoing dehumanizing conditions, like lack of sleep, inadequate food,
I thought angrily. How do You compare to this stricken mass gathered to affirm to You their faith, their anger, their defiance? What does Your grandeur mean, Master of the Universe, in the face of all this cowardice, this decay, and this misery? Why do go on troubling these poor people’s wounded minds, their ailing bodies? … Blessed be God’s name? Why, but why would I bless Him? Every fiber in me rebelled. … But look at these men whom You have betrayed, allowing them to be tortured, slaughtered, gassed, and burned, what do they do? The pray before You! They praise Your name! … I was the accuser, God the accused. My eyes had opened and I was alone, terribly alone in a world without God, without man.” (Wiesel