Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact Of Organisational Structure And Culture
Impact Of Organisational Structure And Culture
Impact Of Organisational Structure And Culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact Of Organisational Structure And Culture
Office Space depicts an exaggerated view of a big corporation’s organizational behaviors. At Initech, such behaviors are misused, ineffective, and unhealthy practices which ultimately lead to the collapse of the organization. The ideal organization would allow employees to obtain job satisfaction through the use of employee input and autonomy, feedback, well-defined organizational roles, clear goals, and effective group structures in the workplace.
Initech displayed a number of organizational issues. The management issue at hand relates to leadership ability and the frequent duplication of effort, resulting in poor productivity. In the film it is apparent that the company fosters “Hierarchy Culture”. The current managers focused much of their time and energy on relatively minor issues, such as the brand of stapler that is used in the office along with making sure that every employee uses the new cover sheet design on reports. The bottom line takes priority as illustrated by an office printer that is always malfunctioning but is never repaired or replaced. Initech was not interested in defining overall corporate goals, or engaging in new strategies such as group work that could potentially improve satisfaction and productivity. The staff is dissatisfied and they often exhibit low self-esteem and a lack of motivation. Administrators focus more on internal control as well as the formalized structured work environment rather than to stress office efficiency. As defined by Competing Values Framework theory, “Hierarchy culture is a culture that has an internal focus and values stability and control over flexibility (Kinick and Kreitner 2013).”
Initech hired an outside consulting firm whose sole concern seemed to be to weed out the e...
... middle of paper ...
...pace” depicts the organizational behaviors at a corporation, Initech. The elimination of employees was conducted without examining the roles of all of the employees at the company. The company should have defined employee roles and objectives in order to create achievement and responsibility. Bill Lumbergh does not allow his employees to use diversity of ideas and therefore they were dissatisfied with their tasks and goals because they lacked autonomy in their jobs. During the plan, Peter would provide feedback towards his friends, and promoted the right motivation to get them on the same page. The importance of roles, structure, and group norms are an essential part when managing an organization. The ideal organization should promote effective organizational behaviors to have a positive impact on its employees as opposed to the downfall of the entire organization.
On January 25, 2011, Egypt dissolved into protests--a revolution thirty years in the making. The quasi-middle class (not comparable to the American standard of a middle class) of college educated youths and the working class united based on the culmination of years of corruption and abuse and the sparks that the Tunisian Jasmine Revolution and the 2011 Alexandria New Year’s Day bombings represented. The “Five Stages of Revolution” model can be applied to Egypt’s revolution, as well as some aspects of the J. Brown Paradigm of National Development, such as the Identifiable People Group, presented themselves throughout Egypt’s conflict.
Moreover, the company has placed great significance on open and honest communications with the employees on many levels. Even more, leadership expected a plan that would utilize all human assets in a way that would support the organization’s attitude in servicing customers and employees. As such, they found it important to centralize the staffing initiative in order to maintain the unique corporate culture created in the beginning. Every one of these strategies would be focused on centralizing staffing, brining in the best possible employees, and retaining each on a high
Moderata Fonte’s Venetian ladies debated the worth of women while cavorting in their fictional garden in 1605; Tempel Anneke met her unhappy fate in the 1660s. The seemingly enlightened and forward-looking feminist attitudes articulated in Fonte's text were absent from the Brunswick courtroom where the allegations against Tempel Anneke eventually brought about her death. The two accounts illustrate the differences in the attitudes towards women between European states during the 17th century. The differences are technically religiously based, however, they deal with the differences of the specific regional factors of the areas discussed. The differences explain why the attitudes of Fonte’s ladies and the persecutors of Tempel coexisted in roughly the same era. Fonte's ladies are Italian Catholics, and Anna's neighbors are German Protestants, therefore, the ideals of women are varied based on religious experience. Additionally, the theory of reason of state that came about with the consolidation of authority consisted of centralization and secularism that subordinated the social role ...
Edgar Allan Poe has been debated to be the author of the most dark and horrific pieces of literature. He was favored by many for his complex pieces of literature that have ultimately impacted the world of literature today. However, Poe’s pieces of work did receive harsh criticism before and after his death. Because Poe was generally known for his thought-provoking short stories, his short stories often received mixed reviews. One of Poe’s most arguable short stories is “The Fall of the House of Usher”. This short story was “regarded as an early and supreme example of the Gothic horror story” (Plot Summary: "The Fall of the House of Usher"). Poe himself described this piece as “arabesque” due to its ornate prose (Plot Summary: "The Fall of the House of Usher"). However, many critics disagreed with each other on their views of “The Fall of the House of Usher”.
(2014) is “the way in which leaders interact, make decisions, and influence others in the organization” (p 237). The culture needs to foster cooperation from all areas of an organization, while providing the ability for adaptation and growth. Not all organizations culture will be the same, there is not a correct one that can blanket all organizations to cozy success. (3) Talent Systems. Human capital drives all organizations, the right people need to be in the right jobs with the correct opportunities for growth and advancement. There must be a constant search for strategic thinkers and leaders able to step up with called upon. The authors mention “Talent Sustainability” (p. 248), there must be enough qualified employees ready to move up so the organization will not stall while searching for others to replace others due to attrition, or other opportunists. (4) Organizational Design, must take a number of variables into account while providing structure to an organization. Hughes et al. (2014) state “the design of the organization is a trade-off between options, each with advantages and disadvantages” (p 253). The correct design can help clear the hierarchy of an organization and the proper channels for
In different industries, there are companies that operate for a purpose, but the bottom line is the management style between supervisors and subordinate can break or make an organization. Organizations and businesses have to run their management a certain way in order to motivate their employees. The main type of organization management is the Classical Theory which contains Theory X. There are five key employee conflict management styles. Building relationships between employees and managers is crucial for an organization to function and execute their purpose whether it is to provide a service or product. Both theories and conflict strategies were present in the film “Office Space” to demonstrate the negatives of corrupt management and ongoing conflicts which were not resolved that led to destruction.
Whether or not a company is attains acclaimed success lies not in the fact that it spends huge amounts of money on Research and Development, rather, and as stated by Bauer and Erdogan (2010), success is determined principally by the people within hat specific organization; they are the assets whose output resonates wit he company’s success. However, while this is an established fact, it is also important to state that both the organization and the people who constitute it mutual impact arriving at collective success. Therefore, as Bauer & Erdogan (2010) continue to assert, it is necessary to understand how people relate at work both at the individual and group levels, and how the organization is impacted by this interrelationship. This is what Bauer & Erdogan (2010), define as organizational behavior. It informs on what is wrong, and what is correct; essentially assisting one as an employee become ore engaged in work. Leadership or governance is one of the constituent components of organizational behavior. More often than not, it is usually associated with power, ethos, and cultural inclinations of the organization. This paper seeks to examine in-depth, management problems associated with leadership and governance at Hewlett-Packard and how it impacts on the company’s organizational culture and behavior.
However, although the open-office layout may be less costly than a private office, the fact remains that the employees are not nearly as satisfied with it as they are with private offices. From feelings about the work environment to co-worker relations and self-reported performances, employees are significantly less satisfied in the open-office layout. Most companies have taken all the positive points into consideration, but not the negatives. These companies should also be checking whether their employees are satisfied or not, as employee satisfaction is positively correlated with worker productivity. Consequently, in trying to cut costs and improve business operations, many companies are actually shooting themselves in the
Staff behaviors control the performance and capabilities of an organization. Most workers display productive or counterproductive productive behaviors that have effect on workers, clients, and programs. The ability to control these behaviors is a necessary part of delivering exceptional services. Many workers automatically adopt behaviors that fit in with the best interest of the organization. Although these behaviors are common, some employees fail to follow order and create havoc for others around them. Productive behavior allows workers to perform daily functions whereas counterproductive behaviors develop issues that are costly. Good behavior contributes to goals and objectives set by the organization (Britt & Jex, 2008).
Each person in a company brings his or her own experiences, values, and beliefs to the company. All the experiences, values, and beliefs combined formulate the organizational culture of the company. A sick organizational culture can cause failure in a company. In a company with a healthy organizational culture employees work together to ensure the company reaches its goals. Each company has a vision. A leader helps others to see the vision and inspire them to make the vision reality. Van Hooser, Phillip asserts that leadership is ineffective without a vision, employees or teams can establish a vision for jobs or an organization, and many people are more focused on carrying out his or her duties each day. Even some managers do not have a clear vision. When looking at an organization’s culture, one sees the motivation given employees to achieve the organization’s goals.
Modern Office Supply is currently dealing with low employee spirit, weak performance measures, lack of control, and unproductive executives. For workers to function
If the organization succeeds then the employees also succeeds. Employees must see the bigger picture and must feel that they are part of the organization and not just a one man show.
Individuals behave in a given manner based not on the way their external environment actually is but, rather, on what they see or believe it to be. An organization may spend millions of dollars to create a pleasant work environment for its employees. However, in spite of these expenditures, if an employee believes that his or her job that assigned to them is lousy and feel unsatisfactory, that employee will behave accordingly.
“While his supposed ideal bureaucracy is unrealistic in today’s business environment, the theory of bureaucracy contains valuable elements which have subsequently been built upon by other scholars” (Cummings, S., & Bridgman, T., 2011). The company should look to the Human Relations Theory to adjust some of its policies and structure. Departments should be encouraged to interact with one another to exchange ideas and familiarize one another with what each department is responsible fo . This could be achieved by creating a standing meeting once per month where each department sends a different representative each time. These meetings could act as roundtable discussion to exchange thoughts and preform troubleshooting. This could provide a great catalyst for engagement amongst employees and to increase morale, ”researchers found that peer group relations among the workers were more influential than working conditions on the level of output” (Pryor, M. G., Humphreys, J. H., Taneja, S., & Toombs, L. A., 2011). Meetings will also help to diminish silos and encourage employees to share information as opposed to keeping it close to increase power. Ordinarily the managers of each department meet, but there is nothing fresh about their engagement and these meetings might be so expected they are often stale. The socialization of employees at lower levels