Productive and Counterproductive Behaviors Paper
Staff behaviors control the performance and capabilities of an organization. Most workers display productive or counterproductive productive behaviors that have effect on workers, clients, and programs. The ability to control these behaviors is a necessary part of delivering exceptional services. Many workers automatically adopt behaviors that fit in with the best interest of the organization. Although these behaviors are common, some employees fail to follow order and create havoc for others around them. Productive behavior allows workers to perform daily functions whereas counterproductive behaviors develop issues that are costly. Good behavior contributes to goals and objectives set by the organization (Britt & Jex, 2008).
Productive Behavior
Employees perform productive behaviors by engaging in behavior that contributes positively to organizational goals and objectives (Britt & Jex, 2008, para 2). Organizations intend for employees to adapt to behaviors that will positively increase the functioning of the agency. This is done through proper training and efficient skills to complete significant roles. Positive long-term effects result from productive employee behaviors. Employees who contribute to the organization help ease financial burdens and strengthen job performances. The goal for most organizations is to have numerous employees perform duties that require little or no excess supervision. New employees train to self-sustain in an organization through strong leadership and staff recognition. The act of being productive relates with performance and a person’s effectiveness on-the-job. Workers achieving a great deal in a short amount of time are known as efficient workers. ...
... middle of paper ...
...ehaviors will interrupt job performances and jeopardize the loss of funds. When an organization risks losing significant stakeholders it will not achieve its mission of delivering quality value. Organizations thrive to make all employees display productive behaviors because this produces an efficient and productive work environment. With a lack of influential behaviors employees tend to affect one another with low performances unbeneficial to clients and programs. An employee’s impressive behavior will contribute to the goals and objectives set by the organization.
Works Cited
Gareer, K. Managing Counterproductive Behavior
Ganly, S. (2011). The Definitio and Impact of Productive and Counterproductive
Behavior. Retrieved from http://www.bukisa.com
Jex, S.M., & Britt, T.W. (2008). Organizational psychology:
A scientist-practitioner approach.
In a business or a workplace, it is essential for the organization, which consists of the employers, the managers, and their employees, to work towards reward programs within the human resources in order to create a healthy and cordial work environment and most importantly, to efficiently achieve business’ goals. In Carol Patton’s (2013) article, Rewarding Best Behaviors, she explains the importance of several companies that are beginning to recognize their employees, not just for the end-results, but for reflecting good behaviors towards the business’ values, such as demonstrating creativity on certain projects, problem solving towards certain issues, and also collaborating with fellow co-workers. Patton stresses that these reward programs could help suffice the overall being of a company as long as the rewarded behaviors correlate with the corporate strategy. Patton expresses that some things human resources must comprehend include “how its company creates success, what drives its business strategy and what behaviors are needed from employees to achieve that success” (Patton, 2013 para. 15). Moreover, the employee would be reflected as a role model for others and perhaps influence them to demonstrate comparable behaviors.
Dr. Leslie Braksick, the master of behavioral science, is known around the leadership community for her book Unlock Behavior, Unleash Profits. In her book, Braksick discusses several significant principles that can be used to facilitate change in employee’s behavior. The following paper will discuss Braksick’s three major models that can be used to improve behavioral issues in a company. The purpose of this paper is to showcase the key principles of her book and to further elaborate on the importance of the models she creates to progress company and leadership behavior.
Kinicki, A., and Fugate, M. Organizational Behavior: Key Concepts, Skills, & Best Practices (5th Edition). McGraw-Hill. ISBN-10: 0078137209/ISBN-13: 978-0078137204, 79-124, 2011.
Robbins , Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy, A. Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Pearson Custom Publishing. 2008 Print
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America: Pearson Prentise Hall.
“It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw para. Therefore, the individual can still attain high job productivity without having the satisfaction in their field of work. This happens when money is just their motivation, or if they’re trying to receive a promotion. Others try to increase their productivity due to just the satisfaction they obtain from their work.
Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills and best practices (customized 4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
When entering the theory and methods class, I thought it was based upon myths and facts about social workers. I was completely wrong about, this class about seeking positons as professional social workers. I learned how to examine basic therapy and counseling techniques that will help deal with certain clients. It provides us with the opportunity to apply knowledge learned in the classroom in the classroom to real world situations. This class offers a taste of future career opportunities. Social workers should always trust your guts.
Developed employees are thus able to be more efficient at work, which in turn leads to an increased in the organisational
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Harlow England: Pearson Education Limited.
Despite its negative effect EL contributes to the job description of frontline employees (e.g., Brotheridge and Grandey, 2002; Johnson et al., 2007; Montgomery et al., 2006. Workers performance can be increase through indentifying factors that help the EL channels. People lean to show right behavior in compliance to set of rules that shows their job (Ashforth and Humphrey 1993). A shy seller may for example display out going behavior in order to achieve high sales during his/her line of duty.
Kolb, D. A., Osland, J. S., Rubin, I. M., & Turner, M. E. (2007). The Organizational Behavior
The fact is employee productivity can make or break a firm, and a firm staffed with underperforming employees will inevitably fail regardless of the amount invested into business development. Many firms that do recognize the importance of employee productivity often invest in improving the corporate culture, but overlook investing in the right tools that result in increased productivity.
There are various challenges faced and even more opportunities for organizational behavior to assist workers in improving the workplace as a whole, people skills, productivity, and customer service. Understanding and taking time to learn and educate one’s self is how attitudes develop and affect behavior is a key component to organizational Behavior. The bottom line is that the more tuned into the needs of its employees, the more successful a company is likely to become. A company will absolutely benefit a great deal so long as employees and management alike are able to control and monitor their attitudes for the appropriate
Hellriegel Don, Slocum John W., & Woodman Richard W. Organizational Behavior. Ohio: South Western College P, 2001