In today’s society, many experts do agreed that a successful organization was developed by a strong organizational culture. However, different people might have different opinion on organizational culture, generally many experts do argue about organizations are part of the culture while some others think that it’s nothing to do with culture. According to Bruce (2015) stated that an organizational culture represents the values, ideas, beliefs and attitudes in order to guide the employees as a way to think, act, perceiving and feel. Thus, an employee often identified with an organization was affected by organizational culture. Bruce (2015) explained that culture can be the “glue” which hold the organization together while “compass” which actually …show more content…
Next, researchers explained that a successful organization with good performance like good sales volume, market share, stock price and revenue all comes with a relationship within organizational culture as well as company performance. All at once, it is crucial that an organization fits the culture into the demands of the company’s environment (Kotter and Heskett, 1992). For instance, a high technology industry that supports its performance by having a strong culture that encourages adaptability and innovativeness will produce good presentation. On the another hand, imagine a same industry company that practice their culture by their tradition with high respect and strong precedence in procedures and upholding rules, this may affect the employees to suffer in such culture. In another way round, it will have a competitive advantage when an organization has the “right” culture, meanwhile it can also lead to responsible for performance failure or difficulties when the organization has the “wrong” culture, and this act might lead to the organization in taking risks as well as barrier of changing (Elvir and Savo, …show more content…
According to Michael (2013) said one of the researcher stated that “culture is how an organizations ‘do things’ ” which what the company repeatedly doing. Whereby, some organization might have repeated behavior or habits in every employee as their core of culture which they believe it exists since the beginning. Based on Desson and Clouthier (2010) argued that culture do matter in an organization because it has the powerful effect on how a person think and behave. Certainly, both researchers agreed “the right kind of culture” can acknowledge the effectiveness and successfulness an organization can be. According to Szczepa (2014) agreed that there are two different kinds of culture. One of the cultures will be allowing employees to adapt with the new environment since culture can be treated as an internal subsystem. Whereby it mainly refer to a company that has a “personality” where it can be easily follow by their employees. Based on the second culture, it shows that a company is treated as a culture. Szczepa (2014) explained it as “a system of knowledge that each of its members can interpret through their
Organizational Culture plays a crucial role in shaping employee and management behavior in an organization.
One way to think about the culture of a company is through the Organizational Cultural
Organizational culture is the system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members, while organizational structure is an expression of social and economic principles of hierarchy and specialization (Kinicki, 2015). Both the culture and the structure of an organization are important things for management to understand in order to successfully set and achieve an organization’s goals. Companies who excel in highly competitive fields can attribute their successful economic performance to a cohesive corporate culture that increases competitiveness and profitability. This culture is best utilized in an organization that has the necessary structure to allow its employees to coordinate their actions to achieve its goals.
A good culture is an important factor in a successful business. If a company has a good culture, it can significantly affect not only the employee’s performance, but the performance of the company as a whole. Most companies these days already have a defined culture. For example, Wal-Mart’s culture is that they strive for excellence by having “everyday low prices.” They set their culture of excellence and then work as a team to achieve that. With FedEx, it is “quality driven management,” meaning that FedEx’s main focus is on conducting management that drives high quality. There are many different concepts/values of culture that will be discussed in this paper: individualism vs. collectivism, power
There are four types of corporate cultures: control, performance, relationship and responsiveness. I chave onsidered the definition for each type of culture and tried to predict the results of my corporate cultural preference. Seeing value in each type of culture, I expected that I would tend toward performance and responsiveness over relationship and control. A performance culture that is effective and efficient and values both individual and organization performance (Blackboard through CSU-Global website, n.d.) is congruent with my personal management philosophy. Likewise, I predicted compatibility with a responsiveness culture because it looks to stay competitive and seeks new opportunities (Blackboard through CSU-Global website, n.d.). This, too, is in line with my approach to running a successful business. While relationships are important and can be a key to an organization’s success, I think that if a company primarily focuses on nurturing and well being it risks losing sight of what will allow it to find success. I believe that I appreciate order and control within corporate culture; however, this culture ranked lower on my list considering the way it is presented in this context. The role of senior executives certainly should be acknowledged, but I do not think I could struggle in an organization where this is the primary focus of its culture. Ultimately each of these corporate cultures are important to varying degrees. I think that finding the appropriate balance among them is critical to building an organization that can attract and maintain the employees and customers it desires.
The concept of organizational cultures was first raised in 1970s, and soon became a fashionable topic. Organizational culture is the shared beliefs, values and behaviours of the group. Theorists of organizations believe that organizational culture represents the pattern of behaviours, values, and beliefs of an organization. Hence, studies around organizational culture have been seen as great helpful and essential for understanding organizations and their behaviours. Additionally, organizational culture has been considered to be an important determinant of organizational success. Therefore, leaders and managers pay more than more attentions on this topic, focusing on constructing and managing organizational cultures.
Culture is one of the most complicated words in the English language (Williams, 1983). The word organization culture was introduced by Pettigrew (1979) however the term was widely spread due to the work of Deal and Kennedy (1982). It was at the beginning of the 1980s after the publication of the Business Week article on corporate cultures when various scholars began paying attention to the concept of organization culture and since then thousands of definitions came to life. The term is used to describe the pattern of values, norms, attitudes, shared believes and assumptions that may have not been articulated but that shape the way employees behave and how things get done in an organization. (Armstrong, 2014).
...l man who enables others to think and do in his way (role model) and his employees work him for unconditional loyalty (e.g. his PA), also, adopt a fair system of rewards and punishments; however, as a leader sometimes he just needs some transformational styles which respect and communicate with followers equally rather than forced them to shut up rudely. As for organizational culture, the article obtains further understanding that some factors attribute to detect cultures existed in an organisation, communication system, for example. As a result, it can be identified that his culture not only can be classified as power but task. Moreover, due to the changeable outside environment, compounded and flexible cultures seems to be a better way for an organisation’s sustainable development. Therefore, leadership is tightly related to organizational culture.
Culture can be defined as “A pattern of basic assumptions invented, discovered or developed by a given group as it learns to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration that has worked well enough to be considered valid, and therefore to be taught to the new members as the correct way to perceive, think and feel in relation to those problems”. Schein (1988). Organizational culture can be defined as a system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members. It includes routine behaviors, norms, dominant values, and feelings or climates. The purpose and function of this culture is to help foster internal integration, bring staff members from all levels of the organization closer together, and enhance their performance.
It brought organisational culture to the performance of a company, which has become a critical topic in management department. In addition to organisational culture, organisations need to be aware and prepared for changes in the expanding workforce as business grows. Companies are faced with maximizing benefits as well as profits while minimizing negative factors that come from those changes. There is no one answer to the issue, but some of the guidelines are clear. Awareness of organisational culture, teamwork, individual performance, external environment adaptation, leadership, and measurement of organisational culture are key factors that lead a company to perform better.
Corporate culture is the shared values and meanings that members hold in common and that are practiced by an organization’s leaders. Corporate culture is a powerful force that affects individuals in very real ways. In this paper I will explain the concept of corporate culture, apply the concept towards my employer, and analyze the validity of this concept. Research As Sackmann's Iceberg model demonstrates, culture is a series of visible and invisible characteristics that influence the behavior of members of organizations. Organizational and corporate cultures are formal and informal. They can be studied by observation, by listening and interacting with people in the culture, by reading what the company says about its own culture, by understanding career path progressions, and by observing stories about the company. As R. Solomon stated, “Corporate culture is related to ethics through the values and leadership styles that the leaders practice; the company model, the rituals and symbols that organizations value, and the way organizational executives and members communicate among themselves and with stakeholders. As a culture, the corporation defines not only jobs and roles; it also sets goals and establishes what counts as success” (Solomon, 1997, p.138). Corporate values are used to define corporate culture and drive operations found in “strong” corporate cultures. Boeing, Johnson & Johnson, and Bonar Group, the engineering firm I work for, all exemplify “strong” cultures. They all have a shared philosophy, they value the importance of people, they all have heroes that symbolize the success of the company, and they celebrate rituals, which provide opportunities for caring and sharing, for developing a spiri...
Even though the workplace culture initiatives were known as world class well-known, it is foolishness to expect the same from all employees of different cultures. Daniel(1995) states that organization culture or workplace ethics and its effectiveness is primarily established on four qualities of the organizational ethics. The four individual traits includes participation or involvement, reliability, flexibility and mission(O’Reilly, Chatman & Caldwell 1991). Similarly, Sinclair(1993) states that management as an trait can also influence organizational and employee performance. Therefore it seems to be doubtful that every employee would be comfortable enough to blend into the company’s norms and culture. Also the two traits namely involvement and adaptability plays a major role in the culture as they reflect flexibility, openness and responsiveness. He states that culture in the workplace can be an integral part of the adaption process and these indicators may be the sign of good performance and growth(Daniel
Organizational culture is imperative to the success of the organization. The strength and core values of the organization is supported by the organizational culture. This allows for organization to operate in a specific manner that is specific to that organization and can pave the path for success. Company founders are passionate about their vision and mission and they elude that passion into their employees. When that passion and mission is successfully implied to the employees the company strives in it 's path to success.
The concept of organizational culture is one of the most debated topics for researchers and theorists. There is no one accepted definition of culture. People even said that it is hard to define culture and even more change it. It is considered a complex part of an organization although many have believed that culture influences employee behavior and organizational effectiveness (Kilmann, Saxton, & Serpa 1985; Marcoulides & Heck, 1993; Schein, 1985a, 1990).
Organizational culture is the key to organizational excellence and leadership is a function to create and manage culture (Chen 1992). Organizational researchers have become more aware of the importance of understanding and enhancing the cultural life of the institution. "This study is one of a group of companies with high-performance in North America, interest in organizational culture is an important element in organizational success. Tesluk et al (1997). Looking at the" soft "of the organization, the researchers claim that" the organizational culture may be suitable for a means to explore and understanding of life at work, and make them more humane and more pronounced (Tesluk et al, 1997), and the graves (1986) also stressed the importance of corporate culture, and the need for research strategies and methods of investigating the various elements and processes of the organizational culture. He argued the culture that meets the basic needs of belonging and security in an attempt to describe this gathering that culture is "the only thing that distinguishes one company from another gives them coherence and self-confidence and rationalises the lives of those who work for it. Standard that may seem random, is to enhance the life to be different, and safe to be similar, and culture is a concept that provides the means to achieve this compromise (p. 157).