Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast fundamental attribution error to attribution theory
Two erros in in attribution theory
Two erros in in attribution theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Fundamental attribution error is defined by Aronson (2013, p. 89) as “the tendency to overestimate the extent to which people’s behavior is due to internal, dispositional factors and to under estimate the role of situational factors”. Attributions are only inferences and the attributions we assign to certain events may not always be the correct explanation. Contradictory as it may seem, Aronson (2013) explains that attribution theory describes the way in which people justify the causes of their own and other people’s behavior. I found out the meaning of fundamental attribution error one morning at work. I answered the phone at work only to be accosted by an irate wife of a client who was carrying on about her white bedroom rug that had a few stains on it. In an attempt to rectify the situation I made several suggestions on how she could prevent these stains from becoming worse but apparently my suggestions fell on deaf ears, because her dialog only became more accusatory and caustic. I managed to end the call by promising to have the rug cleaned and advising the nursing staff to be more conscientious when handling Mr. C . I immediately judged her to be “crazy “ and “ obsessive” and the rest of my staff agreed that Mrs. C. was indeed an unreasonable, ranting lunatic. For four days I continued to believe that Mrs. C.’s telephone rant was in fact due to her cranky, lunacy (an internal attribution) and ridiculous over attention to minor details. In fact, I hate to admit this, but I believe she should have been grateful for the nurses who came to her home to help her husband, since he was a very large, heavy man that required complex care.
It was only latter in the week; after I sent a nurse out to investigate this matter did I fi...
... middle of paper ...
...ndamental error utilizing the two-step model may be the preferred view. Aronson (2013, p.92) reinforces this notion by stating “that engaging in the second step of attributional processing if we slow down and think carefully before reaching a judgment, if we are motivated to reach as accurate a judgment as possible…”
The role of perceptual salience in the fundamental attribution error also came into play in my telephone conversation with Mrs. C. (pg 90). Aronson (et al. 2013) points out that that the reason some people “may fall prey to fundamental attribution error is because when we try to explain someone’s behavior, our focus of attention is usually on the person, not on the surrounding situation”. In this example, the circumstances that have influenced Mrs. C.’s behavior tended to be salient to me. If you were to have asked Mrs. C.
Works Cited
aronson 2013
I think that even when our acts are driven by an automated machinery - the brain, that should not be an excuse to exculpate us but instead an approach to find solutions. II. Why blameworthiness is the wrong question. Eagleman states that the question no longer makes sense because a person and its biology are now understood to be the same.
Background Known today as Madam CJ Walker that was not the name she was given on December 23, 1867. Sarah was orphaned at the young age of seven and was able to survive by working in the cotton fields of Delta and Mississippi. In an attempt to escape abuse from her sisters, (Louvenia sisters name) husband she married at the age of 14 (married Moses McWilliams). She has one daughter names Lelia, currently known as A'Lelia Walker.
In the short film, The Lunch Date, the white woman who misses her train commits fundamental attribution error. Fundamental attribution error is defined as the overestimation of a person's personality and the underestimation of the situation. For example, after the woman in the short film misses her train, she enters a restaurant to order a salad. She leaves her food on her table to get a fork; when she comes back, she finds that a black man is eating her salad. She believes that he is a homeless man who just stole her food, but in reality she just sat at the wrong table. She commits fundamental attribution error by judging the black man's outward appearance, and assuming that the black man did not pay for the salad.
Sarah Breedlove “Madam C.J Walker” was born in Louisiana to former slaves on December 23, 1867. She was the first member of her family to be born “free,” and used this opportunity to have a better life. She married Moses McWilliams and gave birth to her first daughter, Lelia, on June 6, 1885. Unfortunately, soon after her daughter’s second birthday her husband was killed in an accident. She found a job as a laundress in St. Louis, Missouri and thus provided her daughter with an education that she never had the chance to get.
o Snap judgments suggests that such errors can be avoided by thinking more slowly; this isn’t the case, for some people think very slowly with no better results.
The first video, “Fundamental Attribution Error” talks about the ethical problem of the same name. The Fundamental Attribution Error (henceforth referred as FAE) is when we attribute and emphasize other’s behaviors solely on character instead of situational factors or the environment around them. However, under the FAE, we believe that when given identical circumstances, we committed the same action because of completely just personal reasons. In the video, numerous examples are cited. Let’s say we have two people, yourself and Marty McFly (who coincidently shares the name of the protagonist from Back to the Future but has no other relation). You find out that Marty has been cheating on his wife, and automatically assume it is because he is a terrible, awful human being. However, you are also cheating on your wife, but you tell yourself it was because you had one to many drinks at the bar last night. You also find out Marty has been “fudging” or falsifying numbers and accounts at his work place and believe it is because he is some kind o...
Cognitive theory posits that the way people feel, act, or react to any given situation is not so much the situation itself more than it is “…how they construe a situation” (Beck, 2011, p. 30). The Situation/event is the first level of the cognitive model. The second level of the cognitive model is Automatic thoughts. Automatic thoughts are the thoughts and pictures that are created by emotions and perceptions of a situation “…and are not the result of deliberation or reasoning” (Beck, 2011. p. 31). They are typically accepted as factual and true regardless of evidence to the contrary. These automatic thoughts are usually responsible for one’s emotional, behavioral, and/or physiological Reaction which is the third level of the cognitive model. Five people may listen to the same lecture but experience completely different reactions ranging from excited or anxious to disappointed or disgusted.
Attribution theory explains people motives by giving an option of disposition or situation, of which we decipher the motive to a behavior. The fundamental attribution error is the tendency to link behaviors with personal characteristics, therefore if someone is murdered a suspect could be someone who really hates them because it gives them a motive. We can characterize a dispositional situation from a situational and come to a conclusion on why someone had a such behavior, and it helps to find a motive based on that. We can infer a motive from a behavior from things like external and internal attributions, so internal traits and responses to things.
Pascale points out that, in general, most people believe that it is the individual’s fault tha...
The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) is a concept within social psychology that assumes when someone is aggressive, it is due to a flaw in their personality as opposed to a reaction to their personal circumstances (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). However, there is typically a situational reason for the other person’s behavior that is not taken into account through the FAE (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). I have been guilty of making the FAE myself; for example, I can think of two situations where my frustration led me to believe that there were flaws in my antagonists’ characters. Recently, my mother wanted me to assist my brother in scheduling classes for the semester. Since I was annoyed that my mother was insisting that I assist him when
...gorithm”, 1999) This example clearly shows that one seemingly small decision on nurse’s behalf might in a long run bring harmful consequences and put the patient at risk of infection and other complications.
The patient in question was admitted with suspected pancreatitis. This piece of reflection will pay particular attention to the care I gave the patient in the form of instigating admission documentation, assessing their condition, instigating care plans and administration of any medications required. The patient in question had complex needs and as a staff nurse and according to the NMC (2009) I should be able to provide the care he/she required.
Before my shift started, I did my research about my new client for week three clinical. I thought I was well prepared for the clinical, I knew the client’s mental and medical conditions but I was more focused on the client’s mental health issues and not the medical illnesses. When the nurse informed me that client W was experiencing shortness of breath due to his COPD, I was a bit shock because I was not expecting that to happen.
How the Attribution Theory in an attempt to assign meaning/understanding to events on the basis of eith...
Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual's behavior, we attempt to determine whether it was internally or externally caused. That determination depends largely on three factors: distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency. Our perceptions of people differ from our perceptions of inanimate objects.