Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of american exceptionalism
The concept of american exceptionalism
The concept of american exceptionalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of american exceptionalism
Arundhati Roy a famous Indian Author best known for her novel “The God of Small Things” brings a collection of her essays to become one known as “The Algebra of Infinite Justice”. She had experience in acting, architecture, and finally writing. She has devoted herself to political activism and as a spokesperson to the “anti globalization and alter globalisation movement”. According to Arundhati America goes to war and cannot back out unless it ends with one side losing, and when there is no enemy the American government will create one to satisfy their arms business and the angry citizens that have been effected by terrorism. President Bush during his presidency has described the enemies of America as “enemies of Freedom” but this freedom is only for their people. This idea has put the thought in Americans’ head that “The American way of Life” is the only right way and that anyone who goes against it is an enemy or a terrorist. The article’s writing is strong, makes the reader passionate like her about the topic and evokes a response from the reader. It opens readers’ eyes to view the issue of other groups on the global and international problem that she brings up. In her writing she shows her anger about terrorism, globalization, nuclear disarmament and global capitalism. Throughout the essay Roy induces a feeling to the reader that he must have an opinion about the topic and uses that to her advantage. Roy emphasis her main point in the essay which is the foreign policy that the U.S. government engages in around the world in order to promote the American Way of Life is the reason why Americans are hated and not that the people are hated. And that these policies are the reason that invites terrorism across the world that is aim... ... middle of paper ... ...ics regarding both sides. However the approach that Roy takes keeps the audience hooked and so none was necessary to convince the audience as it was full of pathos. Roy has raised the issues that we have seen by these policies and asked questions that made readers question many things however she does not give any solutions to the problem and just leave for the reader’s imagination. All typical TV stations throughout America never thought about telling the story of America's participation with Afghanistan when 9/11 happened. Therefore to the people who were in the shadow from the truth the coverage of the attacks would have been emotional, disturbing and fuel to the people for them to hate on the jihad. However, to the people who are familiar with the history the coverage was offensive and just wrong however none spoke against it and many died because of it.
The citizens of Matewan, a coal -mining town in West Virginia lived amidst a feudalistic class process. One may think of medieval times in connection with feudalism, but the film “Matewan” directed by John Sayles was based on historical events that took place in 1920. The feudal lord was not a European king, and the serfs were not farming his land. Nevertheless, feudalism existed in this southern town, as the workers did not have the ability to choose their employer. Unlike Capitalism, the members of Matewan could not go out into the free labor market and choose the businesses for which they wished to work. The Stone Mountain Coal Company made choice nonexistent and in doing so gained feudal power over the employees.
War is the means to many ends. The ends of ruthless dictators, of land disputes, and lives – each play its part in the reasoning for war. War is controllable. It can be avoided; however, once it begins, the bat...
It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.
In the film, Matewan, director John Sayles paints a 1920’s picture of a small, West Virginia coal-mining town. Over the course of the film, this seemingly American Township reveals itself as the site of feudal hardship for its citizens. The Stone Mountain Coal Company was the sole employer in Matewan. The company’s laborers struggled for autonomy and for freedom from the company’s grasp. The ideal method for this achieving such autonomy was organization of a union. This idea of union struck a cord with the company, and the conflict between employer and employee soon escalated into a battle. The laborers began to realize, in certain terms, that the Stone Mountain Coal Company is not simply a corporation but a feudal power. These townspeople were living in a capitalist country, but they were controlled by a feudal enterprise in Matewan, West Virginia. The coal mining business built a town that was then forced to rely on that company through monopoly control, bondage contract, and the organization of their production. Thus, the Stone Mountain Coal Company created a feudal monopoly over the town. The business had dominant control over all aspects of their laborer’s lives.
Ignorance promotes fear. The Stone Mountain Coal Company exploits the ignorance of its employees to maintain power in Matewan. Keeping Matewan’s residents fearful of their future, fearful of change and fearful for their lives, the Stone Mountain Coal Company retains absolute control over the town of Matewan. Controlling all four social and cultural processes at work in Matewan, the company is able to extract the fear, work, and “loyalty” they desire out of their workers. They are maintaining a feudal environment over their employees, binding them through debt peonage to serve only the Stone Mountain Coal Company, denying them the freedom to search for other employers. The Stone Mountain Coal Company would in fact appear to be searching for a type of slavery over its workers when it contracts them against a union, denying them control over their own lifetimes and identities. Before knowledge enters the town of Matewan with the arrival of Joe Keenan, its residents have no control over their own destinies. Definitely not a form of capitalism, where there is a free labor market, the economic exploitation in Matewan completely denies employees of all of the products of their labor, and grants the exclusive rights of appropriation to the Stone Mountain Coal Company, Matewan’s feudal lord. This is feudalism, bordering on slavery.
George Washington, the first president of the United States, had written a very important historical speech and document towards the end of his time in office. He had written the Farewell address which focused on helping America understand the importance of preserving unity, acknowledging the rise of political parties forming, strengthening religion and morality, and he stated his position on American foreign policy. He addressed these ideas with strong tone and used incredible amount of dictions that strengthens his tone as well as representing his appeal to ethos to a strong degree. However, today’s society seemed to forget Washington’s position on foreign policy and has created a new form of the policy. But nonetheless as time grew, change occurs. In today’s society Washington’s foreign policy would include many positive and negative manifestations, but it is still a speech and document that will always apply to America.
From the time of the Spanish American war until the beginning of the Cold War the United States went from relative isolation to increased global involvement because of 1 utopian thinking, 2 business expansion, and 3 changes in foreign policy. The consequences on American society of that greater involvement were 4 America’s development into an “international police power”.
Berger’s article explains the bombing of Hiroshima was a terrorist act. He thinks terrorists are human killers saying, “the calculations was terrorist, the indiscriminate was terrorist” (240). Berger uses the victims ' stories to grasp the horror and pity they went through allowing the reader observe. Berger’s article demonstrates terrorism as a political decision to kill a group of civilians. Mr. Takashi says, “the United States broke international law and all principles of humanity by using nuclear
This book is written from a perspective foreign to most Americans. Historically, American students are taught from a single perspective, that being the American perspective. This approach to history (the single perspective) dehumanizes the enemy and glorifies the Americans. We tend to forget that those on the opposing side are also human.
Even today, Iran has largely maintained its anti-American stance, and conflict between the two nations is tangible. The United States, still wary of Iran’s hate for all western influence, keeps sanctions on Iran, in an attempt to restrict Iran's nuclear power. To many Americans, Iran is considered part of the Axis of Evil, a nation of terrorists and radical Muslims. In Iran, there still exist many ‘death to America’ slogans. With Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani, however, the United States and Iran have started restoring diplomatic relations. We can only hope that Iran and the US will find enough common ground to break the shackles of
The continuing successful and attempted terrorist attacks in the USA and the endless wars and conflicts in which we are involved are a manifestation of political, economical and imperialistic failures in Arab lands. This was supported by Western society with the United States as the largest of powers. Instability, oppression, poverty and political alienation that the citizens of many Islamic-Arab nations experienced within the last hundred years have led to major hatred of the United States by the people of many Arab nations. These sources of hatred can be viewed as remote causes of the endless terror attacks and conflicts around the globe. Through the analysis of these causes, it is possible to find ways to avoid such incidents of terror by solving the problem at the source.
Societies will always have problems that cause some sort of reaction from individuals who believe that their social stability is being endangered. There have been a number of moral panics which have captivated society in terror and more often than not, owing to unfamiliarity. This essay will discuss the perception of a moral panic and will look at the case of the September 11th Terrorist attack against the United States of America, which triggered a colossal conflict of morality within modern day society. This essay will also analyse terrorism as a perceived deviance, the role of the moral entrepreneur and folk devil, in order to develop a level of understanding to the causes of this particular moral panic and its effects on society.
In conclusion, Huntington's approach of outlining the cultural differences between the West and Islam doesn't entirely explain the present world Jihadist terrorism and response of the US and its allies to it. The inclination of his paradigm is that one culture must win and another must lose. His hypothesis thus promotes political actors, policy makers and citizens to understand cultural dissimilarities as devastating and to support such differences. Consequently, his civilizations approach may not provide a standard paradigm, but it may add to realist and liberal approaches to explain international relations. – 3
The rise of terrorism and extremism in the Middle East during the time this piece was composed prompted Mohi-Ud Din to engage in a passionate argument about how these terrorists have ruined the image of Muslims. He explicitly highlights the main points of his argument by using transitional words such as firstly, secondly, and thirdly. He initiates his argument by proposing that the media’s one-sided focus on Muslim extremists prevent the viewers from recognizing that the majority of Muslims are not violent. Next, he debunks the stereotypes Americans have about Muslims and then he shifts his concern to how America’s political and military actions have exploited Muslim countries. He concludes his argument by explaining why Islam is not a threat to
Issues of ideology and power are remained deeply embedded when dealing with democracy. In International Relations, cultural relativists determine whether an action is right or wrong by evaluating it according to the ethical standards of the society within which the action occurs. . This is particularly so where culture is linked to particular state or regional interests. Relativism has become a complimentary to constructivism since these two concepts are philosophically related. Constructivism and cultural relativism are products of man’s mind. According to both, there are no absolute truths that can really answer the central questions in this thesis since the case itself is about culture, values, and ideology. Furthermore,