Immortal in fact.
If it were given us to determine how our future ought to be, we would choose immortality.
As for immortality, we would choose to be immortal materially.
That desire is articulated symbolically.
The appeal to fictions about vampires, cryogenics, the alchemical search for the elixir of immortality, all of them express that real immortality is material immortality.
One of the symbols for our material immortality is the notion that we shall live more lives by means of successive incarnations here in this plane.
This image makes it obvious that real life implies matter and desire is a form of knowledge.
The notion of reincarnation shows that since by filtering it is virtually impossible for us to conceive matter in the next planes, we transfer to our plane the condition of our material immortality.
Another form of desire, and the drastic one in terms that eternity is material, is the symbol of resurrection.
The term resurrection refers to the resurrection of the body.
Not of the soul.
It is explicit.
The symbol of resurrection states that eternity is material.
Patristic and scholastic philosophies directly assert that our immortality is material.
The statements are linear.
Here are they:
A person is formed by body and soul and immortality is for the complete person, not a partial one.
Living without matter would be semiliving.
The human being was created complete to live complete and to be eternal complete.
Most interesting is the point that until the precise moment of resurrection, when the body would return to the soul, the soul would remain in a condition of unconsciousness or sleep. Resurrection would mean awakening.
That topic overstresses the intuition that life can only be material.
Some th...
... middle of paper ...
...em.
Therefore suffering cannot be postulated as a general principle.
And if suffering were useful, it would entail that the more the suffering, the better would be things on Earth.
The more the overall happiness, the better is Earth.
Ethics is intended precisely to abolish suffering. Not to apotheosize it.
As for cruelty: if suffering were useful, provoking it would be useful.
Cruelty would be desirable.
It would be into the class of aspects considered the good.
Cruelty might be useful.
But what I do know is that I do not want any cruelty upon me.
Whichever way people may affirm that cruelty is useful, they mean it with regard to cruelty upon others. They inexorably evade from cruelty turned at them.
Cruelty cannot be justified.
Since existence widens from the expansion of experience, ethics might be considered as a quest for an attitude for the greater
Indeed, no person can live forever because our bodies are mortal. Therefore, everyone should seize the chance given in the few years on earth to accomplish his or her desires. Historically, no human has lived past 130 years, except the narrations in the Bible or other religious books. Accordingly, this demonstrates the limited life that humans have, which is prone to a premature end due to diseases, accidents, and calamities. For this reason, the uncertainty of the human life makes it necessary for the people to live each day as their last on earth so that they can strive to perfect the desires, duties, and responsibilities bestowed on them. Furthermore, the completion of the tasks should not be a routine but rather a passion for creating a better environment for the success of
...uare Temple at Eshnunna; both very different mediums of art. Although the mediums are different, both are greatly significant in understanding the cultures of the past. Within each of these works of art the theme of immortality is prevalent. One states the theme very plainly, whereas the other has acquired this theme as time has passed. Never-the-less the theme of immortality is important in understanding each of these works of art. It is this theme of immortality which connects these works of art to our modern day and the dream a lot of us have of living forever. Although many hold this dream, I think the artist Freddie Mercury said it best in his song “Who Wants to Live Forever” when he said “This world has only one sweet moment set aside for us.” Our life is very fleeting in the grand scheme of things, it’s this same fact that gives our life such great importance.
Our soul has already had to have these concepts before birth. Which brings him to believe the soul is capable of existing without the body, and so it is immortal.
[III] Immortality: “through Art, and through Art only, that we can shield ourselves from the sordid perils of actual existence”
But this would be impossible unless our soul had been somewhere before existing in this form of man; here then is another proof of the soul’s immortality.” (Phaedo,
...eve in any concept such as an ending, brings the belief that one thing leads to another; therefore refuting the entire concept of human mortality to think of it instead as a never ending cycle and how death leads to another life somewhere else is preposterous. Nonetheless, the idea of immortality is no more than what it was, is and always will be - merely an idea.
Questions about God, knowledge, freedom, and immortality are asked not only by philosophers, but by all individuals. Answers to these questions are extraordinarily contradictory because different beliefs and opinions are held by everyone. A major philosophical issue is that of personal identity and immortality. Most commonly, philosophers attempt to discover what makes someone the same person they were ten or 20 years ago. Some argue that memory is the key to personal identity: however, others object.
All human beings have an immortal soul (atma) which is part of God and is on a journey to reunite with Him (Mukti).
The body will wither and die. But the Ideal can be saved, if one prints off more images. Will exhorts his beloved to reproduce, "breed another thee (6.
Since consciousness is inextricably linked with soul, and we are only conscious while in our bodies, the "immortal soul" theory breaks down. How do we know it is immortal? Support that. Give empirical evidence for it.
Plato believed that the body and the soul were two separate entities, the body being mortal and the soul being immortal. In Plato’s phaedo, this is further explained by Socrates. He claims that by living a philosophical life, we are able to eventually free the soul from the body and its needs. If we have not yield to our bodily needs, we should not fear death, since it can than permanently detach the soul from the body. The most convincing argument for the immortality of the body is the theory of recollection, which shows that we are already born with knowledge of forms and that learning is thus recalling these ideas. If we are already born with knowledge this implies that are soul is immortal, since it would otherwise be a blank page.
Some people do not consider certain acts of animal cruelty to be cruelty or they do not care. Normally the people who think like that are the ones who are actually causing the animal abuse themselves. Animal abusers sometimes do not see any wrong in what they are doing because they do not care what the animals feel. They do not think if the animals are happy or being hurt, they just continue doing what they are doing because to them it is not cruelty towards the animal. Some, though, do not believe that t...
Would you want to live forever ? My position on this topic is equal upon
immortality, death, and the difference between the psyche (soul) and the soma (body) are just a few of the
Socrates: I understand where your fear of death may stem from, but there is no point in trying to live forever. One could spend their entire existence trying to find a way to cheat death, but in the end they will fail and will have wasted what could have been a prosperous