Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emotion and motivation
How do emotion and motivation influence behavior
Conclusion on emotion and decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emotion and motivation
People encounter decision making and problem solving situations in every aspect of their lives, from cooking dinner to working on a project, from getting ready for a party to buying a new house, from gambling to exercising at the gym etc. They make use of ‘affect’ or emotional response, whenever such situations emerge. ‘Affect heuristic’ is a mental shortcut or a ‘rule of thumb’ that we use to make an instantaneous decision or judgement based on our present emotion. It saves time but can also lead to errors. People make decisions,usually without any further thinking and evaluation, about the goodness or badness of an act, object, person, event or situation. There may be more pros than cons to affect heuristics. However, the unexpected disadvantages of inaccurate heuristics are more alarming and detrimental when applied in the wrong situations.
People make judgements based on the negative and positive feelings that they associate with a stimulus. Finucane, Alhakami, Slovic, & Johnson (2000) claimed that affective sensitivities play a significant role in making risk/benefit judgements. Participants evaluated situations differently when presented information either about a possible benefit or a possible risk of nuclear power plants. When information indicating high benefit was presented, they inferred low risk (positive affect) and when high risk information content was presented, low benefit was perceived (negative affect). Similarly, when information indicating low benefit was presented, they inferred high risk (negative affect) and when low risk information content was presented, high benefit was perceived (positive affect) (Finucane et al.,2000).
We make many mistakes in emotionally based judgements because our feelings get in...
... middle of paper ...
...bs’ and ‘missiles’. Probably in a negative context. Now, think about the words ‘war horse’, ‘clean bombs’ and ‘peacekeeper missiles’. These words probably elicit more positive and less negative emotions, comparatively. The example above shows how explicitly affect heuristics influence our thought process and reasoning.
Your emotions override your rational thinking innumerable times a day. Many people are not even aware of the extent to which manipulation of affect heuristics influences them and their judgements. Sometimes, even the manipulation of the affect heuristics is delightful and satisfying, such as watching an entertaining commercial. However, people must also be aware of the pitfall of wrong and faulty judgements and decisions. They can change a most desirable outcome to a least desirable such as overspending on a product that may not be the best for you.
Before starting this reading assignment I never thought to question why I make the decisions I do in such a short amount of time. After reading Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, written by Malcolm Gladwell I have a better understanding of how we as individuals perceive and react to information. This book provides insight on how to critically asses and understand the way our minds operate on a deeper level. The book consists of 6 chapters, each providing insight on how the decision making process works and how it affects what we do with every second of the day. Throughout each chapter there are subsections with personal stories, case studies, or examples that help provide an alternative view on how the decision making process is carried out under normal circumstances.
Understanding how people arrive at their choices is a field of cognitive psychology. Theories have been tested to explain how people get influenced while making decisions in the present and future. Heuristics1 have been researched to understand the decision making process.
...rson’s emotions allows them to be optimistic or pessimistic about various experiences they may have to deal with. “People are not aware of the fact that their defenses are more likely to be triggered by intense rather than mild suffering, thus they mispredict their own emotional reactions” (Gilbert 140) to different experiences which causes them to fail to create better responses to a similar situation in the future. An individual has not only the ability to perceive the world but also the ability to alter their perception of it. Simply put an individual can change situations and outcomes by the way in which they look at them.
Individuals’ mechanical systems for evaluating the world developed over the course of evolutionary history. Such mental operations provide tools for understanding the circumstances, assessing the important concepts, and heartening behavior without having to think or actually thinking at all. These automated preferences are called implicit attitudes.
Shigeru Miyamoto, the father of the Mario and Zelda franchises, tells us that he designs his games around a series of specific emotional experiences. Console manufacturer Sony have christened the PlayStation 2's CPU the ‘emotion engine'. Clearly the gaming community understands the importance of emotion in games, so why do most games offer the player such a shallow emotional play experience?
JSMF explains heuristics; unconscious and fast ways of thinking that make reasoning easier. As heuristics are errors in thinking, these errors are related to poor encoding, as seen in UP. In addition, previous settings can sway how we react to information. JSMF outlines how private factors influence heuristic use more than outside factors. For example, past incidents can physically change the way the brain makes future choices (Chaiken, Liberman, & Eagly, 1989).
They are natural feelings that remain unavoidable. However, the only way to move past them is to understand them, explore them, and control them (Bradberry, Greaves, 2009). The authors begin Emotional Intelligence 2.0, by giving a very descriptive example of the decisions and emotions a young man goes through while being in the ocean and barely escaping being attacked by a shark. It is clear that the actions the young man makes are controlled from fear. The emotional responses he faced aroused from a reasonable area of the human brain (Bradberry, Greaves, 2009). However, we he took the time to make a conscious decision, he was able to take control of his mind. The authors used this example to relate struggling with emotional decisions with everyday life. It is then brought to the reader’s attention how emotions directly correlate with skills that one has to have in every day life. The authors teach the reader, “EQ is the foundation for a host of critical skills, and it accounts for 58 percent of performance in all types of jobs (Bradberry, Greaves, 2009). The reader is encouraged to take an Emotional Intelligence Appraisal test before reading any further in the book, then again after completing the reading. This test will show where the readers EQ stands. After taking the first test, the book offers an action plan based off of the scores of the test. The reader is allowed to choose which skill they would like to work on and learn about first. The rest of the book is separated between the four skills (self awareness, self management, social awareness, and relationship management). The separations of the book go in depth and give strategies, instructions, and guides on how to strengthen, maintain, and express these skills. These actions strengthen your emotional
Tversky and Kahneman, major investigators of irrationality in human judgments, asserted that “logic of choice does not provide adequate foundation for decision making.” People tend to believe that their judgments are logical selections based upon their knowledge and experiences. But in reality, the judgments are not completely rational but rather biased according to the words presenting the choices. This rule can be explained via framing effect. The inconsistency of selections in equivalent choices with different wordings is the most observable evidence of framing effect. According to Levin, Schneider, and Gaeth’s paper written in 1998, there are three major types of framing effect: attribute framing, risky choice framing, and goal framing. Following parts of paper will describe the types of framing effects as well as the influential extant of framing effect on the logical decisions of people in real world.
Heuristics play role in the way we make decisions. These are mental shortcuts we use to help us make a decision, such as weighing the pros and cons of a situation, the cost, differences, and the benefits we receive from a specific item. There are many other factors that we use to make decisions. Kahneman and Tversky (1973) conducted a study that investigated the way judgmental heuristics play a role in making decisions. It can be inferred that decisions are made based on the evidence that is presented to them (Kahneman & Tversky 1973).
For example, our text gives us an example of a breakup and some people’s unwillingness to leave a relationship because they feel they will not be about to handle the emotions that follow. This concept completely connects to the mindset that I had in the decision to leave and pursue my own ambitions. Since I was unwilling to not go to Western in the first and then made the decision to leave once I was there my actions can be explained through the concept of affective forecasting because I was overestimated how I would be affected emotionally by my
Individuals make economic decision based on a variety of reasons. The rational is based on each individual’s need or desire for a commodity. People go through several decision-making processes before making the final decision and are often not conscious of the process. Obviously, decision- making covers a wide area, involving virtually the whole of human action. Often people are not conscious of the process.
All my life I have been taught to think before I act, in order to prevent myself from making a mistake. Yet, I have learned through my many errors in life not to duplicate my unfortunate actions. Many times I have been told to consider the consequences of my actions prior to acting. I have found, though, that this may not always be the best approach. I would not argue this to be true in every situation, however. What is to be said, for example, of those who have acted on their emotions, only to find themselves in prison? One must be able to know instinctively which situations are appropriate to be dealt with solely on emotions, and which are to require a certain amount of development. Nevertheless, as von Kleist states, in “On Thinking Things Over: A Paradox”, the proper time to reflect on an action is after the act has occurred.
Emotions play a role in everyday life in all things big or small, but particularly in making decisions. When an individual is deciding on what to do, they take into account what their expected emotions would be, but the determining factor is the immediate emotions they feel while making the decision. With expected emotions, an individual will think about how happy or upset they may feel for instance if they win a monetary cash prize, or gamble too much and walk away with nothing. Often ...
Intuition is how we perceived things often times we are unaware of it (Hodgkinson et.al, 2009). In the past years, research in management and practice have dramatically accepted the importance of intuition (Matzler, Bailom & Mooradin, 2007; Saddler-Smith, 2008).cf. Klein, 1998; Kahneman & Klein, 2009 as cited in Matzler, et al. (2014) states that how people make a decisions depends on the situation such factor is time pressure, but contrary to that decision making still depends on individual preferences (Epstein et al, 1996; Betsch, 2004; Epstein,
An example of this is when people form judgements about certain events or topics such as the news. When people form judgements they do not come out of thin air; people form judgements using shared and personal knowledge, reason, perspective, and emotions. Depending on the topic, emotions may or may not play a large role in the formation of people’s judgements. This past summer, the Supreme Court legalized same sex marriage which caused a huge controversy among many people. I remember seeing friends having large debates over social media about the court’s ruling. In summer school two people got into a heated argument when discussing the topic in my government class. When people asked me for my opinion on the ruling, I simply refused to comment so that I would not get into a debate with another person. Were people placing a large emphasis on their emotions when forming their judgements? There was a sense of confirmation bias among the people when they were debating. This confirmation bias stemmed from a strong emotional attachment to one’s opinions. It is up to the person to decide whether or not they act on their emotions. Because of my religious background, I felt discontent with the ruling. I began to think, “Was I too quick to come up with an opinion on the ruling?” Like the others, I could not repress my emotions towards the topic. But,