Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How is gender constructed
How is gender constructed
How is gender constructed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How is gender constructed
Struggles can be internal and or external. It can be within ones self or between an individual and or group of people. Hardships are the struggles individual go through, on a daily basis either to fit in or to reach ones goals. Struggles are due to gender, race or ethnicity, class, ability, and marginalization. We are going to be examining the works of Jamaica Kincaid “Girl”, Zadie Smith “The Girl With Bangs”, and Stephen Graham Jones “Discovering America” in order probe the different kinds of struggles the characters go through. In Smith’s “The Girl With Bangs” the unnamed narrator struggles with gender orientation. She is a college student experimenting with a female, Charlotte. She is lusted by Charlotte’s mesmerizing bangs. Charlotte …show more content…
is a hot mess; she sleeps with anyone regardless of gender.
At the beginning of the story, Charlotte is in a relationship with a man named Maurice, who she promises she would wait for as he left for Thailand to pursue his career. As soon as Maurice leaves, the narrator slowly goes after Charlotte. The narrator is tactical; she uses the fact that she is a girl to her advantage. The narrator slowly befriends Charlotte’s friends and then Charlotte. In the story it states “I became a boy for the duration. I stood under the window with my open arms. I did all the old boy tricks. These tricks are not as difficult as some boys will have you believe, but they are indeed slow, and work only by a very gradual process of accumulation.” (Zadie Smith 264) The narrator took on a male role by using their pattern of seduction to win over Charlotte. The relationship between the narrator and Charlotte lasted for eight months and in the beginning the narrator referenced the relationship as an affair, later on she went to say the relationship tore her apart. The narrator must have felt as if she did not belong in that relationship since ultimately Charlotte belonged to Maurice. Before the end of the relationship, Maurice comes back for Charlotte and finds out of the relationship between his girl and the
narrator. He confronts the narrator in a “man-to-man” macho talk; Maurice begged the narrator to let him have Charlotte. (Zadie Smith 266) The narrator agrees but when they go to tell Charlotte the decision, which Charlotte had no part in; they find her with another man. Charlotte’s lovers marginalized her because they didn’t even bother to include her in the conversation about her relationship with either person. Charlotte shaves her head to spite both the narrator and Maurice; in a way she knew all along the power her bangs had on them. Maurice decides to marry her anyways and takes her to Thailand. The narrator always believed that “one might meet some sweet kid and like them a lot – maybe even marry them – while all the time allowing that kid to sleep with other kids, and that this could be done with no fuss at all.” (Zadie Smith 263). The narrator references a life partner as kid because she never clearly knew whether she’d end up with male or female, but she knew she had the option of both. The narrator did not believe in a monogamous relationship, which allowed her to justify her relationship with Charlotte. In Jamaica Kincaid “Girl,” the concept of the story is someone dictating to a young girl how to properly be a lady in society. This ‘someone’ I assume is the mother of the girl. The mother seems to be terrified that her daughter is so bent on becoming a ‘slut’. (Kincaid 137) In this society the role of a female is to be a proper housewife. The mother and daughter are part of the lower class because they have to wash their clothes by hand and put it on rocks to dry also, they buy their own cotton to make their own clothing. The mother gives the girl lessons on how to succeed at performing these chores. The mother gives the young girl recipes, sowing and ironing lessons. The girl is being taught how to act in society. The mother tells her not to eat on the streets, not to talk to street boys, and how to smile towards people you have different feelings of. Among the house chores, the mother teaches her daughter how to attend to the land, clean the floors, set the table -- for different meals and guests, and how to behave in the presence of men. Throughout the lecture, the mother constantly reiterates the fact that she doesn’t want her daughter to be a slut. In addition to the housewife duties she gives her daughter womanly advice. She tells the girl hygiene tips, how to love a man, and how to make medicine for an unborn child. The mother’s last lesson is how to pick bread and even at the last sentence she warns her daughter on becoming the slut. As a woman, your responsibility is to take care of your home and children, if a female fails to do this they are going against the societal norm. In their society woman are expected to be a domestic machine, this is why the mother is teaching it to her daughter at such a young age; while the daughter still goes to Sunday school.
Conflict between the main characters in fictional stories can be so thick, you need a razor-sharp knife to cut it; that is definitely the case in the two literary texts I recently analyzed titled “Confetti Girl” by Diana Lopez and “Tortilla Sun” by Jennifer Cervantes. In the first text, tensions mount when a social butterfly of a teenage girl and her oblivious father lock horns over the subject of homework. In the second passage, drama runs high when a lonely child and her career-driven mother battle over the concept of spending the summer apart. Unfortunately, by the end of both excerpts, the relationships of these characters seem damaged beyond repair due to their differing points of view - the children end up locked behind their barrier-like
It deals with obstacles in life and the ways they are over come. Even if you are different, there are ways for everyone to fit in. The injustices in this book are well written to inform a large audience at many age levels. The book is also a great choice for those people who cheers for the underdogs. It served to illustrate how the simple things in life can mean everything.
These individuals struggle to get by and become successful. Since the Sugar Girl and her siblings are away at residential school, their family breaks apart and there comes a point when they “barely talk with their parents anymore” (166). This shows how the families of Indigenous peoples suffer and struggle to maintain strong relationships, due to such unfortunate events. Over the years, the Sugar Girl grows more comfortable with her life at the residential school, since she thinks the nuns provide her everything she needs. However, once it becomes time for her to leave the school, she realizes that “what they neglected to give her was the ability to find these things on her own” (167). The Sugar Girl was given minimal independence and opportunities to develop these skills. As a result, she and others in her position struggle to get by in the real world. As for the drunk man in “Rock Bottom”, he finally leaves residential school, only to find his family engaging in violent relationships. Likewise, Sanderson illustrates how the young man struggles to obtain a job and actually keep it. He does not have enough money to pay his bills, support himself to make a living, or access adequate food and shelter. Moreover, he is eventually evicted from his apartment, as he is unable to pay his rent, and turns to a local shelter.
Within every story or poem, there is always an interpretation made by the reader, whether right or wrong. In doing so, one must thoughtfully analyze all aspects of the story in order to make the most accurate assessment based on the literary elements the author has used. Compared and contrasted within the two short stories, “Girl” by Jamaica Kincaid, and John Updike’s “A&P,” the literary elements character and theme are made evident. These two elements are prominent in each of the differing stories yet similarities are found through each by studying the elements. The girls’ innocence and naivety as characters act as passages to show something superior, oppression in society shown towards women that is not equally shown towards men.
Teenage rebellion is typically portrayed in stories, films, and other genres as a testosterone-based phenomenon. There is an overplayed need for one to acknowledge a boy’s rebellion against his father, his life direction, the “system,” in an effort to become a man, or rather an adult. However, rarely is the female addressed in such a scenario. What happens when little girls grow up? Do they rebel? Do they, in a sudden overpowering rush of estrogen, deny what has been taught to them from birth and shed their former youthful façades? Do they turn on their mothers? In Sharon Olds’ poem, “The Possessive,” the reader is finally introduced to the female version of the popular coming-of-age theme as a simple haircut becomes a symbol for the growing breach between mother and daughter through the use of striking images and specific word choice.
Throughout the novels we have read this semesters, one can makes observation that many of the characters from each novel have gone through fear whether it was due to racial strife or threat to life. We then see the characters go out and find their salvation or in some cases leave their homes before being faced with the consequences they have brought upon themselves.. Finally, most character are then faced with their fate in life where in most situation it is death or freedom. We see these variations first develop by author Richard Wright 's in his novel and movie Native Son. Each variations can been seen within different characters from both Cane and The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman. The variations are shape within
Instead of loving and caring for her baby, and forgetting about Danny, she became worse than him. Rodriguez presents many aspects of the minority class that live in the United States, specifically the South Bronx. Even though the cases presented in Rodriguez’s short stories are difficult to mellow with, they are a reality that is constant in many lives. Everyday someone goes through life suffering, due to lack of responsibility, lack of knowledge, submission to another entity or just lack of wanting to have a better life. People that go through these situations are people who have not finished studying, so they have fewer opportunities in life.
How does one compare the life of women to men in late nineteenth century to mid-twentieth century America? In this time the rights of women were progressing in the United States and there were two important authors, Kate Chopin and John Steinbeck. These authors may have shown the readers a glimpse of the inner sentiments of women in that time. They both wrote a fictitious story about women’s restraints by a masculine driven society that may have some realism to what women’s inequities may have been. The trials of the protagonists in both narratives are distinctive in many ways, only similar when it totals the macho goaded culture of that time. Even so, In Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing we hold two unlike fictional characters in two very different short stories similar to Elisa Allen in the “Chrysanthemums” and Mrs. Louise Mallard in “The Story of an Hour”, that have unusual struggles that came from the same sort of antagonist.
In this dissertation, ideological systems considered to limit the creation of Western female identity were explored through feminist discourse: Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve (1977) and Kathy Acker’s Don Quixote (1986). The former discussed the extent to which gendered identities are founded on biological difference and binary structures, looking at how these dichotomies work to confine female identity to a concept of fixed ideals. With reference to the work of Butler, Carter undermines essentialist views which limit identity, demonstrating through multifaceted and changeable characters that identity is constructed as opposed to determined. By engaging in multiple discourses, Carter’s characters reject conforming to regulatory norms, and are consequently revealed to be living out simulacrums, as Butler suggests all people do. The motif of the mirror was explored with reference to the work of Lacan and Mulvey, looking at how the novel presents female identity as contingent upon male desires due to society’s preoccupation with the phallus. Female identity is therefore constructed to appease masculine appetites, with the mirror revealing the discord between unified appearance and incoherent inner identity. The lack of female representation was discussed with reference to speech and narrative structure, with patriarchal systems of communication shown to exclude women from representation. Carter uses the dual perspective of Eve(lyn)’s narration to destabilize gender identity, revealing it as cleft and uncertain. Lee suggests that the incongruity of the narration also works to mount a critique of the role of the gaze, with the fact that Eve(lyn) narrates in retrospect hindering the reader’s ability to know whether the narrator ...
The transformation that takes place in the way in which the girl thinks about gender roles is not described directly as an issue of what is appropriate for men and women. Instead, the description is much more subtle, and almost a natural change that occurs in every person (Rasporich 130). It is this subtleness in the language causes the readers to not only feel sorry for the young girl, but to also think about their own views of gender
Within the course of two decades these three novels deal with racism, diversity of people and similar economic status. The writers raise awareness of the oppression of the African American communities and the long lasting struggles that these folks had to endure to survive.
The theme of this book is that the human capacity to adapt to and find happiness in the most difficult circumstances. Each character in the novel shows this in their way. For instance, their family is randomly taken from their home and forced to work but they still remain a close nit family. In addition, they even manage to stick together after being separated for one of their own. These show how even in the darkest time they still manage to find a glimmer of hope and they pursued on.
Among the characters is Wilbur and Charlotte. Wilbur had Character vs. Self conflict concerning friendship as she thinks of Charlotte, “I’ve got a new friend, all right! But what a gamble friendship is! Charlotte is fierce, brutal, scheming, and bloodthirsty-everything I don’t like. How can I learn to like her, even though she is beautiful and, of course, smart?” Such thoughts of Wilbur indicate that he had fears and doubt on whether to accept Charlotte as her friend (White 41). But Wilbur is helpless and needs friend to rely to save his life so to solve his problem, he tries to be like Charlotte so as to solve his conflict. Such an attempt is comprehensible to readers that Wilbur imitates Charlotte’s spinning of a web, so as to relate to a friend’s ability. Such mimicking is supposed to alleviate the lack of confidence friendship. As their story continue, Wilbur discover that his impression with Charlotte is wrong. Underneath Charlotte’s cruel exterior, she has kind heart and a loyal and true friend to the very
In Alice Munro’s “Boys and Girls,” there is a time line in a young girl’s life when she leaves childhood and its freedoms behind to become a woman. The story depicts hardships in which the protagonist and her younger brother, Laird, experience in order to find their own rite of passage. The main character, who is nameless, faces difficulties and implications on her way to womanhood because of gender stereotyping. Initially, she tries to prevent her initiation into womanhood by resisting her parent’s efforts to make her more “lady-like”. The story ends with the girl socially positioned and accepted as a girl, which she accepts with some unease.
Belize has some of the same social hindrances today as they did in the 1950’s, almost 63 years later, such as gender inequality. Beka, the protagonist, has a best friend name Toyce who is a seventeen year old girl attending school with Beka. Both of them attend a Catholic Private school, until Toyce became pregnant during her last year of school and is expelled. However, Emilio, the boy who impregnated Toyce, did not face any consequences. Toyce’s pregnancy, abandonment of Emilio, and expulsion from school led Toyce to her own demise after suffering mental issues. The chain of events which led to Toyce’s death is prevalent because it displays that gender differences in Belize, which also affected Beka. Toyce was left alone, pregnant and uneducated while Emilio continued his education to become a success in Belize. Toyce was Beka’s idol at the beginning of the book, but her death caused Beka to reevaluate her life and decisions. In fact after Toyce’s death, Beka won a writing contest, which gave her a feeling of accomplishment and relief. Beka realized that she could be more than a Belizean living in poverty and living her life thoug...