Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial tensions in australia
Australia racism case
Racial tensions in australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial tensions in australia
Australia has committed 143 human rights violations, and has started to ruin our national reputation. Nobody wants to be called a racist. Unfortunately, many people worldwide are calling Australians exactly that. If one looks at Australian history, they will see that our white ancestors weren’t really racially tolerant at all, which left us with a bad reputation as racists. We’ve worked for many years to change how the world sees us as a country, but now we’ve undone all of that hard work by deciding to turn back the boats. However, by doing this, we’ve not only been called racists, but we’ve also broken international human rights laws that we swore not to break with the UN, severed relations with other countries, and pushed many of these innocent asylum seekers to the brink of suicide.
We’ve recently decided to do one of two things with asylum seekers:
The first thing we’re doing is: when a boat is intercepted or reaches an island owned by Australia, it may be sent back to its country of origin. In a desperate bid to increase the likelihood of boats being turned back, the government has in a way “changed the borders” of Australia, by saying these islands are no longer Australian soil, and if you land there, bad luck, you’re going back home.
The second option is if they reach Australia, or sometimes an Australian owned island, is mandatory detention. Australia is one the very few countries to employ mandatory detention. An Australian government website states this chilling fact, leaving the reader wondering just how bad conditions are in these centres:
“Australian law does not set out standards for conditions or treatment of people in immigration detention.”
As if that’s not bad enough, the way we’re treating the asylum seeker...
... middle of paper ...
... 2007-2011, America allowed 278,850 asylum seekers to enter their country, which has a population of 313.9m, while Australia only allowed 40,320 asylum seekers in, with a population of only 22.68m. Why waste the opportunity to give these people jobs, force them to live in taxpayer-funded detention centres, and then subject them to cruel treatment? Wouldn’t the population growth help increase GDP, make more opportunities for jobs and help boost international relations with our multicultural way of life?
It makes absolutely no sense.
Australia really needs to understand the consequences of what we think is a harmless act, and realise that it isn’t ok to treat human beings like this: if we think doing these cruel deeds is ok, and then we point the finger at countries like North Korea for their terrible prison conditions, doesn’t that make us a nation of hypocrites?
The 2014 Walkley Award winning documentary, "Cronulla Riots: the day that shocked the nation" reveals to us a whole new side of Aussie culture. No more she’ll be right, no more fair go and sadly no more fair dinkum. The doco proved to all of us (or is it just me?) that the Australian identity isn’t really what we believe it to be. After viewing this documentary
Australia is now facing allegations from the Human Rights Council that it has detained children and sent back refugees, in breach of international law.
... we could be or the worst other countries have been but it still is not acceptable the way they are treated, dissimilar to other white Australians. Eventually Australia will and must change.
time in detention camps. How far the principle of this case would be extended before plausible reasons would play out, I do not know." (pg. 1389).
Pauline Hanson’s view on migration is incorrect. Ceasing migration would not be good for Australia either culturally or economically. An intelligent and sophisticated immigration program, which focuses strongly on skilled and business migration, can have a beneficial impact on our economy.
Throughout our rich history, we have overcome these issues by making great changes in our country by promoting multiculturalism and giving everyone a fair go which means giving everyone chance to live a healthy and prosperous life. But, even with these changes, Australia once was plagued with injustice. Australia now has a good reputation, but our horrid past will never be forgotten.
The number of people that are detained within immigration detention in Australia changes constantly. As of 30th of November 2015, there were 1,852 people held in immigration detention facilities and 585 in community detention. 174 children were being detained in closed immigration detention facilities: 104 were being held in closed immigration detention facilities within Australia and 70 children were detained in the Regional Centre in Nauru. However, there was also 331 children in community detention in Australia. That’s over 400 children being held in detention centres. Australia’s refugee policy has no set time limit to how long a person may be held in immigration detention. The period of time in which an individual spends in detention may vary from a few
Controversy has surrounded Australia’s boat arrivals since 2001, when the Howard government took office. Howard instituted Operation Relex, a policy directing the Royal Australian Navy to intercept and board suspected illegal entry vessels, or SIEV’s (Turning Back Boats). Initially widely accepted, this policy was designed to discourage people from arriving illegally by boat. However, turning back small, overcrowded boats, and returning them just inside Indonesian waters, quickly became a safety issue (Turning Back Boats). According to the “Senate Select Committee’s Inquiry into a Certain Maritime Incident,” of the 12 boats intercepted from September 2002 to March 2003, four were turned back and three sank, killing two people (Turning Back Boats). Although Australia has a right to protect its borders from illegal aliens, over 90% of these asylum-seekers qualify as refugees (Turning Back Boats). Such a low success rate is reason enough to end the hazardous practice, but even more concerning are the detention centers where the remaining 10% are held. In 2001, the Howard government passed the Pacific Solution, authorizing the transport of asylum-seekers to island nations and offshore detention centers (Turning Back Boats). Since then, countless human rights violations have occurred at the Christmas Island, Manus Island, and Nauru detention centers (Murray). The asylum-seekers, some children, are often detained in poor conditions for indefinite periods of time, subjected to enhanced screenings, and refused legal representation or the right to appeal (Australia). After Howard left office in 2006 the refugee policies stopped, and the Australian government worked to heal the damage done to the islanders and its international reputation (Turning Back Boats). However, under PM Tony Abbott, the asylum seeker policies returned in 2014 through Operation Sovereign
Lisa Kerr has written countless papers on the subject of prison rights and continues to advocate for their rights. This particular article was published in the Canadian Journal of Rights. The information used to write this meta analysis focuses on the data gathered all over Canada and the different laws a polices since 1992. Lisa Kerr's analysis of the prison system and solitary confinement focuses on the origin California Super Max, its introduction to the Canadian correctional system in 1992 and how it has evolved today.Through out the paper she mentioned important people like Bobbylee Worm an Aboriginal women in solitary for the majority of her sentence, significant legislation, Corrections and Conditional Release Act and psychological evaluations. The paper was written for scholars, graduates and other researchers looking for hight level thinking. This particular paper is extremely helpful when looking for significant for finding research of the most relevance i.e. significant names, polices and events.The paper is extremely helpful and great for supporting arguments. This paper lead me to more credible and useful
Parliament did not foresee that s 198 may not be complied with, therefore the Act should be interpreted considering fundamental rights and in compliance with Australia's international obligations regarding arbitrary detention.
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
“Today we honour the Indigenous peoples of this land, the oldest continuing cultures in human History. We reflect on their past mistreatment. We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were Stolen Generations—this blemished chapter in our nation’s history. The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia’s history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians” (apology by Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, 16th November 2009, Parliament House, Canberra.)
Australia has constantly subsisted to be supposed by others as possessing a welcoming outlook to asylum seekers; despite this, the with the arrival of the first wave of boats carrying people seeking asylum in the 1990’s enforced the government to create essential alterations to its policies. The Labour Party has generally been perceived as liberal within its methodology to asylum seekers, contradicting this, with the cultivating distressing challenges being positioned on asylum seekers, their policies instigated to redirect the positions of the greater public and they developed far less accepting. The initial effect towards this issue was the modification in the current law to place asylum seekers in mandatory detentions. Subsequently after
I am strongly against restricting immigrants from coming into Australia because Australia is a multicultural and multiracial country. This is evident throughout Australia with our foods, lifestyles and cultural practices. I truly believe in the fact that we let legal immigrants into our country, but displacing illegal immigrants is not the right way to do things. Australia as a collective should help these people find their way to a better future.
The Human Rights Commission (2014, p. 62) argues that Australia has a duty of care to all people in detention centres especially children, which is currently unmet due to the unsafe conditions of detention centres. From January 2013 to March 2014, it was found that there were 233 incidents of assault involving children, 27 acts of hunger strikes by children, and 33 reported incidents of sexual assault mostly involving children (Human