Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How peer pressure affects students
Should students be paid for good grades
Effects of peer pressure on academic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How peer pressure affects students
When I found out that some schools pay students for good grades, at first, I envied them. Then I thought,” What would happen to the students’ grades if they stopped receiving money?” paying students for good grades isn’t good for them. It’s similar to a bribery. These situations lead to arguments between students in the classroom. Learning should already provide pleasure even without the offer of money. In the long run, students have lower than naturally motivated students. Students shouldn’t be paid for good grades because it leads to fights and arguments, learning should be done only if you want to, and students have lower grades in the long run. To begin, schools shouldn’t pay students for good grades because it starts problems in the classroom. According to the Prairieecothrifter.com “ Should parents pay for good grades?,” “ NEA article claims: ‘ Many teachers also say paying students for good grades leads to practical problems in their classrooms, including pressure to inflate grades and conflicts with students and parents.” The article is so clearly stating that the money contributes to students getting jealous or spreading rumors of other students. The outcome of this is friendships and bonds being broken. There would barely …show more content…
Stated in the article: Good grades: are you willing to pay? By Ginger Ninja, it states that “ Kids should be satisfied with the warm fuzzy feelings of accomplishment.” This quote was said by parenting experts. Kids shouldn’t be manipulated or bribed into getting good grades with money. They only want the money, and they don’t want to have more knowledge inside their heads. They will not care about the knowledge that they hold, they will simply throw it away and ‘learn’ new subjects. As you can see, paying students for good grades is bad because children should learn it only if they want to, not because they want the
In his essay, “Why Colleges Shower Their Students with A’s,” Brent Staples argues that grade inflation in colleges results in college degrees becoming less valuable. Staples points out that grade inflation is happening among all colleges and there are many factors contributing to this problem. Colleges are willingly giving students good grades that they do not deserve so that the course will not be omitted from the lack of attendance. Part-time teachers’ jobs are at risk because their position is not guaranteed. These teachers were sometimes threatened by the students saying they will complain if their grades are not adjusted for a higher score. With this being said, students are putting pressure on teachers, causing their jobs to be in danger.
According to student reporter Joseph Maneen, “Studies have shown that rewards can motivate students to attend school and that the more kids are in school, the more they learn” (“Cash Courses” 1). Teachers cover topics more in-depth than a school textbook does, so for a student to understand what the teachers are teaching they must be present in the classroom. Some may say that being rewarded with money doesn’t help improve our success in subjects we don’t like, but student Katelyn Vlastaris says, “‘If you reward us with money, it may motivate us to do great in subjects we don’t like, and then we’ll start doing well by ourselves’” (“Cashing In”). Once a student gets involved in a subject they are unsure about, they start to learn about it and understand it better, and the students will continue to grow in that subject area.
To begin, with, school should not pay students for good grades because they are constrained to earn good grades. Evidence from the NEA article claims, “Many teachers also say paying students for grades leads to practical problems in their classroom, including pressure to inflate grades.” This leads to kids trying to get good grades, which can cause stress because if they have one dreadful grade, they will worry a lot about not getting as much money. The effect of this is students will be distressed about grades that they won’t have any fun and won’t rest their brains. Clearly, students are pressured to earn good grades if they are getting
Many high school students have a job that they go to after school which takes up their time that they could be using for homework and studying. If we were to pay these students for their good grades then they would no longer have the need for a job and could get even better grades and would even be able to take harder classes because of the extra time they would have to study and for homework. With the extra time that students would receive they could progress their education even
Arianna Prothero wrote the article “Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work?” Her general argument in her work is about students getting “rewards” for achieving good grades. Parents reward their kids with things such as gift cards, scholarship money, cash, and sometimes even gifts like a new bike to motivate their students to go to school and perform better on tests. I think with all of her research and facts that she is against it parents paying their children for good grades.
People may say it is a bad idea to pay children for good grades . In some ways, this could be true like…. Kids will never just want to learn to be successful, their main focus will be to do the best they can and get rewarded. Another reason why some people disagree is because they
By paying them, they would learn many valuable lessons that will help them in the future. Students should be paid for good grades because it encourages them to work harder, it helps the economy and last but not least, it will allows students to gain more responsibility and would increase their self-esteem. Some responsibilities would include taking care of their own belongings and learning to spend money when it is only needed. Obviously, being paid for good grades will give a brighter future to students and they will always be confident in themselves at whatever they
In the opinionated article “Flunking 3rd-Graders Can Do More Harm Than Good,” David Callaway persuades school members that flunking students is a poor decision because of the impacts it has on the schools. Flunking students requires excessive costs. Inciting why flunking students is detrimental to the schools, Callaway states, “Forcing a student to repeat a grade costs an average of $10,000 per student per year.” If schools are having to sacrifice extra funds to hold back students, they are taking money that can be used to assist other struggling students. If the money is taken away from the struggling students, then the amount of students failing will increase. Then the amount of students that need to be flunked also grows which in the end, inclines the total amount of funds spent on students repeating grades and leaves little to no funds for other
When it comes to in-school in the exchange for grades, incentives aren’t always a good way to help a giving situation.
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
This in turn will cause the students to have a harder time learning because instead of the teachers teaching what the students need to be taught and more time teaching what the people who don’t know what the students know think the students should be taught. One example of this is, if a student already knows how to write a narrative but the standardized curriculum requires them to teach how to write a narrative it would be a big waste of time having to cover it that deeply if the students had already learned it. If those people would not have stepped in then the teacher could have moved faster and taught the students something they actually needed to be taught, such as how to write a argumentative essay (Paying teachers for student test scores damages schools and undermines learning) (Does Merit Pay For Teachers Have Merit? Pros And Cons Of New Models For Teacher Compensation). In the 2011-2012 school year (the year when they tried implementing performance/merit pay in idaho and many other states) the sat scores actually went down very slightly, or did not change at all --the score did not go up like the it was supposed to (Idaho ED
Other research states that in the long run, students who weren’t motivated with money had higher academic performance scores anyway. Students should not be paid money for good grades because they are naturally motivated, the good grade should be a reward in itself, and in the end, the students who aren't motivated with a cash incentive had better academic scores. To begin, students should not be paid for good grades because they are, by nature, motivated to learn. From an article on ‘greatschools.org’ was a quote stating that children don’t need a cash incentive because they are naturally motivated. The evidential quote states,
Why education need costs money? A lot of people ask this question. This question just like why you want to do business to make money. Everything will pay off in return, there is not free lunch in the world. There are four reasons why we need to pay college tuition fees. First of all, education costs money, such as teachers’ salaries. The second reason is tuition also can support school to do research or build new building. The third reason is college has scholarship and finical aid, they already help pay some tuition. Last of all, we all know the higher education gains the higher the wages, when people pay for something, they value it more.
My philosophy is a work in progress but I believe that learning itself is based on survival. Why do parents and teachers reward student? Parents realize that with good grades comes better paying jobs. With better paying jobs comes a better lifestyle and better health. Hence, healthier children and strong, healthy offspring.