Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Applying restorative justice principals
The effect of lack of discipline in schools
Negative effects of discipline in children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Applying restorative justice principals
Students that have been suspended receive a horrible reputation. These kids may have been suspended multiple times in the past and for this reason have no one to discuss their problems with. Suspending students has been a solution for misbehaving children for many years. The question is, is suspending the kids the right decision. Although this method works for some cases, schools shouldn’t suspend students because it isn’t very effective and these kids are more likely to drop out. Moreover to solve this problem schools should use restorative justice. Using this method of suspension is not the most effective. Being out of class students can easily fall behind on class work or do their work incorrectly. Staying at home for a punishment can be a luxury to some. Instead of using this time to reflect, being suspended can also be considered a free time to catch up on sleep or play video games. According to “School Suspensions Don’t Work,” kids are more likely to be suspended if they already have been in the past. Some say suspensions keep the misbehaving kids away, but these facts show being away is not efficient. …show more content…
In the “Why Do We Suspend Misbehaving Students?” article it states “people that have been suspended are three times more likely to dropout of school than people that have not.” A large reason for dropping out is being misunderstood. When teachers or faculty see something controversial they automatically assume and suspend. In most cases there is a logical explanation to why and what exactly happened, but the only way to find out is to take the time to have a conversation with the students. Although suspensions can give an opportunity to think, being understood is much more
They help keep schools and students safe and provide a positive learning environment. This has idea has just been taken too far by school administrators (Wison, 2014). We live in a society where more and more rights have been given to juveniles which have also back fired on us. In days past schools could hand out discipline as well as parents, which in turn could put an end to minor behaviors, where now they are often allowed to advance into things worse, where school administrators see no other choice but to suspend and expel (Wison, 2014). Likewise, we cannot be suspending and expelling students at the drop of a hat because what they did may fall into a gray area, yes there are times when it is needed, but school administrators need to take the time to step back and look at the situation and stop overreacting (Wison, 2014). Suspension and expulsion results in missed classroom time, causing some students to fall so far behind they stop caring about the school work and drop out. Other students are being forced into the criminal justice system ending up with records that can haunt them for life. Eliminating the school-to-prison pipeline will allow these students who are likely to fall into its trap to be able to have a change at a successful life (Wison,
Another major reason why juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system is because many schools have incorporate the zero tolerance policy and other extreme school disciplinary rules. In response to violent incidents in schools, such as the Columbine High School massacre, school disciplinary policies have become increasingly grave. These policies have been enacted at the school, district and state levels with the hopes of ensuring the safety of students and educators. These policies all rely on the zero tolerance policy. While it is understandable that protecting children and teachers is a priority, it is not clear that these strict policies are succeeding in improving the safety in schools.
The zero tolerance policy has become a national controversy in regards to the solid proven facts that it criminalizes children and seems to catch kids who have no intention of doing harm. Although, there has been substantial evidence to prove that the policies enforced in many schools have gone far beyond the extreme to convict children of their wrongdoing. The punishments for the act of misconduct have reached a devastating high, and have pointed students in the wrong direction. Despite the opinions of administrators and parents, as well as evidence that zero tolerance policies have deterred violence in many public and private schools, the rules of conviction and punishment are unreasonable and should be modified.
Approximately 83% (5 out of 6) of all males have never been a victim of cyberbullying. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because the majority of the students are not affected by cyberbullying, making no reason for new reinforcements on the students. In document D, the court sided with the students, but the students must serve ten days, but the ten day suspension will not be shown on their records. It must pose a threat, there was no threat so they sided with the students.
Students’ rights in schools are limited or just taken away. Kids are forced to do whatever the officials at their school, either the principal or the teachers, tell the students to do. One of the main right that gets taken away or limited is students’ first amendment rights, which is the freedom of expression. Students can gets suspended by just doing things the staff at the school does not like, including saying things that they don 't like or supporting a religion that the school does not support. Also, if something is said about the school or the people attending the school is said on social media that student can also get in a lot of trouble. Students should be able to have more first amendment
Schools inevitably must deal with disciplinary action when it comes to misconduct in students. However, at what point should the courts and law enforcement intervene? “Zero tolerance” policies started as a trend in the school setting during the 1990s in “response to the widespread perception that juvenile violence was increasing and school officials needed to take desperate measures to address the problem” (Aull 2012:182-183). However, national statistics indicated a decrease in juvenile’s share of crime during the influx of zero tolerance policies in schools (National Crime Justice Reference Service 2005).
Are teachers enforcing discipline mechanisms in a healthy way for children? Researchers would answer no to this question because of one major factor: removing recess from a child’s school day. In Jessica Lahey’s article, “Students Who Lose Recess Are the Ones Who Need It Most”, she states that “schools continue to take away recess privileges as a penalty for academic or behavioral transgressions”. Many teachers follow this procedure because they assume that they are teaching the child how to act with appropriate behaviors. However, it is a proven fact that eliminating a student’s recess results in a negative outcome. Therefore, recess should not be removed from a child’s school day because this recreation plays a role in their physical health,
This injustice is commonly referred to as the school-to- prison pipeline. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, “zero tolerance” policies in schools criminalize minor violations of school rules, resulting in resource officers placed in schools lead students to be criminalized for situations that should be handled within the school. Moreover, students of color are three times more likely to be severely punished for their behavior than white students. This discrimination follows the student into young adulthood where they are more likely to be incarcerated. This continuous cycle of entering the prison system and then continuously going in and out of it was discussed in the documentary. Possible solutions that have been discussed to end the school-to-prison pipeline include: police being the last resort in fixing conflict, improving the student to staff ratio, and providing more alternative discipline practices. Recently, more schools are noticing the damaging effects related to taking students out of class for disciplinary reasons and have since came up with alternatives to suspension such as restorative justice, which allows students to resolve conflict through conversations that may include the student, the person the student hurt and their
The school to prison pipeline is a caused by disciplinary acts that push students out of schools and into the criminal justice system. These “zero tolerance policies” are the cause of the incrimination of students with disabilities and racial minorities. Instead of correcting minor behavior, students are often suspended or even expelled. It seems wrong to keep students from school rather than punishing them in a way that makes them want to do better. These punishments have a huge effect on minorities, the poor, and disabled students. Minorities make up more than half of the suspensions per year in United States schools. Instead of being
It is estimated that 3.3 million children annually are expelled or suspended for violent or nonviolent offenses while attending school. The majority of the offenses are nonviolent offenses that are handled just as harshly as violent school infractions due to zero tolerance laws. This essay will show how zero tolerance laws, bad schools and policing in schools is failing millions of minority students and fueling the school to prison pipeline.
By keeping the students within the school they are still able to be monitored to ensure that they are still getting their work done and keeping up with the class. Also, by having them out of the class, the environment becomes more learning friendly to the students who do not cause trouble. According to Claiborne Winborne, a writer for Educational Leadership, “Keeping suspended students at school – but isolated from other students - makes more sense and is more effective than giving them a ‘vacation’ away from school.” (King William County, 466)
Restorative justice makes a large impact in Texas schools by Cindy long suggests Restorative justice is better than suspending bad students. In school, suspensions dropped 70 percent and in school, suspensions have dropped 77 percent. the restorative program is has spread to four elementary schools and two middle schools. All students signed an agreement for restorative justice. Like other urban districts days used to harshly punish young black kids more than other students. Restorative justice was mainly made for building relationships and not a get out of a punishment-free card. Theft is a major offence in out out of your school. Most students caught stealing are suspended or worse.the restorative practice is called classroom circling. Restorative
Such negative consequences can be far reaching and long lasting, but some interventions, especially school wide or targeted ones, have shown remarkable progress in diminishing both the occurrence and negative effects of bullying. Lawmakers have attempted to address bullying by legislating against bullying behaviors; at this point, however, the legal attention has been varied at best. State legislatures tend to focus on prohibiting bullying behaviors without defining, or at least defining consistently, what such behaviors are. Legislation also tends to place much of the decision making authority on the individual school districts such that they different districts can decide on the interventions and general methods to address bullying. Although case law exits related to bullying, the courts have been relatively reluctant to get involved for a variety of reasons. Future work in this rea should consider addressing the legal inconsistencies and provide lawmakers with clear and consistent
During this time, they are free to play, hang out, eat lunch, or study for the test. Not for these delinquent students, because this is the only time they would likely cause another disturbance and get involved into another fight. If that ever happens, even it happens a lot, the teachers can pull out their last trick to discipline these delinquents. The delinquents will go to the schoolyard and do a full clean up and make sure that not even a single paper wrap or candy warp is on the ground. It was a little injustice because not only it is waste of time but also cut a lot of times for them to review their schoolwork and homework for the
School suspension only tells the student that they get off of school for a few days and that the student has homework to complete. School suspension doesn’t explain to the student where that student might have gone wrong. Schools need to know that punishing the student isn’t always the way to go. The student might want to explain the reason for their actions. Schools need to find different alternatives to suspension so that teachers and students can have a better understanding with one and other. Schools should get rid of suspension and find a better alternative that way the teachers and students could talk things out and so the student understands what not to do next