Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of honesty essay
Importance of telling the truth always
Concept of honesty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of honesty essay
Lying so might say is wrong some might say is ok under certain circumstances some might also say lie to get help yourself. However a lie is the opposite of the truth it's telling someone a false hope a false truth. Many people view lying as a sin something bad however I think that people lie all the time it's something humans can't help but do. Sometimes we do it by accident or on purpose lying is makes humans were not all perfect.
Lying in many religions and cultures can be viewed as something bad that shouldn't be committed rather it shouldn't even be thought of. Some might say lying is ok under certain circumstances but you have to ask yourself when is it ok? I find that a hard question to answer which is why I look at the great philosopher socrates to answer that. When socrates was jailed he thought man should be over
…show more content…
society be a good man rather a good citizen.
Which meant that Be a good man take a hold of your actions don't follow the rules ask questions and if you're in trouble face the consequence that you will receive. I found that interesting because when socrates was jailed his friend crito tries to free him out of jail. Instead socrates rather drink the hemlock than be a free man again he's upholding his actions by facing his consequences. I found that to be my answer to when he lying should be permissible it never is in my opinion we should face our consequences and take them for what we did. The reason as to why lying is wrong is that when you give someone a false hope a false truth they can sometimes believe that and when someone believes a false hope that make them believe anything you say no matter how many lies you tell them. People might disagree with me on lying because sometimes you might need to lie to get out of certain situations such as why wouldn't you lie to get out of homework or lie
if you're jailed I didn't do it he did it type of ordeal or sometimes we need to lie to get out of certain situations to better ourselves. My answer to that is lying also last a short amount of time as well the truth sometimes the truth is harder to face than a lie which is why people lie to each other. However if we do lie about something minor such as my dog ate my homework that just last a short period of time that doesn't help you. Although a bigger lie would come into play of something such as getting in the trouble with the law. If you put the blame for a crime you committed onto to someone else and they believe your lie you ruined someone's life. I think that's where lying becomes too extreme there's good liars and bad liers you can tell and sometimes you can't and the good ones always get away and that's where society falls letting the bad go away free and the good having to be face the consequences if something they didn't do. I will go along with my view of lying just don't do it tell the truth be like socrates face your consequences don't try to lie your way out or cheat your way out be a man over a citizen do the time and face the punishment you will receive for anything you do don't lie.
Richard Gunderman asks the question, "Isn 't there something inherently wrong with lying, and “in his article” Is Lying Bad for Us?" Similarly, Stephanie Ericsson states, "Sure I lie, but it doesn 't hurt anything. Or does it?" in her essay, "The Ways We Lie.” Both Gunderman and Ericsson hold strong opinions in regards to lying and they appeal to their audience by incorporating personal experiences as well as references to answer the questions that so many long to confirm.
Lying is bad but the fear that can come from it is worse. Fear can rule a person which drives them to extreme and irrational acts that can shape society in a negative way. We as people are so accustomed to how we should act that during times of fear and crisis our vision is blurred and sometimes our decision making abilities are impaired. We often look past at how much fear can affect us and our society. Starting from Salem 1692 and going to the McCarthy era fear ruled the people and even now in present time America we are constantly living in fear.
With different views on when it is OK to lie, the people continue to debate. But personally, I respect Kant’s views on the idea that lying is bad. Lying weakens the purpose to serve justice, destroys the liars’s dignity, and messes up the records. But I think that rare situations justify lies. I believe lies to save someone's life or just to protect someone from a big danger is the only type of lie that is justified. Those situations are the only times I think it is OK to lie. It might seem that lying to get yourself out of trouble is a situation that makes the lie justified. But I think that is a selfish reason for your own good and that people are thinking less about the society and more about their own good. Lying to get out of trouble is one of those many lies that are not justified.
According to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, lying means to tell an account of an untrue event or give false information.
The question of what constitutes morality is often asked by philosophers. One might wonder why morality is so important, or why many of us trouble ourselves over determining which actions are moral actions. Mill has given an account of the driving force behind our questionings of morality. He calls this driving force “Conscience,” and from this “mass of feeling which must be broken through in order to do what violates our standard of right,” we have derived our concept of morality (Mill 496). Some people may practice moral thought more often than others, and some people may give no thought to morality at all. However, morality is nevertheless a possibility of human nature, and a very important one. We each have our standards of right and wrong, and through the reasoning of individuals, these standards have helped to govern and shape human interactions to what it is today. No other beings except “rational beings,” as Kant calls us, are able to support this higher capability of reason; therefore, it is important for us to consider cases in which this capability is threatened. Such a case is lying. At first, it seems that lying should not be morally permissible, but the moral theories of Kant and Mill have answered both yes and no on this issue. Furthermore, it is difficult to decide which moral theory provides a better approach to this issue. In this paper, we will first walk through the principles of each moral theory, and then we will consider an example that will explore the strengths and weaknesses of each theory.
Speaking truthfully is a very important part of living ethically. The Bible has very strong feelings against lying as seen in this book of Psalms. If someone knowingly tells someone that they intend to do something, but know that there is no intention of actually doing it, they are lying. Most of the time small white lies are made just because a person is put on the spot and answers quickly with a rash thought. If someone doesn’t take the time to think about the question they were asked, and answer quickly, they could be lying unintentionally.
In society, some people are looked at as liars or “bullshitters,” as stated in the article, “Is Lying Bad for Us?” Honesty is not always the best policy, and in certain situations, liars are best not to tell the truth when protecting the innocent, or protecting oneself. Because of this, lying should be looked at as a standard in society and something that people recognize in every day life.
Socrates is a man of great controversy. He has been portrayed as many different personalities such as a sophist to a great philosopher to just a vocal old man. The true nature of Socrates is to be questioned. He spoke his thoughts on life and what his philosophy on life was. A couple arguments that he spoke about really stood out about lying. These arguments had brute force and were made very clear through his dialogue. According to his dialogue, he felt that there were two different types of lies.
Healthcare professions have codes of conduct and ethics that address the issue of honesty and trust in relation to patient encounters yet truth-telling (or being honest) versus deception (or being dishonest) has been identified as an ethical issue in hospitals, particularly about diagnosis and prognosis disclosures. Dossa (2010) defines being honest or telling the truth as relating the facts as one knows them. Furthermore, Dossa (2010) states that deception can be an act of dishonesty but also can be without lies. In other words, forms of deception include not giving any information, not giving information of the truth, withholding information, selecting what information to give and not give, and giving vague information.
We lie all the time, lying is not something new to our culture. We lie to our parents, we lie to our friends, we even lie to our significant other, but why do we do it? There is not one set reason on why we lie but they can vary from an insignificant reason to something more nefarious. A good operational definition of a lie is “A lie is a false statement to a person or group made by another person or group who knows it is not the whole truth, intentionally.” (Freitas-Magalhães) We have been raised to know that lying is usually a bad thing, and it’s better to tell the truth, not to mention the circumstances get exponentially worse if you are caught lying. No one wants to be labeled as a liar, or untrustworthy. This may sound unorthodox but I personally think lying is perfectly fine; depending on the situation. If you have a prima-facie duty to be dishonest it’s perfectly acceptable. Ross says a prima facie duty or obligation is an actual duty. “One’s actual duty is what one ought to do all things considered.” (Carson) I’m not the only one who finds this too be true. Ross would also agree with me, He says “Lying is permissible or obligatory when the duty not to lie conflicts with a more important or equal important prima facie duty.” (Carson) As I was doing research on this topic I did read one extremely compelling argument on why we ought not to lie. Aristotle basically said a person who makes a defense for lying could never be trusted. (King.)
Using Kantian philosophy a lie is always immoral and wrong, no matter what the situation is. Kantian ethics establishes the idea that good will be based on the action itself rather than outcome or any inclination one may have to perform an act could be good will.
We all have an instinct to protect ourselves, sometimes that means lying because we know we did something wrong and we don't want to get caught. ”Lying often starts with wrong-doing. For whatever reason, we do something that others disapprove of. When they are in position of greater power, they might punish us.
Viewing this case as unethical, may lead to a few potential disagreements. A person could argue that perhaps people need to be lied to because they are not mentally capable of handling the full extent of the truth or that the reporters are lying for the greater good. While both of these arguments do have some truth behind them, there are reasons that reporting false information is unacceptable and unethical. If a person were to bring up the disagreement that people need to be lied to because they are not mentally capable of handling the full extent of the truth, I would be able to see where their though process is coming from, but I would agree with their statement. While lying is sometimes acceptable if a person is trying to benefit a person
Growing up, we are always told to never lie because it is the worst thing you could ever do. “Lying will only lead to a horrible situation with less than mediocre results. While lying is not always good, it is not always bad either. Samuel Butler once said “Lying has a kind of respect and reverence with it. We pay a person the compliment of acknowledging his superiority whenever we lie to him.
Introduction In order to be able to evaluate the ethics of any case study a person must have a certain set of fundamental guidelines that they live by. These guidelines tell them whether it’s good or bad to cheat a blind man asking for change or to take candy from a baby, both of which according to society would be bad. But what if the blind man stole the money or if the candy fell on the ground and the baby picked it up? It makes the situation a little harder to classify as right or wrong.