Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women in ancient literature vs ancient society
The role of women in greek literature
The role of women in greek literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Whore, Sweet Thing, and Other Roman Endearments: An Analysis of Catullus’ V and XLII Poems
Catullus has managed to remain one of the most notable and influential poets of the Roman Empire. Throughout his era, he and his colleagues proved that a poet could be a real profession. He played a significant role during the rule of Augustus, and many of his works were preserved throughout the centuries, even though he was forgotten for quite some time after the collapse of the Roman Empire. His works, despite everything, lived on and served as inspiration for many poets starting with the Renaissance and onwards. It is interesting to compare the poems so as to see which differing formal elements they feature and how Catullus changed his style
…show more content…
in relation to the newly chosen topic. His poems can be characterized as bold and audacious because moral boundaries did not exist for the author as will be seen in one of the poems before. He often appears to be a person with an immensely egotistical perception on life without much care for what people think of him. If one is to compare poem V from the Lesbia poems and poem XLII, it becomes apparent that the poet does not spare much attention to the surroundings by always pursuing his goals, be it the chase after a woman's lasting affection or personal works which were taken away by the woman. His poetry is arresting because he does not care if he appears in the bad light in front of the reader. That is why he became so appealing during the subsequent centuries after a long period of oblivion. On top of being a brilliant poet from the technical perspective, he was brave in saying what he wanted and how he wanted without the fear of criticism - a trait of any great artist who values art and not the opinion of either critics or society. In both poems, Catullus resorts to numerous formal elements so as to make his lyrics filled with beautiful language, which gets the message across. He also utilizes interesting topics which capture the attention of the readers even nowadays, almost two millennia since the creation of his works. Not much is known of Catullus' biography, so to implement the autobiographical approach during the analysis of his works is futile. Most of the information about his life can be derived from his poems only which describe his lifestyle, feelings, emotions, and other aspects of his existence. There is no clear information regarding his date of birth and death. Apparently, Catullus had a remarkable influence with his work throughout his lifetime. An anecdote saved for future generations by Suetonius tells about Caesar acknowledging the damage done to his reputation thanks to Catullus's lampoons. The latter apologized, and the two had dinner together (Gaisser 2-3). When reading his poems, it becomes apparent that he was an emotional, smart person who could eloquently express his feeling through rhyme on paper. He was not a very honest man as per the Christian values. In poem V alone it becomes apparent that he is engaged in a relationship with a married woman. Hence, it is no surprise that so few works survived the middle ages as he could have been easily deemed as yet another anachronism of the sinful hedonistic Ancient Roman paradigm, an anachronism that had no place in the society based on virtue. Nonetheless, Catullus does have certain values which occupy an important place in his life. Some of the poems describe his lifestyle and that of his friends. Though he was connected to a "governor's entourage", he lived his life distanced from politics (Gaisser 8). Above all qualities, he valued venustas, which can be translated as charm and attractiveness. However, the Ancient Roman concert virtus popularized by Cicero, which could have resonated with Christianity better, was foreign to them. The fifth poem is arguably one of his most famous and at the same time most passionate ones.
The author openly exhibits his feelings without the fear of being judged by other people. Catullus proclaims his egotistic desires and lack of faith into the society's morals encouraging Lesbia to follow him on the difficult path of being together opposite to possible disapproval of the community. His message in the poem is not to pay attention to the comments of others so as to live and exist only for each other, because life is too short, and death can always come unexpectedly. It is very surprising to meet such a 21st-century motive within the Ancient Roman Empire because such an idea perfectly applies to current times when old conservative moral ways are disregarded for the sake of personal happiness and satisfaction. According to Richard A. Bauman, author of Women and Politics in Ancient Rome, the poet had an affair with Clodia, a senator's wife, and "She was almost certainly the ‘Lesbia’ who drove Catullus to distraction" (Bauman 69). That is why the author urges his love interest to disregard the opinion of the society. The reason for such a call to live in the moment, now, regardless of what happens is explained by line 6 in which there is mention of "eternal night" and "brief light" thus indicating the author's hopeless view at the afterlife or rather lack thereof. The author utilizes hendecasyllabic meter, which can be characterized as exhibiting plenty of elision of vowels coupled with the presence of numerous liquid consonants. When one reads the poem, it is impossible not to notice that it flows very well without any break-ins in the rhythm. The author also uses the metaphor of the evil eye for her husband willing to stop their union. He proclaims that had he known the amount of love they were experiencing for each other; he would have never managed to harm them (Dyson Hejduk
258). The poem XLII is directed at a different person who is clearly not Lesbia because Catullus addresses her with brutality and obviously without care for her feelings (Merrill). The woman to whom Catullus addresses apparently stole his notebooks and the author attempts to get them back. The poem is filled with numerous interesting elements, which enrich the language of the poem. Line five features alliteration: "puggilaria si pati potestis." The author indicates in the line that he had given the notes for perusal and not as a gift. The alliteration can be noticed in subsequent lines 7 and 8 as well. Another instance of alliteration can be seen at the end of the poem in lines 23-24. Interestingly enough, line 24 features ellipsis where Catullus says what can be translated as "modest and good" while omitting the subject - the woman. Lines 12 and 20 feature an anastrophe around the phrase "moecha putida redde" which is repeated in line 20 vice versa (Merrill). There are also several important points about the fact that the author talks in the second person and writes "vestra" when mentioning the tablets. He tries to distance himself, trying to be cold and impassionate in the conflict while noting that the tablets are merely the vessels for the poem thus meaning that they are the physical medium for the poem, first and foremost. It differs in the mood immensely from the previous poem because he apparently has no attachment to the woman, and is simply willing to restore his honor and get his works back. The closer observation of two poems indicates that the latter is more filled with various stylistically elements meaning that the author was obviously willing to showcase his remarkable skills in coming up with beautiful poetic language including various embellishments within the same hendecasyllabic meter. With that said, the first poem seems to be far more sincere, emotional, and desperate to the point that the author does not intend to fill it with numerous stylistically beautiful collocations, obviously intending to get his feelings across to the addressee as vividly as humanely possible. The author makes good use of double entendres in both poems thus making the poem more ambiguous, meaning more open to interpretation and interesting. The speaker implores in poem V to give him a thousand kisses, then a hundred, then another thousand, then a second hundred (7-10). This turn of speech either indicates the millennia of the author's undying feelings thus hinting at the immortality or an overstatement that underlines the author's passion. So, either the thousands of kisses three times are a metaphor for immortality or a hyperbole to highlight the importance of going against the currents of social norms. The double meanings are evident in both poems also partially due to the issues of translation. The poems can be translated either literally without rhyme and style, or in an artistic form, but with some loss of original meanings and phrasing. The poem XLII finishes with the final address to the unknown woman who stole his tablets as chaste and approved. In such a way, the big double entendre of the entire poem is the mysterious woman who is addressed in such a nice way in the end while being referred to as a rotten whore. In such a manner, it becomes unclear whether Catullus means indeed that the woman belongs to the most ancient profession in the world, or he is only letting his anger out in such a manner so as to get his message across effectively. The poem features a sharp comparison of a woman with the mouth of a Gallic dog and laugh of an annoying mimic. After some reflection, it seems that "rotten whore" is not meant as a genuine insult, but rather as an element of foreplay. The woman steals the author's tablets thus prompting him to chase her. In this light, it might seem that the author describes in a veiled manner under the barrage of insults a simple courting procedure between two people about to become lovers. It seems that the author's anger is fake and does not carry real meaning behind it. He swears and is enraged for show and never does any actions to retake what belongs to him by force, condescending to a lovely address at the very end of the seemingly angry monolog. Having analyzed Catullus' poetry, it becomes understandable why he has been acquiring such a following throughout the centuries. His topics are interesting and ever-living, and on top of that, he manages to talk about them with remarkable quantities of eloquence and grace to his language. Poem V strikes right into the soul in particular due to the urgency of the message and an excellent choice of the topic which keeps resonating even within the 21st century. Poem V is a prime example of poetry relying on a great subject matter rather than eloquent language including tropes and figures. Poem V may be less exciting when it comes to in-depth reading, but the amount of violent emotion thrown into expressing the idea of carpe diem arrests the perception. With this poem alone, Catullus has proven that he is great in his craft and able to voice such ideas that would resonate with readers much later. With this poem, unlike XLII, he managed to touch something sacred and familiar to all of us - the necessity to live fully in the conditions of the never stopping fast flowing time.
Through her use of the words “dreamed”, “sweet women”, “blossoms” and the Mythology of “Elysian fields” in lines one through three, she leads the reader to the assumption that this is a calm, graceful poem, perhaps about a dream or love. Within the first quatrain, line four (“I wove a garland for your living head”) serves to emphasise two things: it continues to demonstrate the ethereal diction and carefree tone, but it also leads the reader to the easy assumption that the subject of this poem is the lover of the speaker. Danae is belittled as an object and claimed by Jove, while Jove remains “golden” and godly. In lines seven and eight, “Jove the Bull” “bore away” at “Europa”. “Bore”, meaning to make a hole in something, emphasises the violent sexual imagery perpetrated in this poem.
Jacoff, Rachel and Jeffrey T. Schnapp. The Poetry of Allusion: Virgil and Ovid in Dante’s Commedia. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1991.
Although Phillis?s poetry was well received throughout New England, there were people who did not believe all of the poetry was actually written by Phillis. Her expertise with the heroic couplet form perfected by her literary hero Alexander Pope and the allusions to classic Greek and English poetry caused the speculation. In order to prove the validity of her poetry, Joh...
This paper will discuss the well published work of, Pomeroy, Sarah B. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York: Schocken, 1975. Print. Sarah B. Pomerory uses this book to educate others about the role women have played throughout ancient history. Pomerory uses a timeline to go through each role, starting with mythological women, who were called Goddesses. She then talks about some common roles, the whores, wives, and slaves during this time. Pomerory enlightens the audience on the topic of women, who were seen as nothing at the time. Men were seen as the only crucial part in history; however, Pomerory’s focus on women portrays the era in a new light.
Movement is a crucial theme of the Divine Comedy. From the outset, we are confronted with the physicality of the lost Dante, wandering in the perilous dark wood. His movement within the strange place is confused and faltering; `Io non so ben ridir com'io v'entrai'. Moreover, it is clear that the physical distress he is experiencing is the visible manifestation of the mental anguish the poet is suffering. The allegory of the image is one of mid-life crisis, but it is physically represented by the man losing his way in a dark wood. Such an observation may seem far too simple and obvious to be worthy of comment. However, I would argue that it is from this primary example of the deep connection between the physical and the mental, that one can begin to categorise and explain the varying types of movement in the work. The first section of this essay will be a close analysis of several important moments of physical activity or the absence of such. The final section will be an overview of the whole and a discussion of the general structure of the Comedy, how movement is governed and the implications of this.
...ion of the situation to the Ancient Mariner. Moreover, the way in which the dialogue is presented, makes the structure seems more of a script of a play. The structure of the poem is a key characteristic in displaying the theme, for by telling the story as a personal experience, it helps the reader understand the moral and theme intended as a warning to people.
If Geoffrey Chaucer for some unforeseen reason was unable to published The Canterbury Tales, then perhaps, his version of Troilus and Criseyde would be widely acknowledged as one of his most epic tragic poems. However, Chaucer’s poem, though adapted widely into various modern translations, for the sake of this paper the translation by Barry Windeatt will be used, the tale’s influential go-between is still a character trope used today. In fact, the romantic entanglements that the main characters find themselves in are the results of the power structure established by the go-between Pandarus. From the first instance where Pandarus witnesses his friend Troilus’s love-struck grief, the convincing speeches given to yield beneficial results for the Prince Troilus, and the letter trope established in Pandarus’s role as the go-between, which establishes the patriarchal power structure that Pandarus identifies with. Occupying the power structure as defined by theorist Michel Foucault, which upholds that power is the mechanism that establishes the autonomy or de-individualization of a person (Felluga). Therefore, Foucauldian discourse attributed to bodies and power is upheld by the mediator status of Pandarus as the go-between, manipulative rhetor, and plot device in the tale Troilus and Criseyde is used to establish the notions of courtly love.
The poets integrated ?metaphysical conceits? as focal parts of these poems. Along with these, they used effective language as a basis for their convincing arguments, they included subjects of periodical importance (e.g. ?courtship? and ?religion?), and use very clever structures that are manipulated in order to make the poem read in the desired way. The very clear indication of the theme in question was strongly aided by the way in which the personas portrayed the emotions they felt and the way they showed their attitudes towards the subject. Considering all these factors, the poets made critical arguments to the mistresses in order to alter their views, thus changing their minds, on denying the poets the sex that they desired so strongly.
Whilst the poem does have a very lyrical feel, Catullus presents its subject matter as a declaration of fact and states that no one is as loyal to Lesbia as himself. There is a slight degree of self-righteousness as he seems to be obsessed with his own loyalty, but he is clearly distressed that his efforts have not been appreciated or reciprocated by Lesbia and his sentime... ... middle of paper ... ...is own experience. In reading the poems, the reader gets an impression that they are all very sincere and real due to their personal tone.
This follows Rossetti’s value of acceptance of human mortality, as she understands “how long ago” their “love” was in the past but still desires them in her “dreams”. The use of personal language such as “my love” and imagery of “Speak low, lean low” give a feeling of intimacy that is missed by the narrator that endorsed Rossetti’s desire of a psychological need for love but also that the emotional nature of the poem is influenced by romanticism. The rhythmic imagery of the wording “pulse for pulse, breath for breath” is symbolic of a heartbeat showing the focus on the living memories rather than the bodily “death” of her lover. Rossetti uses the ideal of reliving her memories through her “dreams” as a Band-Aid approach as she has come to terms with the physical death of her lover but not the “death” of her “dream”. Christina portrays this attitude, as this could be seen as her coping mechanism for the deaths that occur in her life such as her father 's death which occurred the year she wrote the poem or could be seen symbolically as the death of her past
*All primary documents from this text come with this preface in mind (especially that which I have bolded): In this volume, as in its predecessor, I have tried to keep both footnotes and editorial comment to a minimum, the only real problem occurring with documents written in the emerging literary English of the period. With most of these I have used modern versions, but one or two I have left in the original, to instance the spelling and form of the language. With these some notes have been necessary, but by and large they are intelligible with a little effort, and should be interesting to read. Such mistakes, as exist are of course, mine.
Marcus Aurelius was a famous philosopher in 121 through 180 C.E. He lived a hard life and even though he was surrounded by crowds he was considered a recluse. He was known for his kindness and mercy. The last years of his life were spent on a military campaign. It is said that these years were the hardest and loneliest. However, instead of becoming bitter and angry Aurelius wrote The Meditations. This was a diary or journal of his personal thoughts. He believed that by writing this it was his duty to his soul. The Meditations, is a popular piece of stoic literature. In this paper I will be describing how Aurelius used stoicism in book two of The Meditations and what I liked and did not like about what he said.
Of course, in those times, public mass education was not available and many people took what they read at face value. For example if we read only individual lines from the poem and took them as they meant, then there meanings are controversial. If we read the whole poem, we understand the true meaning behind it. For example, when Strephon dives his hand in hope to find something in Celia’s chest to dissociate all he found earlier, but discovers that he plunged his hand in stool. This is symbolic for men misunderstanding the value of women because they do the same things as them
In Pope’s mock-heroic verse The Rape of the Lock (1717) what is criticised is a moral fault: mainly, immoderate female moral pride. There are several versions of the poem. However, we have preferred the last one which consists of 794 lines in five cantos, as it was revised to be included in Pope’s Works (1717) and is the one which stands now. Written in heroic couplets, this work tells the rape of Belinda’s (the coquette) most appreciated lock by Sir Plume, and the consequences of the event for her. The event is based upon the theft of a lock of a young lady (Ms.Arabella Fermor) by an admirer (Lord Robert Petrel) which led to a rift between their families. The aim of the “heroi-comical” poem was supposedly to reconcile them. As it is a very long poem, we are going to focus on the description of Belinda’s toilette in Canto I.
Two of the greatest masters of British literature, Shakespeare and Chaucer, tended to look to the classics when searching for inspiration. A lesser-known example of this lies in an ancient tale from Greece about two star-crossed lovers. There are many variations on the names of these lovers, but for the purpose of solidarity, they shall henceforth be referred to as “Troilus and Criseyde” for Chaucer and “Troilus and Cressida” for Shakespeare. Chaucer’s “Troilus and Criseyde” offers up a classic tale of love that is doomed, whereas Shakespeare’s “Troilus and Cressida” is not only tragic but also biting in its judgment and representation of characters. This difference may be due to the differences in time periods for the two authors, or their own personal dispositions, but there can be no denying the many deviations from Chaucer’s work that Shakespeare employs. Shakespeare’s work, by making the characters and situations more relatable, builds upon Chaucer’s original work, rather than improving it or shattering it.