Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Womens character in Chaucer's Canterbury tales
Womens character in Chaucer's Canterbury tales
Chaucer's Attitude Toward Women in the Canterbury Tales
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Womens character in Chaucer's Canterbury tales
If Geoffrey Chaucer for some unforeseen reason was unable to published The Canterbury Tales, then perhaps, his version of Troilus and Criseyde would be widely acknowledged as one of his most epic tragic poems. However, Chaucer’s poem, though adapted widely into various modern translations, for the sake of this paper the translation by Barry Windeatt will be used, the tale’s influential go-between is still a character trope used today. In fact, the romantic entanglements that the main characters find themselves in are the results of the power structure established by the go-between Pandarus. From the first instance where Pandarus witnesses his friend Troilus’s love-struck grief, the convincing speeches given to yield beneficial results for the Prince Troilus, and the letter trope established in Pandarus’s role as the go-between, which establishes the patriarchal power structure that Pandarus identifies with. Occupying the power structure as defined by theorist Michel Foucault, which upholds that power is the mechanism that establishes the autonomy or de-individualization of a person (Felluga). Therefore, Foucauldian discourse attributed to bodies and power is upheld by the mediator status of Pandarus as the go-between, manipulative rhetor, and plot device in the tale Troilus and Criseyde is used to establish the notions of courtly love.
Through the actions of Pandarus, the noble, ceremonious and often performative masculine presence in the text, the power of Pandarus lies within his ability to act. As Foucault explains, “power exists only when it is put into action” (Felluga). Therefore, since Pandarus holds a position of subjection to the court, as he is not only the friend of the Prince, Troilus, but he is also his messenger and...
... middle of paper ...
...ga, Dino. “Modules on Foucault: On Power.” Introductory Guide to Critical Theory. Purdue U. 1 Dec. 2013. .
Foucault, Michel. “Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977,” Ed. C. Gordon, Pantheon Books, 1980. Print.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: the birth of a prison. London, Penguin.
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle. Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender. University of California Press, 1992. Print.
Rabinow, Paul (editor) (1991) The Foulcault Reader: An introduction to Foulcault’s thought, London, Penguin.
Schoeck, Richard J. and Jerome Taylor, Ed. Chaucer Criticism Volume II: Troilus and Criseyde & The Minor Poems. University of Notre Dame Press, 1961. Print.
Windeatt, Barry. Troilus and Criseyde. 1992. Oxford Guides to Chaucer. Oxford: University Press, 1995.
Traditional female characteristics and female unrest are underscored in literary works of the Middle Ages. Although patriarchal views were firmly established back then, traces of female contempt for such beliefs could be found in several popular literary works. Female characters’ opposition to societal norms serves to create humor and wish- fulfillment for female and male audiences to enjoy. “Lanval” by Marie De France and “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” by Geoffrey Chaucer both show subversion of patriarchal attitudes by displaying the women in the text as superior or equal to the men. However, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” also incorporates conventional societal ideas by including degradation of women and mistreatment of a wife by her husband.
Foucault, Michel. “Panopticism.” Ways of Reading. Fifth ed. Ed. David Barholomae and Anthony Petrosky. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1999, 312-342. Print.
Mandell, Jerome. Geoffrey Chaucer : building the fragments of the Canterbury tales. N.J. : Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1992.
Lopez, Alan. The Appropriation of Masculine Discourse and the Disruption of Gender Identity in Chaucer's The Merchant's Tale. 2000. 20 August 2003 <http://www.iusb.edu/~journal/2000/lopez.html>.
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle. Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender. Berkeley: U of California P. 1992. Print. (Kennedy Library PR1928.W64 H36 1992)
Howard, Donald R. Chaucer: His Life, His Works, His World. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1987.
Vasta, Edward. "Chaucer, Gower, and the Unknown Minstrel: The Literary Liberation of the Loathly Lady." Exemplaria. 395-419.
In his Canterbury Tales, Chaucer fully explicates the cultural standard known as curteisye through satire. In the fourteenth century curteisye embodied sophistication and an education in French international culture. The legends of chilvalric knights, conversing in the language of courtly love, matured during this later medieval period. Chaucer himself matured in the King's Court, and he reveled in his cultural status, but he also retained an anecdotal humor about curteisye. One must only peruse his Tales to discern these sentiments. In the General Prologue, he meticulously describes the Prioress, satirically examining her impeccable table manners. In the Miller's Tale Chaucer juxtaposes courtly love with animalistic lust, and in various other instances he mentions curteisye, or at least alludes to it, with characteristic Chaucerian irony. These numerous references provide the reader with a remarkably rich image of the culture and class structure of late fourteenth century England.
Parsons, T. (1963). On the Concept of Power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society , 107 (3), 232-262.
As with many plays from the same time period as Oedipus the King, there seems to be more to the story than the tragic story of a simple man. One way that Oedipus the King can be interpreted is as a political commentary about the str...
Chaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde. Ed. Larry Benson The Riverside Chaucer.. Boston: The Houghton Mifflin Company. 1987. P. 471-585.
Mitchell, J. Allan. (2005). Chaucer's Clerk's Tale and the Question of Ethical Monstrosity. Studies in Philology. Chapel Hill: Winter 2005. Vol.102, Iss. 1; pg. 1, 26 pgs
The character of Criseyde in Troilus and Criseyde is intriguing not only because of the conflicts and tensions she is faced with, but also because of the occasional variations between the type of person she is in her thoughts and the type of person she is when she interacts with Pandarus or Troilus. In her thought she is more independent, self confident and her feelings for Troilus are made evident. Whereas her persona when she’s interacting with Pandarus or Troilus is more reserved and her actions depict her as weak and victim like. In Book II, the passage in lines 695- 765 (pgs. 96-101) reveals Criseyde’s thought process and what specific conflicts she is faced with as she contemplates what her course of action should be regarding Troilus after finding out from her uncle, Pandarus, that Troilus loves her and will die without her. This passage also reveals Criseyde’s view of herself, what she considers to be appropriate behavior, what issues she holds in high regard when deliberating what she should do and most importantly, it shows Criseyde to be a complicated person who isn’t just doing what her uncle says or simply fulfilling the desires of Troilus.
..., but he is too much distanced from us. He is admirable, pitiable in the end, but Criseyde is the one who captures and sustains our interest, because she is a mortal in the end, human like us. She is the one we understand or deplore, who makes us go back to the poem to see where she goes wrong and where she is right. Although the story ends on Troilus ascension to the eighth sphere and his subsequent enlightenment on the smallness and brutality of this world, Criseyde is the one whom we remember long after because of the many shades she has to her character.' Indeed in this poem, Chaucer has not only given us a full and finished romance, but has endowed it with what, as rule, Medieval Romance conspicuously lacked-interest of character[...]' (The Cambridge History of English and American literature in 18 volumes (vol2 The end of the Middle ages))
Aside from the actual narrator of the poem, the character Pandarus is the most influential force in shaping Book III of "Troilus and Criseyde". Pandarus does claim at several points to be swept along with the course of events, insisting "Withouten hond, me seemeth that in towne,/ For this merveille ich here ech belle sown" (188-89). Ultimately, however, he takes responsibility for his actions while also acknowledging his need for secrecy. "But wo is me, that I, that cause al this" (271). Because the influence of Pandarus is so significant, any broad thematic discussions developed throughout the work as a whole are potentially qualified or compromised by the presence of Pandarus.