Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stereotypes of mentally disabled
Stereotypes of mentally disabled
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stereotypes of mentally disabled
Dumb decisions and why people make them. Modern society has created a cushion of intellect that protects stupid people. People do stupid things that should result in an inability to pass on stupid genetic material. But as Sally Adee quotes in What Makes People Do Dumb Things, “In the distant past, people whose mutations had slowed their intellect would not have survived to pass on their genes; but Crabtree suggests that as human societies became more collaborative, slower thinkers were able to piggyback on the success of those with higher intellect.”(Adee) It is acknowledging that people do stupid things because society allows them to. People do stupid things because society has built safety nets to protect the lowest common denominators of the population. My Goal in this paper is to demonstrate how stupidity is a direct result of “social safety nets,” genes, and environment. (Adee) To achieve this goal I have organized my paper in to three separate sections and a fourth conclusion section. The first section will be my definition of …show more content…
But for the sake of this paper a stupid decision is considered to be in one of three categories as defined by Aczel, Bence, Zoltan, “(1) violations of maintaining a balance between confidence and abilities; (2) failures of attention; and (3) lack of control.” (Aczel) An example of the first category that I have experienced happened during basic training. There was a soldier who dropped a live grenade inside of the bunker he and the safety officer occupied. This soldier was so overly sure in his ability to throw a grenade into a tire that was some distance away that in his preparations to throw the grenade it ended up rolling out of his hand. If not for “social safety nets” that provide a safety officer in the bunker to forcibly remove the solder in case of live munitions being dropped in the bunker , the soldier would have
Just because someone is top of the class, graduated at a very wealthy, highly academic school they can still make foolish decisions. No matter the IQ or schooling it can't stop someone from being a fool. Chris McCandless was all of these things and had all the knowledge and preparation needed. Although Christopher McCandless embodied intelligence and impacted many lives, he made many foolish decisions that ultimately cost him his life and his family much undeserved pain. People with a stubborn nature refuse to hear good advise causing them to make unnecessary mistakes.
Isaacson and Dweck begin and would agree with a similar base that intelligence, to a `certain point, is innate upon those who society sees as intelligent. Isaacson proves his viewpoint by exploring the mind of Steve Jobs, someone that most would consider to be the pinnacle of intelligence, and stating that “His imaginative leaps were instinctive, unexpected, and at times magical. They were sparked by intuition, not analytic rigor” (Isaacson 3). By emphasizing
4. "Why Intelligent People Tend To Be Unhappy." Scribd. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Dec. 2013. .
Today, realising that genes and environment cooperate and interact synergistically, traditional dichotomy of nature vs. nurture is commonly seen as a false dichotomy. Especially operant conditioning, i.e. the learning of the consequences of one's own behavior can lead to positive feedback loops between genetic predispositions and behavioral consequences that render the question as to cause and effect nonsensical. Positive feedback has the inherent tendency to exponentially amplify any initial small differences. For example, an at birth negligible difference between two brothers in a gene affecting IQ to a small percentage, may lead to one discovering a book the will spark his interest in reading, while the other never gets to see that book. One becomes an avid reader who loves intellectual challenges while the other never finds a real interest in books, but hangs out with his friends more often. Eventually, the reading brother may end up with highly different IQ scores in standardized tests, simply because the book loving brother has had more opportunities to train his brain. Had both brother received identical environmental input, their IQ scores would hardly differ.
Humans are indeed intriguing creatures. We can show signs of intelligence or stupidity. The human mind is a fascinating and intriguing part of the human body. Are the humans, who spends a lot of money, incompetents because possibly their mind is defective? Or are the humans, who conserve their money and invest wisely, intelligent because possibly their mind is superior? The mystery of the human’s measure of intelligence or stupidity frustrates me.
According to Myers (2011), intelligence varies immensely among groups. For example, there are differences between men and women and among racial groups, and these differences can be attributed to many factors such as genetics and location. To note some of the different influences on intelligence, Myers discusses genetic influences. Identical twins that have been reared together have such similar scores on an intelligence test that it is almost as if one person took the test twice. Conversely, fraternal twins produced scores that were not as similar, demonstrating that the more similar genetic makeup of the identical twins played a role in their similar scoring on the test. Myers then discusses the influence differences in environment will have on intelligence, citing that adopted children will have an intelligence level more similar to their biological parents than their adoptive parents as they grow into adulthood. Children in destitute human environments such as third-world orphanages suffered delayed development as opposed to children in nur...
Intelligent Quotient, or IQ score, is a measure of mental ability. It plays a major role in how individuals’ lives play out. It can be accredited for everything from personality to interests to occupation. The main debate when it comes to the subject of IQ is how a person’s score is influenced by environment and heredity. There are many theories on the matter. Some state that either heredity or environment exclusively determines IQ. Others believe that a person’s score is a result of the two. In this paper, we will analyze all of these theories and prove that while heredity plays a much greater role, they both have a very notable influence.
EV1: A poor white woman named Carrie Buck was sterilized in 1927 because her mother was “feebleminded”. A Youtube video titled “Fixed To Fail: Buck vs. Bell / Forced Sterilization Eugenics” it explains that, “Carrie was assumed to have inherited these traits, and was sterilized after giving birth”. The sterilization of Buck shows that scientists thought that intelligence could be passed down and marginalizes people who are “unintelligent”
Have you ever wondered how certain individuals have an outrageous IQ score? Do you believe someone’s intelligence comes from their cultural back ground or do you believe that intelligence is inherited? This is a controversial topic that has been going on for years. This issue has been looked upon by philosophers in the past and is currently by scientists today. Some individual’s think that intelligence comes from your parents whereas others think intelligence comes from the environment in which you are surrounded in. Intelligence is a skill that allows you to apply and interpret information. Intelligence is important because you will have good comprehension skills and you will also be able to analyze different things. According to the dictionary, intelligence is the ability of acquiring and applying knowledge and skills. However, it’s not that simple, since intelligence is something that is often misunderstood. Some people believe
In disagreement with portions of this week’s article, as provided by (Macionis, 2010, pp. 266-267), People living prosperously are not necessarily smarter than those who are less fortunate. While it is true that wealthy people have better educational opportunities, as opposed to their counterparts, many gifted individuals have come from meager beginnings. Such examples clearly bring questions to widely asserted...
A number of aspects can influence one’s mind and its relationship with the world, and how it grows and flourishes. Both genetic and environmental traits have a contribution to the development of cognition and intelligence. Biologically, a person is born with the same number of brain cells they will ever possess, however, a person’s complete brain function capacity and strength will take years to solidify as neural networks grow more complex (Hank, 2014). Biological maturation will allow for such growth processes, and it enables orderly changes in behavior to take place. Cognitive development refers to how thought, intelligence, and language processes change as people mature (King, 2017). The development of thought processes, including memory, problem-solving, and decision-making, expand from childhood through adolescence to adulthood. Jean Piaget (1896-1980), proposed his theory on how children actively construct and seek to
On the ‘nature’ side of the debate is the psychometric approach, considered to be the most dominant in the study of intelligence, which “inspired the most research and attracted the most attention” (Neisser et al. 1996, p. 77). It argues that there is one general (‘g’) factor which accounts for intelligence. In the 1880s, Francis Galton conducted many tests (measuring reaction times to cognitive tasks), (Boundless 2013), in order to scientifically measure intelligence. These tests were linked to the eugenic breeding programme, which aimed to eliminate biologically inferior people from society. Galton believed that as intelligence was inherited, social class or position were significant indicators of intelligence. If an individual was of high social standing, they would be more intelligent than those of a lower position. However he failed to show any consistency across the tests for this hypothesis, weakening his theory that social class correlated with intelligence. Nevertheless, his creation of the intelligence test led many to continue to develop...
In today’s society, one is constantly surrounded by individuals with different behaviors. Some will sacrifice his or her life for a complete stranger. However, there is some individuals who would take advantage of the weak and poor for his or her own personal gain. Now the question arises, what makes human beings behave the way they do? Being the topic of conflict of psychology for years, one usually turns to the nature verses nurture theory for the answer to that question. Some believes that a person is born with a certain personality, others believe it is an individual’s atmosphere that determines his or her attitude, and some even trusts the idea that it is a combination of genes and environment that dictates the conduct of an individual.
In response to Gerald Graff’s article about “Hidden Intellectualism,” he discusses street smarts and that often people are educated through what they learn in their environment. In many ways people are intelligent but this knowledge rarely goes unacknowledged in formal schooling. In this way, people are intellectual but are more able to apply what they know to what they have picked up about life or topics through various scenarios in their lives rather than through
The dichotomy between the view that intelligence levels are affected by situational factors and the view that intelligence is genetically transmitted has dominated psychological debates on IQ throughout decades. The statements made by many commentators that intelligences depends on genetic factors has been ...