What Is The Paradox Of Inquiry In Plato

1640 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Socrates used the Socratic method in Athens

The section 80d-86c of the Meno, which will be the focus of this paper, features the characters Socrates, Meno, and Meno’s unnamed slave. In this section, Plato uses these characters to discuss the paradox of inquiry and propose a possible solution to it. Modern philosophers refer to the proposed three-part solution to the paradox as the ‘theory of recollection’. During Plato’s time, the theory of recollection was a successful solution to the paradox of inquiry, but with modern science there has surfaced a better way to solve the paradox of inquiry. The paradox of inquiry is stated in 80d of the Meno. Meno is frustrated with Socrates because they can’t agree with an accurate definition for ‘virtue.’ He states the paradox in his frustration.
(81c-d)
Because the soul is immortal, Plato is suggesting that the soul learns when it is not bound by a body and that the soul knows everything there is to know. Furthermore, he is suggesting that while in a body, the soul is merely recollecting things it already knows. Relating this to the paradox of inquiry, not only can we not learn but we don’t need to learn because we already know everything. From this point on, whenever Socrates mentions ‘knowledge,’ he is referring to the theory of recollection. The theory of recollection is the second part of his 3-step solution to the paradox of inquiry. Meno’s immediate response is that he would like for Socrates to prove this theory of recollection. To prove the theory, Socrates questions Meno’s slave about geometry problems in 82c-85c. Socrates asks questions about a problem, to which the slave answers ‘yes’ or ‘no,’ or does a simple calculation such as four times two (85d). The slave, whom prior to the conversation knew nothing about geometry, was able to know a few things at the conclusion of the
In order for an argument to be sound, it must have validity and true premises. I believe that Plato’s reasoning is good based on the structure of his argument. As for soundness, his argument is based on the premises that the gods exist and that the soul is immortal and can be sent back to Earth from the underworld. If I were a philosopher during that time and heard this argument, I would believe it to be the truth because to believe otherwise would be to blaspheme Persephone and the gods of the state’s religion. Then the argument is sound, and therefore a very strong and successful argument by their

Show More
Related

  • The Apology and Crito

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.

    Read More

  • Plato Meno's Paradox

    1579 Words  | 4 Pages

    Right after Socrates comments how they can both look for virtue, Meno gives him these questions: “How will you look for it, Socrates, when you do not know at all what it is? How will you aim to search for something you do not know at all? If you should meet with it, how will you know that this is the thing you did not know (80d)?” This is Meno’s paradox which explains the discovery of knowledge is impossible and if you do not know what you are learning, and that you cannot discover it either. Meno states in his first premise that you either know what knowledge is or you don’t, and whether you do know it or not, you cannot discover what that piece of knowledge is. This,

    Read More

  • Socrates In The Apology And 'The Allegory Of The Cave'

    1145 Words  | 3 Pages

    This quote can be used to argue what kind things he would say to our society by providing an example of what his beliefs are. He is saying that once we can only become philosophers we will be able to stop indulging ourselves with our senses and only use them when necessary. Socrates point view of philosophy is when one wants to acquire prudence and irrefutable truth, which was discussed in a classroom community among classmates, simply when wants continuously want to learn and can never be satisfied with what they know. By learning, what Socrates means is our soul 's recollecting knowledge that body hinders the soul from remembering. This is seen in Meno where Socrates shows Meno how a boy figuring out the answers to a question is actually recollecting the knowledge instead of learning something new. He would make a statement about our education system and what we currently see as knowledge what was we should see as knowledge. The way we should learn by his definition would be to have classroom discussions sessions as agreed upon by critical think by my classmates and myself in a philosophy course. Socrates would tell us how we would need to focus on recollecting and focus on feeding our soul instead of our bodies, how we would need to make major changes such as our use of technology for only necessary uses and not merely for mindless entertainment much like how we all use laptops, phones, and the

    Read More

  • Meno's Paradox

    2022 Words  | 5 Pages

    The paradox arises due to a number of assumptions concerning knowledge, inquiry and definition made by both Socrates and Meno. The assumptions of Socrates are:

    Read More

  • Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    I totally agree that Socrates found it important to research about life’s morality and not just think the same way others do. That is a way of proving the knowledge of men. Ones sitting quiet in the corner usually have more knowledge than others that talk so much about what they know. Many men with a high position in life do not always have the most knowledge.

    Read More

  • Plato's Doctrine of Recollection

    412 Words  | 1 Pages

    The 'doctrine of recollection' states that all true knowledge exists implicitly within us, and can be brought to consciousness - made explicit - by recollection. Using the Platonic concepts of 'Forms', 'particulars', 'knowledge' and 'true opinion', this essay explains what can or cannot be recollected, why all knowledge is based on recollection, and why the doctrine does not prove the soul to be immortal.

    Read More

  • The Trail Of Socrates And The Apology Of Plato

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    During this essay, the trail of Socrates found in the Apology of Plato will be reviewed. What will be looked at during this review is how well Socrates rebuts the charges made against him. We will also talk about if Socrates made the right decision to not escape prison with Crito. Socrates was a very intelligent man; this is why this review is so critical. In Plato’s Apology, it seems that overall Socrates did an effective job using the 3 acts of the mind.

    Read More

  • The Immortalityality Of The Soul In The Meno

    1017 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, through the soul, that has been born before being placed into a physical human body, the human has knowledge. As a result of the soul being immortal and knowing everything, Socrates ties that idea of immortality with the theory of recollection, which claims that our knowledge is inside of us because of the soul and it never learns anything new, only remembers, consequently, serving as an evidence that the soul is pre- existent. Socrates uses the knowledge of the soul to explain that there is no such thing as learning but instead there is discovery of the knowledge that one has and does, by himself, without receiving new information. However, most knowledge is forgotten at birth since we are born without knowing, for example, how to add, subtract,talk, etc. Nonetheless, the knowledge we have, has to be recollected with the help of a teacher. Socrates is able to prove this argument to a degree by using Meno’s slave, who had no prior knowledge of geometry before, as an example of how humans have the knowledge inside of them, through the soul, and they know everything but all they need are a sort of guidance to be able to “free” the knowledge they didn’t know they had inside them all this time. (Plato,

    Read More

  • Meno's Paradox

    865 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Meno, Plato addresses the question of virtue, what it is, how to obtain and if virtue can be taught. Meno came to conclusion after a long discussion with Socrates that it is impossible to know what virtue is. The Meno’x paradox states, “if one knows what virtue is, he does not need to search for it. However, if one does not know what virtue is, how can he search for it? He may not know he has it even when he gets it.”

    Read More

  • Peter Geach's Analysis Of The Socratic Fallacy

    1426 Words  | 3 Pages

    Peter Geach’s essay on the Socratic fallacy poses a large problem for the Socratic method of obtaining answers to the What-is-F? question. He claims that Socrates makes an error when he refuses to accept examples as knowledge, primarily citing the Euthyphro as the source. In my last essay, I examined whether or not Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy in two of the early dialogues, namely, the Euthyphro and the Laches. So, I shall begin by giving a brief recapitulation of my previous essay as well as outlining Geach’s Socratic fallacy. Additionally, I will bring up an objection that Beversluis raises to my view. Then I shall explain the importance of the fallacy and the theory of the fallacy within the Socratic dialogues as it relates to

    Read More

  • The Theory Of Recollection By Socrates

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates uses the word “recollection” extensively in the Phaedo dialogue, by this he is asserting that learning is simply recollecting knowledge. Socrates explains to Cebes, one of the philosophers present in the cell that day, that according to the theory, “we must at

    Read More

  • The Doctrine of Recollection

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    To demonstrate Socrates’ theory, a slave boy was brought in. Knowing that this slave boy never had any training in geometry, Socrates asks him a geometric problem. In answering every questions Socrates asked, the slave boy eventually reached the correct answer. Above all, Socrates emphasized that he never taught the slave boy anything during the entire process. He only asked questions that led the slave boy to his own “recollection” of the topic discussed. Because the boy gave the correct answer at the end, Socrates was convinced of his theory of recollection.

    Read More

  • Ideas of Descartes, Plato, and Hume

    896 Words  | 2 Pages

    The immediate starting-point of Plato's philosophical speculation was the Socratic teaching. In his attempt to define the conditions of knowledge so as to refute sophistic skepticism, Socrates had taught that the only true knowledge is a knowledge by means of

    Read More

  • The Critique Of Socrates's Forms

    2590 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the Phaedo, Socrates is concerned about the soul. He wants to show how the soul is immortal and will survive after death. He does this through the opposites (Phaedo, 107-70d-72d) and the recollection (Phaedo, 111-73a-76c) arguments. While discussing recollection and opposites, Socrates introduces qualities (which turn into forms starting at Phaedo, 112-74a). In this paper, I will argue that Socrates’s forms fail for two reasons: he does not prove the existence of forms, and he does not sufficiently prove the existence of innate knowledge. Frist, this paper will go over Socrates’ opposites argument. Second, the argument of recollection. Then finally, it will show the failure of Socrates’ arguments that involve

    Read More

  • The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... when he is discussing the unexamined life. When Socrates mentions the oracle, he is explaining how one can believe he knows all but still can question life. Although he believes that a smarter man will not be found, Socrates still questions and examines the life he leads. This is the basic concept of philosophy, to try to examine and understand what is going on in life. Socrates understands that without this questioning, there would be no philosophy or a worthwhile life. (Plato 25)

    Read More

More about What Is The Paradox Of Inquiry In Plato

Open Document