What Are The Ethical Decision Making Model

Introduction In becoming a public administrator one will face a number of issues. Some of these issues will entail confronting ethical matters. In this paper, the following decision making models are discussed; Werhane, Greenleaf, Rest, Nash, Markkula, and Badaracco. These models are explained, compared, and contrasted. Additionally, their strengths and weaknesses are identified. The end product in this assignment is the creation of my own ethical decision making model influence by the six models studied in this paper.

Ethical Decision Making Models The Werhane Model relies on the concept of moral imagination. Moral imagination has three components. The first is Reproductive Imagination. Reproductive Imagination is having a sense

The Badacco’s Model inquires that individuals think about what the real issues are at hand. Furthermore, the model prompts individuals to assess what they are accountable for and what they have control over. Furthermore, the Badaracco’s Model encourages the individual to think about how the decision will be realized and forces an individual to look at multiple perspective to ensure the appropriate decision was taken (Week 10, 2016). Moreover, there is an emphasis in the model about looking at one’s core values to determine whether the decision made aligns with the right core values. Lastly, the individual through the use of this model analyzes whether the decision at hand aligns or measures up with their

Rest’s Four Component Model, Markkula’s Model, and Werhane all indicate that the first step is recognizing the ethics behind an issue. The second element that is common across most models is the concept of consequences. Markkula’s Model, Greenleaf’s Ethical Test, Nash’s Model, Greenleaf’s Ethical Test, and Rest’s Four Component Model all consider the consequences a decision may have on an individual or group of people. Greenleaf’s Ethical Test requires an individual to consider the effect the decision will not just individuals or groups of people but the whole society. A third element that is common across some models relates to viewing an issue through different perspectives. Werhane’s Model explicitly emphasizes individuals to look at problems from different points of view. Nash’s model also asks individuals to do the same. Meanwhile, Markkula’s has an individual seek out other individuals that will offer different perspectives on the issue. Bardacco’s model goes beyond analyzing an issue through different perspectives, but also helps an individual develop methods to evaluate appropriate