Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about animal rights philosophy
Essays about animal rights philosophy
Essays about animal rights philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about animal rights philosophy
In the ancient time, ancestors had to consume primarily plant foods because it was not that easy to get meat as we can get it now. However, that was not the only reason for being vegetarians. The history tells us that vegetarianism has its beginnings in ancient India and Greece. Those days the vegetarian diet had close connections with the idea of nonviolence toward animals and was promoted by religious groups and philosophers. The ancient Hindu and Buddhist were advocating a vegetarian diet for ethical reasons. One of the most important reasons why people decided not to consume meat is a “Do not harm” principle. People should not make animals suffer and experience pain because animals deserve the same level of respect as people. Even though people started to think of vegetarianism and animal rights movements a long time ago, these movements became popular only in the early 1970s. In the U.S., people became interested in vegetarianism after an American writer Frances Moore Lappé published her bestseller called “Diet for a Small Planet.” Around the same time, a group of Oxford university post-graduate philosophy students, now known as the "Oxford Group", founded an animal rights movement in the UK. The reason why they did this was not just sentimental. Their approach was based on the moral rights of animals. This was the very beginning of these movements that now are so popular. Even though they were founded by different people and in different countries, they still have lots in common. The connection of these two different movements such as vegetarianism and animal rights is characterized by identical beliefs, common goals, and similar hopes.
Originally founded in ancient India, Hinduism and Buddhism have strong links with vegeta...
... middle of paper ...
...nism." Philosophy 53.206 (1978): 481-505.
Francione, Gary L. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? New York: Columbia UP, 2010. Web. p. 62.
Narayanan, Vasudha. “The Hindu Tradition”. In A Concise Introduction to World Religions, ed. Willard G. Oxtoby and Alan F. Segal. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Ryder, Richard. Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism. Basil Blackwell, 1989, ed. Berg, 2000, p. 5.
Tähtinen, Unto. Ahimsa. Non-Violence in Indian Tradition, London 1976, p. 107-109.
“'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges. Retrieved July 12, 2006.
"Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare." World Society for the Protection of Animals. Web.
"Vegan Diets Become More Popular, More Mainstream", Associated Press/CBS News, 5 January 2011.
Regan, Tom. “The Case for Animal Rights.” In Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 2 ed.. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989.
Zak, Steven. “Ethics and Animals.” Taking Sides: Science, Technology, and Society. Gilford: Dushkin Publishing Group, 2007
The essay “Ill-gotten Gains” first appeared in a book called ‘Health Care Ethics’ and was written by Tom Regan who is a renowned philosopher, author and animal rights advocate. The essay appeared again in Tom Regan’s best known book called ‘The Case for Animal Rights’ which states Regan’s beliefs regarding animal rights and provides a sound argument as to why animals should not be exploited for our own gain. Tom Regan believes all animal use that benefits humans is morally unacceptable including for food, entertainment, labour, experiments and research. “Ill-gotten Gains” argues that to be on the right moral path we need to view all individuals with inherent value as a ‘subject of a life’. Regan argues that any practice in which a ‘subject of a life’ is used as a resource is immoral, not because of emotion, but because of reason. Any individual with a sense of a future, awareness and purpose is considered to be a ‘subject of a life’ and has equal inherent value. Regan also takes time to explore the argument that humans have souls while animals do not.
League, Animal Defense. “Policy Statement on Animal Research.” Civil Rights in America. Woodbridge, CT: Primary Source Media, 1999. American Journey.Student Resources in Context. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
“The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."( Schopenhauer). Vegetarianism and animal rights movement have been crossing each other since 70’s. The meeting point between two is veganism which means strict vegetarianism. Vegetarianism was firstly founded as being formed on ethical issues and then it became mostly based on health reasons. Even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to its early days, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not a mere health choice.
Gunnarson, Helen W. "Animal law comes into its own: as Americans place more value -
Every day across America millions of people wake up to start their morning. Throughout the day the vast majority of these people will consume meat, but 3% will replace the pig, cow, and chicken products for vegetable or fruit made meals (Harris). These vegetarians all have many different reasons to make this choice. This decision is a huge change in one’s life and is not without questions. Some people may wonder why would anyone abstain from the amazing food that contains meat. This essay will briefly explain the history of vegetarianism, the reasons for vegetarianism, and answer questions about vegetarianism. Vegetarian diets are all around better than diets containing meat because of three main reasons; the abuse of animals, the environmental damage, and the health benefits for humans.
As an advocate of animal rights, Tom Regan presents us with the idea that animals deserve to be treated with equal respect to humans. Commonly, we view our household pets and select exotic animals in different regard as oppose to the animals we perceive as merely a food source which, is a notion that animal rights activists
Morrison, Nick. "Animal Rights and Wrongs." Northern Echo, 24 Feb. 2001: n. pag. elibrary. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
The Case for Animal Rights. Routledge, London-New York, 1988. Regan T. The Struggle for Animal Rights. International Society for Animal Rights.
"The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.
Tom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford:
A. A. “The Case Against Animal Rights.” Animal Rights Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Janelle Rohr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1989.
Waples KA, Stagoll CS. Ethical issues in the release of animals from captivity. Roundtable. 1997; 115-120.
For several years the issue of eating meat has been a great concern to all types of people all over the world. In many different societies controversy has began to arise over the morality of eating meat from animals. A lot of the reasons for not eating meat have to deal with religious affiliations, personal health, animal rights, and concern about the environment. Vegetarians have a greater way of expressing meats negative effects on the human body whereas meat eaters have close to no evidence of meat eating being a positive effect on the human body. Being a vegetarian is more beneficial for human beings because of health reasons, environmental issues, and animal rights.