Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Urbanization and its effects
Essay on urbanisation in USA
Urban planning history timeline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Urbanization and its effects
In the mid 1900’s, the urbanization of American cities was rapidly taking place amidst countless controversial urban renewal initiatives. Before this wave of urbanization hit, however, there was a major push for the removal of slums and deteriorating districts, as well as more efficient and well planned areas that supported transportation developments. City planners interpreted this need as a chance to take action by attempting to demolish low-income housing and outdated commercial properties to make way for new urban projects. Although these changes intended to provide people with new opportunities, it had the opposite effect. Thousands of families were displaced from their homes and forced to move into public housing which deepened the …show more content…
This project was the start of highway construction, which was meant to aid in city growth by bringing people into the cities in a more direct and orderly manner. Although the original plan seemed to be beneficial, it resulted in the destruction of several thriving neighborhoods. City planners, such as Robert Moses, analyzed the planning of cities from above and cared little about destroying communities in order to to achieve their goal (Urbanized). It is no doubt that controversy transpired because of this. Activists like Jane Jacobs were strongly opposed to these ruinous methods of city rebuilding and were determined to prove the quality of city blocks that remained (Jacobs, 5). Jacobs proposed that cities are in need of four main modes of diversity which are, need for mixed primary uses, small blocks, aged buildings, and concentration. All of the areas being destroyed for highways contained these features, however, they were considered to be hinderance to urban development because they failed to follow the modern idea of …show more content…
The documentary looks at the issues and designs of urban planning that shape the future of cities across the nation. In New York City, the Department of City Planning is developing a project called the High Line, which is transforming an elevated train line into a public park (Urbanized). The department is responsible for positively shaping its neighborhoods and aim to judge their progress by the standards established by Jane Jacobs. The film explains these standards as an argument for communities that offer a variety of uses and that place an emphasis on the perspectives of people who live at street level. Jane Jacobs and the New York city planners have both adopted the view that having a sense of familiar community creates a safer and more comfortable environment for all. Overall, the film argues against urban renewal projects, such as modern highway construction, because it has the potential to rip apart the fundamental social infrastructure that makes community possible. Although highway construction has the benefits of bringing more people into the city, it can be harmful when it uproots established areas. When people move out of historic areas, a sense of civic center is lost and the heart of the city dies. This is what Jane Jacobs attributes to the breakdown of cities and neighborhoods
To appreciate a row house neighborhood, one must first look at the plan as a whole before looking at the individual blocks and houses. The city’s goal to build a neighborhood that can be seen as a singular unit is made clear in plan, at both a larger scale (the entire urban plan) and a smaller scale (the scheme of the individual houses). Around 1850, the city began to carve out blocks and streets, with the idea of orienting them around squares and small residential parks. This Victorian style plan organized rectangular blocks around rounded gardens and squares that separated the row houses from major streets. The emphasis on public spaces and gardens to provide relief from the ene...
Furthermore, he attempts to dispel the negative aspects of gentrification by pointing out how some of them are nonexistent. To accomplish this, Turman exemplifies how gentrification could positively impact neighborhoods like Third Ward (a ‘dangerous’ neighborhood in Houston, Texas). Throughout the article, Turman provides copious examples of how gentrification can positively change urban communities, expressing that “gentrification can produce desirable effects upon a community such as a reduced crime rate, investment in the infrastructure of an area and increased economic activity in neighborhoods which gentrify”. Furthermore, he opportunistically uses the Third Ward as an example, which he describes as “the 15th most dangerous neighborhood in the country” and “synonymous with crime”, as an example of an area that could “need the change that gentrification provides”.
There were four key components in Jacobs’ plan to stimulate diversity; areas should have multiple functions, blocks must be short, buildings of varying age and condition should be present and there should be a sufficient population density to allow for such diversity within it.
Adler, Ben. "What “Clybourne Park” Misses About Gentrification." Next City. N.p., 2 Aug. 2012. Web. 04 May 2014.
Lance Freeman tackles the issue of gentrification from the perspectives of residents in the gentrified neighborhood. He criticizes the literature for overlooking the experiences of the victims of gentrification. The author argues that people’s conceptions on the issue are somewhat misinformed in that most people consider it as completely deplorable, whereas in reality, it benefits the community by promoting businesses, different types of stores, and cleaner streets. These benefits are even acknowledged by many residents in the gentrified neighborhood. However, the author admits that gentrification indeed does harm. Although gentrification does not equate to displacement per se, it serves to benefit primarily homeowners and harm the poor. Additionally,
Gentrification is the keystone for the progression of the basic standards of living in urban environments. A prerequisite for the advancement of urban areas is an improvement of housing, dining, and general social services. One of the most revered and illustrious examples of gentrification in an urban setting is New York City. New York City’s gentrification projects are seen as a model for gentrification for not only America, but also the rest of the world. Gentrification in an urban setting is much more complex and has deeper ramifications than seen at face value. With changes in housing, modifications to the quality of life in the surrounding area must be considered as well. Constant lifestyle changes in a community can push out life-time
As I traverse the overgrown meadow, the impressible soil sticks to my worn shoes. It is dark, chalky, and alluvial. From it, life has flourished, unhindered by barriers of concrete and asphalt. The grass is coarse, and high reaching; the spruce trees tower solemnly. They are sentinels, guarding the ravine from the commotion of the city. They offer protection from any unwelcome reminders of the pandemonium and instability that await me upon my return to civilization. Beyond the ravine is an endless mixture of harsh, discordant noise. There is a steady sprawl of vehicles, construction sites, and sirens. Cement and rebar dominate the landscape. Everywhere, people hurry frantically, impatiently, overwhelmingly – all in an attempt to fulfill their
Jacobs views diversity as the number of ways in which limited areas of space are allocated, as opposed to having an inherent racial or cultural connotation. Jacobs emphasizes that various types of business and residences are the elements of prospering city neighborhoods. Jacobs begins to explore three main myths. These myths are arguments often cited by city planners against diversity. To begin, the first myth that Jacobs attempts to discredit is that diversity is unattractive. She repudiates this assertion by saying that the opposite is in fact true, in which homogeneity is unappealing. I believe that it is quite detrimental when city planners attempt to create a contrived atmosphere of diversity in order to conceal the existing homogeneity. This is accomplished by artificially building different shapes and styles of buildings to give outsiders the impression of diversity. Jacobs underscores the flaws of contrived diversity in the following excerpt:
Although Moses started out with the idea of beautifying cities from piles of ashes and had successful projects (such as Jones Beach State Park), even then he “used physical design as a means of social screening” (p. 299) by only allowing his parkways to be experienced via cars, which at that point in time only the wealthy had. After the “greater reconstruction of the whole fabric of America after World War Two” (p. 307) when automobiles became the center of the modern world, cities were conceived as “obstructions to the flow of traffic, and as junkyards of substandard housing and decaying neighborhoods from which Americans should be given every chance to escape.” (p.307) This country-wide shift in values caused Moses (along with others) to obliterate urban neighborhoods and replace them with highways, and as a result “plunge cities into the chronic crisis and chaos that plague their inhabitants today.” (p. 308) Both the video and the essay about Moses provides more evidence about the injustices regarding city planning, and how that stems from the values of those in charge of planning (the upper
This was the first time she publicly spoke out her opinions of city planning and needless to say her unwavering opinions were under fire as she spoke about her new ideas that would change the way urban city planning was going. During this time she also jumped onboard to join a letter writing campaign to protest a city plan that called for a highway to run through the center of Washington Square. Jacobs was in disbelief and would not let this happen. She wrote a strongly worded letter to Mayor Robert Wagner, stating that this new development is making it impossible for the city to be
New Urbanism also recommends centralized ‘main street’ with narrower streets where pedestrian mobility is prioritized and public transit is encouraged. The Charter of New Urbanism hopes to encourages social diversity – meaning within these neighbourhoods, a variety of housing types can be found thus bringing people of diverse ages, races and incomes into daily interaction (#13). New Urbanists aim to control social environment by acknowledging that physical solutions alone will not resolve social and economic issues – but also realizes that socio-economic stability and environmental sustainability cannot be maintained without a supported and integrated physical framework and could be improved through graphic urban design codes (#17). As stated in the Charter, New Urbanism strives to achieve a sustainable, economically and socially diverse and walkable region through design. It is a direct response to the principles of Charter of Athens where market and policy sustained resulted in an unsustainable and economically and racially segregated communities.
In April, 1956, Jane Jacobs spoke before a crowd of architects, academics, and urban planners at the Harvard Urban Design Conference. Five years later, she would publish The Death and Life of Great American Cities, a book that tore down contemporary city planning and lead to the profession being rebuilt in Jacobs’s image (or, rather, in the image of people claiming to be rebuilding the profession in her image – as Max Page notes, there is no “other urbanist whose ideas more people profess to understand who is less understood [4]”). But at this point, she was little known in the planning community – in fact, she originally was not even scheduled to speak; she only agreed
Jane Jacobs recommended four factors of effective city neighborhood planning: 1) to nurture lively and interesting streets, 2) to create continuous network of streets, 3) to use parks, open spaces and public buildings as part of the street design, encouraging multiple uses rather than segregating them, 4) to foster functional identity at the district level. Her description of successful city neighborhoods challenged Clarence Perry’s Neighborhood Unit Plan which relied on a fixed community scale. The heart of her argument is the principle of creating neighborhoods for a most intricate and close-grained diversity of uses that give each other constant mutual support, both economically and socially [Jane Jacobs, 1989]. Perry’s plan included a small
Jane Jacobs may have been far ahead of her time in her ideas on city planning when she wrote, The Death and Life of Great American Cities. When she wrote this book in 1961 she bluntly opens her book stating that the book “is an attack on current city planning and rebuilding” [Jacobs, 5] and that in the book she wants to “attempt to introduce new principles of city planning and rebuilding, different and even opposite from those now taught in everything from schools of architecture and planning” [Jacobs, 5].
In his article, Roberts (2000) states that “It should be noted that it is different from urban renewal, urban rehabilitation and urban (re)development as urban renewal aims to achieve mainly physical change, urban rehabilitation does not describe the method of actions and urban (re)development has a general mission and lacks a well-defined purpose (Roberts, 2000). The elaboration identifies a few concepts that people often confuse with urban renewal, it also touches upon their differences as well. People often confuse these concepts; urban regeneration, urban development, urban upgrades, urban transformation, urban economic development, urban socio-economic development, brown field development, and among others. All these concepts have different approaches and standards by which they take place hence Roberts has chosen a few of them to outline the manner in which the concepts can differ. Although the concepts and approaches differ from one another, they all serve to achieve the same objective which is '(re)