Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities _ Jane Jacob structure
Essays on urban regeneration
Essays on urban regeneration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jane Jacobs may have been far ahead of her time in her ideas on city planning when she wrote, The Death and Life of Great American Cities. When she wrote this book in 1961 she bluntly opens her book stating that the book “is an attack on current city planning and rebuilding” [Jacobs, 5] and that in the book she wants to “attempt to introduce new principles of city planning and rebuilding, different and even opposite from those now taught in everything from schools of architecture and planning” [Jacobs, 5]. Right from the start Jane Jacobs makes a very bold statement about current planning practices and education process. She continues on to highlight how little aspects of city planning can be changed to create drastic positive changes for …show more content…
Jane Jacobs tries to redefine the orthodox planning theory that the idea neighborhood size is 7,000 residents. She believes that having such a small neighborhood make self- governance, which is crucial for a neighborhood, is next to near impossible. Self- governance is important so that the residents of a neighborhood can maintain a society and imagine that is shared by the majority. When there are only 7,000 residents in a neighborhood Jane Jacobs believes that self- governance is impossible because there will be too many strongly grounded, different ideal and opinions that will make coming to a common idea will never happen. Jane Jacobs focuses on looking at the larger aspect of the neighborhoods as how a neighborhood actually affects a city, and actually that smaller neighborhoods do not play much of role in the city as a whole. She considers that looking at the city as a whole, street neighborhoods or larger neighborhood districts of 100,000 or more residents are what city planners need to focus on to allow self- governance to …show more content…
City and neighborhood cycles tend to destroy the diversity and can be a vicious cycle that harms the city or neighborhood. By understanding the different types of cycles one can start to come up with possible solutions to curb these issues. There are four different types of city or neighborhood cycles. The first type of cycle is the issue of a homogeneous district. A homogeneous district means all the residents in an area share similar, if not the same, social and economic characteristics/ status. A homogeneous district is a type of city cycle that destroys the diversity in an area and creates serious issues if gentrification or “foreign” resident tries to infiltrate the area. The existing residents that are all the same try to force out the “different” or “foreign” people by buying out whatever they own to restore the homogeneity to the area. This cycle destroys all diversity and does not create any sort of character to an area, which can harm a cities
There are many examples of cities reforming itself over time, one significant example is Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. More than a hundred years after the discovery of gold that drew thousands of migrants to Vancouver, the city has changed a lot, and so does one of its oldest community: Downtown Eastside. Began as a small town for workers that migrants frequently, after these workers moved away with all the money they have made, Downtown Eastside faced many hardships and changes. As a city, Vancouver gave much support to improve the area’s living quality and economics, known as a process called gentrification. But is this process really benefiting everyone living in Downtown Eastside? The answer is no. Gentrification towards DTES(Downtown Eastside) did not benefit the all the inhabitants of the area. Reasons are the new rent price of the area is much higher than before the gentrification, new businesses are not community-minded, and the old culture and lifestyle of the DTES is getting erased by the new residents.
look into its planning policies in order to prevent spatial segregation in Toronto. However does not explain what planning instruments are needed to help diversify the socio-economic composition of Toronto’s inner city. The article also suggests that for a more socially progressive city, anti-gentrification policies should be incorporated and adopted into Toronto’s official plan policies but does not explains what can be included as anti-gentrification policy.
At the time Jane Jacobs was writing The Death and Life of Great American Cities, city planning was not a process done by or for the people who lived in them. Residents were rarely consulted or involved in decision making, rather it be left to few elites who dictated their vision of the city for everybody else to conform to.
Rose, J. K. (1997, November 8). The city beautiful movement. University of Virginia. Retrieved December 28, 2010, from http://xroads.virginia.edu/~cap/citybeautiful/city.html
In his article column titled Making sense of Measure S, the latest battle in L.A.'s long war over development, Christopher Hawthorne analyzes a development plan in Los Angeles called “Measure S” and the different sides of the issue. Hawthorne also discusses the history of development plans in Los Angeles and how the general outlook from different groups will and is currently affecting these plans. The general idea of Measure S is anti-development and to keep building projects from changing the general plan of the city. A general plan of a city is a guide to land use in different sectors that is used as a guideline for future and current development projects. Many different policies like Measure S have existed throughout Los
The modern story of developed areas is a move from the inner city to the suburbs. This decentralization of metropolitan areas has left urban areas neglected. Such a transformation has had negative consequences, because it has inherently meant the abandonment of those left behind in urban centers. Furthermore, the issue is complicated by the fact that the distinction between those moving to the suburbs and those left behind has been defined largely by race. As Kain notes,
Of the many problems affecting urban communities, both locally and abroad, there is one issue in particular, that has been victimizing the impoverished within urban communities for nearly a century; that would be the problem of gentrification. Gentrification is a word used to describe the process by which urban communities are coerced into adopting improvements respective to housing, businesses, and general presentation. Usually hidden behind less abrasive, or less stigmatized terms such as; “urban renewal” or “community revitalization” what the process of gentrification attempts to do, is remove all undesirable elements from a particular community or neighborhood, in favor of commercial and residential enhancements designed to improve both the function and aesthetic appeal of that particular community. The purpose of this paper is to make the reader aware about the significance of process of gentrification and its underlying impact over the community and the community participation.
Location, location, location -- it’s the old realtor 's mantra for what the most important feature is when looking at a potential house. If the house is in a bad neighborhood, it may not be suitable for the buyers. In searching for a house, many people will look at how safe the surrounding area is. If it’s not safe, they will tend stray away. Jane Jacobs understood the importance of this and knew how cities could maintain this safety, but warned of what would become of them if they did not diverge from the current city styles. More modern planners, such as Joel Kotkin argue that Jacobs’s lesson is no longer applicable to modern cities because they have different functions than those of the past. This argument is valid in the sense that city
Jacobs views diversity as the number of ways in which limited areas of space are allocated, as opposed to having an inherent racial or cultural connotation. Jacobs emphasizes that various types of business and residences are the elements of prospering city neighborhoods. Jacobs begins to explore three main myths. These myths are arguments often cited by city planners against diversity. To begin, the first myth that Jacobs attempts to discredit is that diversity is unattractive. She repudiates this assertion by saying that the opposite is in fact true, in which homogeneity is unappealing. I believe that it is quite detrimental when city planners attempt to create a contrived atmosphere of diversity in order to conceal the existing homogeneity. This is accomplished by artificially building different shapes and styles of buildings to give outsiders the impression of diversity. Jacobs underscores the flaws of contrived diversity in the following excerpt:
Originally, cities arose because naturally, humans are social creatures that dwell in close proximity to each other, and it was typically in areas where the basic needs of food, shelter and water could be met or obtained. These communities grew to be large and expansive cities with complex natures, public buildings, religious institutions and possessed unique forms of housing, transportation and streets. (Cavaglieri, 22). There are currently two conflicting ideas of how a city should develop, through urban sprawl or through smart growth. Low density development, otherwise known as urban sprawl, is defined as "low density, automobile dependent development beyond the edge of service and employment areas." (The Policy Almanac, Urban Sprawl). On the other hand, Smart Growth which is loosely defined as planning principles "to stop sprawl, regenerate inner cities, provide transportation choices that include public transit, protect and integrate green-space into the urban fabric – and generally renew the promise of vibrant, vital cities and liveable communities." (Onyschuk, 1). Despite the positive aims of smart growth, many say that it is highly flawed and the results tend to contradict its goal of creating livable cities. The use of smart growth principles are essential for building sustainable, urban spaces. Smart growth promotes mid to high density development in the hopes of using less land to sustain more people. Mixed use neighbourhoods is an aspect of Smart Growth which allows residents to live, work and play in the same area. Various forms of transportation are heavily invested in to give people the option not to take their car, or completely get rid of it.
As metropolitan areas across the America have grown overtime, it has become the home of very diverse social and ethnic groups. However, when analyzing the communities that make up these metropolitan areas, most remain consistently homogeneous, particularly on the basis of race and socioeconomic status. The combinations of many of these segregated communities have created metropolitan areas that are socially, economically and politically fragmented. As a result, rather than metropolitan areas working together for the wellbeing of nuclear cities, select suburbs have flourished while main cities have become less prosperous. Cities such as Detroit, that in many respects exemplified the American dream, suffered extreme consequences due to fragmentation. In an effort to recover and, specific strategies must be used to combat fragmentation. By working with other local governments and in some instances state government to create resolutions that benefits nuclear cities and metropolitan area; the social, economic and political cohesion of municipalities will increase the wellbeing of metropolitan areas across the nation.
After decades of watching the city grow and develop They could refine their theory of “Concentric Zones.” The model consisted of 5 concentric circles: Central Business District, Zone of Transition, Working Class Zone, Residential Zone and Commuter
Frank Lloyd Wright was perhaps the most influential American architect of the 20th century and one of the greatest to ever live. What was well known about Wright was that he was deeply ambivalent about cities and metropolis centers. His key criticism of large cities was that the advancing technologies had rendered the cities, which were created industry and immigration in the late 19th and early 20th Century, completely obsolete. He famously quoted that, “ The present city…has nothing to give the citizen…because centralization have no forces of regeneration”. Instead, Wright envisioned decentralized settlements (otherwise known as suburban neighborhoods) that would take advantage of the mobility offered by the automobile, telephones, and telegraphic communication. Because of the rise of the suburban complexes in the post WW2 era, this is where Wright first got the reputation has being a prophet for the architecture world.
In the following article, the author J. David Hulchanski, explains the three different types of neighborhoods, or cities how he defines, that are present within the surrounding of the G.T.A, even more specifically Toronto. Hulchanski discusses about the incomes that all three of these cities present and the various statistics associated with it. The three cities are corresponding as follows. City #1, is a pre- dominantly high-income area of the City of Toronto which “these neighborhoods are generally found in the central city and close to the city’s subway lines” (Hulchanski 2010, 5). Secondly there’s City #2, “a mainly middle-income area, where neighborhood incomes have remained fairly close to the CMA average since 1970” (Hulchanski 2010,
It evident that urban areas are important and should be managed accordingly, the question posed by scholars is whether government or governance should be responsible for ensuring the optimal performance of an urban area. According to Stoker (1998) government refers to formal and institutional processes which aim to maintain public order and facilitate collective action at country level. Several scholars (Rakodi, 2003; Rhodes, 1996) have noted a shift from government to governance. Hendriks (2014) argues that there has been no such shift, the supposed shift is a misinterpretation of reality. Governance existed during the 17th century in the Dutch republic (Israel, 1995). Thus governance is not new, however it has been changing with time (Hendriks,