Jane Jacobs: The Misunderstood Urban Planning Icon

1876 Words4 Pages

Gender and the Urban Planning Community’s Reactions to Jane Jacobs In April, 1956, Jane Jacobs spoke before a crowd of architects, academics, and urban planners at the Harvard Urban Design Conference. Five years later, she would publish The Death and Life of Great American Cities, a book that tore down contemporary city planning and lead to the profession being rebuilt in Jacobs’s image (or, rather, in the image of people claiming to be rebuilding the profession in her image – as Max Page notes, there is no “other urbanist whose ideas more people profess to understand who is less understood [4]”). But at this point, she was little known in the planning community – in fact, she originally was not even scheduled to speak; she only agreed …show more content…

Much of this criticism was tinged with separate spheres ideology and made direct references to the space Jacobs was expected to occupy as a woman. Jacobs was derided by many as a “militant dame (83).” Lewis Mumford, well-known as a historian, social critic, and author of The City in History, wrote a critical review of Death and Life entitled “Mother Jacobs’ Home Remedies,” in which he painted a portrait of Jacobs as a folksy, downhome housewife whose writing and opinion were mostly based on intuition. The image he presented there, of Jacobs as the uninformed housewife operating purely on her own observation without academic training, stuck, among critics and supporters alike. Those who appreciated her insights referred to her “common sense” insights – insights they believed she gained exclusively from her experience as a housewife simply looking out her window, while critics like Mumford mockingly referred to her “home remedies” and thought of her as “an amateur and a housewife who could comprehend no more than the domestic simplicity of Greenwich Village (Laurence 2011, 16),” someone with no grasp of the historical perspective and technical knowledge necessary to speak with any level of authority on …show more content…

One focus of Jacobs’s activism that might be considered a practical gender interest, for example, is her efforts to improve public housing projects. This could be thought of as a practical gender interest because a much greater proportion of households in public housing are headed by women than in the general population (75% of Section 8 beneficiaries, as of 2012 [“Housing Spotlight”]), so more women would benefit from improvements to public housing than men would. The same applies to attempts to alleviate poverty more generally (something Jacobs concerned herself with in her activism intended to preserve neighborhoods and build community, which she believed to be a fundamental part of a process she called “unslumming”) – because the poverty is higher among women than men, a general reduction

Open Document