Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of pricing discrimination
Pros and cons of pricing discrimination
Pricing strategies principles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of pricing discrimination
1. Explain whether or not your employer (or any other firm of your choosing) uses uniform pricing. Using your example, explain why uniform pricing may not be optimal.
Uniform pricing is also called monopoly pricing. In uniform pricing, buyers choose quantity of goods at a fixed price, freely. A seller later charges the same price for every unit of a product. Margin percentage that has increased in uniform pricing is equivalent to the reciprocal of absolute value of price elasticity of demand. Company X in its verge to improve profit margin applied uniform pricing (Viglia, 2014). It had the responsibility to understand what all the potential buyers want and have prices for every product set. To an extent Company X considered uniform pricing to be better than cost-plus pricing, but uniform pricing was not the best, since it brought in the idea of monopoly. In monopoly, it
…show more content…
Price discrimination is practiced by a seller through giving tagging different prices to goods under different markets. Product cost details differentiates price discrimination from product differentiation (Vogel & National Bureau of Economic Research. 2009). First degree price discrimination enables the seller to know maximum price in a monopoly market. Sellers know the price every consumer is willing to pay for a good or service. First degree price discrimination is seldom possible because the seller gains revenues from consumer surplus, thus difficult to fall in loss (Corsetti & Dedola, 2003). Profit realized is always equivalent to the summation of both producer surplus and consumer surplus. A good example that displays the technique in first degree price discrimination is car dealership. A car dealer will want to know what buyers have in market as their prices. Car dealers will then evaluate total prices are stand at a fixed price that would gain them profit much compared to what they had as surplus in
A couple of Squares has a limited capacity for which to produce their products and smaller companies tend to have larger fixed costs than bigger companies. Therefore, A Couple of Squares must maximize profits in order to ensure that they will stay in business. A profit-oriented pricing objective is also useful because of A Couple of Squares’ increased sales goals. A Couple of Squares increased their sales goals due to recent financial troubles. Maximizing profits is the easiest way to meet these sales goals due to the fact that A Couple of Squares has limited production capacity. The last key consideration favors a profit-oriented pricing objective because A Couple of Squares offers a specialty product. A specialty product often has limited competition, therefore can be priced on customer value. Pricing at customer value will maximize profits as well as customer satisfaction. A Couple of Squares’ lack of production capacity, increased sales goals, and specialty product favor a profit-oriented pricing
As we learned from Chapter 12, price must be carefully determined and match with firm’s product, distribution, and communication strategies. (Hutt & Speh, 2012, p. 300) Therefore, there should be a strong market perspective in pricing. In order to build an effective pricing policy, marketers should focus on the value a customer places on a product or service. One of the most effective ways to do so is differentiating through value creation.
Section 2 outlaws price discrimination when it isn’t justified on the basis of cost differences and when it reduces competition.
Commercial firms use Price Elasticity to manage pricing and production decisions, especially in industries where the growth in sales and revenues are the primary measure of a firm’s success. Knowledge of the Price Elasticity for a product or service enables managers to determine the pricing strategy required to get the sales results desired. For example, a firm with a product with a relatively high elasticity would know that a large sales increase can be created with a small price decrease. Conversely, a firm with an inelastic product knows that changes in pricing would have minimal effect on sales.
Goods will be sold at that price at which:.. 1. More goods will be purchased and consumed. 2. More profits will be made. Thus goods will be sold at the most profitable price.
Price discrimination is a significant and influential practice on the market in the modern economic world. It aids in a firm's profit maximization scheme, it allows certain consumers with more scarce resources the opportunity to purchase goods or services that would otherwise be usable, and it aids firms in balancing what is and what is not sold. Price discrimination is an effective means by which a firm can sell a higher quantity of goods, make a higher profit margin on the goods it sells, and builds a broader consumer base due to differing price elasticity of demand for given goods and services. Price discrimination ultimately equalizes price and value for both the consumer and the firm, creating a more ideal situation for both entities in terms of preference and opportunity cost.
The monopoly game is mainly characterized by strategic thinking, luck, critical thinking, probability, trading, and management skills (Darling, 2007). The element of the luck comes from the dices that are thrown by the players. Also, the decision of which player are going to start. What is more , there are other elements that increase the uncertainty in the game. For example, chest cards and the community cards which might change the direction of the player both positively and negatively. As a result to this change the player will adopt new strategies and plans.
Predatory pricing “is alleged to occur when a firm sets a price for its product that is below some measure of cost and forfeits revenues in the short run to put competitors out of business” (Sheffet p.163-164). The reason firms take the short term loss is because they hope to drive out competitors and raise prices to monopolistic levels. By doing this, they covered their short term loss to make even greater profits in the long term than they would have by not using predatory tactics (Sheffert). Predatory pricing became illegal under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. It has remained one of the more difficult allegations for prosecutors to prove, due to the complexity of determining the company’s actual intent and whether or not it the strategy is competitive pricing. According to Areeda and Turner, there are three ways to determine if a firm is implementing predatory pricing. First, a price above marginal cost is presumed lawful; second, a price below marginal cost is considered unlawful, except when there is strong demand; and third, average variable cost is considered a good proxy for marginal cost. This is a reason predatory pricing is still important today. The courts must decide whether or not companies are engaging in competitive prices for the good of the consumers or are using predatory tactics for the good of their own company. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the current legislation regarding predatory pricing, determining when there is predation in an industry and the cause and effect relationship it has on an industry.
With supply solely, factors involved with regulation of the supply also control some aspects of demand. Things such as production costs and desired net profit can determine whether a business succeeds or not. Having a balance between quantity and price is the greatest control any business can have. Pricing is obviously one of the most beneficial, or destructive, parts of a business. Pricing is the first and most valuable thing an individual will look at, which will overrule most other judgments based off of quality and detail. Balancing the price, however, helps to create a pristine product, with just the right amount of detail that will fuel the market, while still generating a steady net income.
Perfect and monopolistic competition markets both share elasticity of demand in the long run. In both markets the consumer is aware of the price, if the price was to increase the demand for the product would decrease resulting in suppliers being unable to make a profit in the long run. Lastly, both markets are composed of firms seeking to maximise their profits. Profit maximization occurs when a firm produces goods to a high level so that the marginal cost of the production equates its marginal
Markets have four different structures which need different "attitudes" from the suppliers in order to enter, compete and effectively gain share in the market. When competing, one can be in a perfect competition, in a monopolistic competition an oligopoly or a monopoly [1]. Each of these structures ensures different situations in regards to competition from a perfect competition where firms compete all being equal in terms of threats and opportunities, in terms of the homogeneity of the products sold, ensuring that every competitor has the same chance to get a share of the market, to the other end of the scale where we have monopolies whereby one company alone dominates the whole market not allowing any other company to enter the market selling the product (or service) at its price.
An oligopolistic market has a small number of sellers dominating market share and therefore barriers to entry are high. These sellers are highly competitive and do not act independently of each other. Access to information is limited so sellers can only speculate of their competitor’s actions. Sellers will take advantage of competitor’s price changes in order to increase market share.
A monopoly is “a single firm in control of both industry output and price” (Review of Market Structure, n.d.). It has a high entry and exit barrier and a perceived heterogeneous product. The firm is the sole provider of the product, substitutes for the product are limited, and high barriers are used to dissuade competitors and leads to a single firm being able to ...
...n the companies will have to decrease the price otherwise the product will not be sold at higher prices and the revenue would not be as large as companies would like to.
...e enough because the company has chosen the best possible way to increase the company performance. The pricing strategy is the company’s best strategy from all because it affected the sales revenue a lot. Although fluctuating the price is quite risky for a business since the customers might order from other companies if the company doesn’t do it properly, but XXX Company manage to done it well so far. The effectiveness might also be seen by the average of sales revenue between January to August from 2011 to 2013.