Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social effects of industrialisation
Social effects of industrialisation
Social effects of industrialisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social effects of industrialisation
What would it be like to be in a man-made famine? The citizens of Ukraine went through a horrible period of time during the year 1932. Ukraine resolved that they wanted to detach themselves from Russia and become their own independent country, because they had their own unique cultures and histories. Therefore, Stalin the new leader of Russia decided he wanted to destroy all the people of Ukraine. But he didn’t do it in the usual way, like using an army. He cut off all the food and crops from them. Russia blamed many villages for keeping some of the grain, which caused a total lockdown for those villages. Russia also closed the borders between Ukraine and a mostly Ukrainian place called Kuban, and didn’t let any peasants pass through. This …show more content…
Ukraine, after a long time of being under the control of Russia, decided it wanted to be its own unique and independent country. Ukrainians voted in favor of granting greater sovereignty to their own republic while preserving the Soviet Union. (Special Report: Ukraine). It didn’t want to be a part of Russia’s extremely communist like government anymore. Nevertheless, detaching from another country never goes without consequences. Russia decided to retaliate by taking away almost all the crops that Ukraine had. They went to all the privately owned farms owned by rich farmers and confiscated all their crops. Every business was shut down, to not let food and goods get around. Soviet Russia didn’t want Ukrainians to leave their country, so they sealed the borders, in effect locking them inside. Russian also didn’t want the Ukrainians to rebel, so they kidnapped and killed all the scientists and professors in Ukraine. Alas, this was not enough to satisfy Russia. Stalin also targeted for extermination a group of wealthy Ukrainian farmers called the Kulaks, and brought about ten million of them to Siberia, where it is estimated that three million of them died (Howard Ball …show more content…
Ukraine decided to embrace a new system of management called collectivization, where everything like land was state owned, and not privately owned. With this in effect, the peasants and farmers started to farm the little land that they did have, and managed to grow sufficient food to be able to survive. Life became better and people started to produce more and more. Although the famine ended, that was not the end of the horror. After first welcoming the Nazis as their saviors, the Germans planned to kill all of the men in Ukraine over 15, but then they decided to put them in work camps, so that they would work to death, and murdered any Ukrainian accused of being a communist. When World War 2 finally ended, Ukraine went back to normal, started producing, and created a flourishing
...h case the government will be more inclined to respond to it because of this (Robinson 1-2). With Crimea now part of Russia, perhaps the people of Ukraine can have some self-determined actions.
Up until 1954, Ukraine was a crucial and highly profitable member of the USSR. Strategically placed between Russia and the rest of Europe, Ukraine contains many valuable natural gas pipelines. Crimea is autonomously governed peninsula owned by Ukraine, about two and a half time the sizes of the Island of Hawaii. There are roughly twice as many ethnic Russians as there are Ukrainians and the majority feel closer ties to Russia [1]. Anti-government protests turned violent and in late February, the Ukrainian government fired on protestors, killing dozens and wounding hundreds [2]. On March 6th, the leaders of Crimea stated that they intended to join Russia and are planning a vote on March 16th [3].
With the fall of the pro-Russian government Russia had lost basically a very important ally to the European Union and NATO. President Vladimir Putin took a great risk and invaded Crimea that resulted in strong reactions from the West. Even Russia’s closest allies supported the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
Holodomor is a Ukrainian word meaning “Genocide Famine” in English [holodomor.org]. The Holodomor ultimately began in 1928 when the then current leader of the Soviet Union Joseph Stalin introduced a program which would lead to the collectivization of agriculture within the Soviet Union. In order to do this, farmers would have to give up privately owned farms, livestock and equipment. These farmers would have to join state owned collective farms as they would no longer have their own farms to run. These collective farms would need to produce large amounts of grain along with feeding their own workers. Ukrainian farmers refused to join these farms, as they considered it a returned to the serfdom of centuries past. In response, Stalin
tried to destroy the Ukrainian nation, tradition and culture. They have been trying to do this
Stalin’s leadership of the Soviet Union can be best described as a period of terror and censorship. In other words, he was very strict, considering the fact that he created the totalitarian government. In order to create this type of government, Stalin used fear and propaganda. He took part in The Great Purge, which was a campaign of terror that was supposed to eliminate anyone who threatened Stalin’s power. He also relied on secret police, who would arrest and execute any traitors. The online blog, “The Reasons For the Failure of The Russian Revolution”, brings up information on how Stalin planned to rule as dictator of Russia. It has been noted, “This ‘reshaping’ had three main aspects: the elimination of all dissent; the liquidation of all forms of democracy and of working class organisation; the slashing of the living standards of the working class and the physical annihilation of millions of peasants” (Text 5). This quote explains how Stalin wanted to industrialize Russia, which includes the deaths of several peasants of Russia. The Russians did not just die from The Great Purge, but also from Stalin’s Five-Year Plan. The Five-Year Plan was an attempt to industrialize the Soviet Union. It was also a plan for increasing the output of steel, coal, oil, and electricity. He had control over economic resources, including farms and
People say that the Stalin’s Great Purges could otherwise be translated as Stalin’s Terror. They grew from his paranoia and his desire to be an absolute autocrat, and were forced to join the NKVD and public show trials. When someone went against him, he didn’t really take any time to do anything about it. He would “get rid of” the people that went against industrialization and the kulaks. Kulaks were farmers in the later Russian Empire.
middle of paper ... ... After everything was dying down, Russia invaded Ukraine, and they started to get Ukraine back on track to what Russia wants them to be. Everything then again gets way out of control, and Ukraine is still today very out of control, and all the people want Russia out of their country, but they do not want to attack because Russia is their main power source. Works Cited Crowley, Michael and Shuster, Simon.
Half a million died of hunger and disease throughout Eastern Europe, running from the fascists.
... then five more, one after another… they allowed themselves to eat those bodies… They said, ‘it was the great unbearable famine that did it.’” The struggle to find food was real. It was a heavy burden for people to bear. The need to stay a live became a daily struggle many civilian and soldiers.
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe, that borders Russia north and northeast. Lately Ukraine has been making international headlines; the country is in complete and total turmoil or for lack of better words a crisis. What started as a request from the Ukrainian citizens for a change in government, limited the powers of the president, restored the country's constitution back to its original form from 2004-2010, and closer ties to the EU. Peaceful protesting turned into a nightmare, when the then president of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych failed to make good on his word. Instead, he made a deal with the Russian president and later sought refuge in Russia.
In order for it to work, Russia had to become an industrial power at all costs. Stalin removed anyone he though could possibly turn against his plan and stay in the way. Over the next few years, he executed many of the old Bolsheviks who had led the revolutions as well as many military officers.
Furthermore, the Ukraine and Russia have always shared a history; as both states are embodiments of the process of transformation, that have risen from the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the end of the Cold War. The Ukraine’s material legacy is demographically and territorially close to Russia, thereby, tying the Ukraine to Russia.
Figures show that Ukrainian aid was 60% greater than the amount exported at the same time, and aid given to the worst areas of famine was over double the exports of the first half of 1933. In light of these facts, it is problematic to unambiguously accuse Stalin of deliberate killing or genocide. His purported response to the famine, which included large amounts of aid point toward the theory that the famines were a result of misguided policy and not an overall plan to put down Ukrainian nationality. One must however examine the reliability of the figures used (or not used) in Tauger’s work, more specifically in his choosing of some Soviet statistics as true and others as false. This arguably highlights a contradiction in his argument; it could be that both sets of figures are fabricated or neither, and henceforth the strength of his argument is somewhat