Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's rights essay example
Women's rights essay example
Women's rights essay example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the late 19th century and early 20th century, idea for the equality of women began to ignite a fire within the world. Women wanted to fight oppression and have a chance to experience the same rights as men. However, although suffragettes would not fight fire with fire until a couple of decades later, the idea of escaping societal roles and gain freedom within society and marriage possibly inspired literary works during this time period. These issues of the inequality between men and women in marriage and society plays strong roles in literary works. In “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen, “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell, and “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman all have something in common: the women are oppressed by the men and society, and ultimately pull away from their societal roles and break free.
In the year 1879, the infamous and controversial play, “A Doll’s House” was published to the world. The play is about the Helmers, a married couple who seem to have the perfect life of a happy marriage, loving children, and more money coming in from the husband Torvald. However, the audience learns that is not the case.
The play begins with Nora, the wife, arriving home from shopping. She quickly eats a few
…show more content…
macaroons and hides them. Torvald is in his study and from there he calls her domineering names such as his “little lark” and his “squirrel.” Torvald’s name calling towards Nora shows his possessiveness of her by calling her his, and the particular names he chose to call her are not names associated to those of intelligence. Squirrels are playful creatures and larks are wonderful singers, but are not considered to be that of intelligence (Ibsen 889). Torvald does not only call her little pet names, but teases her and interrogating her about eating macaroons when he had forbid them. “Surely my sweet tooth hasn’t been running riot in town today, has she?” he asked “shaking an admonitory finger.” He then continues to ask her if she had any sweets that day a way a father would ask his young daughter if he had caught her stealing cookies from the cookie jar (Ibsen 891). The relationship between Nora and Torvald does not seem one of a husband and wife, but rather one of a father and daughter. Torvald does not speak to Nora as though she is an adult and as though she is not his equal. She is essentially his little doll. This similarity of men controlling women is also seen in “Trifles.” Just like Nora, the women in this play are belittled by their male counterparts. In “Trifles,” the short play written in 1916 is about a woman who is named Minnie Wright. Minnie is accused of murdering her husband John Wright by wrapping a rope around his neck, however there is no proof that she had in fact killed him. In searching for answers, George Henderson (a country attorney), Henry Peters (the sheriff), Mrs. Peters (the sheriff’s wife), Lewis Hale (the neighbor who had found John dead in his bed) and Mrs. Hale (the neighbor’s wife) all go inside of the house and search. Henderson speaks lowly of Minnie Wright, commenting on how the house looks. “Not much of a housekeeper, would you say, ladies?” Henderson commented when he examined the house. During that time period, women were meant to be the housewife. Henderson was essentially belittling Minnie, because she “failed” at being a housewife (945). Furthermore, when Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are alone in Minnie’s kitchen while the men search for the house, they find a quilt that Minnie had been making and wondered if she was knotting the quilt. When the sheriff heard this, he made a comment as to where the women were foolish to worry about a quilt and laugh at them. The men laughing at the women in such a way and believe that they were of lesser intelligence shows the domineering attitude towards the women. They are mocking the women like they are children or unintelligent (947). In the play “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the narrator and her husband, John, move into a colonial mansion. John picked a room in which the narrator found to be scary. However, John claims that he is the practical one and that the room that they picked is good for the narrator’s health. John is a doctor, so apparently he is supposed to know all. The narrator enjoys writing, however, her husband does not want her to write, so she does it in hiding. Similar to Nora and Torvald, the narrator’s husband calls her his “little goose” and treats her as though she is extremely delicate (Gilman 956). The narrator is always trapped within the room and in the room is a disturbing yellow wallpaper in which the narrator begins to despise. She finds it scary and begins to believe that there is a woman trapped in the wallpaper. The narrator begins to feel trapped and her husband will not let her be free from the wallpaper. All of these women in this literary works, have been confined because of their husband and society, but have essentially pulled away from the controlling men and society.
In “A Doll’s House”, when Torvald learns of her secret affairs concerning Nora forging her father’s signature to get a loan to save Torvald’s life, he began to treat her horribly, insulting her in every way that is possible. In that moment, Nora realized that she could no longer live a life as Torvald’s wife anymore. He wanted to live a life in which no one in the society would know what had happened. They would act like they were a happily married couple in public, but in private they would act as though they were brother and sisters. Torvald cared about his image rather than
Nora. Furthermore, Nora realized that she had “duties to [herself]” and that she could no longer play the role as Torvald’s “lark” and little “doll.” Nora realized that “before all else, [she’s] a human being.” Nora, wanted to escape from not being a human being. Therefore, at the end of the play, Nora came to the realization that her life was not as happy as she thought it were and in reality she was not living at all. When she left her family she slammed the door shut so she could finally be free. Slamming the door was the signal that she was finally free (940). In “Trifles”, the women find a dead bird hidden within a box. The bird had a broken neck and before that they found a broken bird cage. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters came to the realization that John Wright was abusive to Minnie, and if they were in the same place, they would do the same thing. The women break away from the law and stick up for Minnie. Mrs. Peters hides the dead bird in her pocket, so the men will have no evidence to use against Minnie saying that she had killed her husband. Hiding the bird and lying for Minnie was the signal that they had broken free from the confinement of men controlling them (Glaspell 952). Lastly, as for the narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper”, she rips the yellow wallpaper apart, believing that she is releasing the woman that is supposedly trapped in the wallpaper. Tearing the yellow wallpaper up, was the narrator’s way to become free for herself. “‘I’ve got out at last,” said I, “in spite of you and Jane. And I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back!” Perhaps the narrator believed she herself was trapped in the wallpaper because her husband and kept her locked away in the room. This was her symbol for freedom (Gilman 967). These issues that were found in these plays explore life through the eyes of women during that time period when women were fighting for equality. These women had been confined from men and from society, but had broken away from it. These women yearned for a realization of freedom and they received it.
In the play “A Doll’s House”, marriage is merely a social formality. Torvald and Nora, husband and wife, share merely a few intimate moments throughout the entire novel and their relationship is devoid of any affection at all. The setting of the play “A Doll’s House” is 19th century Norway and the norms and beliefs of this era play a huge role in defining the role of Torvald as a husband, and Nora as a wife. The husband in this era is supposed to be the sole guardian of the house, responsible for taking care of the families financial requirements and ensuring a high standing for the family in society. Torvald believes that Nora is confined to looking after their children and basically taking care of the physical aspects of their household, and Nora feels so oppressed by her husband that she helps him in a time of dire need without even telling him. This incident occurs in the scene where Torvald falls dangerously sick and is too foolish to spend money on foreign treatment that could save his life, Nora sensing the grave danger goes behind Torvald’s back and collects money to save Torvalds life by committing the crime of forgery.
Throughout history, women have struggled with, and fought against oppression. They have been held back and weighed down by the sexist ideas of a male dominated society which has controlled cultural, economic and political ideas and structure. During the mid-1800’s to early 1900’s women became more vocal and rebuked sexism and the role that had been defined for them. Fighting with the powerful written word, women sought a voice, equality amongst men and an identity outside of their family. In many literary writings, especially by women, during the mid-1800’s to early 1900’s, we see symbols of oppression and the search for gender equality in society. Writing based on their own experiences, had it not been for the works of Susan Glaspell, Kate Chopin, and similar feminist authors of their time, we may not have seen a reform movement to improve gender roles in a culture in which women had been overshadowed by men.
Henrik Ibsen uses his play, A Doll’s House, to challenge the status of the typical marriage and question feminist equality. Ibsen makes an example of the Helmer marriage by exposing social problems within society. The play ends without any solutions, however, Ibsen does offer women possibilities. Nora is a heroine among women, then and now.
Nora is trying to keep something away from public knowledge and especially away from her husband. She hides the fact that she borrowed money to save his health. She was afraid that if Torvald knew that she had taken initiative to borrow money to help him that it would be "painful and humiliating"(Ibsen 501) for him. She knows that Torvald needs to feel in control of everything. So she hides her actions from him. & nbsp; Nora hides the fact that she has done something illegal from Torvald. She is given the opportunity to tell Torvald and maybe get his support or advise on the situation, and she lies to him to hide the truth. She claims that the reason that she does not want Torvald to fire Krogstad is that "this fellow writes in the most scurrilous newspapers.he can do [Tor could have told him, but instead she decided to hide the truth from her husband. & nbsp; She also hides her own strength. She plays the part that she has come accustomed to, being the doll. The first time in the play that Torvald refers to Nora, he calls her a "little lark"(Ibsen 493). Throughout the play, he refers to her as a cute little animal, never with any word that might her indicate that he wishes she were a little plaything of his. To fit this character, Nora hides her true strength until the end of the play. Nora says that "[she] must stand quite alone"(Ibsen 546) and leaves Torvald to be alone. Not only does Nora make the claim that she could stand alone, she follows it with an action, thus the audience knows that Nora can be stronger than she was appearing and that she must have been hiding her true & nbsp; Nora hides her ability to handle money. She does not let Torvald know that she is entirely capable of handling debt. Instead, she leads on that "[she] should not care whether [she] owed money or not"(Ibsen 493). Although she says that she would not care about being in debt, the audience learns that she is handling her own debt She leads on that she is the little doll who cannot handle anything. She hides her abilities from Torvald to be his little doll. & nbsp; The hiding and seeking of the characters in the play is reminiscent of the game that Nora plays with her children. In playing games like that with her children, Nora is also hiding from them and her job as mother. She likes to take off their warm outer clothing because "it is such fun"(Ibsen 506). She finds the job of mother fun.  507). The job of mother was no longer fun, so she abandons it. She uses the nurse to hide from the children that she gave birth to. & nbsp; Torvald also hides from his wife, Nora. He shares none of his work with Nora. They speak very little about financial matters. When they do talk, it is mostly silly talk not seriously about their financial situation. Their first conversation on stage is about money. He tries pitifully to talk to her seriously about money, but shillings-a pound-two pounds"(Ibsen 493). He gives her more money to make her happy instead of trying to work out their financial situation. Torvald hides business about money from Nora just like she hides from him. & nbsp; Torvald also hides information about his job from her. Nora barely knows what he does at his job at the bank. Nora asks Dr. Rank if "all the people who are employed in the bank dependant of Torvald now"(Ibsen 504). Nora knows that Torvald has had a promotion, but does not even know really what & nbsp; Nora knows that they are hiding from each other. She knows that she must hide from those around her to protect her way of life. Although she is talking to her children at the time, Nora's words can be applied to her actions throughout the play. Nora says, "Must I hide? Very well, I'll hide first"(Ibs hiding. The snares are hidden. & nbsp; Nora and Torvald both hide from each other. Although she hides from her husband, Nora starts seeking truth. She is playing the game on both sides. She hides and she seeks. She is trying to learn about life. Nora wants to find that there can be a life where she does not have to hide from the of another and inferior species, Woman"(Shaw 143). Nora wants to be able to stop hiding. To be able to do that, she must be treated like an equal. That is something that Torvald will not do for her. He will not "sacrifice his honor for the one he loves"(Ibsen 548). Torvald will not bear all of Nora's weight, even though him, and when that did not happen and she was abandoned, she must seek another life. She seeks a life where her sacred duties are "to [herself]"(Ibsen 546) before her husband and children. M. C. Bradbook acknowledges that "in leaving her husband Nora is seeking a fuller life as a human being"(87). Nora is leaving a life in hiding to find a life that is richer and more full & nbsp; The hiding and seeking that goes on in the play is far from over when Nora ends the game with the children. It started before then and finished only when Nora walked out on Torvald and her marriage. Nora hides her strength, knowledge and abilities from her husband. She does this because he could not handle having a peer as a wife. He given to the nurse and Nora is only left with playing with her children. The job of wife to Torvald is filled only with a hidden personality. He wishes something that he can call his own and protect with ease. Nora becomes a seeker when she realizes what kind of life she is leading with her husband. When she realizes what he seeks as a wife, she also realizes that she needs to find another life. The a sense of individuality. With leaving her husband, Nora gives the indication that she will no longer tolerate a way of life that forces her to hide.
The play starts with Hedda and George Tesman just returning from their honeymoon. We discover through George’s dialogue with his Aunt Julia, that the trip was
Nora is Torvald 's loving and childish wife, and unknowingly, a strong, independent woman. At the begging of the play Nora was playful and happy go lucky but at as the play continued she began to become a strong woman. Nora first impression on me was that she was obedient , childish wife who loved money. If Nora would buy something for the kids right after that she would ask Torvald for money. When her husband would ask her what she wanted for Christmas she say money. Torvald treated Nora like she was a little girl, or like she was an animal. "my little lark mustn 't droop her wings like that. What? Is my squirrel in the sulks?" (Ibesn842) . When he talks to his wife it seem like he is talking to a little girl. And he says that as he is giving her money which makes their interaction seem almost of a grown grandparent giving money to his precious, favorite young granddaughter. In their marriage Nora didn 't seem like a wife she just seemed like an objected.
..." A Doll's House," by Henrik Ibsen portrays the genders role of nineteenth century women and men in society. Torvald's perception of his wife of how she is a helpless creature shows the overall role which women fill. Women are responsible for the purity of the world through their influence in the home and through the upbringing of their children. They had to beg and ask for permission to do certain activities and essential things.
Throughout the play, an important cause of Nora’s change of thought was characterization. One example are the social roles of her time. How each character would like to be perceived and the image that society gives them, is one of the strongest forms of characterization. Torvald was the controlling husband and Nora was supposed to be the obedient wife. Nora did not enjoy these roles, which contributed to her change. In the play Torvald says “Of course, you will continue to live here. But the children cannot be left in your care. I dare not trust them to you” (Ibsen 40). Torvald was so obsessed with these social images, that he was willing to fake a relationship just so his image would not be ruined. This would anger Nora to the point of separation, as she did not want to put in the same amount of effort to please others and society.
Torvald was enraged, not at the fact that Nora obtained the loan, but at the fact that their home was filled with secret and lies. Torvald belittled Nora and discredited her ability to be a good mother to their children. The second envelope that Torvald opened was the bond for the loan in which Nora obtained. When Torvald realized that his reputation had been saved, he recanted all of his mean statements and tried to mend the damage he had caused. At this point, it was too late for Nora. Although she was upset with his words, she was more upset at the fact that she did not really know her husband, or herself for that matter. It was this enlightenment that Nora decided that it would be in the best interest of all involved for her to leave and try to find herself to be a better woman, mother, and potentially wife in the end. Torvald begged her to stay, but she couldn’t do it any longer. As she explained to Torvald, “Ah Torvald, the most wonderful thing of all would have to happen [for me to stay].”
In Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll House Ibsen describes the perfect family and the conflicts within. Ibsen examines the normal lives of the Helmer family through the eyes of the wife, Nora Helmer. She goes through a series of trials as she progresses through the play and with each trial she realizes something is missing in her life. Ibsen examines the struggles within the house.
Nora engages in a mutually dependent game with Torvald in that she gains power in the relationship by being perceived as weak, yet paradoxically she has no real power or independence because she is a slave to the social construction of her gender. Her epiphany at the end at the play realises her and her marriage as a product of society, Nora comes to understand that she has been living with a constr...
Those of you who have just read A Doll's House for the first time will, I suspect, have little trouble forming an initial sense of what it is about, and, if past experience is any guide, many of you will quickly reach a consensus that the major thrust of this play has something to do with gender relations in modern society and offers us, in the actions of the heroine, a vision of the need for a new-found freedom for women (or a woman) amid a suffocating society governed wholly by unsympathetic and insensitive men.
He specifically shows his selfishness in the way he treats Nora. First, he treats her more as child then an adult. At points, Torvald calls Nora names such as, “My little Nora” and “Little Miss Stubbornshoes” (35). Torvald’s relationship with Nora seems more like father and daughter, rather than husband and wife; and because of this Torvald doesn't treat Nora like a true husband should. Torvalds selfishness correlates with his love for Nora and the way he treats her. Torvald doesn't truly love Nora. Instead, he uses her as a decoration, making him feel good about himself and his appearance in society. In addition, his selfishness is shown when he receives Krogstad's letter regarding Nora's forgery. Torvalds self-centered personality can be shown as he accuses her of damaging his good name rather than being grateful for the loans. Instead of acting calm about the situation he insults Nora and screams at her. As Torvald expresses, “You’re speaking like a child. You don’t understand the society you live in” (64). He once again, refers to her as a child and attempts to remind Nora of the kind of society they live in, in efforts to not ruin his own reputation. In addition he says, “You that I carried with my two hands throughout our entire marriage. Do you understand what you’ve done to me?” (59) Ultimately he doesn't show love for Nora and instead selfishly blames her for jeopardizing
“A Doll House” by Ibsen exposes one of the main trials facing Nora and women of today that a lot of men tend to underestimate women. They assume that
In the beginning of the play, the reader is introduced to the Helmer household on Christmas eve; Nora purchases a Christmas tree to be used as the main ornament in the house and brings it in to be decorated. Shortly after, Torvald, her husband, approaches her by referring to her as his “little lark”(12) and his “little squirrel”(12). Shortly after, Torvald criticizes Nora for eating a macaroon: “Not nibbling sweets?..Not even taken a bite at a macaroon or two?”(14). Torvald “was only joking”(15). Perhaps it was the way the couple communicated at all times, but Torvald’s teasing is also manipulative. Nora seems to believe anything Torvald tells her; as naive as she is, she believes Torvald is only playing with her. However, as the man of the house, he does cause Nora to consistently ask for his approval, or fear his rejection: “I should not think of going against your wishes”(15), Nora says.