Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Link between society and self
Self - concept importance in society
Selfishness in humans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Link between society and self
Selfishness appears commonly in today's day and age. As William E. Gladstone, the Prime Minister of Great Britain says, “Selfishness is the greatest curse of the human race.” In the play A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen, each character represents a role in society. The protagonist in the story, Nora Helmer is married to a man by the name of Torvald. Torvald shows positive traits such as his caring personality. As Torvald says, “Nora, do you know that I’ve often wished you were facing some terrible dangers that I could risk life and limb, risk everything for your sake?” (57) He also shows negative traits and flaws. Torvald is a self centered man that only cares about his role and position in the society. Torvalds mistreatment of Nora displays …show more content…
He specifically shows his selfishness in the way he treats Nora. First, he treats her more as child then an adult. At points, Torvald calls Nora names such as, “My little Nora” and “Little Miss Stubbornshoes” (35). Torvald’s relationship with Nora seems more like father and daughter, rather than husband and wife; and because of this Torvald doesn't treat Nora like a true husband should. Torvalds selfishness correlates with his love for Nora and the way he treats her. Torvald doesn't truly love Nora. Instead, he uses her as a decoration, making him feel good about himself and his appearance in society. In addition, his selfishness is shown when he receives Krogstad's letter regarding Nora's forgery. Torvalds self-centered personality can be shown as he accuses her of damaging his good name rather than being grateful for the loans. Instead of acting calm about the situation he insults Nora and screams at her. As Torvald expresses, “You’re speaking like a child. You don’t understand the society you live in” (64). He once again, refers to her as a child and attempts to remind Nora of the kind of society they live in, in efforts to not ruin his own reputation. In addition he says, “You that I carried with my two hands throughout our entire marriage. Do you understand what you’ve done to me?” (59) Ultimately he doesn't show love for Nora and instead selfishly blames her for jeopardizing
When Nora decided to leave her marriage behind this ended up being a turning point in Torvald’s attitude to Nora. While at first he was convinced that she would not really go calling her actions insane and childish, he is now taking what she says seriously and even offering to change for her. This shows that there is a part of Torvald that does perhaps truly love Nora. Although Torvald doesn’t want her to go, the fact that he agrees to give her his ring and not argue with her shows that he finally respects her wishes and ability to make decisions for herself.
Torvald is the typical husband of the time of the play. He tries to control his wife and expect her to submit to him. He manipulates her through many different ways. First, he calls her pet names such as "little lark" (3) and "squirrel" (4) and speaks to her in a condescending tone, as if she is a child. He then tries to control her habits so he will not let her eat sweets or spend too much money. In fact, all the money she gets comes from him. He demands that she is subservient and treats her as almost a dog later on in the play. At the end, when Nora's secret is out, he lashes out at her and kicks her out of the house. When he wants her back after he realizes that he will no longer get into trouble for what she did, she does not want to come back, he finally realizes that she does not love him anymore and that his manipulation of her is over. This leaves him in a pickle because he now has to take care of his children without Nora, hardly a good position for him.
We see his a very controlling and almost derivative man. Nora is seen by him as an object, a possession like being that is just another piece of the puzzle that makes up his life. We realise that Nora is only in Torvalds’s life, not because he loves her, but because it was strict tradition to do so in this time. He rejects Nora and pushes her away from him with his sarcastic and derogatory comments such as pet
Nora had a secret that whole play that Torvald didn’t know about. Nora saved his life by taking him out on a long vacation away from everything so he could clear his mind at a very bad time. She told Torvald the money really came from her Papa. The money really came from a loan she took out from Kogstad that was forged. Krogstad was a former bank employee and long friend of Torvald’s. Torvald was very angry when he first found out of this because he was scared of his appearance, but when Krogstad met a old girl friend of his he didn’t worry about the loan.
In this world there are people who feel that their only duty is to themselves and have an excessive interest in this; we call them selfish or narcissistic. In the play A Doll House written by Henrik Ibsen, the main character Nora Helmer a normal housewife of the nineteenth century goes through a series of psychological and emotional realizations as well as a few unfortunate events. At the end of this process she decides to leave her home, her husband, and her children in order to go out into the world to discover who she really is. Now this isn’t shocking in the twenty-first century as wives and mothers walking out on their families has become a sadly common occurrence. However, when the play was written it sparked a great deal
This shows that Torvald is more interested in Nora physically than emotionally. He feels that it is one of Nora's main duties as his wife to physically pleasure him at his command.
Nora is Torvald 's loving and childish wife, and unknowingly, a strong, independent woman. At the begging of the play Nora was playful and happy go lucky but at as the play continued she began to become a strong woman. Nora first impression on me was that she was obedient , childish wife who loved money. If Nora would buy something for the kids right after that she would ask Torvald for money. When her husband would ask her what she wanted for Christmas she say money. Torvald treated Nora like she was a little girl, or like she was an animal. "my little lark mustn 't droop her wings like that. What? Is my squirrel in the sulks?" (Ibesn842) . When he talks to his wife it seem like he is talking to a little girl. And he says that as he is giving her money which makes their interaction seem almost of a grown grandparent giving money to his precious, favorite young granddaughter. In their marriage Nora didn 't seem like a wife she just seemed like an objected.
From the very start I had an adverse reaction to the way Torvald treated Nora. He was very controlling over her, and often spoke to her in a demeaning manner as if she was a child. I was compelled to read this play because I wanted to know what would happen if and when Torvald discovered Nora’s secret. He taunts her about the money she spends, and questions her about eating sweets that he doesn’t think she should. He refers to her as a “spendthrift” (Ibsen 1107), and speaks as though she is required to get permission to spend money. His reaction to learning the truth about what she had done was quite harsh. He was so angry that he did not give her any chance to explain herself. He was very unreasonable until the moment when he learned that her transgression would not become public, and his honor and reputation would remain in tact. All that mattered to him was “saving the bits and pieces, the appearance” (Ibsen 1148). He believed that his forgiveness was all she would need, but it was his understanding and protection that she was looking for. I applaud her decision to leave him so that she can gain her independence. What she needed most for her happiness was to be free from his
The effects of the societal roles in men and women from the 19th century are displayed through the actions and morals of the characters in Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House. The play demonstrates through its main characters the demanding norms of society. When one does not abide the Victorian society norms they are shunned, pitied and left with almost nothing. Ibsen’s humanistic side is seen through this play as he creates realistic problems for fictional people to suffer through So, the effects of societal roles are seen in the character of Nora Helmer, who is the obedient, naïve wife that finds her true self and decides to rebel against societal prospects. It is also observed in Torvald Helmer, who displays the qualities of the stereotypical male of the Victorian era and this display of societal norms affects Nils Krogstad, who went from accepting the social order to rebelling against for the sake of his family. Each of these characters helps understand the concept of societal expectations and struggles to achieve them.
Throughout the play, an important cause of Nora’s change of thought was characterization. One example are the social roles of her time. How each character would like to be perceived and the image that society gives them, is one of the strongest forms of characterization. Torvald was the controlling husband and Nora was supposed to be the obedient wife. Nora did not enjoy these roles, which contributed to her change. In the play Torvald says “Of course, you will continue to live here. But the children cannot be left in your care. I dare not trust them to you” (Ibsen 40). Torvald was so obsessed with these social images, that he was willing to fake a relationship just so his image would not be ruined. This would anger Nora to the point of separation, as she did not want to put in the same amount of effort to please others and society.
Nora is devoted to her family; she stayed by Torvald’s side when he was sick and she borrowed money to save him without telling him, fearing that it would hurt his pride. Then, when it is Torvald’s turn to play the hero, he readily trades their eight years long marriage for his reputation. As he puts it, “there’s no [man] who gives up honor for love” (Ibsen 939). His immediate reaction to Krogstad’s letter is to “hush up [the threat] at any cost [and] go right on living in this house [in order to save] the bits and pieces, the appearance” (Ibsen 934). The only worry that ever crosses his mind is how other people will judge him; he is willing to showcase his “doll-house” home just to maintain an image. If an eight years long marriage is less important than a man’s reputation/pride, then why is it sufficient to suppress a woman’s
Nothing can stop him doing it…” (II.49.23-24). She is convinced that his love for her will withstand his reputation in society. Nora in order to save his reputation had thoughts of killing herself and sparing him the mock of society. Nora’s thoughts of making the ultimate sacrifice for him shows the values she had regarding love. She is a person who goes against what society says in order to think of others. Torvald unlike Nora follows the rules of society and only believes in what is right for himself.
“I believe that first and foremost I am an individual, just as much as you are—or at least I’m going to try to be. I know most people agree with you, Torvald, and that’s also what it says in books. But I’m not content anymore,”(1017) bemoans Nora Helmer, the protagonist of the play, A Doll’s House, as she relinquishes social benchmarks by abandoning her husband. A Doll’s House, written by Henrik Ibsen, examines the central theme of individual desires conflicting with social ideals. In the play, A Doll’s House, Ibsen applies effective characterization to strengthen the characters; Kristine Linde, Torvald Helmer and Nora, which enable him to develop the fundamental theme. Ibsen develops the static characters; Kristine and Torvald, to establish
The right to act on one’s free will is the most basic of human necessities. To have that right disregarded is to take away a fundamental part of human individualism. “A Doll’s House”, Nora living in the constraints of a 19th century Victorian society has been refused the right to equality and free will. As expected of a woman she is not to have freedom to make her own decisions, she is expected to stay home, care for children and tend to her husbands needs, as well as to have no individual opinion (Mapaulita). Henrik Ibsen however has exploited literary devices throughout the play to accentuate how Nora’s role in society has changed and how her husband Torvald and Dr. Rank among other characters have
Without love a relationship would never even begin. The basis for Nora and Torvald's relationship appears to be centered around love, but this was not exactly obtained. Torvald doesn't really love Nora in a mature way; he just looks at her as another child. He has many nicknames for his wife including "lark" and "squirrel" which are small animals and used as symbols of foreshadowing. By using these symbols, Torvald looks at his wife as being smaller than himself and therefore easy to control. He always refers to Nora as my something. "Is that my little lark twittering out there?" and "Is it my little squirrel bustling about?" (438) He emphasizes the my' which makes him think that he owns his wife and he is in control of her. Calling his wife names such as skylark', squirrel', and spendthrift', Torvald does not love his wife with the respect and sensitivity a man should. He gives Nora an allowance but thinks she spends it frivolously. "What are little people called that are always wasting money? It's a sweet little spendthrift. One would hardly believe how expensive such little persons are" (439) Here, Nora is referred to as a small subordinate creature once again. Torvald is so concerned about...