Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transformational leadership literature review
Transformational leadership pros and cons
Comparing 6 Types of Leadership Styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transformational leadership literature review
There are two kinds of people in this world. No not entertainers and the ones that observe as Britney Spears has so kindly pointed out, but rather; followers or leader. There are so many styles in which a leader can lead a certain group of followers. The two most popular, common and most researched ones are transformational and charismatic leaders. Transformational and charismatic styles of leadership are widely known amongst philosophers. But which one is more effective? Transformational is definitely a better leadership style than charismatic, especially when dealing with and being in charge of a group of people or an organization. The three ways in which this can be proven is by studying the differences between each style in how they affect their followers, what their main focus is when working with a group of people or an organization, and their methods on empowering their followers.
There are so many kinds of leadership styles out there in this world and each one has diverse focuses and goals. Just the same, transformational and charismatic leadership styles differ as well. Transformational leaders tend to focus on the task at hand. They are very good with staying on task and keeping their eye on a goal that will benefit the organization and its followers. Changing Minds, a website that is highly resourceful on different leadership styles, states that “... [a] Transformational Leader will accept that there will be failures and blind canyons along the way. As long as they feel progress is being made, they will be happy.” Through this quote we can procure that these kinds of leaders greatly focus on achieving a goal that is for the better good for the organization and their followers. Bass states that the main objective for tra...
... middle of paper ...
...uired to be a transformational leader, because with those skills you can reach your goals with high degrees of success.
Works Cited
Wayne Ramsey. Transformational Leadership as an Effective Leadership Style. (2010, October 23). Yahoo Voices. Yahoo Contributer Network. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
Charismatic Vs. Transformational Leadership. (2011, April 5).Nccuorgbehavior. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
Transformational Leadership vs. Charismatic Leadership. (2011, April 3). danrobpadm4230blog. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
Lisa Mooney. The Disadvantages of Charismatic Leadership. (n.d.). Azcentral., Demand Media. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
Bass' Transformational Leadership Theory. (n.d.). Bass' Transformational Leadership Theory. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
Nguyen, S. (2010, November 26). Workplace Psychology. Workplace Psychology. Retrieved November 15, 2013.
Transformational leadership theory emphasizes on how a leader can acquire the ability to affect and motivate his followers to succeed beyond expectations. A transformational leader is one, whose vision for the future motivates and excites his followers. For this reason, a transformational leader is judged according to what he achieves as opposed to his character. Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter was the least charismatic leader of all the American presidents. However, his use of transformational leadership to develop his agenda and vision was unprecedented. Furthermore, a transformational leader is more likely to be effective in a chaotic environment. Carter was faced with a stagnant economy, double-digit inflation, and oil and gas shortages.
Transformational leaders exhibit personal and professional qualities that other want to emulate and follow. These leaders advance the mission in combative environments. Transformational leaders propel the growth of the team through communication. Finally, transformational leaders leave a legacy that instills pride, moral, and determination for future success.
According to Riggio (2009), the most popular theory of leadership is transformational. Many believe that these leaders get the job done through inspiring, modeling, and helping others develop their skills as leaders. Research provides clear evidence that groups lead by transformational leaders have higher levels of performance and satisfaction than groups led by other types of leaders (Riggio, 2009). Clear communication is vital to transformational leadership and in order to succeed further, one will need to work on their own skills, and set aside time and space for personal development (Manktelow, 2005).
“..the transformational leader articulates the vision in a clear and appealing manner, explains how to attain the vision, acts confidently and optimistically, expresses confidence in the followers, emphasizes values with symbolic actions, leads by example, and empowers followers to achieve the vision (Yukl, 2002)
Transformational leadership describes a leader moving followers beyond immediate self-interests through idealized influence (charisma), inspiration motivation, intellectual stimulation, or individualized consideration. Transformational leaders are change agents. They influence the mission and objectives to make way for a brighter future for the organization. Followers are motivated to do more than is originally expected because of their feelings of trust and respect for the leader.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership:: the Road Ahead. Emerald Group Publishing.
These leaders influence crowds of people who look up to them daily. Identically, transformational leaders care about each individual follower and help them become pro leaders themselves. Their charisma, support and strong speeches assemble encouragement
It has been stated how the transformational effect of charismatic leaders lead to increased follower motivation (Humphreys, 2009). Due to the various attributes that transformational leaders have, such as charisma and understanding, they are likely to motivate others to follow after the examples that they may display. There is also Effective followership. Effective followership prepares a person to be an Effective leader since being a follower is considered as a prerequisite to leading. According to Humphreys (2009), organizations are comprised of groups of followers and leaders, who are listening and taking direction from one
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
I see myself developing into this type of leader by working to create valuable and positive change and empowering others to become leaders that also create valuable and positive change that they believe in. I will empower others to gain a sense of identity and self to the mission, be a role model that inspires others, challenge others to take ownership of their work, and provide understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of others. To be a transformational leader I will need to display the ability to communicate clearly, listen, collaborate, empower, build strong healthy relationships, and provide others with intellectual stimulation.
As stated in Discourses of Charisma: Barack Obama’s First 6 Months as President of the USA, “charismatic leadership can be divided into ethical and unethical charisma” (Takala, Tanttu, Lamsa, & Virtanan, 2013, p. 155). For the above noted reason, the charismatic leader is heavily reliant on impression management, resourcefulness, and manipulation. When considering methods to garner production and increase performance, then, the charismatic leader seeks domination as a means to complete self-interest for their own purposes. This observation is in stark contrast to the individual consideration exhibited by the transformational leader and the characteristic of servitude from the servant
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
Treatment of Change and Expansion in Lotos-Eaters and Rip Van Winkle. During the Victorian Era, great accomplishments led to prosperity for the British Empire. Accomplishments include owning nearly a quarter of the world’s land and its people. As a result, trade and commerce expanded, and Great Britain reached the height of its power.
According to McLaurin & Al Amri (2008) charismatic leaders can be defined as those who have a high self confidence, a clear vision, engage in unconventional behavior and action as a change agent, and while remaining realistic about environmental constraints. When you hear the names President Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King Jr., Mother Theresa, Adolf Hitler or Larry Ellison; whether or not one can categorize their leadership style, most people are familiar with the effect that these leaders have had on society or business. These leaders have demonstrated qualities that have caused them to be known as “charismatic leaders.”