Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Toulmin argument essay
Toulmin argument essay
Elements of a toulmin argument
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Toulmin argument essay
One of the argumentative styles we are using in this class is the Toulmin argument. The Toulmin argument has six parts: claim, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal and qualifier. The first step is to develop a claim which is what you will be arguing. In this section you use your thesis statement, this specifies the purpose of your article. For example “Gambling should be legalized because there is a demand for it, fans will become more involved and it will help our economy.” The writer needs to have a strong claim to set his/her essay into action. After the claim comes data and the evidence to back up your argument. The evidence could be stats, graphs or statements supporting you claim. “In the United States it is estimated five-hundred billion …show more content…
Although evidence from other authors is important, it is essential to have the paper be for the most part your own thoughts. Quotes, summaries and paraphrases all need to be used properly in order for your essay to be the best it can be. A quote is a word-for-word statement from another author. When a writer wants to use a quote they must have quotation marks indicating a quote and a citation to give the author of the statement credit. When a writer paraphrases, he takes a quote and changes it into his own words. A quote and paraphrase are both taking idea from the original author but a paraphrase is in the words of the writer. A summary is when the writer changes a paragraph or large section of an author’s article and puts it into his own words. Similar to a paraphrase, a summary is just a larger portion of the article. In the article I read, I took a quote from the third paragraph on page 437, “Because of the unpredictability of competition results, sports events have always been an attractive medium for betting” (Connaughton, et al., 437). My paraphrase: Betting on sports as always drawn in gamblers because of the uncertainty and different factors that go into winning and losing (Connaughton, et al., 437). My summary from the same article: Over the years, wagering on sports has become an increased hobby to have fun and make money, but little research has been done in sport management literature. Conlisk’s (1993) idea on the value of sports betting led to a model of demand for sport gambling based on the economic means that people play for. In this study, we have examined the model and found the experiment helped to find sports gambling purposes. We have found gambling consumers are motivated by different factors including market variables. We have used the model constructed to view draw-to-draw sales of the Shengfu game, a popular sports lottery in China. Analyses over time showed:
As students we are taught that in order to have an effective argument, we need a claim, reasoning, and evidence. When comparing, “Two Years Are Better than Four” by Liz Addison, and “Colleges Prepare People for Life” by Freeman Hrabowski it was made obvious that the passage written by Addison had a more effective argument because of the passages claim that was clear to the readers, great reasoning and evidence that backed up her claim.
For most writers, we must know the different types of argumentation styles along with logical fallacies. There are three main types of argumentation styles including: Aristotelian, Rogerian, and Toulmin. All three styles have their own argumentation spin on arguments. Aristotelian refutes the opposing claim while at the same time promoting its own argument by using supporting evidence. Some of that evidence includes using rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos. A Rogerian arguments are the arguments that find the common ground in order for an effective argument. Last but not least there is the Toulmin argument, the Toulmin argument is similar to the Aristotelian argument yet instead of appealing to the audience Toulmin focuses
Former NFL linebacker, Leon Searcy said, “Guys competed just as hard off the field as they did on the field.” Corben includes anecdotal evidence and expert opinions to strength the idea of more money more problems. The sports industry uses meritocracy, the payment method of how well you play is how well you get paid. A large portion of athletes don’t get paid in the millions but buy like they do. Because of this spending technique many live paycheck to paycheck which is an example of expert opinion. An example of Corben using anecdotal evidence is when he included the story of Mike Tyson, Mike had multiple tigers and got sued because a man got mauled. Corben included this evidence to prove to the audience having nice, expensive things don’t always have a nice outcome. A particular athlete wrote a check to a credit card company for $108,000 for one month. With big bucks, it becomes easy to swipe the card. This anecdote strengthens Corben’s argument by giving a personal
Argumentation has followed humans from the dawn of time as a way for us to express our ideas and for our ideas to be heard. People naturally obtain the knowledge to persuade others, either backing their opinions by fact or touching others emotionally, from growing up and through their own experiences in life. We can be persuaded by a numerous amounts of different factors pertaining to the argument. There are four different types of strategies in which an argument can be presented and make the argument effective. Martin Luther King is a key example of the utilization of the strategies as he wrote, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and Nicholas Carr also portrays the strategies with his essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Both authors perfectly
There are many examples of strong argumentative writing in the second half of the book Everyday Arguments. Topics of writing examples include today’s college student, the internet, sports, earning your living, diet, and reading popular culture. Of the writings, two stood out as notable works to be critiqued; Who is a Teacher, and Thoughts on Facebook.
The author's purpose has certainly been achieved, as his arguments are logical and objective. He builds his arguments through verifiable evidence, that primarily involves reference of other literary works or people, in order to draw out a logical conclusion. His arguments has persuaded me into thinking that cheating has not only been widespread and accepted in America but it has also penetrated into Canada. I am able to support my opinion since I myself have experienced foul play at my regional soccer games. Moreover, the final sentence of the essay where the author mocks Pooley for believing "sports should not be immoral rather it should be fun" creates a balanced persuasive effect with a bit of sarcasm.
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
The claims I make in my paper are both argumentative and relevant to my thesis. One of the Course Outcomes is to “Construct academic arguments using sound claims and appropriate evidence.” My first sub claim explains that despite the narrator’s many accomplishments in life he makes a complete circle back to “the trap” of Harlem. I used examples of the narrator’s accomplishments from the story and quotes that indicate
Summarize what you think is the most important information in the article. You should include details and examples from the article. Also, identify any inferences or conclusions that this article makes.
You did an excellent job of explaining all the aspects of the Toulmin argument, which gives me and the rest of your audience total clarity. Where you go into depth of what each paragraph is for and entails, which is very helpful. In which I totally agree with all of your explanation of what is supposed to be included in the Toulmin argument, when writing an essay. Therefore, the depth that you write about the Toulmin argument is useful, along with being valuable to your audience. However, with your explanation of the example, I thought that it could be more specific. Since the example you choose is a more hypothetical one, rather than an example from modern day politicians or one from an actual company. In addition, I think it would be more
Epstein really thought through his evidence and his work reflects off in the editorial as it is very convincing. But to make it exceptional, Epstein can include the advantages of sport specialization to show the readers both sides of the argument. When an author presents both sides of an argument and presents their side, it will more over reflect author's maturity and increase the article's reliability. Especially when talking to a wide range of audience that can disagree with your standing, it is more advantageous to ease into the argument by recognizing both sides of the argument. Adding on, he can also use personal accounts of kids who either hyperspecialized and caused detrimental effects or how kids who diversified and had much success in their lives. These stories and counterarguments make Epstein's claim that sport specialization leads to many health injuries and no real benefit in skills or technique more connected and
When talking about an argument, it should be written in a manner that unfolds both the strengths and limits of the argument. The point of an argument is to come to a conclusion as close to the truth or realistic solution. In the twentieth-century, British philosopher Stephen Toulmin asked the question of where is the love and what are the uses of an argument. Stephen Toulmin then conducted a method constructing and analyzing an argument. This method, named after Stephen Toulmin, is called the Toulmin model. The Toulmin model involves breaking down an argument into six basic parts, looking at all supporting points and views both for and against the argument.
The Toulmin method effectively analyzes and dissects different parts of arguments and allows people to form judgements on how well the different parts of the arguments work together. “Is Education Primarily the Result of Influences Other Than School” analyzes the roles that specific factors play in the education of individuals, specifically the role that school plays. The author effectively explains their warrant and coherently presents the claim. This argumentative paper does not provide adequate evidence to support its claim, does not utilize qualifiers, and does not provide sufficient rebuttals to counterarguments.
...ragraphs that support the argument. The easiest part of this component was actually inserting it in my essay after I understood the purpose for it, because at the beginning I was confused on the whole thesis concept. The thesis was the most challenging because I kept asking myself "Can I really argue this for five to six pages?" and also "Is this even considered a thesis statement?" I noticed that I can speak and write more effectively when I'm thinking critically and intellectually. My sentence structure has always been strong and I feel it has grown because of the practice we have had in class with finding thesis statements in our readings. My overall issue with this component of the writing process is using a justifiable argument and remembering to support my argument with claims and trying not to put unnecessary points in my paper while maintaining my ethos.
SOURCES: You will need to incorporate at least four (4) of these sources into your essay. If you use too few sources, your own argument will appear uninformed and superficial. If you use too many sources, your own argument will get lost in the clamor of all those other voices. The trick is to use enough sources to prove that you’ve read about and thought through the issue, which includes using sources to support your position and sources to offer counterarguments to your position. Four sources is a good target number to find that balance