Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elements of a toulmin argument
Elements of a toulmin argument
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elements of a toulmin argument
You did an excellent job of explaining all the aspects of the Toulmin argument, which gives me and the rest of your audience total clarity. Where you go into depth of what each paragraph is for and entails, which is very helpful. In which I totally agree with all of your explanation of what is supposed to be included in the Toulmin argument, when writing an essay. Therefore, the depth that you write about the Toulmin argument is useful, along with being valuable to your audience. However, with your explanation of the example, I thought that it could be more specific. Since the example you choose is a more hypothetical one, rather than an example from modern day politicians or one from an actual company. In addition, I think it would be more
interesting to see your actual opinion on the Toulmin argument instead of just stating what is inside of the model. For example, you could write about what sections of the Toulmin model help you map out your argument. Despite in your response, in my opinion, not including enough about your own personal view on this model your response was still a helpful one for myself and others. Since you provide a thorough explanation of what a Toulmin argument, myself and others feel knowledgeable about it. All in all you do a substantial job in explaining the outline of the Toulmin argument, however I thought you could have made your example more specific and state more of your opinion.
The tone of this essay is largely persuasive but turns sarcastic as it progresses towards the end. His unique use of diction clearly supports the persuasive tone to his readers. The author's use of the word "tongue-lashing", to describe the way a soccer player "may find himself writhing under a coach's tongue- lashing", gives a harsh impression that the players are forced to cheat like slaves were forced to work. Secondly, the use of over exaggerated adjectives such as "astronomical salaries" is overblown to a point where the reader starts to agree with his arguments. The use of his harsh words and exaggerated adjectives gives insightful depth to his arguments, and in return consistently supports his persuasive tone. His syntax supports his tone as well, since he gives out his own biased opinion to prove h...
Consequence argument means taking a radical claim between compatibilism and determinism. Compatibilism is the free will to do whatever one wishes to do because it is in their own nature. In the free will debate of “Consequence Argument,” Peter van Inwagen, the author of An Essay on Free Will, takes on a compatibilist view by arguing that determinism is not true because one cannot be held responsible for their own actions. Determinism is the belief that human actions or free will have either a positive or an effect in the future. John Martin Fischer, professor of philosophy at the University of California, takes on a determinist view by arguing that compatibilism is never true because one must be held responsible for their own actions. Between both views on compatibilism and determinism, I will explain how the Consequence Argument can be challenged.
Sometimes my professors asked me to write this type of essays. However, I do not think that I wrote them correctly. Because I did not know the structure of this essay. Also, I did not know how to discuss
This essay was convincing. Staples uses the facts to support his arguments. For instance, everything was superior ten years ago and now it is terrible. Getting an A for any classes was so complicated which gave the students high value.
Your paper could have been stronger if you had used quotes to back up your ideas.
In this essay, I attempted to combine two sources and analyze them each by itself first and then combine it at the end. I think I did a good job analyzing and interpreting what Ellen DeGeneres was saying in her article. This essay was more difficult than the other essays for me because it is hard to apply the examples and try to combine two different sources to make a compare and contrast paper make sense.
After using the toulmin model for my essay, I believe without a doubt that it is one of the simplest ways to create a strong, clear argument. Its strength lies in how basic the structure is. Often, when someone attempts to make an argument, it comes out disorganized. They failed to address a counterargument. They failed to explain how any of their data matches their argument. The order in which they presented their information was generally illogical and confusing, the information simply spills out. While one could attribute this to having a structure in general, the toulmin argument actively encourages a writer or speaker to plug any holes in their argument. Inherently, the author has to explain their points, then they have to explain how
The toulmin model is an effective method of argumentation used to persuade others through evidence and reasoning. A successful argument must consist of a claim, qualifiers, grounds, warrants, backing, and a rebuttal. I learned how by using the Toulmin model, it allows me to address my opinions in a complete and organized way. I also learned how important it is to include grounds, warrants, and backings and lacking one of these factors will weaken my argument. Additionally, rebuttals and qualifiers also make an argument more valid because it explores counter arguments and explains why the author’s opinion is more justified than the opposing argument. The toulmin model is popular and is used commonly by politicians in order to argue controversial
Did you find the argument persuasive? Why or why not? If you were in charge of editing this example, what would you change? What would you keep the same?
One of the argumentative styles we are using in this class is the Toulmin argument. The Toulmin argument has six parts: claim, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal and qualifier. The first step is to develop a claim which is what you will be arguing. In this section you use your thesis statement, this specifies the purpose of your article. For example “Gambling should be legalized because there is a demand for it, fans will become more involved and it will help our economy.” The writer needs to have a strong claim to set his/her essay into action. After the claim comes data and the evidence to back up your argument. The evidence could be stats, graphs or statements supporting you claim. “In the United States it is estimated five-hundred billion
In the article, “Raise Wages, Not Walls,” The Toulmin Method is effectively used, to an extent, to prove their point and position. The position that the authors, Michael S. Dukakis and Daniel J. B. Mitchell are evidently in favor of “raising the minimum wage from $5.15 per hour” to a significant increase of eight dollars (Dukakis & Mitchell, 2006). The authors does a poor job of providing the claim, a position being argued for because they do not clearly state it initially. For example, the authors state that the Senate’s approach to immigration is “more realistic” than the House of Representatives’ approach, which is to build a wall (Dukakis & Mitchell, 2006). This statement can easily be mistake as the claim. The authors’ use of claim is not adequate because it is not easy to ascertain within the article, but can be found with the use of context clues. The claim is of six Toulmin Model-Parts which are the claim, grounds, warrant, backing, rebuttal/reservation and qualifications. Typically the claim is followed by grounds, or supporting evidence, to support the position of an author or authors. This
If anything, the most revealing facet of this particular research assignment was that I had to tackle the research from both the concurrent side and the opposing side of the argument. Due to the complex nature of the topics provided for this assignment, it required deeper analysis and quantity of research to pull an unwavering argument together. Being so, I had to be sure to gathering information from many different source types, with many different directions in tackling my chosen topic in order for me to provide a multifaceted argument. After collecting the necessary resources (i.e. reaching the source minimum for this assignment), I found myself needing to gather more information because as I started to write the original draft, I realized that I had too many patches that needed to be filled within my argument. It took more digging and precise investigating to find more resources to each claim I looked to
However, while writing the argumentative essay, it took much more than just asking myself a simple question. Since the topics of my body paragraphs were so diverse, I was forced to work harder at picturing the connections between all three of them. While I knew writing the process essay was difficult, when I began writing the argumentative essay, I knew it was going to be much more challenging. Nevertheless, after the paper was finally complete, my ability of writing transitional sentences was increasingly better due to the difficulty. Furthermore, I never would have examined so closely how to relate the ideas of college athletes’ monetary compensation to lawsuits being filed over disputes of unfairness (“Paying College Athletes” 3). Not only did the process essay help further my knowledge of transitional sentences, but the argumentative pushed it to the next
An inadequate essay is described to have poor organization, confusing logic, and many grammatical errors, etc. I believe that by these requirements my essay definitely falls under successful. My essay does not have poor organization and I tried my best to place each paragraph to where it correlates to the paragraphs before and after it. While I may have a few grammatical mistakes they are not great enough nor poor enough to classify my essay as inadequate because despite these few errors my essay still manages to make complete sense. The logic I used in my essay is perfectly understandable among many people. The logic I used basically states that smoking is bad and harms people in many ways. I backed up my logic with credible evidences to show that many other people understand and agree with the logic I used in my
The rhetoric for this argument letter was very important since I was writing to my towns First Selectman. In this piece, I met the learning outcome 1a, since I was able to recognize it called for a a specific type of writing because of the certain rhetorical situation. Before writing, I thought about my audience, the purpose and context of the piece and picked how to express my ideas accordingly. Since the First Selectman’s job is to deal with town members, I knew he must get many emails and calls from people everyday. I wanted to create something easy yet effective for him to read. I didn’t want to write an essay because that would have been a very ineffective method of getting my argument across. Instead, I chose to write a letter, which goes along with learning outcome 2b. I believe a letter was a good format to write my argument in because I was able to be formal enough to be taken seriously, yet I didn’t seem too serious, as I would have, if I wrote my argument as an essay. While revising this piece, I