Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing 2 movies essay
Comparitive essays with movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing 2 movies essay
1. Steven Pinker opens his essay with scenes from the movie Tootsie to show his argument that people work around what they really mean when talking to others, yet we all want the full truth and also a fake truth when speaking to someone even if all we say is the fake truth when speaking to others. The scene from the movie at the beginning of the essays allows readers a chance to see humor, but also have a glimpse at what we as people do every day when we speak with someone. We all are guilty of saying one thing we want but not truly wanting it when the time comes. If Pinker would have just started his essay with the third paragraph that included his main argument, the point would not have been as clear and easy to understand as it was with the movie scene reference. The movie scene added real life relativity to the essay, and allowed readers to see what Pinker’s argument meant without having to think about a situation where his argument is …show more content…
true. 2.
The quote by Pinker that states, “Such hypocrisy is a human universal,” is a way of saying that people will always be hypocrites. Hypocrisy is in human nature that we can say or want one thing, but do the complete opposite. It has been this way for years among human beings and it never changing. Pinker is not trying to be critical when saying this line in any way. He is simply stating the truth in human nature and what we do on an everyday basis. In my opinion, Pinker is completely correct in his words about human nature. Humans have always been hypocrites and it is something most of us cannot control for many reasons. He is just one of the few people to openly state his feelings about human’s habits. No human can honestly say that they have never been a hypocrite during their lifetime. Many people do not even realize when we are being a hypocrite because it is the type of world we grew up in. Hypocrisy is among us and there is no way of changing it because we say we want it to end, but would never actually try and end
it. 3. When a person asks someone to pass the salt they are conveying a message while negotiating a relationship. This is done by the person saying what they want, the salt, but not in a demanding way of getting what they want, could they pass the salt, and this allows for a person to get what they want without ruining a relationship by sounding demanding. A simple please in a question allows for a person to continue their nice relationship and receive what they want as well. I do this in almost everyday life when I ask my parents for something. It usually is a ride to a friend’s house or if they could go get me food. I simply say, “Could you please take me to so and so’s house?” My parents respond in a positive way because I did not make it a demand for them to bring me. I keep manners involved in the task that I want to be completed by them, and it makes them feel better about doing it because they do not feel forced into doing something. Politeness and a simple question makes people feel as if they are in control of the situation when it arrives, but they are really doing what a person wanted done all along.
The article, “Girl Moved To Tears By 'Of Mice And Men' Cliffs Notes,” published by The Onion, argues through its satire that people shouldn’t cry over the dry, analyzed parts like the summaries and that they should read the book instead. The type of satire used to develop the thesis is horatian and a satirical device used to develop the thesis is irony. The article is filled with verbal irony with direct quotes from Weaver like “‘I never wanted the synopsis to end’” and from her professor that said, “this was not the first time one of his students has expressed interest in the novel’s plot summary.” The target of the satire are students who read summaries rather than the entire book and the purpose is to encourage students to read the book rather than Cliff Notes to get all the information. The opposing argument is that sources like Sparknotes and Cliff Notes can actually help a student if they don’t understand something they just read or if they are under a time crunch.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
Joy Harjo uses a metaphor throughout the memoir Crazy Brave , in order to express her emotions about how she feels about art, her classmates , and the books she has read .
To begin, the article, “Elephants Can Lend a Helping Trunk” by Virginia Morell, had information that was presented in a very lighthearted and formal way. Even though the author conveyed the information in a cheerful manner, she still got the point across in a very informative and intellectual way. The article reads, “Elephants know when they need a helping hand-or rather, trunk...To test the elephants’ cooperation skills, a team of scientists modified a classic experiment first administered to chimpanzees in the 1930s, which requires two animals work together to earn a treat. If they don’t cooperate, neither gets the reward,” (Morell Paragraph 2). This quote demonstrates the fact that the author used the technique of adding humorous sentences when appropriate or needed to break up all the important information she was saying. Not only did she include amusing phrases, but she included sentences that were relevant to the experiment and the overall topic of the article. Next, in the video, “Elephants Show Cooperation” which was presented by Discovery News, the tone was very cheerful and informative. The narrator in the film said the information in a very light and happy way, so it made the reader want to listen to what he was saying. Also, the way that he conveyed the information in a very easy manner was beneficial to the audience because they could understand the point he was trying to get across. Not only did the author relay the information in a light and pleasant way, but he also did so in a way that was informative. He gave the reader a wide variety of information to take away about the experiment, and it really allowed the audience to envision what the whole test looked like. Finally, in the passage, “Elephants Know When They Need a Helping Trunk in a Cooperative Task” by Joshua M. Plotnik, the tone was very serious, yet factual. The
Throughout the course of this novel, Ishmael Beah keeps the readers on the edge of their seat by incorporating interchanging tones. At the beginning of the novel, the tone can be depicted as naïve, for Beah was unaware to what was actually occurring with the rebels. Eventually, the tone shifts to being very cynical and dark when he depicts the fighting he has endured both physically and mentally. However, the most game changing tone is towards the end of the novel in chapters nineteen and twenty. His tone can be understood as independent or prevailing. It can be portrayed as independent because Beah learns how to survive on his own and to take care of himself. At the same time, it is perceived as prevailing and uplifting because Beah was able to demonstrate that there is hope. Later in the novel, Beah travels to
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
This scene, of escalating argument, presents a different type of humor. While the first was a slapstick, exaggerated and dark humor, the argument is more sarcastic, intelligent and cutting.
I realized that sometimes it is fine for things to just be, and I don’t know why. Much of the film has to do with how we think, and what we do in private. Collectively, through these moral and ethical acts (or lack thereof) we can impact the public. Also, by sharing these thoughts and concepts with the public in the documentary, it can affect our thoughts and actions in our private lives; I know it has, at least for myself. One of the earliest topics in the film that I took note of was the ethics of certain matters, in a way that I had never considered before.
Nothing But The Truth is a book written in many different parts from teachers, students, and newscasters. Due to this, readers can see how different people tell the same story. For example, in a conversation between Philip's parents and him about Miss Narwin yelling at him, Phillip explains the incident as, “Yeah. Right. Hum. No big deal.” (Avi 53) Whereas the principal, Dr. Panelli explains Phillips punishment to his mom as, “Disturbing a class.” (Avi 84) Phillip explains his side as a less disastrous action in order to make himself look right. Dr. Panelli also tries to make himself look right by accusing Phillip in a more harsh way. Both of these character apply their opinion to the truth to make themselves look superior over one another. Miss Darwin's point of view on this event varied from the others. She was on the fence. She thought Phillip was just trying to make an incident and something must’ve been bothering him at home. She thought it was rude and distracting to the class but at the same time did not blame it on Phillip. She chose to be lenient to both sides to look superior to both opinions already presented. The different point of views presented in Nothing But The Truth evidently led to the theme of the
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
In a quote by John Mill, “Does fining a criminal show want of respect for property, or imprisoning him, for personal freedom? Just as unreasonable is it to think that to take the life of a man who has taken that of another is to show want of regard for human life. We show, on the contrary, most emphatically our regard for it, by the adoption of a rule that he who violates that right in another forfeits it for himself, and that while no other crime that he can commit deprives him of his right to live, this shall.” Everyone’s life is precious, but at what price? Is it okay to let a murderer to do as they please? Reader, please take a moment and reflect on this issue. The issue will always be a conflict of beliefs and moral standards. The topic
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
In conclusion, there are lots of stereotypes in this movie; stereotypes about countries, foreign people, immigrants, and disabled people. The film criticizes those stereotypes in the society and it shows how communication interacts within stereotypes. Severance of the communication comes from stereotype, and stereotype comes from the severance of communication. Nevertheless, the film explains that we would be able to communicate with each other if we do not judge people by their appearance.