Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why not banned the to kill a mockingbird
Impact of media on Society
Impact of media on Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why not banned the to kill a mockingbird
Kids love freedom. They thrive on it. It’s a part of growing up. The older and more responsible you are the more freedoms you will get. Parents at a variety of schools are restricting the one freedom of children that they should always have. The freedom to chose a book. A number of schools have banned the classic, award winning book “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee. This book is about a little girl who’s father is defending an African American man in court in the south during the 1930’s. Sounds harmless? Many don’t think so! “To Kill A Mockingbird” should not be be banned because it tells an important fictional story about America's past. One of the reasons To Kill a Mockingbird was banned is because in this book they talk about rape. A man is being accused of rape ,and they do talk in detail about the alleged rape at the trial. Rape is by no means encouraged in this book. The …show more content…
topic of rape is talked about in a very respectable and mature way. This is topic that is commonly talked about on the news, on a daily basis. Many kids watch the news, but the news is not banned for talking about rape, so why should this book be. Rape is also talked about on popular television shows all the time. An example is Law and Order: Special Victims.This show talks about rape cases as well, and goes in detail about how the rape occurred. Today's youngsters are still allowed to watch that ,so why can’t they read this book. Are you noticing a pattern here? Another reason this book is banned is for the racism displayed by the characters throughout the writing. This book does contain racism, but in the 1930’s in the south that is just how it was. Most people thought that Caucasian people were better than African Americans. This book does however have the antagonists participating in racism, and no one wants to be a villain they all want to be the heros. Kids in America know that this was our past ;they need to realized we learned from it. Racism is also displayed in many other books and movies such as The Help which many students have watched. The number one reason for this book being banned is the language and racial slurs.
The racial slurs in this book include “nigger” , “whore-lady”, “damn”, and etc. These terms are rather harsh, but are not just found in this book. The “N” word is a popular word used in lots of r&b, hip-hop, and rap music. This term is used in racists context in music that is popular with teenagers. Profanity appears in many television shows that air on television that are popular with teenagers,preteens, and even elementary school children. An example of some of these shows are “Gotham” and “Pretty Little Liars”. These were common terms used in this time period as well. Mrs. Lee was just staying true to the time period. As you can now see “To Kill A Mockingbird” should not be be banned because it tells an important fictional story about America's past. This book does contain rape, violence, and foul language. The author is keeping true to the time period. Also these kind of things are seen in the world on a daily basis. Us children should not be sheltered from these kind of serious
topics.
Mark Twain once said, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it.” However, some of his books, such as Huckleberry Finn, were often banned for irrational reasons. Like Huckleberry Finn and many other books, To Kill a Mockingbird (TKaM) has also been unreasonably banned in many places. I firmly believe that TKaM, like any other book, should not be banned because it is a timeless classic that teaches positive morals and contains many important lessons. TKaM is a very skillful book that explores many significant themes.
Famous author Stephen King said in his book On Writing: a Memoir of the Craft that “ Every book you pick up has its life lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (King 145), but unfortunately not everyone agrees. In today's world, people are becoming more and more easily offended by simple things like the subjects in classic literature, for example To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, and are even trying to ban it in a classroom setting. However, To Kill a Mockingbird should continue to be taught in schools because it positively affects society by changing the way people think about the world, through a very historically accurate setting, and by teaching its readers valuable lessons.
Why should To Kill a Mockingbird be published? One good reason is because To Kill a Mockingbird is a great read about the human dignity that connects people of all sorts. It helps students realize that life was not exactly fair in the 1930s. The lack of humane behavior is shocking and will arouse some students, plus increase their knowledge of history in the 1930s by way of telling the story through a child’s perspective.
To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee is a heartbreaking, timeless novel that examines stereotyping and its consequences. The novel shadows Atticus Finch, a small-town lawyer, as he defends a black man, Tom Robinson, who is accused of raping a white woman in racist Maycomb, Alabama. Frequently, To Kill a Mockingbird has been banned for use in many schools because of the racial content in it. In the novel, racial tension and slurs are used frequently. Although the novel does contain these things, To Kill a Mockingbird should definitely be taught in schools because it represents accurately what it was like before blacks received their civil right, it teaches valuable life lessons, and it shows how novels like To Kill a Mockingbird helped the civil rights movement.
Killing a mockingbird is a very memorable book, people who read the book years ago still remember it today. Some people think the book shouldn't be taught in school, however, the evidence shows the book should be taught in schools. How Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird should be taught in schools because it teaches racism from a kids perspective and how kids deal with the world's problems. Some people think that Harper Lee’s to kill a mockingbird should not be taught in schools, for example Malcolm Gladwell.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written by Harper lee in 1960. The novel tells the story of Atticus Finch, a white lawyer, and Tom Robinson, a black servant, accused of raping a white female. Finch defends Robinson in court arguing lack of evidence as his main point. However, the judge and jury still believe the woman’s testimony and orders Robinson to be killed. The novel has been praised for its outstanding literature since its publication. However, it remains a banned book by the American Library Association for its use of racial slurs and profanity. Due to it being banned, many high schools have reconsidered the notion of teaching it to their students. Two prominent authors wrote articles pertaining to this piece of literature: Angela Shaw-Thornburg wrote an article on her re-reading of the novel and her opinions on it; while Malcom Gladwell wrote an article comparing Atticus Finch to a state governor liberalist, James Folsom, and the restraints of liberalism in the south. In addition, Rebecca Best contributes her thought on how the novel should be taught by introducing the idea of “the other.” Regardless of the modern day political arguments surrounding this piece of literature, this novel contains a large insight into the time period of the 1960s which is an influential topic that should be taught to young high school students.
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
With the thought that someone can be hurt by reading a book, people will try to challenge and ban them. To ban a book is to have it restricted from a certain age or audience. Banning and challenging books is trying to keep a certain book away from an audience due to sexual content, going against religious beliefs, language and vulgarity, violence, drugs, self-harm, racism, occult/satanic views, promoting gangs, and going against community standards. An argument from someone who believes books should not be banned is that it is important for the age group to learn about certain content and material as they grow up. Due to controversial content, the novel The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald should be banned.
Such issues have supplemented the controversial nature of the book and in turn, have sparked the question of whether or not this book should be banned. The novel, The Catcher In the Rye, should not be banned from inclusion in the literature courses taught at the high school level. & nbsp;... ... middle of paper ... ... Banning books is unconstitutional.
It is so important to read books like these. Not only to teach what is was like back in the 1930s, but to get an understanding on what racism was like. If we read books like these today, we have a chance of getting kids to get a better understanding on why racism is so wrong. every child should read To Kill A Mockingbird because it will get them to realize how wrong segregation was back then Why should we ban this book when it’s only teaching kids more about
I personally believe that the story, To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools, and the story should be allowed in students’ curriculum. The first reason to why I believe this to be true would be the fact that it allows students the opportunity to learn about human mistakes and how to be better people in the future. A second reason would be that students are able to learn important parts of our history within the book. It also teaches students important morals that may be hard to teach without the context of a book such as this one.
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Such books should not be banned from public schools, because they expose the reader to things of the past. In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson was a honest, innocent, African American accused of raping a young woman. Sadly, the jury ruled Tom Robinson guilty and this later resulted in his death. Harper Lee’s booked used profanity and exposed racial profiling and injustice. Some may believe that the racist past of America
To Kill a Mockingbird does not need to be banned. people need to open their eyes to the truth, there is evil all around us. Harper Lee shows us that evil through the eyes of a little girl and teaches us how to respond to that evil. To kill a mockingbird is wrong because they don’t do us any harm, they just share their music with us. To ban To Kill a Mockingbird is wrong because it doesn’t harm anyone, it simply opens up our eyes to truths we need to know.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.