Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does literature affect history
Literature censorship
Arguments against book censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
To Kill a Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and The Grapes of Wrath are just a few examples of books that express racial injustice and the use of profanity or drugs. All of these things are a realitys of life and properly represent ideas and things that have happened in the past. The world is full of sin, and no matter how hard one tries sin is a fact of the past, present, and future. Such books, represent they way of living at different times and in different cultures. I believe books should not be banned from schools because they educate students on history, exposes them to different cultures, and does not shelter them from the sins of the world.
Such books should not be banned from public schools, because they expose the reader to things of the past. In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson was a honest, innocent, African American accused of raping a young woman. Sadly, the jury ruled Tom Robinson guilty and this later resulted in his death. Harper Lee’s booked used profanity and exposed racial profiling and injustice. Some may believe that the racist past of America
…show more content…
should remain in the past, but I believe to fully move on and change we must understand and learn from the dark past. Books that have realities from the past should not be banned. Next, public schools should not shelter their students form the wrongs of this world. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain posses profanity and demonstrates racism, slavery, social class, and hypocrisy. Schools should not have the ability to shelter and filter out wonderful works of literature because they posses themes that they do not like. I believe that public schools should teach their students the rights and wrongs of life. They should teach their students to frown upon profanity, racism, and hypocrisy and to smile upon the good things. Finally, schools should not filter out books like The Grapes of Wrath, because such books expose the reader to different cultures and lifestyles. The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck illustrates many themes such as: man’s inhumanity to man, the power of family and fellowship, the dignity of wrath, and the effects of selfishness. John Steinbeck’s book also show the culture of Oklahoma and California in the late 1930s, and it also showed the lifestyle of a farmer. Training students to understand different cultures and lifestyles proves positive. Best selling, award winning books such as: To Kill a Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and The Grapes of Wrath should not be banned for public schools do to their content.
Books that properly display historical facts such as the racism in To Kill a Mockingbird should remain in books, to educate students about historical facts written about in literature. Next, books that display things such as profanity, racism, and hypocrisy should still sit on public school’s bookshelf, because the public school should not shelter their students and I believe they need to educate their students on the rights and wrongs of the past and present. Finally, The Grapes of Wrath and books like it prove positive, because they expose students to different cultures and lifestyles. Public schools need to fully educate their students with facts of the past, present, and
future.
First off, I would like to ask you if you think Huckleberry Finn should be banned from society? With that question in mind I would like to tell you why it should not. The Novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, according to an offended citizen, that the novel "should be removed from schools curriculum and expunged from public library shelves." This novel is already banned from all black schools and Christian schools for the profusely use of the "N" word and the insults of religion by Mark Twain. The "N" was used over 200 times throughout the course of the novel. Also, the actions of Huck and other negative characters in the novel does not help plead my case on why I disagree with this citizen. I disagree with this citizen and I think it should be allowed in schools curriculum and in libraries because it is a classic American novel and it shows how America has evolved as a nation. Huck Finn lies profusely in the novel, depicts African Americans negatively or using the "N" word, and his attitude is a negative influence on children today.
High Schools in the United States should not ban The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. This book is one of the most important components of American literature in our libraries today, it throws the reader into a time when slavery was lawful and accepted, and gives the reader a new perspective on slavery in general. Until civil rights groups can come up with a better argument than the word “nigger” creating a “hostile work environment”(Zwick) it should not be taken off the required reading list of any High School in the country.
Famous author Stephen King said in his book On Writing: a Memoir of the Craft that “ Every book you pick up has its life lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (King 145), but unfortunately not everyone agrees. In today's world, people are becoming more and more easily offended by simple things like the subjects in classic literature, for example To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, and are even trying to ban it in a classroom setting. However, To Kill a Mockingbird should continue to be taught in schools because it positively affects society by changing the way people think about the world, through a very historically accurate setting, and by teaching its readers valuable lessons.
Some people think that harper lee’s to kill a mockingbird should not be taught in schools for example malcolm gladwell a journalist says he wishes that the author had made finch(referring to atticus) a man sufficiently outraged by racial injustice to seek systemic change, rather
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
Banning a book on the basis of profanity is merely a superficial reason of those who wish to limit beliefs that do not coincide with their own. By excluding a novel from a high school curriculum in order to shelter students from profanity, is an attempt to do the impossible. Profanity is found everywhere. According to TV Guide, "Profanity is uttered once every six minutes on American primetime television...
Why should this novel be banned from use in schools? Students should be able to hear these words and talk about them and not use them offensively. Racial content, tension, and slurs are used in people’s everyday lives. If people can use these words outside of school why would they not be allowed to be talked about in school? It is important for everyone to be informed about these racial tensions. This book also shows the reader what is was like to be growing up in this time period. Although this book uses the n-word, it uses it in a historical way. Using these racist words explains the way of thinking of the south in the 1930s. To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is appropriate to use and read in school.
I personally believe that the story, To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools, and the story should be allowed in students’ curriculum. The first reason to why I believe this to be true would be the fact that it allows students the opportunity to learn about human mistakes and how to be better people in the future. A second reason would be that students are able to learn important parts of our history within the book. It also teaches students important morals that may be hard to teach without the context of a book such as this one.
...If Huck Finn is to be banned in schools on the grounds that it is “racist,” then we should not be assigned any books. The Chocolate War should be banned because it uses offensive language and contains sexual content not suitable for junior high students; Julie of the Wolves should as well, because it contains violence, offensive language, and sexual content; Harry Potter, because it contradicts Christianity and endorses the occult, and And Then There Were None, whose ghastly murder techniques were quite disturbing to me as a 14-year-old. Furthermore, Poe’s morbid and violent works should be excommunicated because their content is unsuitable for “fragile minds.” In reality, should any of these books be banned? No. Maturity, sensitivity, and understanding are all that is needed to effectively teach to the children of tomorrow what is conveyed through these masterpieces.
As you can now see “To Kill A Mockingbird” should not be be banned because it tells an important fictional story about America's past. This book does contain rape, violence, and foul language. The author is keeping true to the time period. Also these kind of things are seen in the world on a daily basis. Us children should not be sheltered from these kind of serious
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
For example, in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho, the city’s school board challenged the book and voted that the book should stay as a ninth grade school curriculum. It should not be challenged in any state. In our classroom, we have read this book and when we were reading it, nobody seemed to be making any comments about the use of language and racism mentioned. The reason being is that we are mature enough to handle what is in the book.
People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.
I understand that it is disturbing, but it is unfortunately a historical part of this nation, that everybody, no matter his or her race, should know about. Today, racism still happens, yet it differentiates from the past because it occurs in many directions. I believe if more students were able to see the innocent point of view established in To Kill a Mockingbird, they would be able to view the distinction between good and evil in human nature, and gain a new perspective of how everybody should be treated fairly. The use of foul language and the concept of sex can be overtaken based on the maturity of the reader. In my eyes, the use of vulgar language has indeed become more present, and education on sexual topics is expanding in this generation, so the fact that this book is banned based on those standards confuses me even more.
When a book is banned, reasoning should be backed up with many facts and teachers should be able to agree or disagree. Teachers are the ones who have graduated from colleges and have earned this right. Though the opinions of parents matter, their opinion does not necessarily take into account all that the book has to give. Parents may not see the potential of the book as a whole. They may just see the racist language or cruel behavior in a book. What their opinions are mostly based on is the information that will keep everyone the most comfortable instead of the importance behind the basics for students to learn (Hills). Some books may include opposing ideas like this, but that does not mean that they do not have something to teach us. Many teachers take it on themselves to determine what is appropriate. They take on a certain level of self-imposed censorship to make sure that they are teaching appropriate material. Along with this, books being bought with school funds have to go through a process of approval (Zimmerman). This should eliminate any problem areas that parents may have. Besides just having the school board approving the books, many teachers have the same basic outline of what a book should include and be like. They ag...