Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender discrimination in sports essay
Gender discrimination today in sports
Gender discrimination today in sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender discrimination in sports essay
Title IX and the impacts on women and their education HISTORY: Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 is the landmark legislation that bans sex discrimination in schools, whether it is in academics or athletics. Title IX states: "No person in the U.S. shall, on the basis of sex be excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal aid." Athletics has created the most controversy regarding Title IX, but its gains in education and academics are notable. Before Title IX, many schools refused to admit women or enforced strict limits. Some statistics highlighting the advancements follow: • In 1994, women received 38% of medical degrees, compared with 9% in 1972. • In 1994, women earned 43% of law degrees, compared with 7% in 1972. • In 1994, 44% of all doctoral degrees to U.S. citizens went to women, up from 25% in 1977. Title IX governs the overall equity of treatment and opportunity in athletics while giving schools the flexibility to choose sports based on student body interest, geographic influence, budget restraints, and gender ratio. In other words, it is not a matter of women being able to participate in wrestling or that exactly the same amount of money spent per women's and men's basketball player. Instead, the focus is on the necessity for women to have equal opportunities as men on a whole, not on an individual basis. Concerning intercollegiate athletics, there are three primary areas that determine if an institution is in compliance: 1. athletic financial assistance 2. accommodation of athletic interests & abilities 3. other program areas Appraisal of compliance is on a program-wide basis, n... ... middle of paper ... ...d numbers. Indeed, the United States stands alone and is a world leader in opening the doors of higher education to women. FUTURE: Even today, we acknowledge the many advances women have made in academics, employment and athletics, we still need to recognize some dismaying facts in our efforts to achieve equity. While sex discrimination is no longer routinely accepted in education and has been prohibited since Title IX became law, the incidences of sexual harassment and assault that are continually reported show that freedom from threats to learning still has not been achieved. In response, the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education has released its final policy guidance on sexual harassment to help educators recognize sexual harassment and formulate age-appropriate responses to prevent or resolve incidences of this form of sex discrimination.
McAndrews, Patrick J. "Keeping Score: How Universities Can Comply With Title IX Without Eliminating Men's Collegiate Athletic Programs." Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal 1 (2012): 111-140. Academic Search Premier. Web. 29 Oct. 2013.
Over two decades have passed since the enactment of Title IX, a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded education, including athletics. As a result of Title IX, women and girls have benefited from more athletic participation opportunities and more equitable facilities. Because of Title IX, more women have received athletic scholarships and thus opportunities for higher education that some may not have been able to afford otherwise. In addition, because of Title IX the salaries of coaches for women's teams have increased. Despite the obstacles women face in athletics, many women have led and are leading the way to gender equity.
Title IX is a law that was made by the NCAA in 1972, that states that there can be no discrimination or exclusion of a gender through athletics or education. (Mankiller). Which means that men's sports cannot be favored over women's sports. Many people are very cognizant of this law. For example, if a school has $100,000, the school must spend the money equally between the athletics of each gender, even if there are more men's sports teams. They must get the same treatment. That may sound great, but Title IX has impacted men's athletics significantly. Although Title IX has been a valuable way to establish gender equality, the NCAA loses money, puts men out of scholarships, abolishes smaller men’s sports teams, and it should be
Since the 1972 conception of Title IX of the Education Amendments, the number of women participating in intercollegiate athletics has increased five-fold, from fewer than 30,000, to more 150,000 in 2001. However, more than 400 men’s athletics teams have been dismantled since Title IX, the law forbidding sex discrimination at institutions receiving federal funds, became law. Some would say this is due, in part, to Title IX enforcement standards like proportionality. Proportionality requires that an institution’s athletic population must be of an equal ratio to its general student body. Among some of the 400-plus teams dismantled by Title IX are several former Colorado State University teams including wrestling, baseball, gymnastics, men’s swimming and diving, and men’s tennis. CSU student athletes no longer sport the opportunity of participating in these activities at the NCAA Division I level, and the days of the student body rooting for their ram teams are gone, possibly forever. Now the search is on to find a solution to the problems associated with Title IX if, indeed, a solution is ultimately necessary.
Almost all private colleges and universities must abide by Title IX. Athletics are not the specific target for Title IX. Athletics programs are considered educational programs and activities. There are three basic parts of Title IX as it applies to athletics: 1.) Participation does not require institutions to offer identical sports but an equal opportunity to play.
One of the most important movement was called Title IX. It protects every student from sex discrimination, as well as permitted women with the opportunity to equally participate in educational and academic programs. Women were granted with the same “equal opportunities to participate and benefit from the availability of coaches, sports equipment, resources, and facilities” (Parkay, 2016, p. 291). Following Title IX, women’s rights were enhanced in 1974 with the approval of the Women’s Educational Equity Act (WEEA). This act, as described in the text, allows women with expanded programs such as math and science, reduction of gender stereotypes within curriculum, increased administration, career programs for minority, rural, and disabled women, as well as an increase in opportunities in the classroom and in the future, and finally an boost to increase participation in athletics (Parkay, 2016, p. 297). Title IX and the WEEA were very significant for the movement towards equality within the education
Great inequalities in the educational system between the sexes have occurred for many years and still occur today. Efforts have been made to rectify this disparity, but the one that has made the most difference is Title IX. Passed in 1972, Title IX attempted to correct the gender discrimination in educational systems receiving public funding. The greatest correction it made was in the area of athletics, but social justice of Title IX applies to many other areas as well. Title IX has an effect on women who are not athletes in many ways, including quality of education, receptivity to education, empowerment and creation of ideals.
Juliano’s evaluation that equality has still not been achieved. The displaying of the effectiveness of Title IX in harassment cases also provided another avenue for Title IX analysis. Juliano’s law review provides a different and yet valid insight into the history of Title IX and its effect on the landscape of education, especially the sporting world. The major differences between these law reviews are explicitly why I chose them. Going forward, it is important to understand that there are large amounts of varying opinions on this issue and these are two excellent examples. My choice of these two law reviews displays the broad range of opinions on this topic and how much relevance it still carries in today’s athletic landscape.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which generally prohibits the discrimination of an athlete based on the gender of that particular athlete in athletic events. The court concluded that the plaintiffs may not claim discrimination under Title IX. Even though there is a lack of a Title IX violation, the actions of the defendants were still potentially unlawful. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, “No State shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” As alleged here, those who were in charge of the sanctioned event, discriminated against the plaintiffs based on their gender. For those who are seeking to defend their reasoning for denying the plaintiffs permission to participate in the mixed gender matches, must demonstrate a persuasive justification for their action of denying the participation. The IISD and schools did not have a discriminatory policy in place. Due to the absence of the plaintiff’s constitutional claims, the courts say that it isn’t clear that the Fourteenth Amendment was violated when the plaintiffs were denied permission in the mixed gender competition. These associations did not offer a mixed gender competition it was argued. No anti-discriminatory policies are written and in
Because of Title IX regulations, schools frequently eliminate men's sports programs in order to balance its gender ratios.(Pearson) This is because fewer female athletes enroll in sports programs, forcing schools to reduce the total number of male athletes in order to achieve proportionality with its female athletes. It pushes women toward traditional male team sports because that is the easiest way for schools to meet the equality guidelines and mandate of "sameness between the sexes."(Pearson) From 1985 through 1996, again according to GAO figures, 21,000 male athletic spots disappeared while women gained 14,500 new places.(Pearson) Schools have cut almost 200 men's wrestling programs along with at least 80 men's tennis teams, 70 men's gymnastics teams, and 45 men's track teams. Title XI made it where there was limited discrimination and more opportunities for women, but if it continues the way it is then there will be discrimination against
Why do most the Colleges and the Universities eliminate male sports and some female sports for compliance with Title IX if they can just make more sports for female if it is necessary?
Title IX is considered to be feminist law that is animated to enable women to live a full and meaningful life, without the stifling constraints of gender roles and discrimination. Furthermore, feminist legal scholarship has neglected or marginalized sport this has had some change in the past decade, but only to certain extent devoted to women’s equality in other aspects of women’s lives, sport has been Sorley
This amendment outlawed the discrimination based on sex in the education environment be it curriculum, co-curriculum or the discrimination of male and female teachers on matters of sporting administration (Kaestner & Xu, 2010). Gender balance in sports was imposed on all schools that received funding of any kind from the federal government. These schools make up the bulk of the private and public schools in the US. On the other hand, NCCA formulated principles and code of operation to make effective its operation and improve its impact on male and female education (Kaestner & Xu, 2010). One of the principles is ensuring that all college students sporting activities cover the basis of gender balance. This resolution was passed by the NCAA Gender Equity Task Force of 1992. The main target of the NCCA resolution and the Title IX education amendment act was to diversify the experience of women in sports to bring about a
In order to understand a little more about Title IX, I researched it. I found that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was written to end discrimination based on sex, religion, race, color or national origin. Yet, this 1964 Act did not cover gender discrimination in employment, specifically public education and federally
Women have had quite a few hurdles to get over since the 1950's. In 1958 the proportion of women attending college in comparison with men was 35 percent. (Friedan,