Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Parable of the Prodigal Son." literary analysis
The parable of the prodigal son
The prodigal son parable analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Parable of the Prodigal Son." literary analysis
What makes us human is the ability to recognize the good in other people and in turn recognize the good in ourselves. There is a saying that whatever you think about another person is just a reflection of what you think about yourself; it is like looking into a mirror. Paintings can act like mirrors as well; we can gaze into a painting and see the good of the subject being portrayed and in turn we can identify the same attributes within ourselves allowing us to relate to the subject matter. Both Rembrandt and Vermeer were able to capture intersubjectivity in their paintings. In The Return of the Prodigal Son (Fig. 1) and Aristotle (Fig. 2) by Rembrandt and The Milk Maid (Fig. 3) and Woman Weighing Pearls (Fig. 4) by Vermeer there is an autonomy that can be recognized in the painting as well as within us.
Rembrandt suffered many hardships throughout his life, the death of his children and wives, going bankrupt and having to sell his estate; all of these tribulations have had a personal significance for him and are apparent in subtle ways, in some of his paintings. One such painting that captures intersubjectivity is The Return of the Prodigal Son (Fig. 1); this painting portrays compassion and forgiveness. At some point in everyone’s lives there has been a time where we were asked to forgive or we had to ask for forgiveness, so this painting speaks to everyone. Rembrandt was able to capture the exact moment of forgiveness from the father and the penitence of the son. The father with his downcast eyes, solemn expression and gentle embrace indicate the father has truly forgiven his son and accepted him back into his house. In contrast the son on his knees, burying his head in his father’s chest shows us an appreciation and a sense ...
... middle of paper ...
...individual human being, worthy of our own unique individual response” (Weschler, p. 21). As we look at these paintings it is easy for us to connect to the subject matter, they all pertain to ethics. The contemplation of life and death, picking the right path for our highest and best good, forgiveness and taking pride in what you are doing. Each day we are faced with moral dilemmas and for the most part people choose to be good and do the best they can. These four paintings allow us to see the intersubjectivity in others as well as in ourselves.
Works Cited
Gowing, Lawrence. Vermeer. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1997.
Rosenberg, Jakob. Rembrandt: life & work. Rev. ed. London: Phaidon Publishers, 1964.
Schneider, Norbert. Vermeer, 1632-1675: veiled emotions. Köln: Taschen, 2007.
Westermann, Mariët. Rembrandt. . Reprint, London: Phaidon, 2007.
As Hirsch intended, the painting is meant to teach a lesson in judgement and retribution. Hirsch’s painting showed the how we as human are susceptible to greed and it is something we need to overcome or we will be judged and punished.
Monetarily speaking, an artist such as Vermeer must paint in order to make a living and support his family of 11 children, “And there were other debts.” (pg. 209) Overall, the book describes the soul purpose of art to provide love, sorrow, warmth, depth and happiness to the soul and heart. The monetary wing is also very important because many of the owners had to sell the painting; no matter how much they treasured the painting, they still had to sell it because of monetary problems to keep them on their “feet.” Elevated feelings toward emotional values may be difficult to let go of.
Each artist is an individual with a unique style, and although these styles can be similar in practice – the individuality of the artist often proves the discriminating factor for a successful artwork. Self-portraits are beneficial when looking at the individuality of the artist as there are two aspects to look at – the artist’s style, and the artist’s view of him/herself. The latter can provide a brief insight into the mental situation of the artist as well as any apparent influencing factors of the artwork. This view can often also include fragmental insights into the society and culture of the time. Rembrandt van Rijn and Vincent van Gogh are 2 artists of whom are well represented by this statement.
The Interpretation/Meaning (III) will be written without any guideline points, the aim of this part will be to determine what the painter wanted to express with his piece of work and what it tells us in a symbolic or not instantly clear way. This part will also handle why the artist drew the painting the way he did it and why he chose various techniques or tools.
The painter has his own set of beliefs. He believes that the world is in need of mess rather than this “order” that is created by the
Not only does he neglect to provide any specific instructions as to how art should be incorporated into worship, he fails to develop a model of artistic activity that encourages critical participation in the contemporary world. Ryken claims that all art should be created with the redemptive reality of Christ’s death and resurrection in mind, but he does not explore how abysmal, depressing art can enact justice in the world or capture pain in a meaningful way. If every piece of art must include motifs of hope in some capacity, then pain and injustice can never be communicated in a meaningful way. Protest pieces, graffiti art, and sad or ugly pieces of art are some of the most meaningful things that people have created. Ryken fails to affirm the value of works such as Picasso’s Guernica or Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring, and in doing so he fails to recognize the power of ugliness and sadness to remind us of pain and injustice. By neglecting to expand his vision of what it means for art to glorify God, Ryken loses the power of the ugly and the tragic to mobilize us as agents of God’s justice and mercy.
...wn in the succeeding works of his lifetime. It is thought that this aura of sorrow is capable of moving a person so much that a sadness like this is only found in Rembrandt's last portraits, and no other accomplished artists’. Titian’s work is significant for this effect of inspiring and stirring emotion in even the tamest heart. (“Encyclopedia of World Biography” 242-243)
Although we are unable to know exactly what Van Gogh felt when he created this piece we can establish that it is a “personal expression” based on the lack of realism and the liberal use of colour and brushstrokes. A type of communication is created and we are able to receive “messages” such as how the artist might have felt based on the style in which he painted. The painting itself is a
I have always upheld the notion that all modes of art are simply an act at attempting to bestow animation where once it was absent. The role of art then, as prescribed by the artist, is to arouse the five senses and provide the spectator, no matter the era, a palpable palace where there’s an engagement with flesh and soul. Jan Van Eyck is no stranger to art. Man In A Red Turban, 1433, is Eyck’s best rendition at capturing the philosophy of art. From the moment your eyes rest upon the portrait a spell falls upon you and as your eyes peruse the painting, up and down, you fall into a deep slumber. A space with no perpetual end and devoid of time, a private viewing, of sorts, with a man whom is no longer bond to the constraints of the frame but
The art would not exist without the artist. By looking back to the artists culture and background we can see where the inspiration for the particular art came from, this idea is presented by Diderot when he states, “I. But a thousand years from now [Racine] will still fill people with the feelings of humanity, pity, and love. They will wonder who he was and where he came from” (Diderot, 383) this statement follows the simple idea between the art versus the artist. The art which is the feelings the people will be left with and the artist who is Racine. This idea that the reader will wonder who he was and where he came from is telling the reader that the artist is important and will not only be remembered by his work but for who he is and what defines
As onlookers peer into the artworks in front of them, there is no question as to whether or not they considered what the artwork means, where it came from and what the artist was interested in who created it. The intrigued viewer quite possibly could also want to have a conversation with that artist and ask them questions about the artwork and what it was that they were thinking about when producing it, with a goal of better understanding what they were looking at. As the viewer and after serious contemplation, would you believe you understood the artwork as the artist or artist’s society believed the work? Could you appreciate the work the same? Walter Benjamin, a well known German-Jewish Marxist literary and cultural critic, philosopher, translator and essayist introduced ideas and questions similar to these in his epic essay, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” He wrote about many different ideas concerning the concept of art, writing, politics and society. Benjamin was born in Berlin on July 15, 1892. He worked and lived in Germany for the majority of his life. He earned a Ph. D in 1919, but never held an academic career (egs.edu, 2009). “He dedicated his life’s work to writ...
Through the appearance that the paintings gave off of the thought out analyzations of the different aspects, the viewer is encourages to look at the different parts of the painting. This experience really made me think about what really needs to go into the paintings. It made me realize that sometimes like in some of the paintings the unfinished parts are really the most revealing. This is almost paralleled with us as human beings. It is almost always the unfinished or unrefined part of a person that creates that humanity that everyone looks for. It makes everyone feel comfortable because you are still on the same playing field. The same goes for art the unrefined parts reveal what it took to go from that part to some of the more finished parts of a painting. Through these different components of the paintings another can see what they need to do in order to get to where they may want to
Increasingly, man was accepted as an autonomous individual and emphasized as his own measure, resulting in a loss of true meaning. The “Mona Lisa,” “Pieta,” and “Arnolfini Wedding,” are beautiful masterpieces which not only exemplify esteemed Renaissance art, but also boldly display the convictions of their artists. While Leonardo da Vinci and Jan van Eyck realized the tenants of the gospel and understood the flaws of humanism, Michelangelo adhered to the commonly accepted beliefs of relativism. Most of his contemporaries valued the human intellect, underemphasized their powerful God, and shared Michelangelo’s position. Unsurprisingly, the ideals of humanism that emerged in the Renaissance have not died off, but set the stage for the morals of humanism observed
My definition of art is an expression by an individual, put on canvas, sculpted, composed or built in a visual form; appreciated by others for its beauty and emotional power. Declaring something a piece of artwork is decided but the person who created it, but it is the viewer that determines whether that artwork is any good, and that view is constantly changing. The things that fascinated us once may not any longer. Although anything can be considered art, even a child’s drawing or ceramic green frog, for it to be considered great art, I believe the artist needs the skills to create, the creativity to give the artwork vitality, and the daring to use new techniques regardless of critics opinions.
To me the painting is a way of showing you what everyone else is seeing. That the painter had the men looking right at each other so they can see themselves running away. In turn I got to see myself doing the same thing and was able to change because of it. When other people look at the painting they probably see something else. That is why I choose to do the painting, it gives you the choice too interpret it any way you see fit. Or it can just be a beautiful painting to look at, but the painting was so much more to me. It painted a thousand words for me.