Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of planning in disaster management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of planning in disaster management
Module 1)
There are multiple topics of interest addressing the United States security during the hearing of threats to homeland security. Mr. Henry addresses the focus and priority on reducing vulnerabilities, and ascertains that now the focus needs to be redirected to identifying who adversaries are. Once adversaries are identified, the next step will be to build a comprehensive plan across both the private sector and the United States government. This comprehensive plan will be used to distinguish how intelligence is shared between each sector. This is a significant learning issue because these plans are crucial for intelligence getting to the correct entities during a disaster. Once a comprehensive plan is created, it will eliminate a barrier
…show more content…
The primary difference between local and national response is how many and what level of resources are available to respond to an event in a given area. Resources begin with a dispatch center, moving to law enforcement. From here information is relayed to a local emergency manager who then takes action, if necessary, and communicates the information to a state emergency manager and so forth. Our primary focus in these events is to have a streamlined communication plan to take action quickly and thoroughly while ensuring the proper health and safety of people and property …show more content…
Keeping cyber networks current with security encryptions will help mitigate the potential risk of loss of the sensitive information. Learning evolving thought processes of terrorists, both foreign and domestic, will keep local and federal emergency plans up-to-date when countering and responding to such threats. Protecting the United States security and the health and safety of people and property is both the first and last thought of any effective and comprehensive
The National Response Framework is a guide designed to assist local, State, and Federal governments in developing functional capabilities and identifying resources based on hazard identification and risk assessment. It outlines the operating structure and identifies key roles and responsibilities. It established a framework to identify capabilities based on resources and the current situation no matter the size or scale. It integrates organizational structures and standardizes how the Nation at all levels plans to react to incidents. The suspected terrorist attack will have health, economic, social, environment and political long-term effects for my community. This is why it is essential that local government’s response is coordinate with all responders. Response doctrine is comprised of five key principles: (1) engaged partnership, (2) tiered response, (3) scalable, flexible, and adaptable operational capabilities, (4) unity of effort through unified command, and (5) readiness to act. An introductory word about each follows. (Homeland Security, 2008)
Chapter 1-3 showed the beginnings of homeland security and the expansion and growth of Homeland Security. Chapter 4 shows the actions of homeland security, and the steps they take toward a problem to access it. The DHS above all needs to realized and understand how to address an attack quickly and efficiently, and have counter measure put into place beforehand. The DHS must be able to access the risks of any situation, and must decipher the potential hazard the situation could cause. When looking at the many functions of the DHS, nothing could be more important than the ability to understand or hinder or stop an attack man made or not. First Homeland Security studies the nature of the risk; this means that they study what is likely to happen in a certain situation. The texted explains risk as what can go wrong. A cigarette smoker takes a risk every time he lights up, and everyone take a risk when getting into a car. The DHS takes what they know from prior circumstances to determine the reality of the risk; the department must also anticipate any attack even without prior knowledge to the circumstance. The main questions of risk assessment are easy to understand, questions like will people be injured or harmed. But when looking at chapter 1 which asks the reader to look further into why terrorist commit terrorism, that’s when its easier to see the DHS skill at risk assessment. For example if you understand that a terrorist attack could be coming from radical Islamist terrorist; then you would understand a risk by understanding their motive behind the attack like their religious holidays. The DHS uses a three-fold method for risk assessment and they are threat, vulnerability and consequence. The Rand organization uses th...
The Department of Homeland Security faces challenges of failure to coordinate and cooperate in the latest fight against computer crimes as well as more general intelligence-gathering operations. (...
Both man-made and natural disasters are often devastating, resource draining and disruptive. Having a basic plan ready for these types of disaster events is key to the success of executing and implementing, as well as assessing the aftermath. There are many different ways to create an emergency operations plan (EOP) to encompass a natural and/or man-made disaster, including following the six stage planning process, collection of information, and identification of threats and hazards. The most important aspect of the US emergency management system in preparing for, mitigating, and responding to man-made and natural disasters is the creation, implementation and assessment of a community’s EOP.
The integrated threat theory model consists of four types of threats that can lead to prejudice. These threats are: realistic threats, symbolic threats, intergroup anxiety, and negative stereotypes. Realistic threats are posed by the outgroup and have several types of consequence and impact. They can either be threats of war, threats to political and/or economic power of the ingroup, and threats to physical and/or material well-being of the ingroup and its members. Symbolic threats is usually based on perceived group differences in morals, values, standards, beliefs, and attitudes. Symbolic threats are also threats to the ingroup’s worldview and these threats arise because the ingroup believes that its system of values are morally correct.
The United States has endured numerous security breaches and high security threats over the past two decades. After the attacks on 9/11, the office of Intelligence became a vital source in retrieving sensitive data and tracking down potential terrorists and their networks which could pose a threat to the American people and then forwarding that vital information to the Department of Homeland Security and other government agencies. Intelligence became a key role in “assessing threats to critical American infrastructures, bio-and nuclear terrorism, pandemic diseases, threats to the borders to the nation, and radicalization within American society” (Randol, 2009, p. 7). The sharing of homeland security intelligence has become a precedence for Congress and the government. Our nation must be one step ahead of any potential terrorists that want to harm our turf. Within this text the capabilities and limitations of both domestic and foreign intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts will be explained;
Homeland security entities are proactive in the fight against terrorism on American soil. Their mandate is to collect information relating to potential attacks and analyze it to find a solution to the danger. With this in mind, these entities employ numerous spying techniques to collect intelligence for safeguarding of the nation. Homeland security entities have spies in almost all the countries in the world, especially those that show aggression towards America. The main aim of these spies is to carry out espionage to determine threat levels and find ways of neutralizing threats (Randol, 2009). This involves deployment of secret agents to areas or countries that exhibit terrorism activity in a bid to collect information. The spies interact with local people and members of terrorist groups using aliases that enable them conceal their identities.
In order to fulfill its duty of ensuring the safety of its law-abiding citizens, and apprehending those who would cause them harm, the government does need to access certain information. In fact, many blame suppressed intelligence operations for allowing the terrorist attacks in 2001 to slip through (Cooper). It would be foolish not to tighten security after suc...
Terrorism represents a continuing threat to the United States. It is the most significant threat to our national security. Terrorist attacks have definitely left many concerns about the possibilities of future incidents of terrorism in the United States. Since the events of September 11, 2011, Americans and much of the world are afraid. Americans are at war with terrorism and no longer feel comfortable. A part of this unease feeling has to do with cyber terrorism.
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the United States changed our world forever. It heightened our nation’s security. This included increased awareness of both domestic and foreign acts of terrorism. As a result, congressional and public interest increased in federal spending for homeland security (CBO, 2005).
interests. This is both a collection challenge that the counterintelligence community must support and an analytical challenge that we must meet. We will conduct a common effort to address the most critical gaps in our knowledge of these targets, and, based on those gaps, we will contribute to the integrated collection strategies of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). We will also provide strategic analysis, counterintelligence insight, and policy options to the National Security Council, the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, and the DNI to support their national security deliberations. We will report our assessments of the intelligence environment on a regular basis and will suggest actionable alternatives as appropriate.
National and International Security is a sum of the actions taken by countries and other organizations that can guarantee the safety and well being of their population. It is vital for a nation to pre-emptively discover what issues could affect their security, and take action to prevent any detrimental or harmful events from happening. With the development of technology and the transition into a more technologically savvy society, cyber security has become one of the most prevalent and important economic and national security issues that the United States will come to face.
Working directly with law enforcement, state and local leaders, community-based organizations, private sector and international partners is key to success in the DHS (Strengthening the Homeland Security Enterprise).
There has been a widely talked about need and effort to improve intelligence analysis practice based on scholarship and research. It is the job of intelligence analysts to provide policymakers in government and other fields with relevant and timely information, but not to go as far as shaping or influencing policy in any particular direction or based on any political agenda. With regards to the Intelligence Community (IC) in the United States, major reforms have taken place since the passing of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2005, signed by President George W. Bush. Improving and creating more structured analytical approaches to intelligence gathering, information processing, and intelligence sharing has been one feature of this new initiative. Another is increasing funding and resources for the Intelligence Community.
The nation has become dependent on technology, furthermore, cyberspace. It’s encompassed in everything we deliver in our daily lives, our phones, internet, communication, purchases, entertainment, flying airplane, launching missiles, operating nuclear plants, and implicitly, our protection. The more ever-growing technology empower Americans, the more they become prey to cyber threats. The United States Executive Office of the President stated, “The President identified cybersecurity as one of the top priorities of his administration in doing so, directed a 60-day review to assess polices.” (United States Executive Office of the President, 2009, p.2). Furthermore, critical infrastructure, our network, and internet alike are identified as national assets upon which the administration will orchestrate integrated cybersecurity policies without infringing upon and protecting privacy. While protecting our infrastructure, personal privacy, and civil liberties, we have to keep in mind the private sector owns and operates the majority of our critical and digital infrastructure.