Though Shall Not Kill Led to No War for the Conscientious Objectors

1408 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Argument for pacifism

During the First World War, Britain announced conscription which meant that it was compulsory for men aged between16 to 19 to join to war, which made the Britain army massively increase in power. However some people refused the war for to join, reasons being that they were pacifists or religious objectors who followed the words of bible as it says in the bible “thou shall not kill” so were against the idea of shedding blood of their own kind. These people were own as conscientious objectors or short for conchies, conchies had a bad reputation within the eyes of to the government and general public as, general public saw conchies as criminals and tarter of their country, which resulted in segregation from general public. Furthermore, the government saw conchies as unpatriotic and cowards for not standing up or the country also throw biased opinions towards conchies as the government was blinded with the idea of being victorious in the war so feared that they would lose the war if men opposed against joining the war as around about 16,800 men went against joining the war. Moreover the government made life hell for conchies as government enforced tribunals which consisted of ex- military officials who purposely gave biased judgements which leaded to conchie getting prison sentences in which harsh treatment was done to provoke fear so conchies stop embracing the optioning they had and become patriotic.

There were 2 types of conchie non- commandants who were willing to help out in the war doing non-violence work and another type were absolutist how refused all types of work in the army. Moreover because of their beliefs they embraced nearly 6,000 were send to prison, 39 got sentenced to death and 10 died in prison of harsh treatm...

... middle of paper ...

...morial stone in Tavi Stock Garden which was made in 1994 which make it a primary source the source deems to us that conchie stood strong even with the tough punishment portrayed by general public and government. After the courageous battle conchie faced from general public and government, choice managed to hold strong, which paired of, as now conchie were not seen as coward however, remembered as courageous people in 15 may memorial day. The source is reliable even if the source is a photograph as, the photo show that choice got remembered thus the reliability does not get compromised. Being a secondary inpertation it still portrays positive aspect, as it allow us to see that chocie got recognition of their bravery from general public and government. The source is useful as it contradicts the view held of choice and portrays forward the positive aspect of them.

Show More
Related

  • Why Men Fought In The American Revolution Summary

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    The mannerisms, attitudes, and background of the American and British soldiers contrasted greatly. The values held by the individual soldiers of the two armies differed. American soldiers had a tendency to think on their own accord and often with liberty in mind (143). In contrast, the British soldiers held the values that their army held (144). American soldiers often fought with the same men from their town or village (142). The British soldiers, however, were pulled from society and isolated from it (144). During the time of the British soldiers’ isolation, they were tightly disciplined and rigorously trained (144). This too shows a contrast between the British and American soldiers. British soldiers underwent a stricter regimen of training while the training Americans had was more informal. The commanding men of the armies, the officers, were different as well. The British officers held themselves aloof from war and quite distant from their men (145). British officers were also much harsher on their men and trained them more effectively (136). The American officer sought to achieve the refinement of the British officers but often failed in achieving it. (145). The training American officers gave to their men was also not as cohesive like the

    Read More

  • Newjack: Guarding Sing Sing

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    Conover begins his investigative journey as he goes through the training required to become a prison guard. The process that each potential guard has to graduate from highly resembles that of which the military uses. Perfectly made beds, matching uniforms, roll calls, shooting practice, and psychological tests are all engrained into the schedules of potential guards. When this realizations strikes the author he says, “It dawned on me that I had reported to boot camp.” The emphasis on uniformity and discipline clearly showed the correlation those who controlled prisons saw between the prisons and warzones. The rhetoric is nearly identical as well, as evidenced by the “sergeant” who states,” The gray uniforms are the god guys, and the green uniforms are ...

    Read More

  • My Brother Sam Is Dead Character Analysis

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Christopher and James Collier,”War turns men into beasts.” It is true because many people are willing to

    Read More

  • Schenck v. United States: A Federal Crime

    1516 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the United States entered WWI in 1917, Congress passed a law called the Espionage Act. The law stated that during wartime obstructing the draft and trying to make soldiers disloyal or disobedient were crimes against the United States (Schenck v. United States). Almost 2,000 people broke this law; they were accused of violating this law and were put on trial. Charles Schenck was one of them; he was against the war, and was the general secretary of the Socialist Party of America. He believed that the war had been caused by and would benefit only the rich, while causing suffering and death for the thousands of poor and working-class soldiers who would do the actual fighting in Europe. He mailed thousands of pamphlets to men who had been drafted into the armed forces. The government looked at this as a threat to the country and also to the people. These pa...

    Read More

  • The Believe that Conscientious Objectors were Nothing but Cowards

    1839 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the First World War, Britain introduced conscription for the first time to massively increase the input of power of their army had and forced men aged 16-19 to serve in the army. However, a group of roughly 16,800 men refused to serve. These groups of people were called Conscientious Objectors; sometimes called COs or Conchies; and many were very religious and believed that thou shall not kill as it is a sin in the Bible. This was a main point that most Conscientious Objectors did not take any part during the First World War as they believed it would result in pointless bloodshed. The Government’s and general public’s view on Conscientious Objectors was that Conscientious Objectors were unpatriotic cowards and the Government used propaganda to manipulate the general public’s view on Conscientious Objectors by showing that they would not aid the Britain and were weak. As a result they were treated harshly. The Government made being a Conscientious Objector very hard and difficult as they would enforce tribunals which consisted of ex- military officials who were biased as they were for the First World War. Therefore, these people gave huge prison sentences to Conscientious Objectors as a scare tactic to reduce the number of Conscientious Objectors. Historians use interpretations to show the message behind each source to see it’s reliable or useful. Also this is done to see if the source itself is a primary or secondary interpretation which shows if the source’s view and meaning is from the author of sources (primary interpretation) or giving a generalised views on people who were there at the time (secondary interpretation).

    Read More

  • Women in World War Two

    1430 Words  | 3 Pages

    A war starting was really overwhelming for everybody but there was not time to complain, but to take actions the government quickly realized that with men fighting in the front line a demand had to be satisfied. Political and social leaders ...

    Read More

  • Underlying Causes of World War I

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nationalism influenced people’s thoughts about war, twisting their minds to believe that their government and military was supreme and would win a war quickly. Because “most European countries, with the exception of France and Prussia, had not had any major wars within the 19th century, they stepped into the 20th century thinking that they were immune to defeat. This idea of immunity developed as countries forgot of their past wars and sufferings. The British were confident in their naval forces, the Germans in their arms and ships, and the Russians thought their land was protected by God. Citizens strongly believed that their country was the best and would do just about anything to help their country. It became a school boy’s duty to enlist in the army upon his graduation. As Erich Maria Remarque states in his book, All Quiet on the Western Front, the “young men of twenty... whom Kantorek calls the ‘Iron Youth,’” are the ones sent off to war in Germany. Their teachers drilled this message into their minds from a young age. The boys were told that it was their duty to their country to fight. Zara Steiner, British Historian, related that British teachers were told “to teach boys that success in w...

    Read More

  • Ordinary Men Book Review

    970 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ordinary Men Christopher Browning describes how the Reserve Police Battalion 101, like the rest of German society, was immersed in a flood of racist and anti-Semitic propaganda. Browning describes how the Order Police provided indoctrination both in basic training and as an ongoing practice within each unit. Many of the members were not prepared for the killing of Jews. The author examines the reasons some of the police officers did not shoot. The physiological effect of isolation, rejection, and ostracism is examined in the context of being assigned to a foreign land with a hostile population.

    Read More

  • Warfare: The Different Viewpoints of Men and Women from World War I

    1348 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the beginning of the War, men felt that being part of the troops that were on the frontline was an honorable thing to do. Men who joined the army were seen as patriotic and loyal to their countries. In this perspective, any man who had the strength to go out to fight would voluntarily join the force without any resistance. The feeling was that of enthusiasm as many men wanted to serve their countries. In Britain for example, joining the army was seen as a noble cause and many men would volunteer to leave their families and join the frontline. In addition to this, it was seen as betrayal for fellow countrymen to be on the frontline while one was left at home. Such a person would not earn the respect of the society as he was seen as a traitor who did not love nor respect their country. In this perspective, the thoughts and experiences of men ...

    Read More

  • The People’s War: Were They Really All in it Together?

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are contested views when one tries to interpret the meaning and reality of what is known as the People’s War. Undeniably, the people of England made it through the Battle of Britain, or the ‘Blitz’, with an air of unrelenting morale. With that being said, the idea of the People’s War as representative of the cohesiveness of the social classes in England, and a strong front all around, is an ideology that some argue to be contestable. To show that the People’s War generates class cohesiveness, this paper will examine both sides of the argument, and determine that the People’s War did not actually unify the whole nation. Throughout the paper, memoirs and testimonies will be used to give a representation of the acceptance of the People’s War. There is a vast amount of information to support this, such as propaganda and speeches made by Prime Minister Winston Churchill. However, the goal of this paper is to determine that the People’s War did not unify everyone in Britain, and it did not hold the theme that ‘everyone was in it together’, as seen majorly through class and gender. There are a few select groups that would disagree with the idea of the People’s War, and claim that they did not fit into this niche that is presented so popularly today.

    Read More

  • Marlie Bogdon

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Jews, leftwing politicians, and Communists were the scapegoats of the crushing German loss of World War I. These groups were called traitors and hated for “stabbing Germany in the back.” The German Nazi party’s sense of national pride led to the want to “cleanse” Germany and create a “pure German people.” This caused tem to force this group of people into concentration camps where many died. Although the Allied forces did strive to free those kept in concentration camps and death camps in World War II, more could have been done to have stopped the murder and persecution perpetrated by the Nazis.

    Read More

  • Essay On Japanese Internment

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...nment of Civilians (CWRIC) issued a report saying that military necessity was not the cause of the mass imprisonment. Rather, "...the broad historical causes which shaped these decisions were race prejudice, war hysteria and a failure of political leadership." (VIII)

    Read More

  • Thirty Years War Essay

    1724 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Thirty Years War, men and women had to experience trials and tribulations. Solders and officials, putting fear into the eyes of the countrymen, were testing all their patience, tolerance, and rights. The soldiers thought they could do anything they wanted because they abuse their powers. Citizens were often tortured by water boarding, daggers and hung if they did not satisfy the needs and wants of the officials. Martin Botzinger briefly describes his experience saying, “they beat me to the ground with daggers… both my feet were bound together, and the other took the rope round my left arm, and they shoved me in water.” Scenes like this caused so ...

    Read More

  • To what extent was World War I a total war?

    934 Words  | 2 Pages

    Men were by far the most affected by the war, due to the Conscription Act that was passed in 1916. This included all men aged 18-40 who were able to fight against the triple Alliance. The number of volunteers were decreasing, because of circulating news reports of the horrifying experiences and the living conditions the men were expected to live in. War’s glamorous side was destroyed and replaced with fear. With Britain’s army diminishing, they had to bring in conscription to maintain the necessary numbers of troops. Not all men agreed with this measure and those who opposed conscription were known as conscientious objectors. These men were usually pacifists or highly religious individuals, who were treated like criminals by society; many were assaulted and publicly humiliated. These men were forced to take on jobs that aided the military. The men that refused this alternative to fighting were either sentenced to death or put in solitary confinement. This exhibits the extreme mea...

    Read More

  • Conscription Argumentative Analysis

    998 Words  | 2 Pages

    The attitudes of individuals at the time of WWI towards conscription, created an extreme diversity and difference of opinions. Prime Minister of Australia at the time, Billy Hughes called for conscription, even though conscription was opposed by his own party, the Labor Party. The contrasting and diverse views of Conscription were argued between Leaders of Politics and Business against the views of Farmers and Trade Workers. Some Australian’s believed that it was a man’s duty to fight for his country while others believed no citizen should be forced to fight under “Totalitarianism.” As WWI went on, the enlistment of Australian troops declined as more Australian citizens became opposed to the fighting. The British Government were pressuring

    Read More

More about Though Shall Not Kill Led to No War for the Conscientious Objectors

Open Document