Things to Consider for Performance evaluation

1440 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Employee evaluation and compensation

An engineer, for a manufacturing company, is approaching the time for an annual review to be performed. The previous review suggested a poor rating based on the current evaluation criteria. While the engineer is a bright hard worker, there appear to be personality conflicts that resulted in an unfavorable previous review. These conflicts include practical jokes towards the engineer and lack of respect from the plant manager.

The engineer has proven that suggested changes can result in savings on energy costs and eliminate safety hazards. Personality conflicts and acting standoffish result in a medium rating. Arrogance with managers for not paying attention and have a poor attitude with coworkers gives a low-medium rating. Workspace cleanliness due to papers and memos stacked on the desk gives a low-medium rating. By focusing on the current criteria the engineer is being denied a fair and honest review since it is not looking at all the information available.

The current evaluation has review items of friendliness, neatness, and attitude. The criteria may be useful in another style of business, such as a service sector worker, but is unfair to the review of all the employees in a manufacturing facility. If a change is made to use the three most commonly used criteria, the review would focus on traits, behavior, and ability and knowledge it would create a more even approach to reviewing performance of the engineer and all other staff.

Changing to common criteria for evaluation will allow for a better chance of all people to receive a fair review. Traits look at the personal characteristics of the employee that “can include work ethic, tact when dealing with others, concern for team members, ambition, enthusiasm or creativity.” (...

... middle of paper ...

...tioned can have an influence on the engineer that were not presented and would also need to be reviewed to see why the previous review was poor.

Works Cited

Performance evaluation methods. (n.d.). Accessed on Mar. 5, 2014 from http://www.buzzle.com/articles/performance-evaluation-methods.html

Joy, K. (n.d.). Common criteria in evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/info_8177151_common-criteria-evaluation.html

Lauby, S. (2013, August 13). Overcoming 5 common performance appraisal biases. Accessed on Mar. 5, 2014 from http://www.hrbartender.com/2013/training/overcoming-5-common-performance-appraisal-biases/

Vanek, C. (2013, April 23). Guide to 360 reviews – what is a 360? how do you administer 360 feedback?. Accessed on Mar. 5, 2014 from http://www.surveygizmo.com/survey-blog/guide-to-360-reviews-what-is-a-360-how-do-you-administer-360-feedback/

Show More
Related

  • An Examination of Leadership Evaluation in a Correctional Facility

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    Miller, C. E., & Thornton, C. L. (2006). How Accurate Are Your Performance Appraisals? Public Personnel Management, 35(2), 153-162.

    Read More

  • Halo Effect Essay

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Halo has traditionally been considered a serious problem for the effectiveness of an appraisal system. Cleveland, Murphy, and Williams, (2009) organizations generally use performance evaluations to make some sort of decision about a worker and his job When evaluating a person, the organization attempts to measure the worker on several different criteria. In this way, the worker, with the help of the organization, is able to be aware of his strengths and can target areas for improvement. Halo eliminates the varian...

    Read More

  • Moller-Maersk Group Case Study

    2089 Words  | 5 Pages

    When using a graphical rating scale, this allows the evaluator to use the scale to pin-point a level that a particular trait, behavior, or performance is displayed. Rating forms are useful to connect job performance and integrate performance scales, to certain jobs. The rating scale is set on a continuum ranging from low to high, least effective to the most effective, excellent to poor. Graphical scales range usually between five to seven points.

    Read More

  • Lincoln Electric Case Analysis

    722 Words  | 2 Pages

    The performance appraisal system, In order to maintain productivity at its peak, employee performance and productivity were the keys to the company 's goal. Middle management (supervisors) maintained a "record-keeping duties". The employee performance evaluation was performed twice a year which focused on the criteria of quality, "dependability ideas and cooperation" and "output". Workers commitment to perform efficiently is highly practiced. Education policy has been a key to improved employees performance, thus, a welding school has been

    Read More

  • Kaufman's Organizational Elements Model

    1050 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kaufman, Roger and Keller, John M. "Levels of Evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick." Human Resources Development Quarterly, v5 n4 p371-380, Win 1994.

    Read More

  • Managers Guide to Performance Management

    1049 Words  | 3 Pages

    The author and his supporters have an incredibly resource full website that provides more information, over 1000 relevant articles, tools, assessments and more. You can dig in at www.performance-appraisals.org. No information, registration or costs required for this site.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Biases In Performance Appraisal

    900 Words  | 2 Pages

    The curve can accommodate only a few people at the top. For this, during performance appraisal, relative appraisal mechanisms are employed, wherein an employees’ performance is benchmarked against that of a group of people. When performance appraisals for an employee are done with respect to a group’s performance, biases can be formed about the group’s dominant behavioral characteristic and the employee’s assessment could be calibrated with respect to that

    Read More

  • Rater Bias

    466 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rater Bias is a concern that almost each and every organization experiences in performance appraisal because we are all human beings and a degree of biasness is possessed by each and every one of us but the professional will actually try to remove the bias that we possess and conduct the performance appraisal from a neutral standpoint which is actually very difficult to conduct. If i look into the various organizations I have worked in, I have observed various kinds of Rater Bias which has actually affected the performance appraisal system because as soon as there is a entry of Rater Bias the transparency is no more there and organizations are actually trying to get rid of such activities.

    Read More

  • Omega, Inc. Case Study

    2401 Words  | 5 Pages

    Banner, D. K., Graber, J. M. (1985). Critical issues in performances appraisal. Journal of Management Development. Issue 4. Pp. 27-35.

    Read More

  • Performance Evaluation Reflection Paper

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    Assume you are the vice president of human resources at Eckel Industries and that you are aware that fine-tuning evaluations is a prevalent practice among Eckel managers. If you disagree with th...

    Read More

  • Personnel Assessment

    836 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s competitive job market with all of legal precautions employers must take in the workplace environment, employers face the challenge of attracting, developing, and retaining the best employees. Personnel assessment is a systematic approach to gathering information about individuals (Dessler, 2011). This information is used to make employment or career-related decisions about applicants and employees. Any test or procedure used to measure an individual’s employment or career-related qualifications and interests can be considered a personnel assessment tool (Dessler, 2011). There are many types of personnel assessment tools that help in the selection process. Human resource management and employers can use various tests as well as the personal interview to aid in the employee selection process.

    Read More

  • What Is Merit Pay On Employees

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many employees lose motivation if not considered deserving of merit rewards, which directly affect performance. Employee’s say the criteria used to measure performance is highly subjective and unfair. Consequently, favoritism when rating employees can create major problems within an organization. This makes other employees unmotivated; they feel insignificant, causing low morale, because no matter how high they perform, they never meet the standards. Unmotivated employees produce less and do not substantially contribute to the organization. The inconsistencies with the appraisal system used for merit pay causes a higher degree of employee conflict, which directly affects productivity. Often personal goals may become more important than team goals, which is not beneficial to the company and affects team unity. Developing an accurate performance appraisal system where assessors are properly trained and objectives are clearly spelled out and discussed with employees can alleviate many

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Performance Evaluation

    896 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its

    Read More

  • The Importance of Performance Appraisals

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    Organization is a group of people brought to gather to achieve specific goals. Goals can be achieved if team member are performing well. Performance is the results of activities given to the employees in an organization to be achieved within specific period of time. Evaluating the current performance of employees against past performances and organizational standards is known as Performance Appraisal (Dessler, 2005). Furthermore performance appraisal helps the company know how individual employees are performing and how to improve their performance thus improving the performance of the company (Grubb, 2007). A performance appraisal is propose in which the performance management system in an organizations set work goals, determine performance standards, provide performance feedback, determine training and development needs and distribute rewards as well as evaluating an employee’s job performance during a period of time. The performance of team member is much more than appraising individuals’ works, it is managing the business, so the performance of an employee is influences by the performance of an organization. It is target to achieve the best results for the planned strategic by managing activities of employees. There are many different opinions on the performance appraisals, some organizations do performance appraisals without any aim just follow others., where some organizations do performance appraisals to make sure they have a record of a piece of paper in the employee’s file – they are careless about do corrective action. But successful organizations understand the importance of combining performance appraisals into their performance management process and strategy plan as the success of any organizatio...

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Job Evaluation

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Chaneta (2014), job evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the relative worth of various jobs in an organization for the purpose of comparison and pay grading, and based on qualifications and skills required for a range of jobs. In other words, it forms the basis for pay and benefits negotiation. It helps to compensate employees accurately based on their job grades or values, and hence avoid issues of inequity and indifference at the workplace. To ensure effective job evaluation process, market-driven and job worth systems are largely used. While market-driven system is determined by the existing pay grade or structure in the opened market based on workforce demand and availability for particular positions, job-worth system depends on the value of the job or position to the organization. Both systems can be influenced by the external labor market and there become difficult for managers to apply as they would be torn between fulfilling internal and external demands. Another significant resemblance between market-driven and job worth systems is that they both require the same qualifications and other characteristics from the job performer as the basis for occupying a specific position. For instance, before HR practitioners decide on which system to use to determine Quality Specialist 's pay, they must make sure the potential worker has the job requirements and competencies to execute the job. One of the criteria for rewarding an employee is his or her ability to complete tasks in a proficient, productive, and effective way (Kaifi, Khanfar, Nafei, & Kaifi,

    Read More

More about Things to Consider for Performance evaluation

Open Document