One of the problems with graphic rating scales that quickly became apparent after their introduction is the so-called ‘halo effect.’ When examining graphic ratings of performance, Ford (2001) found that there was a tendency for raters to give similar scores to a ratee on all dimensions of performance. Parrill (1999( To rate a worker in this manner would be the equivalent of rating the worker on one single scale, as opposed to many different scales that measure different aspects of work performance. Other researchers also discovered this problem. Parrill (1999) Soon, there was a great deal of literature documenting the problem of halo when using graphic rating scales. More current literature has also documented the issue of halo, citing that it continues to be a pervasive problem with graphic rating scales (Landy and Farr, 2000).
For a while, it was thought that halo could be eliminated, or at least attenuated, by training. By warning raters of this pitfall associated with the graphic rating scales, scores would contain fewer halos, and the ratings would be more appropriate. However, research has shown this not to be the case (Ryan, 2008). Some have proposed the alternative of statistical correction to compensate for halo.
Halo has traditionally been considered a serious problem for the effectiveness of an appraisal system. Cleveland, Murphy, and Williams, (2009) organizations generally use performance evaluations to make some sort of decision about a worker and his job When evaluating a person, the organization attempts to measure the worker on several different criteria. In this way, the worker, with the help of the organization, is able to be aware of his strengths and can target areas for improvement. Halo eliminates the varian...
... middle of paper ...
... halo were only measures of error was wrong. A more plausible conceptualization was that these “rating errors” actually contained some true- score variance, not just error (Hedge and Kavanagh, 2008). Regardless, the traditional criticism of the graphic rating scale’s susceptibility to these “errors” no longer holds the same concern that it once did.
There are other problems associated with graphic rating scales besides the traditional problems of halo and leniency. Graphic rating scales have also been cited of having problems associated with validity, poor inter-rater agreement and personal biases of a rater (Kane and Bernardin, 2002). Though important, these other problems associated with graphic rating scales are not as prevalent in the research literature and have not traditionally been attributed the same level of importance and influence as halo and leniency.
The MPAA rating system was once a good source for people to find out whether a movie would contain immoral or violent images; currently the system has grown to become ineffective in today’s society. Society changes as well as movies; content and subject matter has changed for movies of this generation. If the system is not changed it will not help parents to know what movies will be appropriate for their children to watch. Because of the influence and prevalence of movies in our society and culture today a rating system is important, if that system fails to do its duty the negative influence that the movies can have on the children and youth of tomorrow will be great.
Winston, Andrew S., and Cupchik, Gerald C. “The Evaluation of High Art and Popular Art By Naive and Experienced Viewers.” Visual Arts Research 18.1 (Spring 1992): 1-14. JSTOR. Web. 11 Feb. 2014.
The effects of color help to understand how audiences may perceive visuals used in business communication. The use of color has become more prevalent in business as the costs of including color graphics has decreased. Color is often used in business communication to represent categories. Some examples would be charts and presentations. A summary of empirical studies on the effects of color by The Program of Research for Investigating Management Information Systems was reviewed in this article. The studies show significant time improvements in business related activities when color was utilized. Also that the use of color improves: recall, search-and-locate tasks, retention, comprehension and decision making (Hoadley, 1990).
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
Fine-tuning becomes an issue when someone is not accurately grading their team. He/she may have the plans to help somebody out but he/she end up hurting them by telling them their flaws. Despite the fact that he/she may accept the system is flawed he/she need to stay with the guidelines he/she were given. I am not a devotee of the system as it stands. I might advocate changing the system. However without concurred changes to the system, I don't think they might be made (Williergivens, 2011).
Violent video games are becoming more popular among children and adolescents of all ages since its debut approximately 30 years ago. This growing popularity is generating an increasing concern that these sometimes very graphic videos and life like characters can have a negative influence on the younger generation. Although never proven, there has been speculation that some of the high school shootings across the country were committed by students who were habitual players of violent video games. Due to these concerns, a non-profit, self-regulatory organization was established in 1994 by the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) to appropriately rate all video games from EC (early childhood), E (everyone), E10+ (everyone 10 and over), T (teen), M (mature), and AO (adults only). While assessing the efficacy of violent video game ratings, it is unknown how effective these ratings are for the intended audience (Becker-Olsen & Norberg, 2010).
Low and medium level performers improved and high performers reduced over time. It is due to supervisors who received evaluation were no more likely to improve performance than managers who did not receive feedback; people who gave themselves higher self-rating than the ratings their subordi...
Ø The “pitchfork effect” is evaluating the employee on a recent event whether positive or negative, rather than evaluating them for the entire time of the evaluation. (San Joaquin County Human R...
Primary Audience Outcome: To have the audience see that violence in video games does not correlate to real life violence
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
10. Limitation and future research Previous studies that use of self-rated performance was under criticisms hence it is not the best approach but secret replies may increase reliability of the performance ratings. Getting supervisor/peer-rating performance out-comes via random sampling is impossible. Hence, future research may use other-performance-ratings methods so as expand the overview of the results.
A solution to address issues with the current rating scale would be to utilize Management by Objectives (MBO) and a ranking system like a forced distribution. By having set objectives that employees are compared to, it reduces the ambiguity of the pervious system. The ranking mechanism aids in identifying the best workers and makes it easier to compensate them properly as a result.
Grubb, T. (2007). "Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It's Not All Positive." Journal of Human Resource Education. Vol. 1, (No. 1,): 1-22.
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
Network Solutions, Inc. is a worldwide leader in hardware, software, and services essential to computer networking (Aguinis, 2013, p.31). In the past, this company has used over 50 different systems to measure performance management. Even with the large amounts of different systems to measure performance, only a fraction of employees were receiving performance reviews, and less than 5% of employees received the lowest category of ratings. Also, the organization had no recognition program for employees with a higher category of ratings. In addition to the lack of employees not receiving reviews, it was noticed in the organization that performance problems were not being addressed or resolved.