Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Key principles of multicultural education
Promoting multicultural education
Key principles of multicultural education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Key principles of multicultural education
In a secular society, there should be no public funding of religious based education, this is because it is discriminatory, expensive and does not promote multiculturalism. A single non-denominational school is the solution because it embodies tolerance and accommodates diversity. Hence, providing equal access and opportunity for all students. Secularism embraces and protects religion in a private sphere. Religion belongs in the home and places of worship; such as a church, mosque or synagogue. The vital aim of public schools is education, not explicit religious beliefs. Due to historical and political reasons, under section 93 of the constitution act (1867) denominational schools are protected for the members of the catholic faith alone. Though, …show more content…
The legal system in Canada is made to represent the values and beliefs of the society. Multiculturalism is highly valued by the Canadian society, and is an equal celebration of racial, religious and cultural backgrounds. Furthermore, a non-denominational school limits the ability of Canadians to participate in the society and affects the practice of their religion. The United Nations human rights committee has also declared that Ontario's policy of fully funding Roman Catholic schools, while denying full funding to other religious schools, is discriminatory. Consequently, they can extend funding to all religious based schools, or end funding to separate denominational schools. Secondly, many teachings and doctrines of the Catholic Church run contrary to the progressive and civilized society. Roman Catholic schools condemn homosexuality as part of their fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible. For example, the Catholic board refused to allow its students to use the term “gay-straight alliance”. Also, they have managed to retain the right to discriminate in employment which allows them to hire based on religion. Thus, they are closed to unemployed non-Catholic teachers. Educational institutions should not discriminate against homosexuals and in employment and any that do should not get public money. Lastly, religion based education is coherently expensive. In fact, religious institutions in Canada received approximately seven million dollars from the federal government. This funding from all taxpayers, hence many have to pay for what Catholics demand. Instead, this money could be used to enhance the current public education
Canada is known for their diversity and multiculturalism where they ensure that all citizens are able to keep their identities and take pride in their ancestral roots regardless of where they are from and which religion they affiliate with. They encourage racial and ethnic harmony and cross-cultural understanding . Since multiculturalism is such an important part of the Canadian identity, people cannot be stripped of their rights to freely practice their religion, especially if they claim to value the individual identity. However, even though the above is what Canada strives to stand for, it isn’t achieved in reality. For example, if everyone were free to practice their religion however they wanted to in public, conflict would arise in society since everyone may believe that their religion is superior to others. So in order to ensure there is peace amongst us, the government must regulate how people practice their religion, at least in the public
There is a time and place for religion, but public schools is not one of them. Although religion has the potential to unify some kids in school, it is not unifying to all. This leaves room for disagreement to destroy bonds between others. Once groups are separated by religion, the unification as a whole is eliminated. “Religious wars breed disunity” (Museveni). If religion can be kept to the family and community, there would be less conflict in public schools.
No Prayer in Public Schools Chapter three of Civil Liberties: Opposing Viewpoints inspired me to research today’s issues of school prayer. To understand how we got to where we are today, I first delved into our country's history of court cases pertaining to rulings on prayer in schools. Lastly, to update my audience on how our lives are being affected today, I directed my efforts toward finding current situations. By analyzing these situations, I gained knowledge for a better understanding of why society needs to be aware of these controversies. I don’t think there should be any form of organized prayer in today’s public schools.
Since 39 percent of students are enrolled in parochial schools, I think that having public funds to support activities like transportation, books, standardized testing and scoring, diagnostic services and therapeutic and remedial services is fine since with these the government is not actually advocating for the religion (262-263). Seen the cases that are related to public funds provided for private education in the U.S. Supreme court, I do see that repeatedly there has been an attempt to having “excessive entanglement”. When the government starts to get involve in trying to provide funds for schools like we can observe in the Lemon v. Kurtzman is when a conflict occurs (263). It is hard to tell when the establishment clause tolerates since there are not many specifics and falls under the judgment of people, but when the government starts to get to involve in creating a school district for a particular religion (e.g. Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet) it clearly conflict with the clause.
Until the early 1960s, religion was accepted in most public school systems across our nation. One of the main purposes for school in early America was for religious purposes (Prothero). Benjamin Franklin stated, "It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand." Thomas Jefferson stated, "The question isn't what religion is true. The question is what religious traditions do we need to know something about in order to be an effective citizen." Something that can be beneficial to our nation should not be taken away. Even though religion offends some people, it should be allowed in public schools because of its influence on America and western civilizations, and its ability to help form closer relationships.
Tax dollars are your money at work. Do you want your money to go to fund private religious schools? Tax dollars should not fund religious education because it is a violation of the separation of church and state clause of the first amendment to the constitution.
“We want to make sure that all children are protected and receive equal rights.” Hernan stated. It is a critical issue and the church is very insistent and very consistent that, while no individual should be without protection, marriage where a mother and a father are present in a child's life. This is what the ideal situation would be. Homosexual people must always be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity, but will not be accepted by the Roman Catholic Church.
...al Roman Catholic stance is that homosexuality is a disorder, and any priest openly dissenting from that view may lose his priesthood. Overall, the church itself is not supportive of even it’s own people.
Many outsider views have changed negatively since the enlightenment (McConnell, 10) however, the fact still stands that religion is one of the most powerful influences on a person’s decisions throughout whether it is an actual religion or the lack thereof. The Supreme Court even states that “it is legitimate for the public schools to inculcate values” and most values of present day society are often based on religious beliefs. Inculcating religion into the lives of students in the public school is not only both historically and presently permissible but also beneficial to the three main areas of a school system.
This plainly states that public school teachers, principals, and boards are required to be religiously neutral. They may not promote a particular religion as being superior to any other, and may not promote religion in general as superior to a secular approach to life. They also may not promote secularism in general as superior to a religious approach to life, be antagonistic to religion in general or a particular religious belief, be antagonistic to secularism, and they must neither advance nor inhibit religion (Religion in Public).
Religion should not be taken out of public schools that are funded by the government, because our government was based on religious principles from the very beginning. Our government was founded o...
“If we ever forget that we are “One nation under God,” then we will be a nation gone under” -- Ronald Reagan (BrainyQuote). Ronald Reagan makes a great point. America was created as a place for religious freedom. Now that freedom is beginning to be stripped away from us. One of the biggest reasons is due to the argument concerning whether or not religion should be allowed in school. It is believed, by many, that allowing education and religion to coincide is going against the first amendment. This argument is one that dates back to the eighteen hundreds, and has yet to be resolved. It is an American citizen’s right to freely express and learn about religion wherever they please, including the public school system.
To have prayer in the public school system is against the idea of separation of church and state. The state should not institute school prayer because the public schools are for education, not a place where religion should be taught (Gaylor, 1995, p. 1). The state should not force every child to say a prayer in the classroom because not everyone believes...
While students are attending public schools they should be aware of their religion options. The student should have the right to practice their religion as they please, just on the own time. Yes, religion plays a huge part in molding a person but, should be practiced when the time is available, not in a classroom setting. The government should have the ability to control the protection of the students that just want to learn. The capability to regulate the religious practices while attending public educational institutions should be left to the government. Faith, religion and belief, usually are three words that are used to describe one situation, although these words have three different meanings. To have faith in something or someone you must first believe in it and also accept it as well, but have a belief without evidence. Religion is a belief in a heavenly superhuman power or principle, such as the almighty or creator to all things. Everyone has faith and belief, but not all believers believe in the almighty. Allowing religion into public schools while everyone attending not having the same belief is unfair, unconstitutional and is complicated to teach to a verity of students.
have made it clear that students should have the right to practice their religion, with some