Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality and ethical decisions
Ethics morals and human values
Morality and ethical decisions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morality and ethical decisions
I feel that I identify the most with Deism. Being a Deist means that I recognize that God’s only role was to create the world and that I don’t have to confine myself to the rules of the Holy books. However, I do not see myself as an Atheist entirely since I have been raised in a Catholic family. Nevertheless, I have found a way to be in the middle of the two extremes.
Deism is not a complex belief. It is fairly simple, it believes that god is a creator; he made the world that we currently live in and then left us alone to make our own decisions. Personally, I like this belief since I believe that as long as you are a good person you will be rewarded in life. For example, if you do a good job, then your boss can offer you a raise or promotion.
…show more content…
Deism strongly believes this. Also, unlike Christianity or other theological religions, there are not so many strict rules that can get you punished or sent to hell. For example, the Ten Commandments are rules written to keep humans in check by setting certain expectations in their morals. If those rules were broken, then fear would set in since breaking them would mean damnation. The way I see it, is that everyone practically has already broken these so-called rules. However, we know for ourselves what is wrong and what is right, so we have the responsibility for our own choices. Deism believes in the idea of God as a creator of the world. Theism acknowledges God as a creator of everything. It makes it easier for me to believe that God only created the world. Nonetheless, what enhances my belief in Deism is that it does not limit its ideas to the “holy books” unlike Theism. The difference between the two beliefs helps me understand why I can acknowledge Deism as my world …show more content…
As I mentioned before in the first paragraph, there is no other role than being the creator of this world for God. God has no power over us to dictate our decisions in life or the ability to punish us for doing the wrong thing. As creatures made from nature, our morality has helped us decide what is wrong and right. We have conducted ourselves by this sense of morality so that we could be independent with our lives. We have chosen what to do with those who have done bad things and as well as how to reward ourselves when we make the right choice. The holy books are like propaganda from a tyrant who wants everyone to believe that there is only one way to live and that is his way. If the laws of the holy books are broken, then anyone who breaks them gets punished. He is known to have an invisible hand that pushes people to believe that it is a necessity to follow his Ten Commandments. However, I don’t believe that he even has that power. If we break a leg, lose a job, or get sick, then those outcomes have a rational reason. As well as when good things happen, for example, when we get a good grade, a promotion, or when two people get married. All these outcomes are from the decisions that we take. There has never been a day when God has actually visibly rewarded me or punished me. It all has to do with what we view as what is good and bad for us. Natural law and Deism go along with my beliefs and world
I have been to several different types of denominations over the course of my life time. I was raised to go to where the Lord felt was right for me. So, as I was trying to decide what I wanted to write my research paper about the New Salem Association of the Old Regular Baptist stood the most. I find the New Salem Association of the Old Regular Baptist to be very interesting. Their beliefs stand out the most to me. The New Salem Association of the Old Regular Baptist has many different beliefs.
Deism - belief in God but did not interfere in the world positively or negatively
In order to understand the truth, people must have solid justified beliefs to prevent diminished autonomy. As humans, we are motivated to practice morally good actions since God provides love. His act of caring is compelling and promotes gratitude.
Calvinism taught the doctrine of determinism — that God holds absolute sovereignty over passive men; in contrast, Arminianism rejected this and presented a doctrine of free will that gave the individual personal responsibility for his or her salvation. People believed that sin was voluntary and could be rooted out of society, once acknowledged; as a result, people began to take personal responsibility for their actions and recognize their responsibility to improve society. Desire for personal redemption from sin arose from Arminianism, which taught that moral depravity was the choice of
The Natural Law Theory is one of many theories that author Russ Shafer Landau wrote about in his book, The Fundamentals of Ethics. The Natural Law can be quite difficult to understand, which may be why many don 't approve or agree with it. It says that the actions human beings do are right because they are natural, and wrong actions are unnatural. In order to understand and utilize this theory many feel that humans have to believe in God, although some may find it easier to understand it, believing in God is not an essential part of the theory. Also it can still hold truth and can be a good way for humans to morally live by. The way the theory works is that people who do things that follow human nature is in the right
This is the “view according to which an act is morally right just because God commands it” (Shafer-Landau 2004, 145). If we assume God were to exist and he is the creator of all moral laws then it creates a twisted image of a God who whimsically created the moral laws that guide his teachings by pure chance. As Shafer-Landau mentions: “if an act is only right because God loves or commands them. Now it is God’s say-so that makes it so, transforming something that was previously morally neutral into something that is good or evil, or right or wrong” (Shafer-Landau 2004, 80). An alternate solution Shafer-Landau provides is to imagine God as a referee of a sports game, simply a follower of rules or laws which were previously created by a higher power. By creating this new concept of God, we can understand that morality exists this way for a significant and just reason. It has to be noted that Shafer-Landau and I believe that theists should reject the first-premise on top of the second premise because it would create shaky and untrustworthy implications of God and our laws of morality. Regardless of whether God is the author of his own moral laws or not, if he were to exist, then morality would still be
Thomas Paine argued that there is happiness in Deism, when one rightly understood it concept. What makes Deism stood out from the rest of world religion, Is that Deist doesn’t need tricks to show miracles to confirm faith. He claimed that Deism brings happiness to it followers; unlike other religious believe systems where they restrain from reasoning and if the reasoning makes sense they will dispute against it. A man or a woman who able to think at all must restrain his/her own reason in order to force themselves into believe the teaching of that religion without questioning. Deist believes that the structure of the universe and everything we witness in the system of the creation of the world are far more convincing than any text or scriptures. Deists believe that by exercise their reason is what enabled them to contemplate God and His work. (Paine, 1794) Thomas Paine also mention that “man has wandered from the straight path of their duty and pursued of happiness, and become by turns the victim of doubt and the deceive of delusion from what people so called religion.” In the other extreme, the Evangelical Revival Methodist faithfully emphasizing the importance of the words of God and the commitment of the Holy Spirit in the beatification of the life of Christian followers. Deists were often perceive as pure rationalist that advocated nothing but reasoning, whereas Methodists were commonly identify as religious fanatic. (Heidinger, 1986) These two movements together often led to a great disagreement in the early 18th century. This paper will argues that, even though the Evangelical Methodist and Deist may appear as completely opposite on the outside but their core concept appeared to be very similar.
Divine command ethics is a theory that states, that an action's moral content is equivalent to if it was commanded by God. It states that if God is all powerful, then he must also be all good. It then follows that if God is all good, everything He commands must be moral. It uses God as the only basis of determining if a particular action is moral. Moreover it states that an action cannot be moral if, God did not expressly command the action to be performed, this theory also does not allow an atheist to be able to perform a moral action even by mistake. Since the morality of the action depends entirely on if God would have commande...
Descartes believes God exists and plays a key role in his belief that he is a thinking thing residing in a material world. God’s existence is an innate idea we are born with. This idea explains how our clear and distinct reasoning leads us towards knowledge. Descartes believes God to be a perfect being, so he cannot deceive us. Since he has a perfect knowledge and supplies us with truth in this world, we must believe we reside in a material world.
The Theory of Natural Law, defined in three aspects, there being a natural order in the world, everything having a purpose and how things are and how things ought to be. This theory also states that humans can distinguish between what is right or wrong through human reason/moral knowledge. On the other hand, the Divine Command Theory is a view of morality and believes that what’s right or wrong is set by God’s moral commands. God’s commands tell us what is morally obligatory, permitted and wrong.
Moses: If it is what people want to believe, then let them believe in it. Everyone has a different opinion on religion.
The Divine Command Theory is the idea that what makes an action wrong or right is the command of God. Therefore, an action is morally obligatory if God commands it is right. An action is morally wrong if God commands it is wrong. Lastly, an action is only optional if God doesn’t command it or forbid it. Morality is commanded by God independently of what we think is right or wrong. For instance, if God commands that murder is wrong, than it is wrong only because God commands it is wrong. If he commands that donating to charity is right, it is only right because of his will.
In today’s society, having a religious/spiritual identity plays a huge part for the majority of the population. In my family, my grandparents are Catholic, my other grandparents are Methodist, my oldest brother and his wife are atheist, and my parents are Catholic. As for me, I classify
Let’s start off by explaining what atheism is, it’s when you don’t believe in any form of an “Intelligent Creator” or God, as usually referred to as. The word atheism comes from the root word “theism”, which is when you believe in a God, or numerous Gods depending on the religion, and the prefix “a”, which means “not”. There are no set practices of atheism, or a set list of beliefs. To be an atheist you must believe what you would like and simply live your life without constraints based on what you believe is good or bad, not what you are told is good or bad. There is a constant debate against atheism from the theist side, because both sides’ arguments are polar opposites and each believes their side of the argument is 100% valid. I will state my view on some arguments, and clarify some common atheist stereotypes.
Morality conveys the idea of what is right and wrong and what is good and bad. Natural law theorists believe that human laws are defined by morality, and not by an authority figure, like a King or a government.