Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions

1232 Words3 Pages

I have always thought of my character as being fairly ethical. I was raised with good moral values, and I always treated others with the respect and value that I would want to be treated with. I am a firm believer in karma, you get back what you put out! When reading the book Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions by Arthur R. Holmes, it brought up some thoughts that have never occurred to me. Why do I make the decisions I make? What am I basing my decisions on? What impact do my beliefs have on the decisions I make? Holmes covers a wide range of answers to these questions. Our decisions are made with several different factors, including cultural relativism, ethical egoism, moral knowledge and virtue ethics just to name a few. The ethical …show more content…

I believe if a person calls themself a Christian they should be held to a higher standard of their ethics. As a Christian, you have been called to exemplify God in all that you do, whether that be in ministry, child rearing, or everyday normal life. Just because you are a Christian does not mean that you are not going to mess up. We fail God daily, and those decisions bear consequences just as they do for anyone else. Holmes (2007) states that “consequences play an important part in moral decisions, and not least for the Christian. The problems with basing ethic on consequence alone must not blind us to this fact. Christians should be more concerned with doing good to others and should doubtless make decisions that contribute to God’s purposes in this world” (p. 51). A good example of this would be tithing to the church. A single mom with one income and 3 children, who is a Christian and “follows all the rules” does not tithe because she needs to use every penny she gets to care for the needs of her family. We have been commanded to seek His kingdom first, and our tithes go to the church to help reach others. On a personal level, I understand her resistance to doing this, but we are to put the kingdom of God before our own needs and trust in Him, that He will provide what we need. “Our highest end, as Jesus said, is to love the Lord our God with all our being, and for his …show more content…

A moral agent is a being who is capable of acting with reference to right and wrong” (wikipedia.org). I agree with Holmes (2007) when he says that “moral agency requires more than principled thinking” (p. 125). This is more apparent in the differences between men and women and how they interpret and solve moral problems. There are two different perspectives that can be seen when faced with a moral problem. The first approach sees the problem as an intellectual challenge involving rules and application, while the other perspective sees the problem as a relational issue that needs personal attention. I bet you can discern which perspective is the man’s and which is the woman’s! Neither one is right nor wrong, in fact, both are needed. As Holmes (2007) states, “they are mutually complementary, so it seems that masculine and feminine approaches should be wed” (p. 125). God is both of these, masculine - the justice, and feminine - the love. “All justice and no love is harsh, all love and no justice is chaotic” (class 3- ethics- slide show). We must be willing to use practical principles in our moral decision making, along with love and care to aid in keeping us grounded, not just a decision-making

More about Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions

Open Document