More handpicked essays just for you.
Character of meursault in the stranger
The stranger by Albert Camus analytical essay
The stranger by Albert Camus analytical essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Stranger
BY: Albert Camus
LAP Topic #1
Written by: Jason Gutierrez
The fundamental ideals that contradict themselves never exist in their purest form. There is no true honesty. Truth is an illusion that appears perfect in one lense but corrupt in another. One man's principle morals is his truth but to another man it may be a lie or a truth he wishes not to uncover. Often times, truth and honesty are mixed together to have a similar meaning. However, these two fundamentals have a significant gap that differentiates between their roles in the novel “The Stranger” by Albert Camus. We see many illustrations in the text of how both truth and honesty have apparent roles that not only define one another but also provide in depth insight
…show more content…
Those with honesty uncover the truth that is in many cases cast aside to protect their childlike minds. One man who definitely had honesty without a doubt was Meursault. However, isn’t it mind boggling to interpret it as a way that he did not know truth? It’s a very strange diversion of whether he had both truth and honesty. In the text it states (120,Camus) “He wasn’t even sure he was alive because he was living like a dead man.” Meursault had a distinct mind to those around him. He is emotionally diverged from the rest of the world. He holds no emotional attachment to anyone or anything that would normally be significant to others. He could arguably be considered a dead man for he had no attachment and really no reason to be alive. One thing was for certain, Meursault had no filter, no boundaries, no lies when he spoke his words. Honesty to him is his lifestyle. He knows no other way to live even if it means he is a walking dead …show more content…
They do have their similarities but it is necessary to know that truth is fact and that honesty is what you believe is the truth. Truth and honesty is not a part of the stranger… for it is the stranger. Afterall, the stranger is Meursault. He is distant to the world. A stranger to everyone. The trial that Meursault had to fight in was in itself an illustration of how one man’s truth is another’s lie. Two viewpoint that contradict because of different mentalities. During the trial we see a very important part in the text which states (90,Camus) “ And my lawyer, rolling up one of his sleeves, said with finality, "Here we have a perfect reflection of this entire trial: everything is true and nothing is true!" These words spoken by the lawyer basically showered us with the eulogy of the book itself. The lawyer's honesty showed the truth that was not clear until that certain
"All the things I am about to tell you are shameless lies." So begins the Books of Bokonon. Bokononism is an original religion that is introduced in this book, Cats Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut. The book shows the importance of religion, even if that religion is "shameless lies". It also displays how people convince themselves that things are better then they really are. I read this book because of a promise I made to my father. I'm glad I made that promise; I just read a delightfully funny and deep tale about the end of the world.
In Stephen L Carter's "The Insufficiency of Honesty", he attempts to dissect exactly what it means to be honest and to have integrity in the worlds view. We soon realize as a reader that it takes a greater deal of effort to participate in
Throughout the novel, Camus presents the audience with one reason after another why Meursault should not, and in many cases cannot, be judged by "normal" standards. He also seems to say that no matter how mystifying or straightforward a person might be, there is no excuse for judging another human being. The question he finally presents to the reader is this: do we take his advice and abstain from judgment, or do we continue to judge others, often wrongly?
In The Stranger by Albert Camus, the main character, Meursault, is an absurdist who lives in the moment and refuses to be distracted by societal norms. He views the world as random and is indifferent to it. But to many French people living in Algeria, religion, social order and character are intertwined and are imperative to human life. Camus uses the crucifix and the courtroom to convey the idea that religion is man’s desperate attempt to create meaning in life where there is none.
It is interesting how Malte tried to get his mother to have an understanding of his elder sister’s death, unknowingly. He used to wore dresses and become Sophie for his mother. They talked and talked about various things, about Malte, about boys, and other things. It is important to note here that Rilke’s elder sister died before he was born, and his mother used to dress him like a girl in his childhood, to make up for her loss (Gorner 11). It is possible that Malte’s behaviour emerges from there. However, Rilke dwells more on this experience in the Notebooks. Ingeborg, Malte’s sister was not afraid of her death, she accepted it as it was. She told everyone not to make it any more difficult for her because she had already accepted that she
It is absolutely clear that you feel sad when somebody cheated and duplicate your own things. This causes many people to feel frustration and getting upset when they are facing this difficult situation. We know it is not a good attitude for students, authors, and anyone else to use something misappropriate that they didn’t belong it. I read an article that called “When the Story Stolen is Your Own”. When the author Sherman Alexie was writing this article, he was feeling nervous because somebody has stolen his article and use it in his own. Nobody didn’t believe him when he told the publisher that his story was stolen by someone and imitate that he belong it. Same as the students when they cheated each other and submit the same paper, it was one of the biggest challenge that happens some of the students when they are in the college.
From the moment Meursault is introduced, it is clear that something about him is not normal. When his mother dies, Meursault shows no emotion. When Meursault kills a man is a way that has the potential to be seen as justified by the courts, he admits the killing as a murder in cold blood and accepts the punishment of death without major protest. When he is first questioned regarding the murder of the Arab, Meursault tells the complete truth, even going so far as to explain “that at first [he] had fired a single shot and then, a few seconds later, the other four” (Camus 67; pt. 2). Any normal person wishing to avoid punishment for murder could have—and almost certainly would have—lied about small details and claimed that all five shots were fired without pause, but Meursault chooses to take the honest route. Instead, Meursault does the honest thing, motivated by his personal moral values. Meursault knows that he has co...
Firstly, Camus juxtaposes the stories of Meursault and the Czechoslovakian man to create a presage of the denouement of Meursault. The Czechoslovakian man undergoes major life changes, and this ultimately leads to his demise. He goes to make a better life for himself, and he returns to his village with riches in wealth and in family. Unrecognizable to them, the Czechoslovakian man returns to his mother and sister, and he decides to play a simple joke “of taking a room” and “he had shown off his money” (80). This trick ends when “during the night his mother and sister had beaten him to death…in order to rob him” (80). The Czechoslovakian man’s newfound courage results in obstinacy. Contrastingly, until Meursault commits his crime of murder, his life appears nearly painfully simple. ...
The Artful Deception of Socialistic Practices in The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin
French author and playwright Albert Camus once said, “He who despairs over an event is a coward, but he who holds hope for the human condition is a fool.” In the The Stranger and The Guest this philosophy is expanded on by demonstrating how those who do not conform to society are isolated, and portrayed as a threat to society because of their unique beliefs.
Often times an author incorporates a thought or philosophy into a work that can shape or reshape the attitude emitted from the novel. In Albert Camus', The Stranger, the Existential philosophy that the author fills into the work give an aura of apathy. With the opening lines of "Mother died today. Or, maybe, yesterday; I can't be sure," Camus immediately sets a tone of indifference (1). Though the protagonist, Mersault, is not completely without cares, the overall attitude of passiveness he has toward himself, as well as toward others, give the entire novel a tone of apathy.
Crime fiction, is a genre which many are fond of while others regret paying nine dollars to go see the next Batman movie. Crime fiction is the genre of literature which focuses triggering a sense of suspense and mystery amongst the audience, through the fictionalization of crime, criminals, their motives as well the detection of those very crimes. However, crime fiction without a character arc would simply be words. A character arc is the transformation of one of the characters as the story progresses.
Within the Stranger, Albert Camus brought up many questions and a few answers. He created an outsider to society and showed us how he lived, Meursault.
Existentialism is defined as "a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will”. In other words, existentialism it emphasizes individual freedom. Throughout The Stranger, the amount of existentialism views is abundant. The use of Mersault’s experiences covey the idea that human life has no meaning except for simple existence. The idea of existentialism in Albert Camus' The Stranger reflects through Mersault's life experiences with his relationship with Marie, the death of his mother Maman, the murdering of the Arab, and Mersault's trial and execution, all these events show that Mersault’s life of no meaning.
Camus writes in a simple, direct, and uncomplicated style. The choice of language serves well to convey the thoughts of Meursault. The story is told in the first person and traces the development of the narrator's attitude toward himself and the rest of the world. Through this sort of simple grammatical structure, Camus gives the reader the opportunity to become part of the awareness of Meursault. In Part I, what Meursault decides to mention are just concrete facts. He describes objects and people, but makes no attempt to analyze them. Since he makes no effort to analyze things around him, that job is given to the reader. The reader therefore creates his own meaning for Meursault's actions. When he is forced to confront his past and reflect on his experiences, he attempts to understand the reasons for existence. At first, Meursault makes references to his inability to understand what's happening around him, but often what he tells us seems the result of his own indifference or detachment. He is frequently inattentive to his surroundings. His mind wanders in the middle of conversations. Rarely does he make judgments or express opinions about what he or other characters are doing. Meursault walks through life largely unaware of the effect of his actions on others.