Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of india on the british empire
History of indian independence
The impact of india on the british empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of india on the british empire
The history of British India is remembered for its controversial events surrounding Indian nationalism. The seemingly indestructible empire was brought down by Indian nationalists following years of reforms and suppressions. Daniel Headrick’s article, A Double-Edged Sword: Communications and Imperial Control in India, provides insight into how and why the Indians were able to attain dominance over an apparently impregnable empire. This paper will examine Headrick’s specific argument about the significance of communications technologies in British India over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. I will observe the relationships between his views pertaining to the significance of British innovations — both economic and technological — and Indian nationalism. In addition to this relationship, I will argue that Headrick’s specific position is that, due to the British technological advancements in India, the Indians were able to successfully attain autonomy. His views also show that, by improving the economy and technology within their colonies, the British empire came to an ironic collapse altogether because of how the inhabitants came to use these feats against their own rulers. I will first illustrate Headrick’s argument on how the innovations of the British — that is to say, their use of bringing economic and technological ideas to India to benefit their empire — gave the British the illusion of imperial stability. The author asserts the importance of how the British did not harm the Indians when they brought their technological influences to the area. In the beginning of his article, Headrick states how the British left the Indians’ underlying social structures and customs untouched when they brought over industri... ... middle of paper ... ... attain independence from the British. Headrick’s argument that is evident in his approach to outline the positive influences that the British had on Indians. Though the British, by utilizing their technologies to increase economic prosperity, strengthen security, and suppress early revolts, seemed to dominate the region of India, they began to show weakness once the Indians were able to show promise in their handling of British technologies. Their economic involvement within British India, the Indians were able to use their educated minds to promote nationalism. This sense of unity was spread via means of British media, resulting in demographic strife that would prove problematic for the British hold over their Indian region. Works Cited Daniel Headrick, “A Double-Edged Sword: Communications and Imperial Control in India”, Historical Social Research, 35:1 (2010)
Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement in India to regain their freedom. He believed that there should not be a Caste System because of one’s birth.
The British considered Indian civilization to be inferior and implemented their western ways, overriding ancient Indian customs. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that British imperialism in India resulted in both positive as well as negative reforms in political, economic and social aspects of its new colony. To begin with, one can observe that the British colonizers did indeed improve Indian civilization by developing means of communication and transport. They built a great number of bridges, over 40,000 miles of railway and paving an astounding 70,000 miles of road (Doc. 4. The adage of the adage.
Norton, James H.K. India and South Asia. 9th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2010.
One of the most important factors in the British loss of control over India was the establishment of English as a unifying language. Prior to British colonisation, India was fragmented and multi-lingual, with 15 major languages and around 720 dialects. English served as a common ground for Indians, and allowed separate cultural and ethnic groups to identify with each other, something which had rarely if ever occurred before on a grand scale. Although it was mainly educated Indians of a privileged caste who spoke English, these were the most influential people in terms of acting as facilitators for nationalist ideas to be communicated throughout the populace. The publication of magazines and journals in English was also a great influence on the rise of Indian nationalism. Although most Indians received nationalist ideas orally, these journals allowed Indians who were literate in English to come into contact with the ideas of social and political reformers.
Although the British brought a strong, powerful government to India, they used it to benefit Britain rather than India. The British established a justice system, loyal army, efficient police force and a government that had over 500 million people, however, the used these resources against the Indians (Lalvani). Out of the 500 million people in the British government, only 16% of them were Indians which resulted in India being overruled in the government (doc 2). The British government also used their army and police forces to attack the Indians. The battle of Amritsar is one example of how the British used their power to benefit themselves.
" India was where the riches of the world came from, the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. The British needed to dispel the threat of other Europeans in Africa to maintain control of India, and they did so efficiently. They quickly gained control of both the major sea routes to India and then turned their eyes to the rest of the continent. Whether the British were trying to foster public support or prevent another nation from becoming a threat, all British actions in Africa were directly or indirectly linked to India. The British were motivated by their desire to become powerful, and they skillfully combined enterprise and conquest to create a globe spanning empire centered around the wealth of India.
“It is generally recognized that the extension of British power was dependent on the willing participation of Indians, either as allies, or by those employed as revenue collectors, merchants and sepoys” (Johnson). According to this view, if the British had great power in India, it then follows that many Indians either helped or at least did not hinder this expansion. The colonizers realized that to maintain a certain level of peace with the natives, they would have to interfere as little as possible in the lives of the people. “British rule had, until the 1810s generally integrated itself with Indian modes of government. Many British officials had become ‘Indianised’, adopting Indian dress and custom” (Johnson). However, it wasn’t always smooth sailing. There were many British reformers who sought to change India. Educational reformers believed that India’s “only opportunity for salvation…was if the Indians could learn the English language and adopt English customs through an English education” (Johnson). Furthermore, religion was also something imposed on the Indians since “there is no question that Christian missions frequently rode on the coattails of European colonialism, and it is equally well accepted that missions have not merely benefited from colonization but have often aided in both establishing and stabilizing colonial regimes” (Roberts). Legal reform was also carried out: “The Indian Penal Code (1860), for example, was based on British law” (Johnson). So, British colonization in India was more about taking over culture and customs, whereas in Australia it was more about taking over land and
1 Moore, Robin J., "Imperial India, 1858-1914", in Porter, Andrew, Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001a, p.422-446,
Unlike the U.S. empire, the British empire was mammoth in size, spanning continents. European nations like Great Britain were in constant struggle not to let other empire nations from becoming more powerful through imperialism and domination of resources and land. “In 1906 a colonial conference in London decided that the name ‘Dominion’ should in future be used for the British self-governing dependencies, which meant, in effect, the colonies of white settlement” (Roberts, 94). The growth of humanitarian and missionaries in England and the Colonial Office tradition of distrust of settler demands made it difficult to oversee the native populations of the British colonies than it had been for the nineteenth-century Americans who flooded into the unorganized west and the lands acquired from Mexico after the Louisiana Purchase (Roberts, p. 94). Much of the British expansion in India in the nineteenth century was spent by soldiers and statesmen in search of viable frontiers by overthrowing overawing, or patronizing native rulers (Roberts, p. 87).
Nicholas B. Dirks. (2011). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
India can be considered as the most classical example of Western Imperialism’s development and the rise of anti-colonial nationalism; indeed the Indian national movement appears as the precursor of the national liberation fronts that flourished in Asia in the twentieth century. How then would we have imagined that the Indian mobilization would take a national dimension so fast, and the English would leave hurriedly?
Crane, Ralph J. Inventing India: A History of India in English Language Fiction. London: Macmillan, 1992.
Vasco da Gama landed at Calicut, sailing via the Cape of Good Hope in 1498. This marked the beginning of
The British invasion formed into a historical development of British colonialism in India. Despite India under the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi played an important role in gaining Independence. He not only changed India but also strongly fought for India's independence, using various strategies. The British Empire ruled as long as they could to reform India both politically and socially.