Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors of imperialism in the 19th century
Impacts of imperialism in the 1800s
Factors of imperialism in the 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors of imperialism in the 19th century
The time period from the nineteenth century to the twentieth century is known as the Age of Imperialism. During this era, countries began to carve empires for themselves and compete against each other to create their own respective territories. The influence on history of what the nineteenth century came to call ‘imperialism’ was known to be the positive advocacy of particular forms of their supremacy (Roberts, p. 83). Imperialism is when a nation or empire extends their culture and political system through overseas control of conquered lands. Different colonial regimes all have their own special impacts, contributing to the world’s cultural landscape. Even though they had different forms of imperialism, the United States and England both …show more content…
The United States had its part in expansion throughout history. U.S. imperialism differed in economic importance and size from British imperialism. The Americans have always been skeptical when it came to acquiring territory (Roberts, p. 103). Americans had not been recognized for their imperial activities when packaged as a ‘Manifest Destiny’ (Roberts, p. 103). The U.S.-controlled territories contributed greatly to the U.S. economy; such is the case with Hawaiian businessmen who were heavily involved in the annexation of Hawaii because Hawaii’s profitable sugarcane business and growing climate. In 1898, Hawaii became annexed by the United States, a political move that created new trades and economic playing fields for the ‘mother’ country. Elsewhere in the Pacific, Guam had gone to the United States peacefully, while in the Caribbean, Puerto Rico became American territory and Cuba obtained independence on terms that its domination by the United States was certain. American claimed to enter the …show more content…
Unlike the U.S. empire, the British empire was mammoth in size, spanning continents. European nations like Great Britain were in constant struggle not to let other empire nations from becoming more powerful through imperialism and domination of resources and land. “In 1906 a colonial conference in London decided that the name ‘Dominion’ should in future be used for the British self-governing dependencies, which meant, in effect, the colonies of white settlement” (Roberts, 94). The growth of humanitarian and missionaries in England and the Colonial Office tradition of distrust of settler demands made it difficult to oversee the native populations of the British colonies than it had been for the nineteenth-century Americans who flooded into the unorganized west and the lands acquired from Mexico after the Louisiana Purchase (Roberts, p. 94). Much of the British expansion in India in the nineteenth century was spent by soldiers and statesmen in search of viable frontiers by overthrowing overawing, or patronizing native rulers (Roberts, p. 87). The same trend of British acquisition reflected a growing British preoccupation with sea routes to Asia and a spreading involvement in India. The Raj was already the centerpiece of the British Empire and transportations with it gave the Near East new importance (Roberts, p. 88). The British had begun taking over Egypt in 1879 without formally contesting the
The late1890s signaled an imperial expansion of the United States. After the victory of the Spanish American War and the Annexation of Hawaii, the U.S. had successfully expanded its borders overseas. Through the Treaty of Paris 1898, the United States acquired territories in the Caribbean and the Pacific. For example, the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba were all obtained from the Treaty of Paris. That same year the U.S. also Annexed Hawaii into the Union. This massive expansion into the Caribbean and especially the Pacific created a political clash between Imperialist and Anti-Imperialist. During this time Anti-Imperialist and Hawaiian political leaders argued that the mistreatment of indigenous people was unethical. On the other hand, Imperialist like Albert Beveridge supported Imperialism. In Beveridge’s speech “The March of the Flag” (1898) he expressed imperialism was the Anglo-Saxon way, because it improved the prosperity of these islands and expanded American borders. Also, he stated that it’s America’s
United States of America. U.S. Department of State. Office of the Historian. Annexation of Hawaii, 1898. N.p, n.d. Web. 03 Mar. 2014.
Like previous American expansion, American imperialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was motivated by desire for new economic gains and improvements. However, the social justification, diplomatic and military approach and geographical aspect of imperialist expansionism varied greatly from previous American growth. Therefore, American expansionism underwent more change in this period than continuity. For many years, the American boundaries expanded as people moved, at the governments urging, westward for new economic opportunities and later imperialist expansion was no different. While many factors contributed, economic possibility was a driving factor in the expansionist aspirations.
They also needed land to acquire raw materials for growing markets. One country that had imperialism was India. By the mid-1880s, the British East India Company controlled three fifths of India. The cause of British domination was that the land was very diverse and the people could not unite and that the British either paid local princes or used weapons to get control. Positive effects of imperialistic rule in India were that the British set up a stronger economy and more powerful industries.
The British considered Indian civilization to be inferior and implemented their western ways, overriding ancient Indian customs. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that British imperialism in India resulted in both positive as well as negative reforms in political, economic and social aspects of its new colony. To begin with, one can observe that the British colonizers did indeed improve Indian civilization by developing means of communication and transport. They built a great number of bridges, over 40,000 miles of railway and paving an astounding 70,000 miles of road (Doc. 4. The adage of the adage.
In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, Imperialism was a popular trend among the large, powerful countries. Imperialism is defined as “The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations”. Imperialism cannot be said as either good or bad, but as a general rule: If you live in an annexed country, imperialism is not good, if your country annexes smaller ones to gain profit, land, and respect, then imperialism is good. The United States was not much of an imperialistic country until we won the Spanish-American war. As a result of this war, we annexed Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico.
Eventually, the expansion to this area became imperialistic. Pearl Harbor, on the island of Oahu, offered one of the most attractive natural bases in the Pacific. Soon other Americans followed to become sugar planters and to establish profitable businesses. Americans were busy building huge plantations, warehouses, railroads, dry-docks, banks, hotels, and stores. They soon dominated the island's economy, and they were able to influence its government as well. Americans created and controlled Hawaii's legislature and cabinet, and they limited the power of the native king. As the century began to come to a close, disputes arose between the Kanaka and those of foreign descent. "Hawaii for Hawaiians" became the slogan of people who sought to restore the traditional ways of the kingdom. Others called for the annexation of Hawaii by the United States. Annexation would eliminate the recent trade restrictions on sugar and revive the island's faltering economy. The imperialistic was taking over the islands.
consent. By this act, they started taking power in Hawaii, Guam, Cuba, Philippines and Puerto
After the annexation of Hawaii, the natural resources were enjoyed by both America and Hawaii. Despite the fact that Hawaii was annexed during the war with Spain as a strategic move, America took great care in the expansion of the island (Thurston 1897). Works Cited Brown, DeSoto. " Beautiful, Romantic Hawaii: How the Fantasy Image Came to Be." The Journal of Decorative and Propaganda Arts.
After the civil war, United States took a turn that led them to solidify as the world power. From the late 1800s, as the US began to collect power through Cuba, Hawaii, and the Philippines, debate arose among historians about American imperialism and its behavior. Historians such as William A. Williams, Arthur Schlesinger, and Stephen Kinzer provides their own vision and how America ought to be through ideas centered around economics, power, and racial superiority.
The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and Social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans were aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on. Britain was endowed with geographic and political advantages that allowed the country to become the first to unwittingly stumble onto industrialization. Britain was an island, therefore had developed a unique naval strength which subsequently gave Britain leverage when globalization blossomed from expanding maritime trade. Meanwhile, the rest of Europe, including Belgium, trailed behind. Presently, colonized regions still bear the traits and scars from the subjugators of their past.
There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India, having previously been an group of independent and semi-independent princedoms and territories, underwent great change under British administration. Originally intended to consolidate their hold on India by establishing a population that spoke the same language as their rulers, the British decision in the 1830s to educate Indians in a Western fashion, with English as the language of instruction, was the beginning of a chain of events, including a rise in Indian nationalism, that led to Indian resentment of British imperialism and ultimately to the loss of British control over India.
Imperialism can also be encouraged by patriotism, religion, and a sense of cultural and racial superiority. During the late 1800’s, a strong feeling of nationalism swept most European countries.
In 1898, in an effort to free Cuba from the oppression of its Spanish colonizers, America captured the Philippines. This brought about questions of what America should do with the Philippines. Soon, controversy ensued both in the American political arena as well as among its citizens. Throughout its history, America had always been expansionistic, but it had always limited itself to the North American continent. Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, however, there emerged a drive to expand outside of the continent. When America expanded to the Philippines, the policy it followed was a stark break from past forms of expansionism. Despite much controversy, America followed the example of the imperialistic nations in Europe and sought to conquer the Philippines as an imperialist colony that they would rule either directly or indirectly.
1 Moore, Robin J., "Imperial India, 1858-1914", in Porter, Andrew, Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001a, p.422-446,