That our memory isn’t veridical is not a novel idea. This means that we don’t perfectly remember everything that we have seen or experienced in the past. Broadly speaking, there are two fundamental memory errors that occur in everyday life. One is forgetting events that have occurred, and the other is remembering something that did not transpire (or misremembering them in the way that they occurred). The first error, forgetting, is very common, and needs no explanation. We can all think of instances where our memory has failed us. However, the latter error is a more curious scenario. Often times, when a friend mentions a funny episode that happened at a party you were at, you might incorporate that into your memory even though you yourself may have not witnessed it. In fact, you may even go as far as to visualizing the event in your head. This begs the question, how could a memory that seems so clear and vivid in one’s head be anything but completely accurate? And more importantly, why do we make such errors in remembering events?
To be able to answer that question comprehensively, we first need to identify how our memory system works. The current model that is accepted in academic circles today is the ‘Working Memory Model’ proposed by Alan Baddeley and Graham Hitch. It offers a more accurate explanation of short-term memory than the previously held Atkinson & Shiffrin’s ‘Modal Memory’ model. The present model is composed of three main components: the ‘central executive’, which acts as supervisory system and controls the flow of information from and to its slave systems – the ‘phonological loop’ and the ‘visuo-spatial sketchpad’ (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974). The slave systems are short-term storage systems dedicated to a content ...
... middle of paper ...
...hat our memories are not veridical. There is an element of a top-down processing involved in their formation, as for a variety of reasons, we tend to alter raw data into more coherent, organized structures. That means that our memories aren’t recordings of events that have happened, but rather they are active ‘recodings’ of all incoming stimuli. This is not to say that this is a fallacy of the human memory; it’s just a minor and slightly unfortunate side-effect of an incredibly advanced cognitive system.
Works Cited
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working Memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 47-89.
Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-Sensitive Retrieval Processes in Long-Term Free Recall. Cognitive Psychology, 173–89.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of Memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 123-7.
Roediger III, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating False Memories: Remembering Words Not Presented in Lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cogntion, 21, 803-814.
Over the years, memory have been researched and debated, however there are two theories that have explained extensively and are highly recognised by psychologist in the cognitive field of psychology and scientist alike, on how we process experiences and turn them into memories. These theories include the Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) Multi-store Model of Memory and Baddeley and Hitch (1974) Phonological Loop Model of Memory. This essay aims to compare, contrast and evaluate these models of memory, with supporting evidence and empirical research.
Human memory is flexible and prone to suggestion. “Human memory, while remarkable in many ways, does not operate like a video camera” (Walker, 2013). In fact, human memory is quite the opposite of a video camera; it can be greatly influenced and even often distorted by interactions with its surroundings (Walker, 2013). Memory is separated into three different phases. The first phase is acquisition, which is when information is first entered into memory or the perception of an event (Samaha, 2011). The next phase is retention. Retention is the process of storing information during the period of time between the event and the recollection of a piece of information from that event (Samaha, 2011). The last stage is retrieval. Retrieval is recalling stored information about an event with the purpose of making an identification of a person in that event (Samaha, 2011).
Atkinson, R.C. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control process.
The second stage of memory processing is storage. Aronson et al. (2013) defines storage as the process by which people store the information they just acquired. Unfortunately, memories are affected by incoming information through alteration or reconstruction. This phenomenon is referred to as recon...
This essay addresses the working memory model which was proposed by Baddeley and Hitch (1974 in Smith & Kosslyn, 2007) as a response to Atkinson and Shiffrins (1968 in Smith, 2007) multi-store model. According to Baddely and Hitch the multi-store model failed to explain most of the complexities of the human memory and viewed it as being too simplistic. They argued that the short term memory store must have more components rather it being a single inflexible store as suggested previously by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). The working memory model is therefore an enhancement of the multi store model. According to Baddeley and Hitch working memory is a limited- capacity system that stores and processes information.
...pporting details. At the conclusion of the article, the authors share their thoughts on how it might be virtually impossible to determine when a memory is true or false. I also like their willingness to continue the investigations despite how difficult it might be to obtain concrete answers.
Schacter, D. L., & Slotnik, S. D. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion. Neuron, 44, 149-160.
Healy and Mc Namara (1996) explain how the Atkinson & Shiffrin model involves the transfer of information from short-term memory to Long-term memory...
As brain systems begin working, memory also starts to work. (4). The aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid afor I am intrigued by the fact that short-term memory can work independently of long-term memory. While long-term memory can be achieved through the repetition of a fact that is in the short-term memory, it appears that in amnesiac patients their long-term memory tends to return faster than their short-term memory. They can remember their favorite childhood food, but cannot remember why they are in the hospital.
In recent years there has been a hot debate between "repressed" vs. "false" memories. Neurobiological studies show that both suppression and recall and the creation of false memories are possible. This paper evaluates the evidence but forth by both sides of the controversy and concludes that both are feasible and separate phenomenon, which occur at significant rates in our society.
Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814
Throughout this essay I aim to evaluate the ‘Working Memory’ proposed by Baddeley and Hitch (1974). The working memory was first investigated by Atkinson's and Shiffrin's (1968). Their multi-store model was highly successful as far as the measure of research it created. However the research that was formed created a various amount issues with their beliefs concerning the attributes of here and now memory. Expanding on this investigation, Baddeley and Hitch (1974) built up an alternative model of here and now memory which they called ‘working memory’. Baddeley and Hitch (1974) contend that the image of here and now memory (STM) gave by the Multi-Store Model is unreasonably basic. As indicated by the Multi-Store Model, STM holds restricted measures
Memory is the tool we use to learn and think. We all use memory in our everyday lives. Memory is the mental faculty of retaining and recalling past experiences. We all reassure ourselves that our memories are accurate and precise. Many people believe that they would be able to remember anything from the event and the different features of the situation. Yet, people don’t realize the fact that the more you think about a situation the more likely the story will change. Our memories are not a camcorder or a camera. Our memory tends to be very selective and reconstructive.
According to Sternberg (1999), memory is the extraction of past experiences for information to be used in the present. The retrieval of memory is essential in every aspect of daily life, whether it is for academics, work or social purposes. However, many often take memory for granted and assume that it can be relied on because of how realistic it appears in the mind. This form of memory is also known as flashbulb memory. (Brown and Kulik, 1977). The question of whether our memory is reliably accurate has been shown to have implications in providing precise details of past events. (The British Psychological Association, 2011). In this essay, I would put forth arguments that human memory, in fact, is not completely reliable in providing accurate depictions of our past experiences. Evidence can be seen in the following two studies that support these arguments by examining episodic memory in humans. The first study is by Loftus and Pickrell (1995) who found that memory can be modified by suggestions. The second study is by Naveh-Benjamin and Craik (1995) who found that there is a predisposition for memory to decline with increasing age.