Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of colonialism
Effect and impact of colonialism
Environmental issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “The Vulnerable Planet ” John Bellamy Foster argues that, All ecological problems faced today and in the past are brought on by humans caused factors, these problems and factors being “overpopulation, destruction of ozone layer, global warming, extinction of species, loss of genetic diversity, acid rain, nuclear contamination, tropical deforestation, the elimination of climax forests, wetland destruction, soil erosion, desertification, floods, famine, and the despoliation of lakes streams and rivers”(pg.11). In addition, In the first chapter, Bellamy discusses the history of our society and how capitalism came to be and evolved over time, starting with European colonization, where Europe began to expand and created an outflow of surplus …show more content…
from peripheral countries to the core countries. This allowed the more industrialized countries to become more industrialized, while less industrialized countries focused on developing the more industrialized ones. From this Bellamy points out that “one problem is that many of the crucial sources for the streams of energy and materials that feed human society and production are declining while many of the sinks are overflowing (pg.23). meaning that as our population grows we will find it harder and harder to fulfil our capitalist needs, and must change in order to prevent environmental degradation. The world has enough food and resources necessary to feed and sustain our population, the problem lies within our food production and distribution. We need to stop producing so much and get rid of the idea that we need to continually grow and take from the Earth in order to come out on top, doing so has caused environmental conditions to worsen and has only enforced the capitalistic need for more. Bellamy wrote this book in hopes of finding a way to better understand and coexist with our Planet Earth. In chapter two he discusses Capitalism before the industrial revolution and how it evolved into something that shaped how we would look at resources, early industrialization caused the loss of wildlife and exhaustion of the land in order to produce a certain crop. According to foster the 18th century was the start of “human dominance” over the planet. From this we can see what began the shift from family farmers to industrialized plantations. Early industrialization at the time seemed like a good thing, but now looking at it we realized what we were doing and currently doing is wrong. Most natural resources we use are not renewable, so when we use them up they are gone. We have to find a way to create a society in which we can live harmoniously with on planted. Next in chapter three, Foster talks about the Agricultural revolution, a time between the early 17th to late 19th century that showed an increase in agricultural production due to labor and land productivity. This enabled wealthy landlords with massive houses and large Estates to begin to privatize, the estates being run by tenant farmers and worked by agricultural wage laborers. The Rise of machine capitalism made possible the real subjection of the original source of wealth the soil and the worker to the Capitol. In addition to the agricultural Revolution, the Industrial Revolution was defined as sudden take off in growth as a result of a series of economic social and ecological transformations. The Center of the Industrial Revolution was the cotton industry, which provided both its raw material and the bulk of it fine product in the form of calicos imported from India by the East India Company. Colonialism thus launched the British textile industry and remained a key to British expansion throughout the Industrial Revolution. Enabled the emergence of the modern Factory dominated by Machine production which up until the mid-nineteenth century was largely identified with a cotton Goods industry. The profits of capital led to a degree of ill health and physical deformation. This later caused restrictions and regulations in the workplace making the work environment safer for workers. In chapter four, Bellamy discusses Capitalizing on natural resources by treating them as a source of free income, this encouraging waste on a global scale.
This in turn causing extensive damage to the environment such as toxic waste being dumped into waterways and emissions lowering air quality.”The conservation movement came to be dominated by more business-oriented forces who sought not so” much to oppose the Environmental depredations of the large corporations as to regulate and rationalize the exploitation of Natural Resources for purposes of long-term profit”(pg.75). Corporations continued to abuse the environment and took advantage of the conservation movement making it so corporations can take natural resources for their own gains with no worries for what is happening to the environment. In chapter Five Bellamy explains Colonialism and imperialism and how it has shaped our society into what it is today. Bellamy examines how the English concentrated on activities in the Indian subcontinent where beginning in 1611 they established what were called “Factories”, “points of settlement and commerce along the coast”(pg.86). These “factories” began hundreds of years ago, yet can still be seen in most cities today and has only contributed to the degradation of the environment. The economic surplus from India helped feed British industrialization and from this India was gradually integrated into the capitalistic economy as a dependency of Britain. Equally important, In chapter five Bellamy considers Ecological imperialism and how it affects native species within an ecosystem. One problems caused by ecological imperialism is Genetic erosion or the loss of diversity; not only were invaluable species lost through the extension of Agricultural monocultures But crucial varieties (land races built up over thousands of years) of key crops disappeared as well. In the last two decades around 1,000 traditional seed companies have been absorbed by International biochemical
corporations. “It is not overpopulation as much as the development of an economic system that places economic growth and profits before all else that has as we shall see brought the world to the brink of Ecological disaster”(pg.107) Then in chapter six Foster talks about The Vulnerable Planet, and how society has changed the planet moving more toward productive technologies with intense impacts instead of less productive ones with lower ecological impacts. This being where synthetic and artificial products became more and more prominent. These synthetic and artificial products can be seen as good in that they may not be using natural resources in order to make them, but at the same time the fact that these synthetically made products cannot be broken down by natural cycles gives us another problem. Where is all this waste going? Much of this waste ends up in our waterways and then flows into the ocean and is captured by the Pacific Garbage patch. So how do these companies get away with this? Well It is crucial to emphasize that the revolution in science and technology was not simply the accumulation of scientific knowledge but the transformation of science itself into Capital. Also in Chapter six Foster lists the four laws of ecology and economic growth the first, saying everything is connected to everything else, second, everything must go somewhere, third, Nature Knows Best, fourth, Nothing comes from nothing. These laws can be seen as a guideline for how corporation should think about how they affect the environment and what they can do. Last, in chapter seven Foster considers the failure of ecological reform and how some things cannot go on without causing substantial damage to the environment. For instance the Banning of DDT or the removal of lead additives from fuel is an instance where if we did not change, many animals as well as people would have suffered. In this instance the problem was dealt with at its source through prevention, as a result the environment dramatically Improved. In conclusion as said by Foster “Environmental Revolution Necessitates social Revolution. Only through the democratically organized social governance of both production and nature on a global scale is there any meaningful hope and even then no guarantee that the world will be cared for in common and in the interest of generation still to come, rather than simply exploited for individual short-term gain”(pg.142) This meaning in order to have an Environmental Revolution we must have a social revolution and vice versa. People need to organize and stand up to the government’s capitalistic and destructive ways in order to stop the degradation of our environment, for their gains.
The majority of this piece is dedicated to the author stating his opinion in regards to civilization expanding beyond its sustainable limits. The author makes it clear that he believes that humans have failed the natural environment and are in the process of eliminating all traces of wilderness from the planet. Nash points out facts that strengthen his argument, and quotes famous theologians on their similar views on environmental issues and policies. The combination of these facts and quotes validates the author’s opinion.
Society portrays the Earth as a resource, a place that provides an abundance of tools that are beneficial to one’s way of living. As time continues on, humanity’s definition of sustainability with the ecosystem becomes minor, meaning that it is not essential to their own lives. Thus, leading to the environment becoming polluted and affecting the human population. These ideas are demonstrated through these four sources: “Despair Not” by Sandra Steingraber, which provides the author’s perspective on the environmental crisis in terms of climate change.
In the book “Collapse” written and theorized by Jared Diamond, historical societies known for their peril due to environmental and human catastrophes. Jared Diamond analyzes the root causes of failed societies and uses his knowledge to depict today’s warning signs. The main focus of this book is to present clear and undeniable evidence that human activities corrupted the environment. To prove this Diamon used past societies, modern societies, and social business societies as a foundation. The most specific and beneficial theories that Diamond analyzes would be the decline of biodiversity on Easter Island, the deforestation of the Greenland Norse, the mining mismanagements in Australia and big businesses.
The environmental movement in politics is often overplayed causing people to loose interest in the issue, but Jarred Diamond makes it impossible to ignore the issue in his book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Jared Diamond hopes to catch as many peoples attention as he can; the name alone, “Collapse”, makes him appear to be an alarmist looking for attention. He has just cause though for blowing the whistle on society. He makes parallels to previous failed societies and to modern societies showing how the practices that we employ are similar to these failed societies. He is suggesting that America, as well as other countries, are headed down the path of ecocide more possible a global ecocide. Through his extensive research and numerous examples he makes it impossible to argue with his thesis. While all of examples seem redundant and like he is over emphasizing the point he does this to show his thoroughness. He also does it to show that he is correct. Diamond does not want to be wrong; he is a major author who gets a lot of attention when he releases a book. People look to discredit Diamond’s work. Due to this he gives ample resources to support this thesis.
John McNeill, in his informative book, Something New Under the Sun, he discusses how the twentieth century brought the world into a steady decline. Although the world has improved technology-wise, it has also had a decline that overshadows the improvement we have seen. McNeil goes on to prove that it is humans, with our new technology are the reason behind this fateful decline. The world’s population has positively and negatively affected the twentieth century world by bringing “ecological changes” that will forever change the world(4).
Ecological imperialism is an idea introduced by Alfred Crosby in his seminal work Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900 which refers to the efforts of colonialists to introduce their animals, plants and even diseases in the native’s land to felicitate their rule. But that concept of Crosby has a renewed interest in postcolonial world especially in light of the growing popularity of capitalism and globalization. Capitalistic and colonialist invasions focus not merely on the subjugation of native but the land in which he lives. This conquest seems to have some ecological aspects. Voluntarily or involuntarily each of these conquests has an adverse impact on the land they conquered. In industrialist and capitalistic societies, such invasions into indigenous communities will result in an erosion of natural resources and deforestation. The new face of ecological imperialism and its impact on postcolonial indigenous communities can be seen in many of the works of postcolonial literature. A focus on Thomas King’s Green Grass Running Water and Leslie Marmon Silko’s Almanac of the Dead hopes to reveal the complex fabrics of relations between the oppressed land and its inhabitants.
Ecological Imperialism provides new insight into the ecological expansion of Europe. The introductory nature of the topic requires more in-depth research. This book is for students, historians, teachers, and the public who want an introduction into ecological history or early American history. However, the reader needs to be reminded that without technology, medical science and military power would have been impossible. Without technology, countries are left behind politically, socially, and economically.
This desire has led to global warming and other horror stories such as oil leaks and their effect on the ocean life. This book really opens your eyes to this horrific man made future that is being presented as a reality in this book. The journey brings her to many mistreated creatures who have been reduced to their low population by side effects of the human’s desire to explore and innovate. In the final chapter of the book Kolbert expresses her hope for mankind to actively bond and fix these raging issues that affect the planet we inhabit. She points out many cases of this occurring and how we can help.
“The Anthropocene Biosphere” is an insightful and informative article on the modern era and portrays why understanding the present impact of humans on the planet is crucial for future survival of Earth as a whole. The article by Mark Williams et al illustrates key aspects and contributions, as well as the positive and negative impacts of the current era known as the Anthropocene. The authors argue that this Anthropocene age is substantially different in comparison to any preceding metazoan and microbial eras, stating that four elements clearly distinguish the Anthropocene age as different; the restructure of ecosystems due to invasive species spread, the increase in consumption of materials in both marine and terrestrial ecosystems, the biological
Ecologists formulate their scientific theories influenced by ethical values, and in turn, environmental ethicists value nature based on scientific theories. Darwinian evolutionary theory provides clear examples of these complex links, illustrating how these reciprocal relationships do not constitute a closed system, but are undetermined and open to the influences of two broader worlds: the sociocultural and the natural environment. On the one hand, the Darwinian conception of a common evolutionary origin and ecological connectedness has promoted a respect for all forms of life. On the other hand, the metaphors of struggle for existence and natural selection appear as problematic because they foist onto nature the Hobbesian model of a liberal state, a Malthusian model of the economy, and the productive practice of artificial selection, all of which reaffirm modern individualism and the profit motive that are at the roots of our current environmental crisis. These metaphors were included in the original definitions of ecology and environmental ethics by Haeckel and Leopold respectively, and are still pervasive among both ecologists and ethicists. To suppose that these Darwinian notions, derived from a modern-liberal worldview, are a fact of nature constitutes a misleading interpretation. Such supposition represents a serious impediment to our aim of transforming our relationship with the natural world in order to overcome the environmental crisis. To achieve a radical transformation in environmental ethics, we need a new vision of nature.
According to World WildLife Fund, many ecosystems around the world are being destroyed, eliminating many plant and animal species that inhabit them (“Pollution”).
Political ecology began in the 1960s as a response to the neglect of the environment and political externalities from which it is spawned. Political ecology is the analysis of social forms and humans organizations that interact with the environment, the phenomena in and affecting the developing world. Political ecology also works to provide critiques and alternatives for negative reactions in the environment. This line of work draws from all sorts of fields, such as geography, forestry, environmental sociology, and environmental history in a complex relationship between politics, nature, and economics. It is a multi-sided field where power strategies are conceived to remove the unsustainable modern rationality and instead mobilize social actions in the globalized world for a sustainable future. The field is focused in political ethics to refresh sustainability, and the core questions of the relationships between society and ecology, and the large impacts of globalization of humanized nature.
A human induced global ecological crisis is occurring, threatening the stability of this earth and its inhabitants. The best path to address environmental issues both effectively and morally is a dilemma that raises concerns over which political values are needed to stop the deterioration of the natural environment. Climate change; depletion of resources; overpopulation; rising sea levels; pollution; extinction of species is just to mention a few of the damages that are occurring. The variety of environmental issues and who and how they affect people and other species is varied, however the nature of environmental issues has the potential to cause great devastation. The ecological crisis we face has been caused through anthropocentric behavior that is advantageous to humans, but whether or not anthropocentric attitudes can solve environmental issues effectively is up for debate. Ecologism in theory claims that in order for the ecological crisis to be dealt with absolutely, value and equality has to be placed in the natural world as well as for humans. This is contrasting to many of the dominant principles people in the contemporary world hold, which are more suited to the standards of environmentalism and less radical approaches to conserving the earth. I will argue in this essay that whilst ecologism could most effectively tackle environmental problems, the moral code of ecologism has practical and ethical defects that threaten the values and progress of anthropocentricism and liberal democracy.
But there is one element of colonialism that many people forget: the Europeans’ impact on the environment. Depending on the location, the landscape might be completely different now than it was in its pre-colonial days. In America, settlers exhausted the land by excessive farming, causing the Dust Bowl. In order to produce enough coffee, French colonialists burned the forests of Madagascar to make room for their cash crop. This replaced local subsistence farming, bringing in the need to clear even more land as the displaced local farmers attempted to grow coffee as well as their traditional crops.
The young boy looks back from the loading ramp of the giant metal alloy ship, his breath billowing clouds of steam in the bitter air made cold by the now almost completely diminished ozone. He stares in disbelief at the endless pile of automobiles parked haphazardly to and fro like a child’s worn jenga blocks fallen from a poorly made tower in the vehicles owner’s frantic rush to get their families to the evacuation ships in time. How did it come to this¬¬? The forlorn boy wonders. When did it all go wrong in mankind’s endless quest to be bigger, faster, and more powerful than all the rest? As the nearly city-sized ship reaches the smoky horizon bound for humanity’s new home named Kepler-22b, he gazes one last time at the vast oceans, blazing a filthy orange fire as far as the eye could see from the final disaster that had sealed humanity’s fate on earth. If only they had stopped drilling in the oceans—the boy thinks. And as the distance grows and the bright fires fade, he tearfully waves goodbye to the now dying planet his race had called home for a millennia and slowly turns to go find his parents.