The effects of colonialism, whether positive or negative, are subjective wherever colonialism was practiced. Colonialism, a practice of one country exploiting another country for economic gain or for population expansion, affects both the colonizers and the colonized. There are times where the colonizers have profited and the colonized have suffered while there are times where neither the colonizers nor the colonized have profited. Because this is so, any benefits or losses occurring because of colonialism negate each other.
The negation between ‘benefits’ and ‘losses’ are seen in how colonizers and the colonized view colonialism. For the most part, colonizing countries deem colonialism as a positive good. The colonial power gets a new country to populate, free labor, and a new facet to add to their economy while they bring long awaited civilization to the savages. However the colonized country views colonialism as a negative bad. The colonial power controls their country, demands free labor and cheap exports, and implement heavy taxes while the colonized are slaves to the colonial power. If neither parties
…show more content…
partaking in the act of colonialism agree on the effects of colonialism, people can’t deem those effects positive or negative. The effects of colonialism are not few and far between.
With almost every country and island colonized or having once been a colonial power, there are many documented effects of colonialism. An example of colonialism where there were ‘positive’ effects for the colonial power and ‘negative’ effects for the colonized is the United States of America. The effects of this colonization clash depending on whoever you ask. Some say the effects are the creation a world power and a safe haven for everyone around the world who wishes to find a new home. Others say the effects are the creation a country full of racists and somewhere they’ll never be equal. The colonized, otherwise known as Native-Americans, say the effects were the destruction of their home, people, and culture. The effects of colonialism can’t judged as negative or positive with such varying
thoughts. The only way to determine whether there have ever been positive benefits from colonialism is to choose one side or another. The judge has to look at what the colonizers claim are the effects, what the colonized claim are the effects, and decide which ones outweigh the others. In doing this, the judge must trivialize one's experiences while upholding the others. Thus the positivity or negativity of the effects from colonialism can never be judge because the process has to be completely objective, which it is not.
Imperialist portrayed imperialism as a positive effect as they believed their empire would expand and prosper. As stated by Joseph Chamberlain in document 1, he states that colonist provided a way for expansion and control. He also states “...new markets shall be created, and the old
Imperialism had some positive effects regardless of how strict and unfair it was. Some positive effects can be seen in documents 2 and 7, which talks about what the mother nation gave to their colonized nations. These oppressors built them roads, canals, railways, and gave them education. They also introduced to them telegraphs, newspapers, and overall made them economized. Another positive effect can be read on documents 1 and 5. These documents show how both the oppressors and oppressed benefit from getting new resources such as raw m...
In an excerpt in O.P Austen’s “Does Colonization Pay” from The Forum, he says that colonization is mutually beneficial for both the colonizers and the ones being colonized. In the excerpt, he says that the colonizers receive tropical produce and other raw materials from the area that is colonized. But in return, the one being colonized would receive foodstuffs and manufacturing and other European innovations such as canals, school, roads. Austen describes these innovations as blessings of civilizations that non-Europeans cannot develop themselves. However, these “blessings of civilization” are not necessarily good for the ones being colonized. Colonization also results in discrimination against the people being colonized. Lastly, colonization
A true saying is “Colonization often does more damage than contribution.” Colonialism encouraged Africa’s development in some areas, but in many others it severely damaged the natural progress of the continent. If colonialism was never imposed on Africa, Africa’s developments would be significantly different and many of the problems that the continent faces now would not exist today. In conclusion, at first it seems that colonialism has both positive and negative effects, but the truth is it only damages the colonized nation.
Although imperialism helped the colonized people by improving the economy and the lives of the people, for the most part imperialism hurt the colonized people because the people were forced to grow cash crops which led to death by starvation. First of all, imperialism improved the lives of the colonized people by aiding economic growth. The imperial powers prompted industrialization in the colonies, which is the development of advanced technology, leading to modernization in the colony. This is the change to a more modern, a more advanced country with new technology and better standards of living. These improvements then led to an increase in self-sufficiency, being able to maintain the colony’s economy by itself.
The Negative Force of American Expansionism and Imperialism Many people believe that American Expansionism and Imperialism was a positive force, that it did more good than bad. However, many people disagree with this popular notion. Many good things do come out of it, but the bad ultimately trumps the good. There were several problems between whites and Natives and because of the problems countless people died. To start off, American Expansionism and Imperialism brought isolation to America.
Césaire states that “colonization works to decline the colonizer, to brutalize him in the truest sense of the word, to degrade him, to awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence, race hatred and moral relativism” (Césaire, 173). This can be seen
Conquest and colonization has always played a role in the history of European powers. Throughout the centuries many different European empires have attempted to make their mark on multiple different continents. Some have found success, while others have failed. One case in particular, in which European nations could not quite find stability, was in North America. Factors such as the American Revolution, U.S. westward expansion, and the Monroe Doctrine pushed European nations out of North America. Afterwards, the late 19th century marked the beginning of New Imperialism. As New Imperialism began, Africa became important to European nations in their “Scramble for Africa”.
British imperialism on India had many positive and negative affects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. Many people would argue which effects were more prominent in these countries and some would agree that they were equal. But in both cases there were actually both.
To completely understand this impact of colonisation on indigenous cultures however, we must first define the meaning of the word ‘colonisation’. We will then examine the various effects, both positive and negative that colonisation has had on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Throughout history, imperialism by one nation on another has had many negative influences on the nation being colonized. The legacy of European imperialism in Africa in the 19th century was negative. Imperialism negatively affected Africa politically, economically, and culturally.
Exploration and Colonization impacted the native peoples in positive and negative ways. These positive and negative impacts include religion, disease, and technology. These expeditions were occurring during the time that many European nations started searching for new trade routes and started spreading their influence to many new cultures. These people had their way of life, but the Europeans thought their way was better so they pushed their ways on the natives. Some Europeans had good relations with natives, but others did not.
influences of the colonizer, still felt by the countries colonized and their people. The abolition of
What is the impact of colonialism on the economic development of Sub-Saharan Africa (Africa) or more generally the colonized countries? This is a question which has reiterated itself through the social sciences for over a century. Colonialism refers to the establishment of political and economic control by one state over another. The colonial experience began in the late 1400s, when Europeans arrived and set up trading posts in Africa. They became interested in Africa as a whole. Europeans were impressed with the abundance of natural resources. It reached a peak in the late 1800s and early 1900s, when European powers dominated many parts of the continent. Colonialism in Africa created nations and shaped their political, economic, and cultural
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused.