A human induced global ecological crisis is occurring, threatening the stability of this earth and its inhabitants. The best path to address environmental issues both effectively and morally is a dilemma that raises concerns over which political values are needed to stop the deterioration of the natural environment. Climate change; depletion of resources; overpopulation; rising sea levels; pollution; extinction of species is just to mention a few of the damages that are occurring. The variety of environmental issues and who and how they affect people and other species is varied, however the nature of environmental issues has the potential to cause great devastation. The ecological crisis we face has been caused through anthropocentric behavior that is advantageous to humans, but whether or not anthropocentric attitudes can solve environmental issues effectively is up for debate. Ecologism in theory claims that in order for the ecological crisis to be dealt with absolutely, value and equality has to be placed in the natural world as well as for humans. This is contrasting to many of the dominant principles people in the contemporary world hold, which are more suited to the standards of environmentalism and less radical approaches to conserving the earth. I will argue in this essay that whilst ecologism could most effectively tackle environmental problems, the moral code of ecologism has practical and ethical defects that threaten the values and progress of anthropocentricism and liberal democracy.
Ecologism is the political philosophy that recognizes the intrinsic worth of the natural environment and all living beings, including the earth itself as an organism that has rights that should be protected.. Ecologism has a holistic vie...
... middle of paper ...
...ogical answer to an Economical Crisis’ Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader. Oxford University Press, pp.459-468
Dryzek, J. S. and Schlosberg, D 1998, ‘Liberal Democracy’, Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader. Oxford University Press, pp.129-130
Singer, P 1995, ‘Animal Liberation’, Random House
National geographic 2014
Visited on 10/6/2014
Naess, A. 1989 ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary’, Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader. Oxford University Press, pp.353-356
Bookchin, M.1998, ‘Society and Ecology’, Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader. Oxford University Press, pp.416-428
Foreman, D. 1998, ‘Putting the Earth First’, Debating the Earth: the Environmental Politics Reader. Oxford University Press
Solis, Hilda. “Environmental Justice: An Unalienable Right for All.” Human Rights 30 (2003): 5-6. JSTOR. Web. 13 February 2014.
Ponting, Clive. Ch.11 from "A Green History of the World," St. Martins Press, NYC, 1991
Anthropocentrism has been a central belief upon which modern human society has been constructed. The current state of the world, particularly the aspects that are negative, are reflective of humans continuously acting in ways that are in the interest of our own species. As environmental issues have worsened in recent decades, a great number of environmentalists are turning away from anthropocentric viewpoints, and instead adopting more ecocentric philosophies. Although anthropocentrism seems to be decreasing in popularity due to a widespread shift in understanding the natural world, philosopher William Murdy puts forth the argument that anthropocentrism still has relevancy in the context of modern environmental thought. In the following essay, I will explain Murdy’s interpretation of anthropocentrism and why he believes it to be an acceptable point of
The book is often cited as an environmental classic - of which there can be little doubt - but it is also said by some to have largely triggered the modern environmental movement. Its warning about the dangers of
Plumwood, Val. 1995. "Nature, Self and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism." in People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees: Basic Issues in Environmental Ethics, 2d ed., eds. Christine Pierce and Donald VanDeVeer. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
...R.D. (2005). The Quest of Environmental Justice: Human Rights and the Politics of Pollution. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
Levin, Mark R.. "On Enviro-statism." Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto. New York: Threshold Editions, 2009. 137. Print.
Rudel, K. Thomas, J. Timmons Roberts and JoAnn Carmin. 2011. “Political Economy of the Environment.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 221-238.
It is a melancholy object to those who travel through this great country to see isolated corners of this fair realm still devoted to protecting the environment. The wretched advocators of these ideals are frequently seen doling out petitions and begging at their neighbours’ doors to feed their obsession, which keeps them in the contemptible poverty that they so richly deserve.
Most academic activity in the 1970s was spent debating the Lynn White thesis and the tragedy of the commons. These debates were primarily historical, theological, and religious, not philosophical. Throughout most of the decade philosophers sat on the sidelines trying to determine what a field called environmental ethics might look like. The first philosophical conference was organized by William Blackstone at the University of Georgia in 1972. The proceedings were published as Philosophy and Environmental Crisis in 1974, which included Pete Gunter's first paper on the Big Thicket. In 1972 a book called Is It Too Late? A Theology of Ecology, written by John B. Cobb, was published. It was the first single-authored book written by a philosopher, even though the primary focus of the b...
“Unless humanity is suicidal, it should want to preserve, at the minimum, the natural life-support systems and processes required to sustain its own existence” (Daily p.365). I agree with scientist Gretchen Daily that drastic action is needed now to prevent environmental disaster. Immediate action and changes in attitude are not only necessary for survival but are also morally required. In this paper, I will approach the topic of environmental ethics from several related sides. I will discuss why the environment is a morally significant concern, how an environmental ethic can be developed, and what actions such an ethic would require to maintain and protect the environment.
The critiques of deep ecology from Murray Bookchin are typically negative ideas that downplay the aspect of deep ecology, while in fact, not every aspect is negative. Deep ecology was the first national movement that was sparked by Arne Naess. The idea of deep ecology brought interest into the world of conservationism and was the motivation for environmental ideals. Deep ecology could reach such a large audience because its ideas are very appealing. Social Ecology is a critical social theory founded by Murray Bookchin. Conceptualized as a critique of current social, political, and anti-ecological trends, it advocates a reconstructive, ecological, communitarian, and ethical approach to society. Social ecology and deep ecology are contrasting,
Whitford, Andrew B. and Karen Wong. "Political and Social Foundations for Environmental Sustainability." Political Research Quarterly 62, no. 1 (Mar., 2009): pp. 190-204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759856.
Chasek, P. S., Downie, D. L., & Brown, J. W. (2014). The Development of Environmental Regimes: Chemicals, Wastes, and Climate Change. In P. S. Chasek, D. L. Downie, & J. W. Brown, Global Environmental Politics (6th ed., pp. 101-173). Boulder: Westview Press.
Anthropocentrism is the school of thought that human beings are the single most significant entity in the universe. As a result, the philosophies of those with this belief reflect the prioritization of human objectives over the well-being of one’s environment. However, this is not to say that anthropocentric views neglect to recognize the importance of preserving the Earth. In fact, it is often in the best interests of humans to make concerted efforts towards sustaining the environment. Even from a purely anthropocentric point of view, there are three main reasons why mankind has a moral duty to protect the natural world.