Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on victorian age
History victorian era essay
Short note on victorian age
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short note on victorian age
The Victorian Butler
Colonel Mustard: “Are you the host?”
Wadsworth: “Me, sir? No, I'm just the humble butler.”
Colonel Mustard: “And what exactly is it you do here?”
Wadsworth: “I buttle, sir.”
In Victorian times having a house full of servants at the owner's command was quite common for upper and middle class families. Some job titles included footman, cooks, maids, butlers, coachman, and cooks. Among these servants, the highest ranked and paid was the butler. While we all may have a stereotype of a tall, skinny man that opens the door and says, “You rang?” the actual list of duties and responsibilities of a butler express he is a man of high demand.
The Butler of a home was expected to be present during breakfast, lunch, and dinner. He was to serve the meals and drinks to each member of the family and to wait on them for any requests. He also had the responsibility to oversee the kitchen and make sure it was in order. This included choosing fine wine, managing the wine cellar and the inventory of liquors. The Butler worked closely with the cook and not only assisted with preparing a menu for everyday meals but also for upcoming events and parties the master may present. He was expected to set the table and the decorations for all parties. During these events the butler was always present awaiting any requests from the guests and served them drinks and their meals. The Butler also was responsible for other servants in the home and acted as a manager for the property.
The average pay for a Victorian butler was between 40 to 100 pounds per year, which converts to about 2600 to 6500 today. Charles Dickens, Jr. gave this advice in 1879: “Give good wages, and let it be clearly understood before hiring that no perquisites are allowed. A serious mistake, and one too often made, is to lay down the hard-and-fast rule 'no followers allowed'. Servants always have had and always will have followers, whether their masters and mistresses like it or not” (n.pag.). In Vanity Fair, we read that Miss Horrocks also serves in the house because she is the daughter of the butler.
Miss Horrocks acted as a maid in the Crawley's home. Housemaids during the Victorian times were responsible for keeping the home clean and tidy. They did the “cleaning, scrubbing and dusting” (Roberts 206). The number of housemaids was determined by the size of the home.
In Victorian times, a woman's identity and place in society were determined by who she married. The woman was the "angel in the house," bringing moral purity to the household, and often had free time to pursue lighthearted activities such as crocheting and entertaining guests. She was also responsible for raising the children and teaching them to be virtuous, as she was. Without marriage, however, a woman had few opportunities, and became a governess, an old maid, or a prostitute, none of which carried much if any social standing. Thus, a woman's greatest fear was to end up without a husband, especially as a result of some event that brought embarrassment or a stain on her character.
According to Jeanne Boydston, the relationship between home and work in the antebellum America was very strong, especially for women. Work, for both men and women, had direct correlations to the household. During the antebellum period, women were basically paid household workers. According to “The Pastoralization of Housework,” a wife’s basic housework would average around $150 per year, if
In Victorian society courting rituals were put into effect to keep the young ladies pure and the gentlemen confused. Courting usually began at balls and dances where young girls were first introduced into society during their “coming out.” At every gathering of Victorian society the young ladies were chaperoned by their mothers or some other married woman so that nothing improper would happen that could ruin the young lady's reputation in society. The young ladies and gentlemen at the dances and balls were introduced through a third party and their Christian names were prohibited from being used because it would have been to forward and improper. After placing their name on the dance card of the young lady they could then proceed to dance no more then three dances because any more then that would be inappropriate in Victorian society. “After this formal introduction the gentleman would give the young lady his card to remember him by and at the end of the evening the young lady would look through her cards to see which gentleman she would allow to court her” (Powell). She would give the gentleman permission to court her by giving that gentleman her card and the right to call on her at her home where the courtship must take place.
One of the most common expectations for women then is that they are responsible for doing the chore of cleaning whether it is cleaning the house, doing the laundry. The McGuffey Readers mentions the women’s duty to clean in a multiple places. In this handbook it gives clear directions to the woman on what she is to do when cleaning, “This ceremony completed, and the house thoroughly evacuated, the next operation is to smear the wall and ceilings with brushes dipped into a solution of lime… (Gorn 111).” The book explains how it is the women’s job to thoroughly clean the house once a year in a manner that sounds very laborious! It further states, “The misfortune is, that the sole object is to make things clean (Gorn 112).” In this part of the book it is very clear that it is saying that the woman’s duty is to clean. In Women’s Diaries of the Westward Journey it illustrates this in a couple of passages. For example, one woman wrote in her diary, “Oh! Horrors how shall I express it; it is the dreaded washing day . . . but washing must be done and procrastination won’t do it for me (Schlissel 83).” Although this woman obviously did not like doing the washing she saw it as her job to do. In addition, the book describes this scene, “The banks of a river would be lined with women who carried their kettles, their washtubs, and piles of unwashed linen (Schlissel 82).” Again, it is the women who are doing the cleaning. The McGuffey Readers being the handbook that young girls would read in school taught them that it was their place to do the cleaning. It is apparent that they took that into consideration as shown by the Women’s Diaries and even today is seen as their role.
In both the upper and middle classes, there were certain expectations, or guiding principles that women had to follow in order to be called a lady. There were numerous etiquette guides and books published in this time period regarding dining, beauty, and social activities, and most of the newspapers and women's magazines included articles on how to be the perfect Victorian Lady. These are some of the most interesting forms of etiquette.
The macho society of Victorian England has inevitably high expectation on the male gender. To fulfill the idealistic image of a “manly man” one has high standards to live up to. For instance, men at the time are anticipated to be morally upright, as well as to be the bread-winner in a household adored by his wife.
Etiquette was a major part of life in Victorian England, and was oftentimes seen as more important than education, especially for women (Malheiro). The higher social class a woman was in, the more proper she would have been expected to be, but going down the social ladder, people became less concerned with manners. While the middle class was moderate in its etiquette, “[in] the working classes, social mores were less rigid, in large part due to the extreme penury and terrible conditions in which many found themselves living” (“Victorian Age”). Women had to work along so the men and any education that was in place did not bother with teaching a women the proper way to things, as she would not use it. The wealthiest families were the most serious about etiquette and manners. For the upper classes “etiquette and manners became one of the pre-occupation of females” (“Victorian Etiquette”). Just a few of the things women were taught to be were humble, quiet, loving, caring, faithful, modest, gentle, and kind. They were also told to put others before themselves and not attract attention (Malheiro). All of this was done in order to find a suitable husband and care for him properly. If a woman could not marry, she would be a shame and a burden to the family (“Victorian Etiquette”). The large gap between working class and upper class in etiquette can be seen in the statistics of premarital sex in Victorian England. About one-third of women in the working class were pregnant on their wedding day, while a “nice woman” of the upper class would not go past a kiss on the hand or cheek until married (“Victorian England: An Introduction”). Most etiquette rules were directed at women, but men were also expected to become gentlemen as they grew and they had rules too. These rules usually were about assisting women or for a lady’s benefit. For example, men had to help a lady down from her carriage, carry things for
The lord and lady had easy jobs throughout the days in the castle. "No lord expected to clean his rooms, prepare his food, or care for his horse"("Lords and Ladies"). Castles provided a living space for the lord and lady along with their servants and peasants. This allowed for the, to barely have to do any tasks around the castle. The lord and lady were the highest rank in the castle which meant they were respected and in the highest class. Also, because the castles were a living space for peasants, they were so close to the lord that the lord wouldn't need to do anything. Castles also increased the efficiency of peasants because there were more in one area. The upper class also had very mobile lives that gave them freedom to move. "Many medieval lords lived itinerant lives, and when they moved they brought their favorite and most valuable furnishings with them" ("Lords and Ladies"). Most lords had multiple castles that they would travel to making sure that they were still standing and that everything was under control. They had certain servants come with them and bring whatever that lord or lady wanted. This let them easily travel and have a simple travel because the servants
For a family who wished their son to be a knight, they needed to pass several hurdles. First be able to family back through five generation of “noble” ancestry. Secondly, the family needed influential friends of high estate, such as a duke. Lastly, the family had to have the capital to back such a hefty expenditure. If these formalities were accomplished, the young boy was usually sent away as attendants to persons of rank, usually noble, often that of his uncle or a great lord, to be a page. At this stage he learned how to behave before society as well as learning how to ride a horse. His duties involved serving the knights in the dining halls as well as attending to the noble ladies.
The idea of governess extended until the nineteenth century. The Victorian women especially the Bronte sisters, Charlotte and Anne, experienced the occupation of a governess. Their impressions were negative because of the poor condition, bad treatment, and low wage of a governess during the Victorian era. According to Gilbert, Anne endured in the governess’s job for six years while Charlotte shortened it to two years. Charlotte wrote in a letter to her sister Emily, “I can now see more clearly than I have ever done before that a private governess has no existence, is not considered as a living and rational being, except as connected with the wearisome duties she has to fulfill”(qtd. in Heyck, 203). Charlotte transfers her negative views of
Women in the 19th century were idealized as just housewives with no career. Kathryn Hughes stated that “women were to stay home and cleaned. While men laboured all day” (pg.1). They were seen to be physically weaker, therefore they couldn’t have a labored intensive jobs (Balanza, pg.1). “Women were expected to do needlework, responsible for making and mending clothes and household linen (pg.1). Women believed in order to be a successful wife they had to listen and give whatever
Women were expected to stay at home, all of the household work was left up to them, along with most of the farm work, which many women had to deal with. The average week of a women in the nineteenth century consisted of laundry, ironing and mending, baking, tidying and cleaning of the kitchen parlor, and then cleaning
Well-to-do families employed as large a staff as they could afford, while middle-class families held to the minimum of one (Horn 18). There were many types of servants, among them the housekeeper, and the nurse (Horn 49). On the female side of the domestics there were numerous servants. Since this essay is not concerned with male domestics, only a list of female domestics is provided. Female domestics would include the housekeeper, the cook, lady’s maid, nurse, housemaids, kitchenmaids, scullery-maids and laundry staff (Horn 49).
In general, women had no legal existence and no responsibility so her husband was left responsible for any debts and misbehavior (Gies and Gies 30). However, without ithout a husband, whether they were widowed or single, women found many restrictions placed on them and this made it difficult to do certain tasks. Unmarried women would work as a wage laborer, which included jobs such as haymaking, thatching, reaping, or washing (Moore). They also might work as a live-in servant, either at richer peasants home or the manor house itself, taking care of the lord’s children, washing clothing, or any other job assigned by their master (Moore). If an unmarried woman couldn’t find any work within the manor, they would be to travel to a town if possible. However they would find this difficult, given that most women were tied to their manor and the land. Widowed women, wives who have lost their husbands, had to give their lord a heriot and also give the church a mortuary (Moore). A heriot was a large part for the woman’s household that was given to the manor’s lord after one’s husband